On 4/7/12 2:47 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
Not a whole lot, but the whole paper goes into the various factors
involved. Ultimately, it winds up that the mismatch from SMAs is
a) a whole lot less than the usual "worst case" spec of 1.05:1 or 1.03:1
(which is basically a measurement limit)
and
b) doesn't change much with many mate/demate cycles
He did look at things like coupling nut friction and what not.
Do you have the name of the paper? It might be interesting to read.
Attila Kinali
I'll try to find it. I've got the pdf "somewhere" on my computer..
On 4/7/12 2:47 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
> Moin,
>
> On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 16:54:09 -0700
> Jim Lux<jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Not a whole lot, but the whole paper goes into the various factors
>> involved. Ultimately, it winds up that the mismatch from SMAs is
>> a) a whole lot less than the usual "worst case" spec of 1.05:1 or 1.03:1
>> (which is basically a measurement limit)
>> and
>> b) doesn't change much with many mate/demate cycles
>>
>> He did look at things like coupling nut friction and what not.
>
> Do you have the name of the paper? It might be interesting to read.
>
> Attila Kinali
>
I'll try to find it. I've got the pdf "somewhere" on my computer..
