great-loop@lists.trawlering.com

Cruising America's Great Loop and other inland routes

View all threads

Re: GL: THRUSTERS

JH
Jim Healy
Wed, Apr 12, 2017 12:03 PM

Ken,

In my opinion, hydraulic wins hands down.  Price to install is about the same, but issues and trade-offs are easier/better.  Maintenance over time is much easier.  If you only plan for one, stern thrusters are far better than bow thrusters because they give you better maneuvering options.

See this discussion on my website: https://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/category/boat-technical-topics/equipment-topics/dickson-stern-thruster-system/ https://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/category/boat-technical-topics/equipment-topics/dickson-stern-thruster-system/.

Jim

Peg and Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary, currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL
http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/
Monk 36 Hull #132
MMSI #367042570
AGLCA #3767
MTOA #3436

Ken, In my opinion, hydraulic wins hands down. Price to install is about the same, but issues and trade-offs are easier/better. Maintenance over time is much easier. If you only plan for one, stern thrusters are far better than bow thrusters because they give you better maneuvering options. See this discussion on my website: https://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/category/boat-technical-topics/equipment-topics/dickson-stern-thruster-system/ <https://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/category/boat-technical-topics/equipment-topics/dickson-stern-thruster-system/>. Jim Peg and Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary, currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com <http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/> Monk 36 Hull #132 MMSI #367042570 AGLCA #3767 MTOA #3436
JP
joseph.pica@gmail.com
Wed, Apr 12, 2017 3:57 PM

I seldom disagree with Sage Jim, however do so "slightly" in this case.  I prefer a bow thruster over that of a stern thruster based on the unique design performance of our boat.  We have a large bow windage area that is easily moved by winds.  We have very small (54hp) twin engines that greatly facilitate tight quarters handling and even provide the ability to slide the boat sideways when used in combination with our large rudders.  Our main problem occurs if needing to back where the wind pushes the bow. In reverse the boat's stern is easily controlled by the props dragging the stern albeit somewhat ineffective as oppose to going forward.  However, the bow offers too much leverage in certain side winds for our props to keep it in line when backing down a narrow fairway, or out of a deep slip. For those situations the bow thruster easily controls the bow so it isn't askew and hitting/rubbing against other boats or obstructions.  All of Jim's points concerning maintenance with thruster tunnels, hydraulic  VI's electric thrusters is absolutely valid.  Hydraulic is the best solution and tunnels are great barnacle gardens.

Joe Pica
M/V Carolyn Ann GH N-37
http://carolynann-n37.blogspot.com/
MTOA#3813, AGLCA #5485 Platinum

On Apr 12, 2017, at 8:03 AM, Jim Healy gilwellbear@gmail.com wrote:

Ken,

In my opinion, hydraulic wins hands down.  Price to install is about the same, but issues and trade-offs are easier/better.  Maintenance over time is much easier.  If you only plan for one, stern thrusters are far better than bow thrusters because they give you better maneuvering options.

See this discussion on my website: https://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/category/boat-technical-topics/equipment-topics/dickson-stern-thruster-system/ https://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/category/boat-technical-topics/equipment-topics/dickson-stern-thruster-system/.

Jim

Peg and Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary, currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL
http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/
Monk 36 Hull #132
MMSI #367042570
AGLCA #3767
MTOA #3436


http://lists.trawlering.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop_lists.trawlering.com

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.trawlering.com/mailman/options/great-loop_lists.trawlering.com

I seldom disagree with Sage Jim, however do so "slightly" in this case. I prefer a bow thruster over that of a stern thruster based on the unique design performance of our boat. We have a large bow windage area that is easily moved by winds. We have very small (54hp) twin engines that greatly facilitate tight quarters handling and even provide the ability to slide the boat sideways when used in combination with our large rudders. Our main problem occurs if needing to back where the wind pushes the bow. In reverse the boat's stern is easily controlled by the props dragging the stern albeit somewhat ineffective as oppose to going forward. However, the bow offers too much leverage in certain side winds for our props to keep it in line when backing down a narrow fairway, or out of a deep slip. For those situations the bow thruster easily controls the bow so it isn't askew and hitting/rubbing against other boats or obstructions. All of Jim's points concerning maintenance with thruster tunnels, hydraulic VI's electric thrusters is absolutely valid. Hydraulic is the best solution and tunnels are great barnacle gardens. Joe Pica M/V Carolyn Ann GH N-37 http://carolynann-n37.blogspot.com/ MTOA#3813, AGLCA #5485 Platinum > On Apr 12, 2017, at 8:03 AM, Jim Healy <gilwellbear@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ken, > > In my opinion, hydraulic wins hands down. Price to install is about the same, but issues and trade-offs are easier/better. Maintenance over time is much easier. If you only plan for one, stern thrusters are far better than bow thrusters because they give you better maneuvering options. > > See this discussion on my website: https://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/category/boat-technical-topics/equipment-topics/dickson-stern-thruster-system/ <https://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/category/boat-technical-topics/equipment-topics/dickson-stern-thruster-system/>. > > Jim > > Peg and Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary, currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL > http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com <http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/> > Monk 36 Hull #132 > MMSI #367042570 > AGLCA #3767 > MTOA #3436 > > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.trawlering.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop_lists.trawlering.com > > To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address, > unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.trawlering.com/mailman/options/great-loop_lists.trawlering.com
JH
Jim Healy
Wed, Apr 12, 2017 4:15 PM

I yield to Joe on matters related to the Great Harbour's design.  On our classic trawler, I like being able to put the bow right on a piling where Peg can simply reach over to place our large loop lines over it.  No boat hooks, no lassoing; just a simple reach.  She snugs the line and I use the stern thruster to swing my stern in.  That's especially helpful when there is no dock assistant to help secure the boat.  It's also very helpful to get off unassisted.  But, that's just out experience.

Jim

On Apr 12, 2017, at 11:57, joseph.pica@gmail.com wrote:

I seldom disagree with Sage Jim, however do so "slightly" in this case.  I prefer a bow thruster over that of a stern thruster based on the unique design performance of our boat.  We have a large bow windage area that is easily moved by winds.  We have very small (54hp) twin engines that greatly facilitate tight quarters handling and even provide the ability to slide the boat sideways when used in combination with our large rudders.  Our main problem occurs if needing to back where the wind pushes the bow. In reverse the boat's stern is easily controlled by the props dragging the stern albeit somewhat ineffective as oppose to going forward.  However, the bow offers too much leverage in certain side winds for our props to keep it in line when backing down a narrow fairway, or out of a deep slip. For those situations the bow thruster easily controls the bow so it isn't askew and hitting/rubbing against other boats or obstructions.  All of Jim's points concerning maintenance with thruster tunnels, hydraulic  VI's electric thrusters is absolutely valid.  Hydraulic is the best solution and tunnels are great barnacle gardens.

Joe Pica
M/V Carolyn Ann GH N-37
http://carolynann-n37.blogspot.com/
MTOA#3813, AGLCA #5485 Platinum

On Apr 12, 2017, at 8:03 AM, Jim Healy gilwellbear@gmail.com wrote:

Ken,

In my opinion, hydraulic wins hands down.  Price to install is about the same, but issues and trade-offs are easier/better.  Maintenance over time is much easier.  If you only plan for one, stern thrusters are far better than bow thrusters because they give you better maneuvering options.

See this discussion on my website: https://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/category/boat-technical-topics/equipment-topics/dickson-stern-thruster-system/ https://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/category/boat-technical-topics/equipment-topics/dickson-stern-thruster-system/.

Jim

Peg and Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary, currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL
http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/
Monk 36 Hull #132
MMSI #367042570
AGLCA #3767
MTOA #3436


http://lists.trawlering.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop_lists.trawlering.com

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.trawlering.com/mailman/options/great-loop_lists.trawlering.com

Peg and Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary, currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL
http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/
Monk 36 Hull #132
MMSI #367042570
AGLCA #3767
MTOA #3436

I yield to Joe on matters related to the Great Harbour's design. On our classic trawler, I like being able to put the bow right on a piling where Peg can simply reach over to place our large loop lines over it. No boat hooks, no lassoing; just a simple reach. She snugs the line and I use the stern thruster to swing my stern in. That's especially helpful when there is no dock assistant to help secure the boat. It's also very helpful to get off unassisted. But, that's just out experience. Jim > On Apr 12, 2017, at 11:57, joseph.pica@gmail.com wrote: > > I seldom disagree with Sage Jim, however do so "slightly" in this case. I prefer a bow thruster over that of a stern thruster based on the unique design performance of our boat. We have a large bow windage area that is easily moved by winds. We have very small (54hp) twin engines that greatly facilitate tight quarters handling and even provide the ability to slide the boat sideways when used in combination with our large rudders. Our main problem occurs if needing to back where the wind pushes the bow. In reverse the boat's stern is easily controlled by the props dragging the stern albeit somewhat ineffective as oppose to going forward. However, the bow offers too much leverage in certain side winds for our props to keep it in line when backing down a narrow fairway, or out of a deep slip. For those situations the bow thruster easily controls the bow so it isn't askew and hitting/rubbing against other boats or obstructions. All of Jim's points concerning maintenance with thruster tunnels, hydraulic VI's electric thrusters is absolutely valid. Hydraulic is the best solution and tunnels are great barnacle gardens. > > Joe Pica > M/V Carolyn Ann GH N-37 > http://carolynann-n37.blogspot.com/ > MTOA#3813, AGLCA #5485 Platinum > >> On Apr 12, 2017, at 8:03 AM, Jim Healy <gilwellbear@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Ken, >> >> In my opinion, hydraulic wins hands down. Price to install is about the same, but issues and trade-offs are easier/better. Maintenance over time is much easier. If you only plan for one, stern thrusters are far better than bow thrusters because they give you better maneuvering options. >> >> See this discussion on my website: https://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/category/boat-technical-topics/equipment-topics/dickson-stern-thruster-system/ <https://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/category/boat-technical-topics/equipment-topics/dickson-stern-thruster-system/>. >> >> Jim >> >> Peg and Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary, currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL >> http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com <http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/> >> Monk 36 Hull #132 >> MMSI #367042570 >> AGLCA #3767 >> MTOA #3436 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> http://lists.trawlering.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop_lists.trawlering.com >> >> To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address, >> unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.trawlering.com/mailman/options/great-loop_lists.trawlering.com Peg and Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary, currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com <http://gilwellbear.wordpress.com/> Monk 36 Hull #132 MMSI #367042570 AGLCA #3767 MTOA #3436