trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

TWL: RE: Ford Lehman on KK42

FM
Faure, Marin
Sat, Mar 13, 2004 2:03 AM

Why would someone (in Annapolis) rebuild a Ford Lehman 120HP at 855

hours?

Some 120 Lehmans are equipped with rather strange exhaust systems, and
some of these systems can allow water to run back into the exhaust
manifold and into a cylinder if the interior components of the riser
muffler, water-jacketed elbow, etc. rust out or develop leaks.  So that
could be one cause of the early demise of a Lehman.

Lehmans are pretty low-tech, low-performance engines.  I'm told by
people who know a lot about these things that an engine like a Lehman is
happiest running along at 1,500 to 1,800 rpm.  Running them consistently
at higher rpms can accelerate wear fairly dramatically (I'm told) and
will subject the engine to higher heat levels than the components,
gaskets, etc. really like.  This is one reason the engine proved
unsuitable for its original intent, which was heavy-duty truck use in
the 1950s.  The engine is strong and (for its day) very reliable, but it
didn't do well under the higher power and rpm loads required for hauling
semi-trailers and heavy loads on the highway (remember, in the 1950s,
semi-trailers were not very big).  Plus the power output of the engine
was not really sufficient for this kind of work, especially as road
speeds and truck weights began to go up dramatically.

Where the engine proved very successful was in relatively low-power,
constant-rpm applications.  So the Lehman (called the Dorsett by the
manufacturer, Ford of England), proved extremely well suited for
tractors, generators, cranes, and other industrial applications.  The
demands of a marine diesel, at least in the 1960s and 70s, were similar,
which is why the Dorsett was so successful in its Lehman
marine-conversion form.

BUT... if an owner today is in more of a hurry than his 1960 counterpart
and consistently runs his Lehman-equipped boat at higher power settings,
say 2,000 rpm and above, this could take a toll on the longevity of the
engine, particularly if it develops a problem with the raw water or
coolant circulation systems.

Also....the 120 Lehman's Simms injector pump is separately lubricated--
it has its own little oil sump.  Because of the possibility of oil
dilution from fuel leaking past the injector pump pistons, it's VERY
important that the oil in the pump be changed every 50 hours.  As the
oil dilutes, its lubricating properties are reduced, and wear on the
pump's components goes up.  I know, there are people who say, "I change
the pump oil every 200 hours or 500 hours and I've never had a problem
since Moses did his thing with the Red Sea."  Well, they've been REALLY
lucky.  Not only does the operation manual stress the importance of
changing the pump oil every 50 hours, but so do people like Bob Smith at
American Diesel, who probably knows more about the care and feeding of
Lehmans than anyone else around today.  I'm told that the injector pump
is the single most expensive and critical item on the engine.  If wear
or mis-adjustment causes the pump timing to be off, this can result in
Bad Things happening inside the cylinders, which in turn can affect the
heat being developed as well as the buildup of deposits on valves,
pistons, etc.  So if the injector pump on the engine you're inquiring
about is bad, this could cause problems that eventually require an
overhaul.

And...the valves on a 120 Lehman require adjustment periodically.  Here
the operator's manual and the opinion of experienced mechanics can
differ.  I believe the manual wants the valves adjusted every 200 hours,
or perhaps it's 500 hours.  But I recall Bob telling me that the valves
shouldn't need to be adjusted but every 2,000 hours (don't quote me on
that, I may be mis-remembering his figure, so check with him).  So it's
possible that one or more valves on the engine in question drifted out
of adjustment but the valve clearances were never checked.  If the
clearance opens up, the result will be that the pushrod follower will
start hammering on the cam lobe and gradually flatten it down to the
point where it's no longer possible to adjust the valve clearance to
specifications.  The cure is to replace the camshaft or chrome it back
to tolerance if that's even possible, both of which require taking it
out.  If the clearance tightness up (usually not likely), the result
will be the valve can't close all the way, which in the case of an
exhaust valve will burn it sooner rather than later, and in the case of
an intake valve will result in poor compression and incomplete ignition
of the fuel/air charge.  The cure is to overhaul the head to replace the
burned valves.

One other possibility is that the hour meters were replaced at some
point for some reason, so the total number of hours on the engine is
actually greater than 855.  The meters on our boat, for example, were
replaced when the engines had about 1,200 hours on them.  So when we
bought the boat, the meters showed about 250 hours.  I was skeptical of
the 1,200 hour claim on a 25-year old boat, but when I divided the total
nautical mile readout on the boat's original knotmeter (a figure that
could not be reset other than by taking the instrument apart) by the
average speed of the boat, the result was close enough to 1,200 hours to
make that figure believable.  That and the fact that the boat had spent
all its 25 years in San Francisco Bay, where I'm told by boaters from
there that the relatively short cruise distances can easily result in an
old boat having fairly low engine hours even when the boat is used
regularly.


C. Marin Faure
GB36-403 "La Perouse"
Bellingham, Washington

>Why would someone (in Annapolis) rebuild a Ford Lehman 120HP at 855 hours? Some 120 Lehmans are equipped with rather strange exhaust systems, and some of these systems can allow water to run back into the exhaust manifold and into a cylinder if the interior components of the riser muffler, water-jacketed elbow, etc. rust out or develop leaks. So that could be one cause of the early demise of a Lehman. Lehmans are pretty low-tech, low-performance engines. I'm told by people who know a lot about these things that an engine like a Lehman is happiest running along at 1,500 to 1,800 rpm. Running them consistently at higher rpms can accelerate wear fairly dramatically (I'm told) and will subject the engine to higher heat levels than the components, gaskets, etc. really like. This is one reason the engine proved unsuitable for its original intent, which was heavy-duty truck use in the 1950s. The engine is strong and (for its day) very reliable, but it didn't do well under the higher power and rpm loads required for hauling semi-trailers and heavy loads on the highway (remember, in the 1950s, semi-trailers were not very big). Plus the power output of the engine was not really sufficient for this kind of work, especially as road speeds and truck weights began to go up dramatically. Where the engine proved very successful was in relatively low-power, constant-rpm applications. So the Lehman (called the Dorsett by the manufacturer, Ford of England), proved extremely well suited for tractors, generators, cranes, and other industrial applications. The demands of a marine diesel, at least in the 1960s and 70s, were similar, which is why the Dorsett was so successful in its Lehman marine-conversion form. BUT... if an owner today is in more of a hurry than his 1960 counterpart and consistently runs his Lehman-equipped boat at higher power settings, say 2,000 rpm and above, this could take a toll on the longevity of the engine, particularly if it develops a problem with the raw water or coolant circulation systems. Also....the 120 Lehman's Simms injector pump is separately lubricated-- it has its own little oil sump. Because of the possibility of oil dilution from fuel leaking past the injector pump pistons, it's VERY important that the oil in the pump be changed every 50 hours. As the oil dilutes, its lubricating properties are reduced, and wear on the pump's components goes up. I know, there are people who say, "I change the pump oil every 200 hours or 500 hours and I've never had a problem since Moses did his thing with the Red Sea." Well, they've been REALLY lucky. Not only does the operation manual stress the importance of changing the pump oil every 50 hours, but so do people like Bob Smith at American Diesel, who probably knows more about the care and feeding of Lehmans than anyone else around today. I'm told that the injector pump is the single most expensive and critical item on the engine. If wear or mis-adjustment causes the pump timing to be off, this can result in Bad Things happening inside the cylinders, which in turn can affect the heat being developed as well as the buildup of deposits on valves, pistons, etc. So if the injector pump on the engine you're inquiring about is bad, this could cause problems that eventually require an overhaul. And...the valves on a 120 Lehman require adjustment periodically. Here the operator's manual and the opinion of experienced mechanics can differ. I believe the manual wants the valves adjusted every 200 hours, or perhaps it's 500 hours. But I recall Bob telling me that the valves shouldn't need to be adjusted but every 2,000 hours (don't quote me on that, I may be mis-remembering his figure, so check with him). So it's possible that one or more valves on the engine in question drifted out of adjustment but the valve clearances were never checked. If the clearance opens up, the result will be that the pushrod follower will start hammering on the cam lobe and gradually flatten it down to the point where it's no longer possible to adjust the valve clearance to specifications. The cure is to replace the camshaft or chrome it back to tolerance if that's even possible, both of which require taking it out. If the clearance tightness up (usually not likely), the result will be the valve can't close all the way, which in the case of an exhaust valve will burn it sooner rather than later, and in the case of an intake valve will result in poor compression and incomplete ignition of the fuel/air charge. The cure is to overhaul the head to replace the burned valves. One other possibility is that the hour meters were replaced at some point for some reason, so the total number of hours on the engine is actually greater than 855. The meters on our boat, for example, were replaced when the engines had about 1,200 hours on them. So when we bought the boat, the meters showed about 250 hours. I was skeptical of the 1,200 hour claim on a 25-year old boat, but when I divided the total nautical mile readout on the boat's original knotmeter (a figure that could not be reset other than by taking the instrument apart) by the average speed of the boat, the result was close enough to 1,200 hours to make that figure believable. That and the fact that the boat had spent all its 25 years in San Francisco Bay, where I'm told by boaters from there that the relatively short cruise distances can easily result in an old boat having fairly low engine hours even when the boat is used regularly. ______________________________ C. Marin Faure GB36-403 "La Perouse" Bellingham, Washington
RR
Ron Rogers
Sat, Mar 13, 2004 2:53 AM

Marin,

Thank you for your insights. This is a one owner boat up the Severn River
from me so I am assuming that the hours are real and something bad happened.

More importantly, thank you for changing my perspective on the Ford Lehman
engine. I saw one outside a boat and was amazed how big it was. I made the
gross assumption that this was a rough, tough engine with low maintenance
requirements. Now I know there are important maintenance items that must be
catered to. I also think that this vessel and a friend's Kadey Krogen 42
were often run at close to full throttle. My friend was always trying to get
her KK42 up to 10 knots! Mr. Smith had told her that no new propeller was
going to help her achieve that. The other vessel had a long run up the river
to get home and was always getting badly rolled by passing power boats. He
seemed to be going as fast as he could.

So ask a simple question and get a real education. Thank you Marin and thank
you List!

Ron Rogers

Marin, Thank you for your insights. This is a one owner boat up the Severn River from me so I am assuming that the hours are real and something bad happened. More importantly, thank you for changing my perspective on the Ford Lehman engine. I saw one outside a boat and was amazed how big it was. I made the gross assumption that this was a rough, tough engine with low maintenance requirements. Now I know there are important maintenance items that must be catered to. I also think that this vessel and a friend's Kadey Krogen 42 were often run at close to full throttle. My friend was always trying to get her KK42 up to 10 knots! Mr. Smith had told her that no new propeller was going to help her achieve that. The other vessel had a long run up the river to get home and was always getting badly rolled by passing power boats. He seemed to be going as fast as he could. So ask a simple question and get a real education. Thank you Marin and thank you List! Ron Rogers
MG
Mike Gladwin
Sat, Mar 13, 2004 5:19 AM

From: "Ron Rogers" rcrogers6@comcast.net
To: "Faure, Marin" marin.faure@boeing.com;

Thank you for your insights. >
More importantly, thank you for changing my perspective on the Ford Lehman
engine.  I made the
gross assumption that this was a rough, tough engine with low maintenance

Well there must be something wrong with my Ford Lehman. I bought the boat
new in 1981 and I still have her and the damn Ford Lehman just keeps on
running just like the Energizer Bunny. Yea I change the oil and make sure
the fuel is clean and I even change the injector oil for the winter lay-up
not quite sure this qualifies for high maintenance. I've even run the boat
above 2000 rpms too. Even if I could put four engines in my boat, I'd still
probably only go a couple of knots faster maybe, but I'd sure burn alot more
fuel.
And I'm not sure I understand how a Ford Lehman is the cause of a boat being
badly rolled by passing powerboats? The Ford Lehman is like any other
engine, you take care of it and it will always bring you back to port.
Maybe I'm spending to much time up here in Maine, AYUP!
Mike Gladwin
S. Bristol ME

From: "Ron Rogers" <rcrogers6@comcast.net> To: "Faure, Marin" <marin.faure@boeing.com>; > Thank you for your insights. > > More importantly, thank you for changing my perspective on the Ford Lehman > engine. I made the > gross assumption that this was a rough, tough engine with low maintenance Well there must be something wrong with my Ford Lehman. I bought the boat new in 1981 and I still have her and the damn Ford Lehman just keeps on running just like the Energizer Bunny. Yea I change the oil and make sure the fuel is clean and I even change the injector oil for the winter lay-up not quite sure this qualifies for high maintenance. I've even run the boat above 2000 rpms too. Even if I could put four engines in my boat, I'd still probably only go a couple of knots faster maybe, but I'd sure burn alot more fuel. And I'm not sure I understand how a Ford Lehman is the cause of a boat being badly rolled by passing powerboats? The Ford Lehman is like any other engine, you take care of it and it will always bring you back to port. Maybe I'm spending to much time up here in Maine, AYUP! Mike Gladwin S. Bristol ME
RR
Ron Rogers
Sat, Mar 13, 2004 5:26 AM

Sorry that I wasn't clear. The guy was always rushing to get home. I
assumed that another advantage of going "fast" was that a KK42 would build
up some form stability and roll less at higher speeds. I never saw him alter
course to head into the wakes.

Ron Rogers

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Gladwin" mgladwin3@comcast.net

| And I'm not sure I understand how a Ford Lehman is the cause of a boat
being
| badly rolled by passing powerboats?

Sorry that I wasn't clear. The guy was always rushing to get home. I *assumed* that another advantage of going "fast" was that a KK42 would build up some form stability and roll less at higher speeds. I never saw him alter course to head into the wakes. Ron Rogers ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Gladwin" <mgladwin3@comcast.net> | And I'm not sure I understand how a Ford Lehman is the cause of a boat being | badly rolled by passing powerboats?
K
Keith
Sat, Mar 13, 2004 2:16 PM

When I took Bob Smith's diesel class, he said to adjust the valve clearance
between 500 and 1000 hrs. For a 120, you need to retorque the head bolts in
a specific pattern as well. I'm sure if you call American Diesel, they'll
send you the pattern and torque specifications, if they're not in the 120
manual.

Keith
__
Backup not found. [A]bort, [R]etry, [P]anic...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Faure, Marin" marin.faure@boeing.com

And...the valves on a 120 Lehman require adjustment periodically.  Here
the operator's manual and the opinion of experienced mechanics can
differ.  I believe the manual wants the valves adjusted every 200 hours,
or perhaps it's 500 hours.  But I recall Bob telling me that the valves
shouldn't need to be adjusted but every 2,000 hours (don't quote me on
that, I may be mis-remembering his figure, so check with him).

When I took Bob Smith's diesel class, he said to adjust the valve clearance between 500 and 1000 hrs. For a 120, you need to retorque the head bolts in a specific pattern as well. I'm sure if you call American Diesel, they'll send you the pattern and torque specifications, if they're not in the 120 manual. Keith __ Backup not found. [A]bort, [R]etry, [P]anic... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Faure, Marin" <marin.faure@boeing.com> > > And...the valves on a 120 Lehman require adjustment periodically. Here > the operator's manual and the opinion of experienced mechanics can > differ. I believe the manual wants the valves adjusted every 200 hours, > or perhaps it's 500 hours. But I recall Bob telling me that the valves > shouldn't need to be adjusted but every 2,000 hours (don't quote me on > that, I may be mis-remembering his figure, so check with him).
JT
John Tegtmeyer
Sat, Mar 13, 2004 2:57 PM

Ron et al,

As a former owner of a KK42, let me throw in my 2 cents.  Firstly, without
a significant current boost, a KK42 will never see 10 kts.  The hull speed
is around 8.6 kts and even at that speed the stern is squatting.  While the
KK42 hull does provide good form stabilization, this is not dependent on
going as fast as you can.  We were always comfortable in ours, even without
stabilizers, unless some unthinking cowboys blew past us too close and/or
too fast.

On the Ford Lehman engine - given that there are thousands of these engines
pushing trawlers all over the world, I think that you will find that most
owners feel that they have a die hard, true friend powering away down in
the engine room.  These things run forever with just basic care.  Add to
that the excellent support provided by American Diesel and you have a
package that allows you to cruise world wide with confidence.

John Tegtmeyer

At 09:53 PM 3/12/2004 -0500, you wrote:

Marin,

Thank you for your insights. This is a one owner boat up the Severn River
from me so I am assuming that the hours are real and something bad happened.

More importantly, thank you for changing my perspective on the Ford Lehman
engine. I saw one outside a boat and was amazed how big it was. I made the
gross assumption that this was a rough, tough engine with low maintenance
requirements. Now I know there are important maintenance items that must be
catered to. I also think that this vessel and a friend's Kadey Krogen 42
were often run at close to full throttle. My friend was always trying to get
her KK42 up to 10 knots! Mr. Smith had told her that no new propeller was
going to help her achieve that. The other vessel had a long run up the river
to get home and was always getting badly rolled by passing power boats. He
seemed to be going as fast as he could.

So ask a simple question and get a real education. Thank you Marin and thank
you List!

Ron Rogers


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawler-world-list

To Unsubscribe send email to trawler-world-list-request@lists.samurai.com
Include the word "Unsubscribe" (and nothing else) in the subject or body
of the message.

Ron et al, As a former owner of a KK42, let me throw in my 2 cents. Firstly, without a significant current boost, a KK42 will never see 10 kts. The hull speed is around 8.6 kts and even at that speed the stern is squatting. While the KK42 hull does provide good form stabilization, this is not dependent on going as fast as you can. We were always comfortable in ours, even without stabilizers, unless some unthinking cowboys blew past us too close and/or too fast. On the Ford Lehman engine - given that there are thousands of these engines pushing trawlers all over the world, I think that you will find that most owners feel that they have a die hard, true friend powering away down in the engine room. These things run forever with just basic care. Add to that the excellent support provided by American Diesel and you have a package that allows you to cruise world wide with confidence. John Tegtmeyer At 09:53 PM 3/12/2004 -0500, you wrote: >Marin, > >Thank you for your insights. This is a one owner boat up the Severn River >from me so I am assuming that the hours are real and something bad happened. > >More importantly, thank you for changing my perspective on the Ford Lehman >engine. I saw one outside a boat and was amazed how big it was. I made the >gross assumption that this was a rough, tough engine with low maintenance >requirements. Now I know there are important maintenance items that must be >catered to. I also think that this vessel and a friend's Kadey Krogen 42 >were often run at close to full throttle. My friend was always trying to get >her KK42 up to 10 knots! Mr. Smith had told her that no new propeller was >going to help her achieve that. The other vessel had a long run up the river >to get home and was always getting badly rolled by passing power boats. He >seemed to be going as fast as he could. > >So ask a simple question and get a real education. Thank you Marin and thank >you List! > >Ron Rogers >_______________________________________________ >http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawler-world-list > >To Unsubscribe send email to trawler-world-list-request@lists.samurai.com >Include the word "Unsubscribe" (and nothing else) in the subject or body >of the message.
MM
Mike Maurice
Sat, Mar 13, 2004 4:35 PM

John Tegtmeyer jet2@principia.edu
At 09:57 AM 3/13/04 -0500, you wrote:

As a former owner of a KK42, let me throw in my 2 cents.  Firstly, without
a significant current boost, a KK42 will never see 10

Another 2 cents.
The Non Turbo Lehman is pretty reliable. The comments posted by others are
pretty right in that the engines require a fair amount of maintenance. I
might add that the raw water pumps are prone to bearing failure. Carry a
spare pump, not just the impeller.

The one major source of serious damage to these engines has not been
mentioned. There is a petcock at the front end of the engine, located over
the exhaust manifold. This is located at the high end of the engine and is
intended for bleeding. I think the air bleeding has been mentioned. What
has not been mentioned is that the bleeding is intended to prevent an air
bubble from forming behind the last cylinder, number 6. If you leave air
there it will create a hot spot. In itself this may or may not cause any
damage, but if you overheat the engine generally while there is a air
pocket behind number 6, you will almost certainly damage the head and
block. The damage may not be apparent at the time. But, the head will most
likely be warped and pretty soon you will be headed for a major rebuild.

It only takes ONE single instance of this and the cost to repair is on the
order of thousands of dollars.

Mike

Capt. Mike Maurice
Wilsonville, Oregon (Portland).

John Tegtmeyer <jet2@principia.edu> At 09:57 AM 3/13/04 -0500, you wrote: >As a former owner of a KK42, let me throw in my 2 cents. Firstly, without >a significant current boost, a KK42 will never see 10 Another 2 cents. The Non Turbo Lehman is pretty reliable. The comments posted by others are pretty right in that the engines require a fair amount of maintenance. I might add that the raw water pumps are prone to bearing failure. Carry a spare pump, not just the impeller. The one major source of serious damage to these engines has not been mentioned. There is a petcock at the front end of the engine, located over the exhaust manifold. This is located at the high end of the engine and is intended for bleeding. I think the air bleeding has been mentioned. What has not been mentioned is that the bleeding is intended to prevent an air bubble from forming behind the last cylinder, number 6. If you leave air there it will create a hot spot. In itself this may or may not cause any damage, but if you overheat the engine generally while there is a air pocket behind number 6, you will almost certainly damage the head and block. The damage may not be apparent at the time. But, the head will most likely be warped and pretty soon you will be headed for a major rebuild. It only takes ONE single instance of this and the cost to repair is on the order of thousands of dollars. Mike > Capt. Mike Maurice Wilsonville, Oregon (Portland).