Dear Colleagues,
I've just been informed that our campus is losing its site-licence to
Endnote, which I've been using for some years. They are recommending
Zotero or Mendeley--does anyone have any experience using the latter with
Chinese/Japanese bibilography? Any advice would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Beverly
--
Beverly Bossler
Professor, History
University of California, Davis
I switched from Endnote to Zotero about 5 years ago and find it meets all my CJK bibliography needs.
Best wishes,
James
James A. Benn
Professor
Department of Religious Studies, McMaster University
University Hall, Room 105, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, CANADA
Phone: 905 525 9140, ext 24210
Fax: ha ha, no, it’s 2018
URL: jamesabenn.ca
On Aug 18, 2018, 7:20 PM -0400, Beverly Bossler <bjbossler@ucdavis.edu>, wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
I've just been informed that our campus is losing its site-licence to Endnote, which I've been using for some years. They are recommending Zotero or Mendeley--does anyone have any experience using the latter with Chinese/Japanese bibilography? Any advice would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Beverly
--
Beverly BosslerProfessor, History
University of California, Davis
_______________________________________________
Listserv mailing list
Listserv@mail.songyuan.org
http://mail.songyuan.org/mailman/listinfo/listserv_mail.songyuan.org
Dear Beverly,
I have been using both, but not very actively in the last few years (no
time for research!). Years ago Mendeley was cool as it was one of the first
platforms in which you could upload pdf files and it would harvest the
bibliographic details from the pdf you uploaded. Elsevier took it over not
too long ago, which makes it far less cool. I just logged in to see what
they did with it. I noticed that Elsevier immediately asked me to agree to
their terms, but all info was still there. When I first uploaded my pdf
files (that may be different now), the bibliographic extraction of CJK
materials did not work, but it does accept unicode (filenames for example
show up fine in CJK).
Zotero remains as far as I know open source. You can easily import your
endnote libraries (best to convert them to the other available
non-proprietary formats so you can easily import them in a variety of
bibliographic software packages); you can also harvest bibliographic data
from online sources. And yes it does handle CJK too. You can also set up
groups--we started once a Song group with French colleagues. You can also
use their API to share libraries to the web (our online bibliographies on
comparative history, for example, were created this way--this sometimes
generates some work (they occasionally change things).
Both have standalone and online versions--mendeley also has apps in case
you want to access your info on your phone or tablet.
If you have to make a choice, I would go for Zotero; Elsevier has been a
pain for many universities to negotiate reasonable deals with--hopefully
that will change in the future.
Best,
Hilde
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Beverly Bossler bjbossler@ucdavis.edu
wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
I've just been informed that our campus is losing its site-licence to
Endnote, which I've been using for some years. They are recommending
Zotero or Mendeley--does anyone have any experience using the latter with
Chinese/Japanese bibilography? Any advice would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Beverly
--
Beverly Bossler
Professor, History
University of California, Davis
Listserv mailing list
Listserv@mail.songyuan.org
http://mail.songyuan.org/mailman/listinfo/listserv_mail.songyuan.org