AK
Alexei Kuznetsov
Wed, Nov 5, 2008 10:45 PM
Hi,
After calling pjsua_set_snd_dev() CPU loads up to 10%. Mac OS X 10.5.5, Intel.
Is that an ussue or a normal behavior?
--
Best regards,
Alexei Kuznetsov
Hi,
After calling pjsua_set_snd_dev() CPU loads up to 10%. Mac OS X 10.5.5, Intel.
Is that an ussue or a normal behavior?
--
Best regards,
Alexei Kuznetsov
NI
Nanang Izzuddin
Thu, Nov 6, 2008 9:05 AM
Hi,
I guess that's normal, I experienced about the same with echo
canceller enabled (running pjsua without any params).
Regards,
nanang
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Alexei Kuznetsov eofster@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I guess that's normal, I experienced about the same with echo
canceller enabled (running pjsua without any params).
Regards,
nanang
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Alexei Kuznetsov <eofster@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After calling pjsua_set_snd_dev() CPU loads up to 10%. Mac OS X 10.5.5, Intel.
>
> Is that an ussue or a normal behavior?
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Alexei Kuznetsov
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
AK
Alexei Kuznetsov
Thu, Nov 6, 2008 12:56 PM
I mean, the application uses 10% of cpu without any media active.
Also, pjsua without any params uses less than 1% cpu after start-up,
but 10% after the first call. Is it something you could improve in the
future? Or is it the design, or is it not up to pjproject but to other
code pjrpoject uses? Is it on a Mac only?
--
Best regards,
Alexei
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Nanang Izzuddin nanang@pjsip.org wrote:
Hi,
I guess that's normal, I experienced about the same with echo
canceller enabled (running pjsua without any params).
Regards,
nanang
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Alexei Kuznetsov eofster@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
After calling pjsua_set_snd_dev() CPU loads up to 10%. Mac OS X 10.5.5, Intel.
Is that an ussue or a normal behavior?
--
Best regards,
Alexei Kuznetsov
I mean, the application uses 10% of cpu without any media active.
Also, pjsua without any params uses less than 1% cpu after start-up,
but 10% after the first call. Is it something you could improve in the
future? Or is it the design, or is it not up to pjproject but to other
code pjrpoject uses? Is it on a Mac only?
--
Best regards,
Alexei
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Nanang Izzuddin <nanang@pjsip.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess that's normal, I experienced about the same with echo
> canceller enabled (running pjsua without any params).
>
> Regards,
> nanang
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Alexei Kuznetsov <eofster@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After calling pjsua_set_snd_dev() CPU loads up to 10%. Mac OS X 10.5.5, Intel.
>>
>> Is that an ussue or a normal behavior?
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Alexei Kuznetsov
RK
Ruud Klaver
Mon, Nov 10, 2008 8:54 AM
Hi Alexei,
On 06 Nov 2008, at 13:56, Alexei Kuznetsov wrote:
I mean, the application uses 10% of cpu without any media active.
Also, pjsua without any params uses less than 1% cpu after start-up,
but 10% after the first call. Is it something you could improve in the
future? Or is it the design, or is it not up to pjproject but to other
code pjrpoject uses? Is it on a Mac only?
--
Best regards,
Alexei
I've noticed exactly the same behaviour on Mac, it's a very annoying
problem. Just having the sound device open seems to consume an
inordinate amount of CPU cycles already. From what I've seen, it
actually seems to be a PortAudio issue. I already went on their
mailinglist to discuss the issue, but I didn't pursue the matter.
Ruud Klaver
AG Projects
Hi Alexei,
On 06 Nov 2008, at 13:56, Alexei Kuznetsov wrote:
> I mean, the application uses 10% of cpu without any media active.
> Also, pjsua without any params uses less than 1% cpu after start-up,
> but 10% after the first call. Is it something you could improve in the
> future? Or is it the design, or is it not up to pjproject but to other
> code pjrpoject uses? Is it on a Mac only?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Alexei
I've noticed exactly the same behaviour on Mac, it's a very annoying
problem. Just having the sound device open seems to consume an
inordinate amount of CPU cycles already. From what I've seen, it
actually seems to be a PortAudio issue. I already went on their
mailinglist to discuss the issue, but I didn't pursue the matter.
Ruud Klaver
AG Projects
AK
Alexei Kuznetsov
Mon, Nov 10, 2008 11:26 AM
I mean, the application uses 10% of cpu without any media active.
Also, pjsua without any params uses less than 1% cpu after start-up,
but 10% after the first call. Is it something you could improve in the
future? Or is it the design, or is it not up to pjproject but to other
code pjrpoject uses? Is it on a Mac only?
-- Best regards,
Alexei
I've noticed exactly the same behaviour on Mac, it's a very annoying
problem. Just having the sound device open seems to consume an inordinate
amount of CPU cycles already. From what I've seen, it actually seems to be a
PortAudio issue. I already went on their mailinglist to discuss the issue,
but I didn't pursue the matter.
Ruud Klaver
AG Projects
Hi Ruud,
>> I mean, the application uses 10% of cpu without any media active.
>> Also, pjsua without any params uses less than 1% cpu after start-up,
>> but 10% after the first call. Is it something you could improve in the
>> future? Or is it the design, or is it not up to pjproject but to other
>> code pjrpoject uses? Is it on a Mac only?
>>
>> -- Best regards,
>> Alexei
>
> I've noticed exactly the same behaviour on Mac, it's a very annoying
> problem. Just having the sound device open seems to consume an inordinate
> amount of CPU cycles already. From what I've seen, it actually seems to be a
> PortAudio issue. I already went on their mailinglist to discuss the issue,
> but I didn't pursue the matter.
>
> Ruud Klaver
> AG Projects
I've solved this issure for me, but not shure if this is the most
correct way. It's only about adding one line into pjsua_media.c and
setting snd_auto_close_time=0. I've written about it here:
http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2008-November/005341.html
Alexei Kuznetsov
RK
Ruud Klaver
Mon, Nov 10, 2008 11:34 AM
Hi Alexei,
On 10 Nov 2008, at 12:26, Alexei Kuznetsov wrote:
I mean, the application uses 10% of cpu without any media active.
Also, pjsua without any params uses less than 1% cpu after start-up,
but 10% after the first call. Is it something you could improve in
the
future? Or is it the design, or is it not up to pjproject but to
other
code pjrpoject uses? Is it on a Mac only?
-- Best regards,
Alexei
I've noticed exactly the same behaviour on Mac, it's a very annoying
problem. Just having the sound device open seems to consume an
inordinate
amount of CPU cycles already. From what I've seen, it actually
seems to be a
PortAudio issue. I already went on their mailinglist to discuss the
issue,
but I didn't pursue the matter.
Ruud Klaver
AG Projects
I'm not using PJSUA, so this is not a solution for me.
I don't think it is a solution even, this just seems to close the
sound device again if it's idle. The problem still persists, because
it will still consume those CPU cycles while in a call (on top of the
echo cancellation that is). I did some tests with PortAudio directly,
see http://techweb.rfa.org/pipermail/portaudio/2008-October/
008943.html for the relevant thread. The issue wasn't really solved.
Ruud Klaver
AG Projects
Hi Alexei,
On 10 Nov 2008, at 12:26, Alexei Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hi Ruud,
>
>>> I mean, the application uses 10% of cpu without any media active.
>>> Also, pjsua without any params uses less than 1% cpu after start-up,
>>> but 10% after the first call. Is it something you could improve in
>>> the
>>> future? Or is it the design, or is it not up to pjproject but to
>>> other
>>> code pjrpoject uses? Is it on a Mac only?
>>>
>>> -- Best regards,
>>> Alexei
>>
>> I've noticed exactly the same behaviour on Mac, it's a very annoying
>> problem. Just having the sound device open seems to consume an
>> inordinate
>> amount of CPU cycles already. From what I've seen, it actually
>> seems to be a
>> PortAudio issue. I already went on their mailinglist to discuss the
>> issue,
>> but I didn't pursue the matter.
>>
>> Ruud Klaver
>> AG Projects
>
> I've solved this issure for me, but not shure if this is the most
> correct way. It's only about adding one line into pjsua_media.c and
> setting snd_auto_close_time=0. I've written about it here:
> http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2008-November/005341.html
>
> Alexei Kuznetsov
I'm not using PJSUA, so this is not a solution for me.
I don't think it is a solution even, this just seems to close the
sound device again if it's idle. The problem still persists, because
it will still consume those CPU cycles while in a call (on top of the
echo cancellation that is). I did some tests with PortAudio directly,
see http://techweb.rfa.org/pipermail/portaudio/2008-October/
008943.html for the relevant thread. The issue wasn't really solved.
Ruud Klaver
AG Projects
