time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

SSR-6t Connector

DM
David Martin
Thu, Dec 20, 2012 3:16 PM

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so I
just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is weak
against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - their
P3B adapter cable.

See
http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm
pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so I just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the details have been lost in the dust. However it looks like http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is weak against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more "firm" fitting data connector. The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - their P3B adapter cable. See http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail - Sent from my iPhone - Please Reply To David Martin drmartin@ivietechnologies.com 801-372-0978 Just curious, what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm pitch connector on your SSR-6T. Thanks, Dale NV8U
PS
paul swed
Thu, Dec 20, 2012 3:41 PM

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But
my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There have
been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age.
My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and it
is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow
this to replace the older rcvr.
Am I on the right track?
As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a
3801s stability?
Thanks
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin <
drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote:

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so I
just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is weak
against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - their
P3B adapter cable.

See

http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm
pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There have been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age. My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and it is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow this to replace the older rcvr. Am I on the right track? As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a 3801s stability? Thanks Paul WB8TSL On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin < drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote: > I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so I > just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. > > The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the > details have been lost in the dust. > > However it looks like > > http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND > > I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is weak > against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more > "firm" fitting data connector. > > The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - their > P3B adapter cable. > > See > > http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail > > - Sent from my iPhone - > Please Reply To > David Martin > drmartin@ivietechnologies.com > 801-372-0978 > > Just curious, > what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm > pitch connector on your SSR-6T. > Thanks, > Dale NV8U > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
D
dlewis6767
Thu, Dec 20, 2012 3:48 PM

The SSR-6t is a 3.3v device.


From: "paul swed" paulswedb@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 9:41 AM
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But
my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There
have
been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age.
My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and it
is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow
this to replace the older rcvr.
Am I on the right track?
As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a
3801s stability?
Thanks
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin <
drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote:

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so
I
just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is
weak
against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - their
P3B adapter cable.

See

http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm
pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

The SSR-6t is a 3.3v device. -------------------------------------------------- From: "paul swed" <paulswedb@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 9:41 AM To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector > Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But > my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There > have > been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age. > My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and it > is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow > this to replace the older rcvr. > Am I on the right track? > As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a > 3801s stability? > Thanks > Paul > WB8TSL > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin < > drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote: > >> I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so >> I >> just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. >> >> The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the >> details have been lost in the dust. >> >> However it looks like >> >> http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND >> >> I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is >> weak >> against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more >> "firm" fitting data connector. >> >> The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - their >> P3B adapter cable. >> >> See >> >> http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail >> >> - Sent from my iPhone - >> Please Reply To >> David Martin >> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com >> 801-372-0978 >> >> Just curious, >> what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm >> pitch connector on your SSR-6T. >> Thanks, >> Dale NV8U >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
PS
paul swed
Thu, Dec 20, 2012 3:53 PM

Understood that its 3.3 yup need some regulators but I am hoping I can
essentially drop the ssr into the 3801.
Thanks

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:48 AM, dlewis6767 dlewis6767@austin.rr.comwrote:

The SSR-6t is a 3.3v device.

------------------------------**--------------------
From: "paul swed" paulswedb@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 9:41 AM
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <
time-nuts@febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But

my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There
have
been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age.
My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and it
is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow
this to replace the older rcvr.
Am I on the right track?
As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a
3801s stability?
Thanks
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin <
drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote:

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so

I
just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?
Detail&name=A33546-NDhttp://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is
weak
against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net -
their
P3B adapter cable.

See

http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-
female-Adapter/Detailhttp://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm
pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U
_____________**
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_____________**

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_____________**
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Understood that its 3.3 yup need some regulators but I am hoping I can essentially drop the ssr into the 3801. Thanks On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:48 AM, dlewis6767 <dlewis6767@austin.rr.com>wrote: > The SSR-6t is a 3.3v device. > > > > > > > ------------------------------**-------------------- > From: "paul swed" <paulswedb@gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 9:41 AM > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" < > time-nuts@febo.com> > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector > > > Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But >> my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There >> have >> been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age. >> My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and it >> is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow >> this to replace the older rcvr. >> Am I on the right track? >> As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a >> 3801s stability? >> Thanks >> Paul >> WB8TSL >> >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin < >> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote: >> >> I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so >>> I >>> just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. >>> >>> The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the >>> details have been lost in the dust. >>> >>> However it looks like >>> >>> http://search.digikey.com/**scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?** >>> Detail&name=A33546-ND<http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND> >>> >>> I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is >>> weak >>> against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more >>> "firm" fitting data connector. >>> >>> The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - >>> their >>> P3B adapter cable. >>> >>> See >>> >>> http://www.data-alliance.net/**servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-** >>> female-Adapter/Detail<http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail> >>> >>> - Sent from my iPhone - >>> Please Reply To >>> David Martin >>> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com >>> 801-372-0978 >>> >>> Just curious, >>> what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm >>> pitch connector on your SSR-6T. >>> Thanks, >>> Dale NV8U >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts> >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/** >> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts> >> and follow the instructions there. >> > > > ______________________________**_________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/** > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts> > and follow the instructions there. >
EP
Ed Palmer
Thu, Dec 20, 2012 5:21 PM

I don't think that will work, Paul.  The Z3801 is designed for the VT
receiver and uses commands that are not supported by the M12 or the
SSR.  I believe there has been discussion on this in the past.

Now, maybe with a bit of arm twisting, whining and grovelling we could
get Synergy to write an emulator for the VT instead of the M12.  Since
they've already done the M12, it might not be a lot of extra work to do
the VT.  Of course, an adapter board would be required to deal with the
physical differences.  I don't know if they already have one.

Ed

On 12/20/2012 9:41 AM, paul swed wrote:

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But
my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There have
been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age.
My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and it
is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow
this to replace the older rcvr.
Am I on the right track?
As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a
3801s stability?
Thanks
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin <
drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote:

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so I
just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is weak
against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - their
P3B adapter cable.

See

http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm
pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U

I don't think that will work, Paul. The Z3801 is designed for the VT receiver and uses commands that are not supported by the M12 or the SSR. I believe there has been discussion on this in the past. Now, maybe with a bit of arm twisting, whining and grovelling we could get Synergy to write an emulator for the VT instead of the M12. Since they've already done the M12, it might not be a lot of extra work to do the VT. Of course, an adapter board would be required to deal with the physical differences. I don't know if they already have one. Ed On 12/20/2012 9:41 AM, paul swed wrote: > Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But > my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There have > been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age. > My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and it > is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow > this to replace the older rcvr. > Am I on the right track? > As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a > 3801s stability? > Thanks > Paul > WB8TSL > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin < > drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote: > >> I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so I >> just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. >> >> The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the >> details have been lost in the dust. >> >> However it looks like >> >> http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND >> >> I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is weak >> against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more >> "firm" fitting data connector. >> >> The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - their >> P3B adapter cable. >> >> See >> >> http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail >> >> - Sent from my iPhone - >> Please Reply To >> David Martin >> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com >> 801-372-0978 >> >> Just curious, >> what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm >> pitch connector on your SSR-6T. >> Thanks, >> Dale NV8U
PS
paul swed
Thu, Dec 20, 2012 8:24 PM

Funny you mention the board they do make boards for various units that do
adapt and cover the various voltage translations.
Regards
Paul.

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Ed Palmer ed_palmer@sasktel.net wrote:

I don't think that will work, Paul.  The Z3801 is designed for the VT
receiver and uses commands that are not supported by the M12 or the SSR.  I
believe there has been discussion on this in the past.

Now, maybe with a bit of arm twisting, whining and grovelling we could get
Synergy to write an emulator for the VT instead of the M12.  Since they've
already done the M12, it might not be a lot of extra work to do the VT.  Of
course, an adapter board would be required to deal with the physical
differences.  I don't know if they already have one.

Ed

On 12/20/2012 9:41 AM, paul swed wrote:

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But
my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There
have
been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age.
My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and it
is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow
this to replace the older rcvr.
Am I on the right track?
As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a
3801s stability?
Thanks
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin <
drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote:

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so

I
just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?
Detail&name=A33546-NDhttp://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is
weak
against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net -
their
P3B adapter cable.

See

http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-
female-Adapter/Detailhttp://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm
pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U

_____________**
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Funny you mention the board they do make boards for various units that do adapt and cover the various voltage translations. Regards Paul. On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Ed Palmer <ed_palmer@sasktel.net> wrote: > I don't think that will work, Paul. The Z3801 is designed for the VT > receiver and uses commands that are not supported by the M12 or the SSR. I > believe there has been discussion on this in the past. > > Now, maybe with a bit of arm twisting, whining and grovelling we could get > Synergy to write an emulator for the VT instead of the M12. Since they've > already done the M12, it might not be a lot of extra work to do the VT. Of > course, an adapter board would be required to deal with the physical > differences. I don't know if they already have one. > > Ed > > > On 12/20/2012 9:41 AM, paul swed wrote: > >> Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But >> my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There >> have >> been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age. >> My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and it >> is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow >> this to replace the older rcvr. >> Am I on the right track? >> As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a >> 3801s stability? >> Thanks >> Paul >> WB8TSL >> >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin < >> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote: >> >> I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so >>> I >>> just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. >>> >>> The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the >>> details have been lost in the dust. >>> >>> However it looks like >>> >>> http://search.digikey.com/**scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?** >>> Detail&name=A33546-ND<http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND> >>> >>> I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is >>> weak >>> against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more >>> "firm" fitting data connector. >>> >>> The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - >>> their >>> P3B adapter cable. >>> >>> See >>> >>> http://www.data-alliance.net/**servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-** >>> female-Adapter/Detail<http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail> >>> >>> - Sent from my iPhone - >>> Please Reply To >>> David Martin >>> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com >>> 801-372-0978 >>> >>> Just curious, >>> what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm >>> pitch connector on your SSR-6T. >>> Thanks, >>> Dale NV8U >>> >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/** > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts> > and follow the instructions there. >
TV
Tom Van Baak
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 4:15 PM

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business case for.

/tvb

----- Original Message -----
From: "paul swed" paulswedb@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But
my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There have
been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age.
My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and it
is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow
this to replace the older rcvr.
Am I on the right track?
As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a
3801s stability?
Thanks
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin <
drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote:

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so I
just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is weak
against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - their
P3B adapter cable.

See

http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm
pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U

Hi Paul, I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver. The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver. I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business case for. /tvb ----- Original Message ----- From: "paul swed" <paulswedb@gmail.com> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector > Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But > my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There have > been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age. > My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and it > is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow > this to replace the older rcvr. > Am I on the right track? > As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a > 3801s stability? > Thanks > Paul > WB8TSL > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin < > drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote: > >> I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header so I >> just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. >> >> The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the >> details have been lost in the dust. >> >> However it looks like >> >> http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND >> >> I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is weak >> against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more >> "firm" fitting data connector. >> >> The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - their >> P3B adapter cable. >> >> See >> >> http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail >> >> - Sent from my iPhone - >> Please Reply To >> David Martin >> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com >> 801-372-0978 >> >> Just curious, >> what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 1.27mm >> pitch connector on your SSR-6T. >> Thanks, >> Dale NV8U
PS
paul swed
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 4:17 PM

Thanks

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Tom Van Baak tvb@leapsecond.com wrote:

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era)
GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous
GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus
M12 receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a
uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12.
It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is
uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but
you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably
not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a
VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make
a business case for.

/tvb

----- Original Message -----
From: "paul swed" paulswedb@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <
time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But
my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There

have

been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age.
My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and

it

is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow
this to replace the older rcvr.
Am I on the right track?
As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a
3801s stability?
Thanks
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin <
drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote:

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header

so I

just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is

weak

against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net -

their

P3B adapter cable.

See

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5

1.27mm

pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Thanks On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Tom Van Baak <tvb@leapsecond.com> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) > GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous > GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus > M12 receiver. > > The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a > uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. > It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is > uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver. > > I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but > you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably > not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a > VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make > a business case for. > > /tvb > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "paul swed" <paulswedb@gmail.com> > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" < > time-nuts@febo.com> > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector > > > > Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. But > > my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There > have > > been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age. > > My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different and > it > > is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should allow > > this to replace the older rcvr. > > Am I on the right track? > > As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve a > > 3801s stability? > > Thanks > > Paul > > WB8TSL > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin < > > drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote: > > > >> I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header > so I > >> just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. > >> > >> The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and the > >> details have been lost in the dust. > >> > >> However it looks like > >> > >> > http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND > >> > >> I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is > weak > >> against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a more > >> "firm" fitting data connector. > >> > >> The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - > their > >> P3B adapter cable. > >> > >> See > >> > >> > http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail > >> > >> - Sent from my iPhone - > >> Please Reply To > >> David Martin > >> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com > >> 801-372-0978 > >> > >> Just curious, > >> what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 > 1.27mm > >> pitch connector on your SSR-6T. > >> Thanks, > >> Dale NV8U > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
W
W2GPS
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 4:26 PM

Tom,

Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP, UT,
UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old 8-channel
messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's just a
matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution for
this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would like one
or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) GPSDO
use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS timing
receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a uBlox 6T
& PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a drop-in
replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old Motorola
UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but you
realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not that
high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a VP-compatible
uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business case
for.

/tvb

Tom, Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP, UT, UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old 8-channel messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's just a matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution for this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would like one or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along. Rick -----Original Message----- From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector Hi Paul, I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver. The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver. I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business case for. /tvb
PS
paul swed
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 4:37 PM

Art?
If $35 I am in.
Paul
WB8TSL

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:26 AM, W2GPS w2gps@cnssys.com wrote:

Tom,

Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP,
UT,
UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old
8-channel
messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's
just a
matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution
for
this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would
like one
or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era)
GPSDO
use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS
timing
receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12
receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a
uBlox 6T
& PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a
drop-in
replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old
Motorola
UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but
you
realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not
that
high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a
VP-compatible
uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business
case
for.

/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Art? If $35 I am in. Paul WB8TSL On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:26 AM, W2GPS <w2gps@cnssys.com> wrote: > Tom, > > Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP, > UT, > UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old > 8-channel > messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's > just a > matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution > for > this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would > like one > or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along. > > Rick > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com] > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector > > Hi Paul, > > I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) > GPSDO > use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS > timing > receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 > receiver. > > The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a > uBlox 6T > & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a > drop-in > replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old > Motorola > UT/GT/VP receiver. > > I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but > you > realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not > that > high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a > VP-compatible > uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business > case > for. > > /tvb > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
EP
Ed Palmer
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 5:00 PM

Since I have a Z3801A this is an interesting development.  Do you expect
to see improved performance or is this simply to replace a dead VP
receiver and bring the Z3801A back to life?

My 6 channel VP receiver was flaky so I replaced it with an 8 channel
model.  My Holdover Uncertainty Prediction is now oscillating between a
high of 2 - 3 microseconds and a low of 200 - 300 ns with an oscillation
period of 7-9 days.  It's only been running for a few weeks so I'll have
to wait and see if the oscillations die out.  Depending on how things
settle, there might not be any need (or room) for improvement.

Ed

On 12/21/2012 10:26 AM, W2GPS wrote:

Tom,

Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP, UT,
UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old 8-channel
messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's just a
matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution for
this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would like one
or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) GPSDO
use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS timing
receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a uBlox 6T
& PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a drop-in
replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old Motorola
UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but you
realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not that
high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a VP-compatible
uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business case
for.

/tvb

Since I have a Z3801A this is an interesting development. Do you expect to see improved performance or is this simply to replace a dead VP receiver and bring the Z3801A back to life? My 6 channel VP receiver was flaky so I replaced it with an 8 channel model. My Holdover Uncertainty Prediction is now oscillating between a high of 2 - 3 microseconds and a low of 200 - 300 ns with an oscillation period of 7-9 days. It's only been running for a few weeks so I'll have to wait and see if the oscillations die out. Depending on how things settle, there might not be any need (or room) for improvement. Ed On 12/21/2012 10:26 AM, W2GPS wrote: > Tom, > > Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP, UT, > UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old 8-channel > messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's just a > matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution for > this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would like one > or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along. > > Rick > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com] > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector > > Hi Paul, > > I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) GPSDO > use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS timing > receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver. > > The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a uBlox 6T > & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a drop-in > replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old Motorola > UT/GT/VP receiver. > > I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but you > realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not that > high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a VP-compatible > uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business case > for. > > /tvb
BC
Bob Camp
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 5:12 PM

Hi

The holdover uncertainty prediction is far more a function of your OCXO than of the GPS.

Bob

On Dec 21, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Ed Palmer ed_palmer@sasktel.net wrote:

Since I have a Z3801A this is an interesting development.  Do you expect to see improved performance or is this simply to replace a dead VP receiver and bring the Z3801A back to life?

My 6 channel VP receiver was flaky so I replaced it with an 8 channel model.  My Holdover Uncertainty Prediction is now oscillating between a high of 2 - 3 microseconds and a low of 200 - 300 ns with an oscillation period of 7-9 days.  It's only been running for a few weeks so I'll have to wait and see if the oscillations die out.  Depending on how things settle, there might not be any need (or room) for improvement.

Ed

On 12/21/2012 10:26 AM, W2GPS wrote:

Tom,

Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP, UT,
UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old 8-channel
messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's just a
matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution for
this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would like one
or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) GPSDO
use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS timing
receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a uBlox 6T
& PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a drop-in
replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old Motorola
UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but you
realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not that
high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a VP-compatible
uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business case
for.

/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi The holdover uncertainty prediction is far more a function of your OCXO than of the GPS. Bob On Dec 21, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Ed Palmer <ed_palmer@sasktel.net> wrote: > Since I have a Z3801A this is an interesting development. Do you expect to see improved performance or is this simply to replace a dead VP receiver and bring the Z3801A back to life? > > My 6 channel VP receiver was flaky so I replaced it with an 8 channel model. My Holdover Uncertainty Prediction is now oscillating between a high of 2 - 3 microseconds and a low of 200 - 300 ns with an oscillation period of 7-9 days. It's only been running for a few weeks so I'll have to wait and see if the oscillations die out. Depending on how things settle, there might not be any need (or room) for improvement. > > Ed > > On 12/21/2012 10:26 AM, W2GPS wrote: >> Tom, >> >> Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP, UT, >> UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old 8-channel >> messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's just a >> matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution for >> this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would like one >> or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along. >> >> Rick >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com] >> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM >> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement >> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) GPSDO >> use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS timing >> receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver. >> >> The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a uBlox 6T >> & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a drop-in >> replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old Motorola >> UT/GT/VP receiver. >> >> I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but you >> realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not that >> high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a VP-compatible >> uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business case >> for. >> >> /tvb > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
SJ
Said Jackson
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 5:14 PM

Rick,

Good job on this effort!

Is there any document of the differences between the m12 and SSR-6T behavior on the comm interface? Are all m12 commands implemented for example? Are things like UTC offset implemented?

Thanks,
Said

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 21, 2012, at 8:26 AM, "W2GPS" w2gps@cnssys.com wrote:

Tom,

Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP, UT,
UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old 8-channel
messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's just a
matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution for
this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would like one
or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) GPSDO
use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS timing
receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a uBlox 6T
& PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a drop-in
replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old Motorola
UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but you
realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not that
high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a VP-compatible
uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business case
for.

/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Rick, Good job on this effort! Is there any document of the differences between the m12 and SSR-6T behavior on the comm interface? Are all m12 commands implemented for example? Are things like UTC offset implemented? Thanks, Said Sent from my iPad On Dec 21, 2012, at 8:26 AM, "W2GPS" <w2gps@cnssys.com> wrote: > Tom, > > Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP, UT, > UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old 8-channel > messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's just a > matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution for > this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would like one > or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along. > > Rick > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com] > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector > > Hi Paul, > > I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) GPSDO > use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS timing > receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver. > > The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a uBlox 6T > & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a drop-in > replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old Motorola > UT/GT/VP receiver. > > I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but you > realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not that > high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a VP-compatible > uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business case > for. > > /tvb > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
PS
paul swed
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 5:17 PM

Funny
My 3801 has been working fine. But I had read on time-nuts the issues with
the flaky rcvr and thats why I became interested. The 3801s are getting
pretty old. I had to change a 6sk7 in the pre-amp. ;-)
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Ed Palmer ed_palmer@sasktel.net wrote:

Since I have a Z3801A this is an interesting development.  Do you expect
to see improved performance or is this simply to replace a dead VP receiver
and bring the Z3801A back to life?

My 6 channel VP receiver was flaky so I replaced it with an 8 channel
model.  My Holdover Uncertainty Prediction is now oscillating between a
high of 2 - 3 microseconds and a low of 200 - 300 ns with an oscillation
period of 7-9 days.  It's only been running for a few weeks so I'll have to
wait and see if the oscillations die out.  Depending on how things settle,
there might not be any need (or room) for improvement.

Ed

On 12/21/2012 10:26 AM, W2GPS wrote:

Tom,

Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP,
UT,
UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old
8-channel
messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's
just a
matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution
for
this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would
like one
or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era)
GPSDO
use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS
timing
receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12
receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a
uBlox 6T
& PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a
drop-in
replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old
Motorola
UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible,
but you
realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably
not that
high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a
VP-compatible
uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business
case
for.

/tvb

_____________**
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Funny My 3801 has been working fine. But I had read on time-nuts the issues with the flaky rcvr and thats why I became interested. The 3801s are getting pretty old. I had to change a 6sk7 in the pre-amp. ;-) Regards Paul WB8TSL On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Ed Palmer <ed_palmer@sasktel.net> wrote: > Since I have a Z3801A this is an interesting development. Do you expect > to see improved performance or is this simply to replace a dead VP receiver > and bring the Z3801A back to life? > > My 6 channel VP receiver was flaky so I replaced it with an 8 channel > model. My Holdover Uncertainty Prediction is now oscillating between a > high of 2 - 3 microseconds and a low of 200 - 300 ns with an oscillation > period of 7-9 days. It's only been running for a few weeks so I'll have to > wait and see if the oscillations die out. Depending on how things settle, > there might not be any need (or room) for improvement. > > Ed > > > On 12/21/2012 10:26 AM, W2GPS wrote: > >> Tom, >> >> Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP, >> UT, >> UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old >> 8-channel >> messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's >> just a >> matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution >> for >> this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would >> like one >> or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along. >> >> Rick >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com] >> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM >> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement >> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) >> GPSDO >> use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS >> timing >> receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 >> receiver. >> >> The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a >> uBlox 6T >> & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a >> drop-in >> replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old >> Motorola >> UT/GT/VP receiver. >> >> I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, >> but you >> realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably >> not that >> high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a >> VP-compatible >> uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business >> case >> for. >> >> /tvb >> > > > ______________________________**_________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/** > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts> > and follow the instructions there. >
EP
Ed Palmer
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 5:37 PM

Hi Bob,

I agree that the HUP is basically determined by the OCXO, but the GPS is
the reference that the OCXO is compared to when determining the HUP.  So
it seems reasonable to ask if a better GPS will improve the HUP numbers.

Even with the flaky receiver, my Z3801A was producing 1 PPS signals with
a standard deviation of < 300 ps and a max - min range of about 2 ns.
That was measured over multiple runs of 1000 measurements each.  At
those levels, you start to wonder whether the GPS is the limiting factor
or is it the internal architecture and algorithms of the Z3801A itself.

Ed

On 12/21/2012 11:12 AM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

The holdover uncertainty prediction is far more a function of your OCXO than of the GPS.

Bob

On Dec 21, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Ed Palmer ed_palmer@sasktel.net wrote:

Since I have a Z3801A this is an interesting development.  Do you expect to see improved performance or is this simply to replace a dead VP receiver and bring the Z3801A back to life?

My 6 channel VP receiver was flaky so I replaced it with an 8 channel model.  My Holdover Uncertainty Prediction is now oscillating between a high of 2 - 3 microseconds and a low of 200 - 300 ns with an oscillation period of 7-9 days.  It's only been running for a few weeks so I'll have to wait and see if the oscillations die out.  Depending on how things settle, there might not be any need (or room) for improvement.

Ed

On 12/21/2012 10:26 AM, W2GPS wrote:

Tom,

Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP, UT,
UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old 8-channel
messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's just a
matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution for
this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would like one
or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) GPSDO
use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS timing
receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a uBlox 6T
& PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a drop-in
replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old Motorola
UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but you
realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not that
high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a VP-compatible
uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business case
for.

/tvb

Hi Bob, I agree that the HUP is basically determined by the OCXO, but the GPS is the reference that the OCXO is compared to when determining the HUP. So it seems reasonable to ask if a better GPS will improve the HUP numbers. Even with the flaky receiver, my Z3801A was producing 1 PPS signals with a standard deviation of < 300 ps and a max - min range of about 2 ns. That was measured over multiple runs of 1000 measurements each. At those levels, you start to wonder whether the GPS is the limiting factor or is it the internal architecture and algorithms of the Z3801A itself. Ed On 12/21/2012 11:12 AM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > The holdover uncertainty prediction is far more a function of your OCXO than of the GPS. > > Bob > > On Dec 21, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Ed Palmer <ed_palmer@sasktel.net> wrote: > >> Since I have a Z3801A this is an interesting development. Do you expect to see improved performance or is this simply to replace a dead VP receiver and bring the Z3801A back to life? >> >> My 6 channel VP receiver was flaky so I replaced it with an 8 channel model. My Holdover Uncertainty Prediction is now oscillating between a high of 2 - 3 microseconds and a low of 200 - 300 ns with an oscillation period of 7-9 days. It's only been running for a few weeks so I'll have to wait and see if the oscillations die out. Depending on how things settle, there might not be any need (or room) for improvement. >> >> Ed >> >> On 12/21/2012 10:26 AM, W2GPS wrote: >>> Tom, >>> >>> Synergy already has a carrier board to put the SSR-6T receiver into a VP, UT, >>> UT+, etc. socket. All that is needed is firmware support for the old 8-channel >>> messages. I am planning to implement this capability for Synergy. It's just a >>> matter of time and priorities. Eventually Synergy will have the solution for >>> this problem. If you could gather a list of Time-Nuts people who would like one >>> or more of these and send it to Art that could speed the process along. >>> >>> Rick >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:tvb@LeapSecond.com] >>> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 11:15 AM >>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement >>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector >>> >>> Hi Paul, >>> >>> I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's era) GPSDO >>> use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a famous GPS timing >>> receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver. >>> >>> The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a uBlox 6T >>> & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an M12. It's a drop-in >>> replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device that is uses an old Motorola >>> UT/GT/VP receiver. >>> >>> I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, but you >>> realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is probably not that >>> high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project to create a VP-compatible >>> uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not something you can make a business case >>> for. >>> >>> /tvb
DL
Don Latham
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 6:59 PM

Had a good conversation with Art Slepin at Synergy. He said, if my
ancient memory serves, that the PIC on the new board will be available
for programming, and that it might be possible to do an ONCORE as a
software conversion from the UBLOX to the output connector. Just who is
going to do this, not sure. But it will be possible.
The newer versions of the SST will be programmable through the serial
port. At present, the extra side port on the board is a programming
connector.  The info will be on Synergy's SST website. Even at $70 per,
a UBLOX timer and PIC on the same board might be very cost-effective for
all sorts of fooling around!
Don

Tom Van Baak

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's
era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a
famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the
Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a
uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an
M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device
that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible,
but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is
probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project
to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not
something you can make a business case for.

/tvb

----- Original Message -----
From: "paul swed" paulswedb@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet.
But
my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There
have
been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age.
My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different
and it
is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should
allow
this to replace the older rcvr.
Am I on the right track?
As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve
a
3801s stability?
Thanks
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin <
drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote:

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header
so I
just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and
the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is
weak
against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a
more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net -
their
P3B adapter cable.

See

http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5
1.27mm
pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
"If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
Ghost in the Shell

Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com

Had a good conversation with Art Slepin at Synergy. He said, if my ancient memory serves, that the PIC on the new board will be available for programming, and that it might be possible to do an ONCORE as a software conversion from the UBLOX to the output connector. Just who is going to do this, not sure. But it will be possible. The newer versions of the SST will be programmable through the serial port. At present, the extra side port on the board is a programming connector. The info will be on Synergy's SST website. Even at $70 per, a UBLOX timer and PIC on the same board might be very cost-effective for all sorts of fooling around! Don Tom Van Baak > Hi Paul, > > I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's > era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a > famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the > Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver. > > The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a > uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an > M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device > that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver. > > I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, > but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is > probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project > to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not > something you can make a business case for. > > /tvb > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "paul swed" <paulswedb@gmail.com> > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" > <time-nuts@febo.com> > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector > > >> Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. >> But >> my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There >> have >> been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age. >> My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different >> and it >> is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should >> allow >> this to replace the older rcvr. >> Am I on the right track? >> As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve >> a >> 3801s stability? >> Thanks >> Paul >> WB8TSL >> >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin < >> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote: >> >>> I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header >>> so I >>> just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. >>> >>> The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and >>> the >>> details have been lost in the dust. >>> >>> However it looks like >>> >>> http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND >>> >>> I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is >>> weak >>> against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a >>> more >>> "firm" fitting data connector. >>> >>> The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - >>> their >>> P3B adapter cable. >>> >>> See >>> >>> http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail >>> >>> - Sent from my iPhone - >>> Please Reply To >>> David Martin >>> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com >>> 801-372-0978 >>> >>> Just curious, >>> what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 >>> 1.27mm >>> pitch connector on your SSR-6T. >>> Thanks, >>> Dale NV8U > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- "Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind." De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century. "If you don't know what it is, don't poke it." Ghost in the Shell Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL Six Mile Systems LLP 17850 Six Mile Road POB 134 Huson, MT, 59846 VOX 406-626-4304 www.lightningforensics.com www.sixmilesystems.com
K
KD0GLS
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 7:20 PM

I'm looking at Synergy's Tech Note #493 for the SSR-6Tr and trying to make out the part number of the PIC from the picture.  Looks like it might be a PIC24F part.  Would appreciate knowing the actual part number from one of you who's already received your board.

73,
Brent, KD0GLS, Minneapolis

On 21 Dec 2012, at 12:59, Don Latham wrote:

Had a good conversation with Art Slepin at Synergy. He said, if my
ancient memory serves, that the PIC on the new board will be available
for programming, and that it might be possible to do an ONCORE as a
software conversion from the UBLOX to the output connector. Just who is
going to do this, not sure. But it will be possible.
The newer versions of the SST will be programmable through the serial
port. At present, the extra side port on the board is a programming
connector.  The info will be on Synergy's SST website. Even at $70 per,
a UBLOX timer and PIC on the same board might be very cost-effective for
all sorts of fooling around!
Don

Tom Van Baak

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's
era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a
famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the
Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a
uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an
M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device
that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible,
but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is
probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project
to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not
something you can make a business case for.

/tvb

----- Original Message -----
From: "paul swed" paulswedb@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet.
But
my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There
have
been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age.
My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different
and it
is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should
allow
this to replace the older rcvr.
Am I on the right track?
As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve
a
3801s stability?
Thanks
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin <
drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote:

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header
so I
just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and
the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is
weak
against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a
more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net -
their
P3B adapter cable.

See

http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5
1.27mm
pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
"If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
Ghost in the Shell

Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I'm looking at Synergy's Tech Note #493 for the SSR-6Tr and trying to make out the part number of the PIC from the picture. Looks like it might be a PIC24F part. Would appreciate knowing the actual part number from one of you who's already received your board. 73, Brent, KD0GLS, Minneapolis On 21 Dec 2012, at 12:59, Don Latham wrote: > Had a good conversation with Art Slepin at Synergy. He said, if my > ancient memory serves, that the PIC on the new board will be available > for programming, and that it might be possible to do an ONCORE as a > software conversion from the UBLOX to the output connector. Just who is > going to do this, not sure. But it will be possible. > The newer versions of the SST will be programmable through the serial > port. At present, the extra side port on the board is a programming > connector. The info will be on Synergy's SST website. Even at $70 per, > a UBLOX timer and PIC on the same board might be very cost-effective for > all sorts of fooling around! > Don > > Tom Van Baak >> Hi Paul, >> >> I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's >> era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a >> famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the >> Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver. >> >> The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a >> uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an >> M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device >> that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver. >> >> I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, >> but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is >> probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project >> to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not >> something you can make a business case for. >> >> /tvb >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "paul swed" <paulswedb@gmail.com> >> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" >> <time-nuts@febo.com> >> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM >> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector >> >> >>> Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. >>> But >>> my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There >>> have >>> been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age. >>> My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different >>> and it >>> is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should >>> allow >>> this to replace the older rcvr. >>> Am I on the right track? >>> As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve >>> a >>> 3801s stability? >>> Thanks >>> Paul >>> WB8TSL >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin < >>> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header >>>> so I >>>> just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. >>>> >>>> The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and >>>> the >>>> details have been lost in the dust. >>>> >>>> However it looks like >>>> >>>> http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND >>>> >>>> I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is >>>> weak >>>> against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a >>>> more >>>> "firm" fitting data connector. >>>> >>>> The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - >>>> their >>>> P3B adapter cable. >>>> >>>> See >>>> >>>> http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail >>>> >>>> - Sent from my iPhone - >>>> Please Reply To >>>> David Martin >>>> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com >>>> 801-372-0978 >>>> >>>> Just curious, >>>> what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 >>>> 1.27mm >>>> pitch connector on your SSR-6T. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Dale NV8U >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > > > -- > "Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument > are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind." > De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century. > "If you don't know what it is, don't poke it." > Ghost in the Shell > > > Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL > Six Mile Systems LLP > 17850 Six Mile Road > POB 134 > Huson, MT, 59846 > VOX 406-626-4304 > www.lightningforensics.com > www.sixmilesystems.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
DJ
Dale J. Robertson
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 9:04 PM

PIC is a PIC24FJ64GA-004-I/PT

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:20 PM, KD0GLS kd0gls@mninter.net wrote:

I'm looking at Synergy's Tech Note #493 for the SSR-6Tr and trying to make out the part number of the PIC from the picture.  Looks like it might be a PIC24F part.  Would appreciate knowing the actual part number from one of you who's already received your board.

73,
Brent, KD0GLS, Minneapolis

On 21 Dec 2012, at 12:59, Don Latham wrote:

Had a good conversation with Art Slepin at Synergy. He said, if my
ancient memory serves, that the PIC on the new board will be available
for programming, and that it might be possible to do an ONCORE as a
software conversion from the UBLOX to the output connector. Just who is
going to do this, not sure. But it will be possible.
The newer versions of the SST will be programmable through the serial
port. At present, the extra side port on the board is a programming
connector.  The info will be on Synergy's SST website. Even at $70 per,
a UBLOX timer and PIC on the same board might be very cost-effective for
all sorts of fooling around!
Don

Tom Van Baak

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's
era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a
famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the
Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a
uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an
M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device
that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible,
but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is
probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project
to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not
something you can make a business case for.

/tvb

----- Original Message -----
From: "paul swed" paulswedb@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet.
But
my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There
have
been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age.
My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different
and it
is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should
allow
this to replace the older rcvr.
Am I on the right track?
As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve
a
3801s stability?
Thanks
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin <
drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote:

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header
so I
just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and
the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is
weak
against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a
more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net -
their
P3B adapter cable.

See

http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5
1.27mm
pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
"If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
Ghost in the Shell

Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

PIC is a PIC24FJ64GA-004-I/PT Sent from my iPhone On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:20 PM, KD0GLS <kd0gls@mninter.net> wrote: > I'm looking at Synergy's Tech Note #493 for the SSR-6Tr and trying to make out the part number of the PIC from the picture. Looks like it might be a PIC24F part. Would appreciate knowing the actual part number from one of you who's already received your board. > > 73, > Brent, KD0GLS, Minneapolis > > On 21 Dec 2012, at 12:59, Don Latham wrote: > >> Had a good conversation with Art Slepin at Synergy. He said, if my >> ancient memory serves, that the PIC on the new board will be available >> for programming, and that it might be possible to do an ONCORE as a >> software conversion from the UBLOX to the output connector. Just who is >> going to do this, not sure. But it will be possible. >> The newer versions of the SST will be programmable through the serial >> port. At present, the extra side port on the board is a programming >> connector. The info will be on Synergy's SST website. Even at $70 per, >> a UBLOX timer and PIC on the same board might be very cost-effective for >> all sorts of fooling around! >> Don >> >> Tom Van Baak >>> Hi Paul, >>> >>> I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's >>> era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a >>> famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the >>> Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver. >>> >>> The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a >>> uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an >>> M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device >>> that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver. >>> >>> I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, >>> but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is >>> probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project >>> to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not >>> something you can make a business case for. >>> >>> /tvb >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "paul swed" <paulswedb@gmail.com> >>> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" >>> <time-nuts@febo.com> >>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM >>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector >>> >>> >>>> Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. >>>> But >>>> my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There >>>> have >>>> been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age. >>>> My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different >>>> and it >>>> is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should >>>> allow >>>> this to replace the older rcvr. >>>> Am I on the right track? >>>> As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve >>>> a >>>> 3801s stability? >>>> Thanks >>>> Paul >>>> WB8TSL >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin < >>>> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header >>>>> so I >>>>> just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. >>>>> >>>>> The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and >>>>> the >>>>> details have been lost in the dust. >>>>> >>>>> However it looks like >>>>> >>>>> http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND >>>>> >>>>> I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is >>>>> weak >>>>> against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a >>>>> more >>>>> "firm" fitting data connector. >>>>> >>>>> The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - >>>>> their >>>>> P3B adapter cable. >>>>> >>>>> See >>>>> >>>>> http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail >>>>> >>>>> - Sent from my iPhone - >>>>> Please Reply To >>>>> David Martin >>>>> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com >>>>> 801-372-0978 >>>>> >>>>> Just curious, >>>>> what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 >>>>> 1.27mm >>>>> pitch connector on your SSR-6T. >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Dale NV8U >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >> >> >> -- >> "Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument >> are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind." >> De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century. >> "If you don't know what it is, don't poke it." >> Ghost in the Shell >> >> >> Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL >> Six Mile Systems LLP >> 17850 Six Mile Road >> POB 134 >> Huson, MT, 59846 >> VOX 406-626-4304 >> www.lightningforensics.com >> www.sixmilesystems.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
DL
Don Latham
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 9:21 PM

Hi Brent: It's a PIC24J64GA, with 25AA256 external flash, and an AC00
glue chip. The resonator or crystal is apparently 184 A KOX (or K0X),
couldn't get more on it.
Apparently ancient memory did not serve me well about replacing the
ONCORE. As noted earlier by a TN, Synergy may make a piggyback board,
sorry I deleted the message about that, so can't refer to the
appropriate TN message.
Don

KD0GLS

I'm looking at Synergy's Tech Note #493 for the SSR-6Tr and trying to
make out the part number of the PIC from the picture.  Looks like it
might be a PIC24F part.  Would appreciate knowing the actual part number
from one of you who's already received your board.

73,
Brent, KD0GLS, Minneapolis

On 21 Dec 2012, at 12:59, Don Latham wrote:

Had a good conversation with Art Slepin at Synergy. He said, if my
ancient memory serves, that the PIC on the new board will be available
for programming, and that it might be possible to do an ONCORE as a
software conversion from the UBLOX to the output connector. Just who
is
going to do this, not sure. But it will be possible.
The newer versions of the SST will be programmable through the serial
port. At present, the extra side port on the board is a programming
connector.  The info will be on Synergy's SST website. Even at $70
per,
a UBLOX timer and PIC on the same board might be very cost-effective
for
all sorts of fooling around!
Don

Tom Van Baak

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's
era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is,
a
famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the
Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns
a
uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an
M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a
device
that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP
compatible,
but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is
probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love
project
to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not
something you can make a business case for.

/tvb

----- Original Message -----
From: "paul swed" paulswedb@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it
yet.
But
my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801.
There
have
been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age.
My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different
and it
is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should
allow
this to replace the older rcvr.
Am I on the right track?
As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually
improve
a
3801s stability?
Thanks
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin <
drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote:

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data
header
so I
just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and
the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure
is
weak
against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a
more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net -
their
P3B adapter cable.

See

http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5
1.27mm
pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
"If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
Ghost in the Shell

Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
"If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
Ghost in the Shell

Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com

Hi Brent: It's a PIC24J64GA, with 25AA256 external flash, and an AC00 glue chip. The resonator or crystal is apparently 184 A KOX (or K0X), couldn't get more on it. Apparently ancient memory did not serve me well about replacing the ONCORE. As noted earlier by a TN, Synergy may make a piggyback board, sorry I deleted the message about that, so can't refer to the appropriate TN message. Don KD0GLS > I'm looking at Synergy's Tech Note #493 for the SSR-6Tr and trying to > make out the part number of the PIC from the picture. Looks like it > might be a PIC24F part. Would appreciate knowing the actual part number > from one of you who's already received your board. > > 73, > Brent, KD0GLS, Minneapolis > > On 21 Dec 2012, at 12:59, Don Latham wrote: > >> Had a good conversation with Art Slepin at Synergy. He said, if my >> ancient memory serves, that the PIC on the new board will be available >> for programming, and that it might be possible to do an ONCORE as a >> software conversion from the UBLOX to the output connector. Just who >> is >> going to do this, not sure. But it will be possible. >> The newer versions of the SST will be programmable through the serial >> port. At present, the extra side port on the board is a programming >> connector. The info will be on Synergy's SST website. Even at $70 >> per, >> a UBLOX timer and PIC on the same board might be very cost-effective >> for >> all sorts of fooling around! >> Don >> >> Tom Van Baak >>> Hi Paul, >>> >>> I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's >>> era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, >>> a >>> famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the >>> Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver. >>> >>> The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns >>> a >>> uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an >>> M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a >>> device >>> that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver. >>> >>> I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP >>> compatible, >>> but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is >>> probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love >>> project >>> to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not >>> something you can make a business case for. >>> >>> /tvb >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "paul swed" <paulswedb@gmail.com> >>> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" >>> <time-nuts@febo.com> >>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM >>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector >>> >>> >>>> Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it >>>> yet. >>>> But >>>> my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. >>>> There >>>> have >>>> been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age. >>>> My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different >>>> and it >>>> is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should >>>> allow >>>> this to replace the older rcvr. >>>> Am I on the right track? >>>> As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually >>>> improve >>>> a >>>> 3801s stability? >>>> Thanks >>>> Paul >>>> WB8TSL >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin < >>>> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data >>>>> header >>>>> so I >>>>> just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. >>>>> >>>>> The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and >>>>> the >>>>> details have been lost in the dust. >>>>> >>>>> However it looks like >>>>> >>>>> http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND >>>>> >>>>> I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure >>>>> is >>>>> weak >>>>> against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a >>>>> more >>>>> "firm" fitting data connector. >>>>> >>>>> The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - >>>>> their >>>>> P3B adapter cable. >>>>> >>>>> See >>>>> >>>>> http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail >>>>> >>>>> - Sent from my iPhone - >>>>> Please Reply To >>>>> David Martin >>>>> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com >>>>> 801-372-0978 >>>>> >>>>> Just curious, >>>>> what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 >>>>> 1.27mm >>>>> pitch connector on your SSR-6T. >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Dale NV8U >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >> >> >> -- >> "Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument >> are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind." >> De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century. >> "If you don't know what it is, don't poke it." >> Ghost in the Shell >> >> >> Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL >> Six Mile Systems LLP >> 17850 Six Mile Road >> POB 134 >> Huson, MT, 59846 >> VOX 406-626-4304 >> www.lightningforensics.com >> www.sixmilesystems.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- "Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind." De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century. "If you don't know what it is, don't poke it." Ghost in the Shell Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL Six Mile Systems LLP 17850 Six Mile Road POB 134 Huson, MT, 59846 VOX 406-626-4304 www.lightningforensics.com www.sixmilesystems.com
K
KD0GLS
Fri, Dec 21, 2012 9:41 PM

Thanks to all who replied with that part number.  Come to think of it, if anyone has any (moderately high-res) photos of the front and back of the board, those would be great to see as well.

73,
Brent, KD0GLS, Minneapolis

On 21 Dec 2012, at 15:06, Dale J. Robertson wrote:

PIC is a PIC24FJ64GA-004-I/PT

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:20 PM, KD0GLS kd0gls@mninter.net wrote:

I'm looking at Synergy's Tech Note #493 for the SSR-6Tr and trying to make out the part number of the PIC from the picture.  Looks like it might be a PIC24F part.  Would appreciate knowing the actual part number from one of you who's already received your board.

73,
Brent, KD0GLS, Minneapolis

On 21 Dec 2012, at 12:59, Don Latham wrote:

Had a good conversation with Art Slepin at Synergy. He said, if my
ancient memory serves, that the PIC on the new board will be available
for programming, and that it might be possible to do an ONCORE as a
software conversion from the UBLOX to the output connector. Just who is
going to do this, not sure. But it will be possible.
The newer versions of the SST will be programmable through the serial
port. At present, the extra side port on the board is a programming
connector.  The info will be on Synergy's SST website. Even at $70 per,
a UBLOX timer and PIC on the same board might be very cost-effective for
all sorts of fooling around!
Don

Tom Van Baak

Hi Paul,

I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's
era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a
famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the
Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver.

The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a
uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an
M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device
that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver.

I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible,
but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is
probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project
to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not
something you can make a business case for.

/tvb

----- Original Message -----
From: "paul swed" paulswedb@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector

Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet.
But
my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There
have
been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age.
My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different
and it
is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should
allow
this to replace the older rcvr.
Am I on the right track?
As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve
a
3801s stability?
Thanks
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin <
drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote:

I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header
so I
just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t.

The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and
the
details have been lost in the dust.

However it looks like

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND

I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is
weak
against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a
more
"firm" fitting data connector.

The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net -
their
P3B adapter cable.

See

http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail

Just curious,
what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5
1.27mm
pitch connector on your SSR-6T.
Thanks,
Dale NV8U


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
"If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
Ghost in the Shell

Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Thanks to all who replied with that part number. Come to think of it, if anyone has any (moderately high-res) photos of the front and back of the board, those would be great to see as well. 73, Brent, KD0GLS, Minneapolis On 21 Dec 2012, at 15:06, Dale J. Robertson wrote: > PIC is a PIC24FJ64GA-004-I/PT > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 21, 2012, at 2:20 PM, KD0GLS <kd0gls@mninter.net> wrote: > >> I'm looking at Synergy's Tech Note #493 for the SSR-6Tr and trying to make out the part number of the PIC from the picture. Looks like it might be a PIC24F part. Would appreciate knowing the actual part number from one of you who's already received your board. >> >> 73, >> Brent, KD0GLS, Minneapolis >> >> On 21 Dec 2012, at 12:59, Don Latham wrote: >> >>> Had a good conversation with Art Slepin at Synergy. He said, if my >>> ancient memory serves, that the PIC on the new board will be available >>> for programming, and that it might be possible to do an ONCORE as a >>> software conversion from the UBLOX to the output connector. Just who is >>> going to do this, not sure. But it will be possible. >>> The newer versions of the SST will be programmable through the serial >>> port. At present, the extra side port on the board is a programming >>> connector. The info will be on Synergy's SST website. Even at $70 per, >>> a UBLOX timer and PIC on the same board might be very cost-effective for >>> all sorts of fooling around! >>> Don >>> >>> Tom Van Baak >>>> Hi Paul, >>>> >>>> I'm pretty sure the hp Z3801A and 58503A/B (and perhaps other 1990's >>>> era) GPSDO use the Motorola Oncore VP receiver. It was, and still is, a >>>> famous GPS timing receiver. Later, many GPSDO evolved to use the >>>> Motorola/iLotus M12 receiver. >>>> >>>> The new Synergy SST-6T is a clever combination h/w and s/w that turns a >>>> uBlox 6T & PIC into a PCB that is both h/w and s/w compatible with an >>>> M12. It's a drop-in replacement. But as such, it won't work in a device >>>> that is uses an old Motorola UT/GT/VP receiver. >>>> >>>> I suggested that they also come up with a board that is VP compatible, >>>> but you realize the number of 15-year-old Oncore VP's in the field is >>>> probably not that high. It would make an excellent labor-of-love project >>>> to create a VP-compatible uBlox 6T board, but it's probably not >>>> something you can make a business case for. >>>> >>>> /tvb >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "paul swed" <paulswedb@gmail.com> >>>> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" >>>> <time-nuts@febo.com> >>>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:41 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] SSR-6t Connector >>>> >>>> >>>>> Not to hijack the thread. I purchased a ssr and have not rcvd it yet. >>>>> But >>>>> my simple interest is to if needed replace the rcvr in my z3801. There >>>>> have >>>>> been threads on time-nuts that these rcvrs do fail with age. >>>>> My belief is that though the connector on the 3801 may be different >>>>> and it >>>>> is 5V, essentially connecting the 1 pps TX RX data and power should >>>>> allow >>>>> this to replace the older rcvr. >>>>> Am I on the right track? >>>>> As a longer term goal and question does this new rcvr actually improve >>>>> a >>>>> 3801s stability? >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Paul >>>>> WB8TSL >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM, David Martin < >>>>> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I had a Motorola M12+ all hooked up with a RF pigtail and data header >>>>>> so I >>>>>> just unplugged the Motorola and plugged in the SSR-6t. >>>>>> >>>>>> The data connector was purchased from digikey several years ago and >>>>>> the >>>>>> details have been lost in the dust. >>>>>> >>>>>> However it looks like >>>>>> >>>>>> http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=A33546-ND >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm unhappy with the one I'm using as the contacts spring pressure is >>>>>> weak >>>>>> against the connector pin -- I will have to consider looking for a >>>>>> more >>>>>> "firm" fitting data connector. >>>>>> >>>>>> The RF pigtail was also obtained years ago from data-alliance.net - >>>>>> their >>>>>> P3B adapter cable. >>>>>> >>>>>> See >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.data-alliance.net/servlet/-strse-800/MCX-BNC-female-Adapter/Detail >>>>>> >>>>>> - Sent from my iPhone - >>>>>> Please Reply To >>>>>> David Martin >>>>>> drmartin@ivietechnologies.com >>>>>> 801-372-0978 >>>>>> >>>>>> Just curious, >>>>>> what connector/pigtail/adapter board did you use to access the 2x5 >>>>>> 1.27mm >>>>>> pitch connector on your SSR-6T. >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Dale NV8U >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>>> To unsubscribe, go to >>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument >>> are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind." >>> De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century. >>> "If you don't know what it is, don't poke it." >>> Ghost in the Shell >>> >>> >>> Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL >>> Six Mile Systems LLP >>> 17850 Six Mile Road >>> POB 134 >>> Huson, MT, 59846 >>> VOX 406-626-4304 >>> www.lightningforensics.com >>> www.sixmilesystems.com >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.