Hi, could anybody advise if rfnoc-devel branch is regularly synchronized to maint branch? In my case I use rfnoc-devel branch because I want to develop custom RFNoC blocks. From the other hand I need fixes for X310 device I use which are published in maint branch. Should I continue to use rfnoc-devel and apply necessary maint fixes by hand or it is better to switch to maint branch and try to move necessary RFNoC blocks to maint? And which version of FPGA sources should I use? thanks, Dmitry

Hi Dmitry, RFNoC is supported fully only on top of the rfnoc-devel branch, so that is the branch you'd want to use for any custom development. We will merge fixes from master into rfnoc-devel really soon, but if you are having issues that are already solved in maint of master, I believe cherry-picking them into rfnoc-devel might be the easiest before the official merge. Regards, - Nicolas On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > Hi, > > could anybody advise if rfnoc-devel branch is regularly synchronized to > maint branch? > > In my case I use rfnoc-devel branch because I want to develop custom RFNoC > blocks. From the other hand I need fixes for X310 device I use which are > published in maint branch. Should I continue to use rfnoc-devel and apply > necessary maint fixes by hand or it is better to switch to maint branch and > try to move necessary RFNoC blocks to maint? And which version of FPGA > sources should I use? > > thanks, > Dmitry > > _______________________________________________ > USRP-users mailing list > USRP-users@lists.ettus.com > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com > >

Thanks Nicolas, now it is clear. 2018-02-26 12:17 GMT+03:00 Nicolas Cuervo <nicolas.cuervo@ettus.com>: > Hi Dmitry, > > RFNoC is supported fully only on top of the rfnoc-devel branch, so that is > the branch you'd want to use for any custom development. We will merge > fixes from master into rfnoc-devel really soon, but if you are having > issues that are already solved in maint of master, I believe cherry-picking > them into rfnoc-devel might be the easiest before the official merge. > > Regards, > - Nicolas > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Дмитрий Михайличенко via USRP-users < > usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> could anybody advise if rfnoc-devel branch is regularly synchronized to >> maint branch? >> >> In my case I use rfnoc-devel branch because I want to develop custom >> RFNoC blocks. From the other hand I need fixes for X310 device I use which >> are published in maint branch. Should I continue to use rfnoc-devel and >> apply necessary maint fixes by hand or it is better to switch to maint >> branch and try to move necessary RFNoC blocks to maint? And which version >> of FPGA sources should I use? >> >> thanks, >> Dmitry >> >> _______________________________________________ >> USRP-users mailing list >> USRP-users@lists.ettus.com >> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com >> >> >