passagemaking@lists.trawlering.com

Passagemaking Under Power List

View all threads

PPM - An idea for how to restructure the topic

KW
Ken Williams
Thu, Nov 13, 2008 3:27 AM

As many people have said, there is no such thing as a Perfect Passagemaker.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Everyone has different budgets,
cruising plans, and comfort needs. No one boat can be perfect for everyone.

That said, here's a thought for the group. Could we swap the topic to
"Things to think about when buying a Passagemaker?".

Hardly a week goes by that I am not contacted by someone who is putting
together a boat order, and asking my advice in selecting equipment for their
boat. I tend to have lots of opinions, and certainly share them, but suspect
there is a better way to do this, than for new boat buyers to contact each
of us, and solicit our opinions one by one. Worst yet, most don't know
anyone to ask questions of (other than their salesman, which can have mixed
results), and don't know what questions to ask.  I suspect many of you get
these same queries. Perhaps it is possible to pool our thinking and come out
with a simple list (or book) we could email to people that gives them lots
to think about (and, hopefully doesn't frighten them).

Specifically, I'm suggesting that to the extent we want to continue this
discussion, and convert it to something that might have some real merit, we
consider changing the goal for the discussion. I am suggesting we break a
passagemaker into its component systems, and then think about the kinds of
decisions that someone should be thinking about as they  pick out the
systems for their boat, OR, as they do a refit of their boats. My thought is
that there are lots and lots of options and upgrades that are never
considered because people weren't smart enough to ask the questions.

If we were to do this, I'd say that a basic ground rule should be that there
are no wrong answers. Virtually any device or option has a place in the
market. One device might be better suited to someone on a tight budget than
another. Different devices (decisions) have pros and cons. An option that
makes no sense on a million dollar boat that will rarely leave the dock,
might be a "must have" on a half million dollar boat that will be
circumnavigating. For instance, I would argue, with respect to
stabilization, that active stabilizers, paravanes, anti-roll tanks, and the
complete absence of stabilizers, are ALL valid options. Which is "the" best
solution for a particular buyer depends on the buyer, and what they plan to
do with the boat. As a group, we can probably outline what the options are,
and what the criteria are that someone might want to think about as they
choose "their perfect passagemaker."

I was thinking we could slice the pie something like:

Hull

  •      Material
    
  •      Type of hull (semi-displacement, displacement)
    
  •      Aft pilot house, forward pilothouse
    
  •      Narrow beam, wide beam
    
  •      Etc
    

Propulsion

  •      Twins vs singles
    
  •      Get home options
    
  •      Props (normal, feathering, hundestat)
    
  •      Transmissions (normal, v-drives)
    
  •      Etc
    

Interior

  •      Sound proofing
    
  •      Layout
    

Electronics

  •      Options for internet (vsat, bgan, wifi, cellular, ocens, ssb,
    

etc)

  •      Nav systems
    
  •      Auto pilots
    
  •      Radars
    
  •      Sonar
    
  •      Monitoring Systems
    

Watermakers

Electrical Systems

  •      Shore power converters
    
  •      Isolation transformers
    
  •      Step up/down transformers
    
  •      Grounding
    
  •      Shore power cables
    
  •      International power
    
  •      Generators
    

Ground Tackle

  •      Anchoring
    

Tenders

Misc

  •      Licensing
    
  •      Taxes
    
  •      Davits
    
  •      Fuel (polishing systems, bladders, ???)
    
  •      Security systems
    

I only had a few minutes to think about this list, but suspect the group
could easily double it in size, and that each of us has good information
about each of these categories, and what the right option is at different
budgets, and cruising plans.

Were we to work this list in a organized manner, one system at a time,  I
suspect we would come out with something that would teach all of us a great
deal (via learning from others), plus be of tremendous benefit to newbies,
and even ourselves as we think about refitting our boats.

-Ken Williams

http://www.kensblog.com www.kensblog.com

Sans Souci, Nordhavn 68

As many people have said, there is no such thing as a Perfect Passagemaker. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Everyone has different budgets, cruising plans, and comfort needs. No one boat can be perfect for everyone. That said, here's a thought for the group. Could we swap the topic to "Things to think about when buying a Passagemaker?". Hardly a week goes by that I am not contacted by someone who is putting together a boat order, and asking my advice in selecting equipment for their boat. I tend to have lots of opinions, and certainly share them, but suspect there is a better way to do this, than for new boat buyers to contact each of us, and solicit our opinions one by one. Worst yet, most don't know anyone to ask questions of (other than their salesman, which can have mixed results), and don't know what questions to ask. I suspect many of you get these same queries. Perhaps it is possible to pool our thinking and come out with a simple list (or book) we could email to people that gives them lots to think about (and, hopefully doesn't frighten them). Specifically, I'm suggesting that to the extent we want to continue this discussion, and convert it to something that might have some real merit, we consider changing the goal for the discussion. I am suggesting we break a passagemaker into its component systems, and then think about the kinds of decisions that someone should be thinking about as they pick out the systems for their boat, OR, as they do a refit of their boats. My thought is that there are lots and lots of options and upgrades that are never considered because people weren't smart enough to ask the questions. If we were to do this, I'd say that a basic ground rule should be that there are no wrong answers. Virtually any device or option has a place in the market. One device might be better suited to someone on a tight budget than another. Different devices (decisions) have pros and cons. An option that makes no sense on a million dollar boat that will rarely leave the dock, might be a "must have" on a half million dollar boat that will be circumnavigating. For instance, I would argue, with respect to stabilization, that active stabilizers, paravanes, anti-roll tanks, and the complete absence of stabilizers, are ALL valid options. Which is "the" best solution for a particular buyer depends on the buyer, and what they plan to do with the boat. As a group, we can probably outline what the options are, and what the criteria are that someone might want to think about as they choose "their perfect passagemaker." I was thinking we could slice the pie something like: Hull - Material - Type of hull (semi-displacement, displacement) - Aft pilot house, forward pilothouse - Narrow beam, wide beam - Etc Propulsion - Twins vs singles - Get home options - Props (normal, feathering, hundestat) - Transmissions (normal, v-drives) - Etc Interior - Sound proofing - Layout Electronics - Options for internet (vsat, bgan, wifi, cellular, ocens, ssb, etc) - Nav systems - Auto pilots - Radars - Sonar - Monitoring Systems Watermakers Electrical Systems - Shore power converters - Isolation transformers - Step up/down transformers - Grounding - Shore power cables - International power - Generators Ground Tackle - Anchoring Tenders Misc - Licensing - Taxes - Davits - Fuel (polishing systems, bladders, ???) - Security systems I only had a few minutes to think about this list, but suspect the group could easily double it in size, and that each of us has good information about each of these categories, and what the right option is at different budgets, and cruising plans. Were we to work this list in a organized manner, one system at a time, I suspect we would come out with something that would teach all of us a great deal (via learning from others), plus be of tremendous benefit to newbies, and even ourselves as we think about refitting our boats. -Ken Williams <http://www.kensblog.com> www.kensblog.com Sans Souci, Nordhavn 68
M
Mark
Thu, Nov 13, 2008 4:33 AM

One possible vehicle for Ken's suggestion would be a Wiki. It is more topic oriented than discussion oriented.  It allows for editing, history, linking, etc.  There is no reason why these articles could not go directly to Wikipedia itself, or they could start off in draft form on the list or a independent wiki.  I don't follow any boating wikis, but a quick search only turned up

http://www.wikicruising.com
http://captainwiki.com

But they seem to be more destination oriented than equipment oriented. I have no idea how popular they are.

There are lots of sites out there that will let you set up a wiki for free, similar to yahoo/google pages, groups, etc.

Just a thought.....

--- On Wed, 11/12/08, Ken Williams kenw@talkspot.com wrote:

Hardly a week goes by that I am not contacted by someone
who is putting
together a boat order, and asking my advice in selecting
equipment for their

One possible vehicle for Ken's suggestion would be a Wiki. It is more topic oriented than discussion oriented. It allows for editing, history, linking, etc. There is no reason why these articles could not go directly to Wikipedia itself, or they could start off in draft form on the list or a independent wiki. I don't follow any boating wikis, but a quick search only turned up http://www.wikicruising.com http://captainwiki.com But they seem to be more destination oriented than equipment oriented. I have no idea how popular they are. There are lots of sites out there that will let you set up a wiki for free, similar to yahoo/google pages, groups, etc. Just a thought..... --- On Wed, 11/12/08, Ken Williams <kenw@talkspot.com> wrote: > Hardly a week goes by that I am not contacted by someone > who is putting > together a boat order, and asking my advice in selecting > equipment for their
RA
Ross Anderson
Thu, Nov 13, 2008 1:13 PM

I agree on changing focus to systems and construction, especially for
those that are "First timers" or moving from coastal to offshore and
passaging. As I have said before as a previous owner of Seahorse, a
53' Skookum (Great sea kindly boat in tough conditions) to our new
custom built 47+2 Duck I don't believe there is a perfect design that
fits all conditions. Since most reading this blog will buy used in a
various stages of condition and I imagine in the 300 to 750K price
range a discussion on retrofitting I think would be a good topic. I
know after both retro-fitting and building new that improvements and
up-grades are done almost annually. In addition, the relative
longevity of systems being considered before major and costly repairs
from our personal experiences might also help those who are thinking
of new or used. God Bless - Ross - 10&2

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Ken Williams kenw@talkspot.com wrote:

As many people have said, there is no such thing as a Perfect Passagemaker.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Everyone has different budgets,
cruising plans, and comfort needs. No one boat can be perfect for everyone.

That said, here's a thought for the group. Could we swap the topic to
"Things to think about when buying a Passagemaker?".

Hardly a week goes by that I am not contacted by someone who is putting
together a boat order, and asking my advice in selecting equipment for their
boat. I tend to have lots of opinions, and certainly share them, but suspect
there is a better way to do this, than for new boat buyers to contact each
of us, and solicit our opinions one by one. Worst yet, most don't know
anyone to ask questions of (other than their salesman, which can have mixed
results), and don't know what questions to ask.  I suspect many of you get
these same queries. Perhaps it is possible to pool our thinking and come out
with a simple list (or book) we could email to people that gives them lots
to think about (and, hopefully doesn't frighten them).

Specifically, I'm suggesting that to the extent we want to continue this
discussion, and convert it to something that might have some real merit, we
consider changing the goal for the discussion. I am suggesting we break a
passagemaker into its component systems, and then think about the kinds of
decisions that someone should be thinking about as they  pick out the
systems for their boat, OR, as they do a refit of their boats. My thought is
that there are lots and lots of options and upgrades that are never
considered because people weren't smart enough to ask the questions.

If we were to do this, I'd say that a basic ground rule should be that there
are no wrong answers. Virtually any device or option has a place in the
market. One device might be better suited to someone on a tight budget than
another. Different devices (decisions) have pros and cons. An option that
makes no sense on a million dollar boat that will rarely leave the dock,
might be a "must have" on a half million dollar boat that will be
circumnavigating. For instance, I would argue, with respect to
stabilization, that active stabilizers, paravanes, anti-roll tanks, and the
complete absence of stabilizers, are ALL valid options. Which is "the" best
solution for a particular buyer depends on the buyer, and what they plan to
do with the boat. As a group, we can probably outline what the options are,
and what the criteria are that someone might want to think about as they
choose "their perfect passagemaker."

I was thinking we could slice the pie something like:

Hull

  •      Material
    
  •      Type of hull (semi-displacement, displacement)
    
  •      Aft pilot house, forward pilothouse
    
  •      Narrow beam, wide beam
    
  •      Etc
    

Propulsion

  •      Twins vs singles
    
  •      Get home options
    
  •      Props (normal, feathering, hundestat)
    
  •      Transmissions (normal, v-drives)
    
  •      Etc
    

Interior

  •      Sound proofing
    
  •      Layout
    

Electronics

  •      Options for internet (vsat, bgan, wifi, cellular, ocens, ssb,
    

etc)

  •      Nav systems
    
  •      Auto pilots
    
  •      Radars
    
  •      Sonar
    
  •      Monitoring Systems
    

Watermakers

Electrical Systems

  •      Shore power converters
    
  •      Isolation transformers
    
  •      Step up/down transformers
    
  •      Grounding
    
  •      Shore power cables
    
  •      International power
    
  •      Generators
    

Ground Tackle

  •      Anchoring
    

Tenders

Misc

  •      Licensing
    
  •      Taxes
    
  •      Davits
    
  •      Fuel (polishing systems, bladders, ???)
    
  •      Security systems
    

I only had a few minutes to think about this list, but suspect the group
could easily double it in size, and that each of us has good information
about each of these categories, and what the right option is at different
budgets, and cruising plans.

Were we to work this list in a organized manner, one system at a time,  I
suspect we would come out with something that would teach all of us a great
deal (via learning from others), plus be of tremendous benefit to newbies,
and even ourselves as we think about refitting our boats.

-Ken Williams

http://www.kensblog.com www.kensblog.com

Sans Souci, Nordhavn 68


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power

To unsubscribe send email to
passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.

Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are trademarks of Water World Productions, formerly known as Trawler World Productions.

I agree on changing focus to systems and construction, especially for those that are "First timers" or moving from coastal to offshore and passaging. As I have said before as a previous owner of Seahorse, a 53' Skookum (Great sea kindly boat in tough conditions) to our new custom built 47+2 Duck I don't believe there is a perfect design that fits all conditions. Since most reading this blog will buy used in a various stages of condition and I imagine in the 300 to 750K price range a discussion on retrofitting I think would be a good topic. I know after both retro-fitting and building new that improvements and up-grades are done almost annually. In addition, the relative longevity of systems being considered before major and costly repairs from our personal experiences might also help those who are thinking of new or used. God Bless - Ross - 10&2 On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Ken Williams <kenw@talkspot.com> wrote: > As many people have said, there is no such thing as a Perfect Passagemaker. > Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Everyone has different budgets, > cruising plans, and comfort needs. No one boat can be perfect for everyone. > > > > That said, here's a thought for the group. Could we swap the topic to > "Things to think about when buying a Passagemaker?". > > > > Hardly a week goes by that I am not contacted by someone who is putting > together a boat order, and asking my advice in selecting equipment for their > boat. I tend to have lots of opinions, and certainly share them, but suspect > there is a better way to do this, than for new boat buyers to contact each > of us, and solicit our opinions one by one. Worst yet, most don't know > anyone to ask questions of (other than their salesman, which can have mixed > results), and don't know what questions to ask. I suspect many of you get > these same queries. Perhaps it is possible to pool our thinking and come out > with a simple list (or book) we could email to people that gives them lots > to think about (and, hopefully doesn't frighten them). > > > > Specifically, I'm suggesting that to the extent we want to continue this > discussion, and convert it to something that might have some real merit, we > consider changing the goal for the discussion. I am suggesting we break a > passagemaker into its component systems, and then think about the kinds of > decisions that someone should be thinking about as they pick out the > systems for their boat, OR, as they do a refit of their boats. My thought is > that there are lots and lots of options and upgrades that are never > considered because people weren't smart enough to ask the questions. > > > > If we were to do this, I'd say that a basic ground rule should be that there > are no wrong answers. Virtually any device or option has a place in the > market. One device might be better suited to someone on a tight budget than > another. Different devices (decisions) have pros and cons. An option that > makes no sense on a million dollar boat that will rarely leave the dock, > might be a "must have" on a half million dollar boat that will be > circumnavigating. For instance, I would argue, with respect to > stabilization, that active stabilizers, paravanes, anti-roll tanks, and the > complete absence of stabilizers, are ALL valid options. Which is "the" best > solution for a particular buyer depends on the buyer, and what they plan to > do with the boat. As a group, we can probably outline what the options are, > and what the criteria are that someone might want to think about as they > choose "their perfect passagemaker." > > > > I was thinking we could slice the pie something like: > > > > Hull > > - Material > > - Type of hull (semi-displacement, displacement) > > - Aft pilot house, forward pilothouse > > - Narrow beam, wide beam > > - Etc > > Propulsion > > - Twins vs singles > > - Get home options > > - Props (normal, feathering, hundestat) > > - Transmissions (normal, v-drives) > > - Etc > > Interior > > - Sound proofing > > - Layout > > Electronics > > - Options for internet (vsat, bgan, wifi, cellular, ocens, ssb, > etc) > > - Nav systems > > - Auto pilots > > - Radars > > - Sonar > > - Monitoring Systems > > Watermakers > > Electrical Systems > > - Shore power converters > > - Isolation transformers > > - Step up/down transformers > > - Grounding > > - Shore power cables > > - International power > > - Generators > > Ground Tackle > > - Anchoring > > Tenders > > Misc > > - Licensing > > - Taxes > > - Davits > > - Fuel (polishing systems, bladders, ???) > > - Security systems > > > > I only had a few minutes to think about this list, but suspect the group > could easily double it in size, and that each of us has good information > about each of these categories, and what the right option is at different > budgets, and cruising plans. > > > > Were we to work this list in a organized manner, one system at a time, I > suspect we would come out with something that would teach all of us a great > deal (via learning from others), plus be of tremendous benefit to newbies, > and even ourselves as we think about refitting our boats. > > > > -Ken Williams > > <http://www.kensblog.com> www.kensblog.com > > Sans Souci, Nordhavn 68 > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power > > To unsubscribe send email to > passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com with the word > UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message. > > Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are trademarks of Water World Productions, formerly known as Trawler World Productions.
JH
Jonathan Haas
Thu, Nov 13, 2008 5:17 PM

Friends:  OK, well, it was put up or shut up time for me.  I've volunteered to
set up a passagemaker wiki in the past, but have not followed through, mostly
due to sloth.  But, we have a very interesting thread going and lots of
interesting ideas.  So, I went ahead a set up a very basic Wiki for
passagemakers:  http://passagemaker.wikispaces.com

I confess that I stole the logo from Nordhavn's webpage, so I hope they don't
sue me for copyright infringement.  That of course is also open to change.

This is only a preliminary first draft, so please don't jump on me right away
for putting in or leaving out stuff.  The purpose of a wiki is to allow the
community to edit the information and I/we can invite anyone we want to be a
contributing member of this wiki.  Georgs K. has offered to support a wiki,
but I didn't want to commit him without his permission and agreement.  This is
my first effort at a wiki, and I know it still needs to be adjusted to make it
as user friendly as possible.  I am willing to serve as overall
editor/moderator (in case some of our wonderful members get up on the wrong
side of the bed and express their discontent in delightful and poetic - though
not always appropriate - language); however, the wiki is open to all and I
have no intention of editing content.

On a personal note, I am NOT an expert on trawlers or passagemakers.  I do not
own a boat, and have never owned a boat.  I have no stake in anything other
than a lively, informed  source of information on passagemakers.  There is a
selfish motive to my endeavors.  My wife, Winifred, and I will be buying a
passagemaker in the relatively near future and we would really appreciate
learning as much as we can from the collective expertise of the PUP group as a
whole.

All the best,

Jonathan Haas

--- On Thu, 11/13/08, Ross Anderson 10and2@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ross Anderson 10and2@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PUP] PPM - An idea for how to restructure the topic
To: kenw@talkspot.com, "Passagemaking Under Power List"
passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com
Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 7:13 AM

I agree on changing focus to systems and construction, especially for
those that are "First timers" or moving from coastal to offshore and
passaging. As I have said before as a previous owner of Seahorse, a
53' Skookum (Great sea kindly boat in tough conditions) to our new
custom built 47+2 Duck I don't believe there is a perfect design that
fits all conditions. Since most reading this blog will buy used in a
various stages of condition and I imagine in the 300 to 750K price
range a discussion on retrofitting I think would be a good topic. I
know after both retro-fitting and building new that improvements and
up-grades are done almost annually. In addition, the relative
longevity of systems being considered before major and costly repairs
from our personal experiences might also help those who are thinking
of new or used. God Bless - Ross - 10&2

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Ken Williams kenw@talkspot.com wrote:

As many people have said, there is no such thing as a Perfect

Passagemaker.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Everyone has different budgets,
cruising plans, and comfort needs. No one boat can be perfect for

everyone.

That said, here's a thought for the group. Could we swap the topic to
"Things to think about when buying a Passagemaker?".

Hardly a week goes by that I am not contacted by someone who is putting
together a boat order, and asking my advice in selecting equipment for

their

boat. I tend to have lots of opinions, and certainly share them, but

suspect

there is a better way to do this, than for new boat buyers to contact each
of us, and solicit our opinions one by one. Worst yet, most don't know
anyone to ask questions of (other than their salesman, which can have

mixed

results), and don't know what questions to ask.  I suspect many of you

get

these same queries. Perhaps it is possible to pool our thinking and come

out

with a simple list (or book) we could email to people that gives them lots
to think about (and, hopefully doesn't frighten them).

Specifically, I'm suggesting that to the extent we want to continue

this

discussion, and convert it to something that might have some real merit,

we

consider changing the goal for the discussion. I am suggesting we break a
passagemaker into its component systems, and then think about the kinds of
decisions that someone should be thinking about as they  pick out the
systems for their boat, OR, as they do a refit of their boats. My thought

is

that there are lots and lots of options and upgrades that are never
considered because people weren't smart enough to ask the questions.

If we were to do this, I'd say that a basic ground rule should be that

there

are no wrong answers. Virtually any device or option has a place in the
market. One device might be better suited to someone on a tight budget

than

another. Different devices (decisions) have pros and cons. An option that
makes no sense on a million dollar boat that will rarely leave the dock,
might be a "must have" on a half million dollar boat that will

be

circumnavigating. For instance, I would argue, with respect to
stabilization, that active stabilizers, paravanes, anti-roll tanks, and

the

complete absence of stabilizers, are ALL valid options. Which is

"the" best

solution for a particular buyer depends on the buyer, and what they plan

to

do with the boat. As a group, we can probably outline what the options

are,

and what the criteria are that someone might want to think about as they
choose "their perfect passagemaker."

I was thinking we could slice the pie something like:

Hull

  •      Material
    
  •      Type of hull (semi-displacement, displacement)
    
  •      Aft pilot house, forward pilothouse
    
  •      Narrow beam, wide beam
    
  •      Etc
    

Propulsion

  •      Twins vs singles
    
  •      Get home options
    
  •      Props (normal, feathering, hundestat)
    
  •      Transmissions (normal, v-drives)
    
  •      Etc
    

Interior

  •      Sound proofing
    
  •      Layout
    

Electronics

  •      Options for internet (vsat, bgan, wifi, cellular, ocens, ssb,
    

etc)

  •      Nav systems
    
  •      Auto pilots
    
  •      Radars
    
  •      Sonar
    
  •      Monitoring Systems
    

Watermakers

Electrical Systems

  •      Shore power converters
    
  •      Isolation transformers
    
  •      Step up/down transformers
    
  •      Grounding
    
  •      Shore power cables
    
  •      International power
    
  •      Generators
    

Ground Tackle

  •      Anchoring
    

Tenders

Misc

  •      Licensing
    
  •      Taxes
    
  •      Davits
    
  •      Fuel (polishing systems, bladders, ???)
    
  •      Security systems
    

I only had a few minutes to think about this list, but suspect the group
could easily double it in size, and that each of us has good information
about each of these categories, and what the right option is at different
budgets, and cruising plans.

Were we to work this list in a organized manner, one system at a time,  I
suspect we would come out with something that would teach all of us a

great

deal (via learning from others), plus be of tremendous benefit to newbies,
and even ourselves as we think about refitting our boats.

-Ken Williams

http://www.kensblog.com www.kensblog.com

Sans Souci, Nordhavn 68


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power

To unsubscribe send email to
passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.

Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are trademarks of Water World

Productions, formerly known as Trawler World Productions.


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power

To unsubscribe send email to
passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.

Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are trademarks of Water World Productions,
formerly known as Trawler World Productions.

Friends: OK, well, it was put up or shut up time for me. I've volunteered to set up a passagemaker wiki in the past, but have not followed through, mostly due to sloth. But, we have a very interesting thread going and lots of interesting ideas. So, I went ahead a set up a very basic Wiki for passagemakers: http://passagemaker.wikispaces.com I confess that I stole the logo from Nordhavn's webpage, so I hope they don't sue me for copyright infringement. That of course is also open to change. This is only a preliminary first draft, so please don't jump on me right away for putting in or leaving out stuff. The purpose of a wiki is to allow the community to edit the information and I/we can invite anyone we want to be a contributing member of this wiki. Georgs K. has offered to support a wiki, but I didn't want to commit him without his permission and agreement. This is my first effort at a wiki, and I know it still needs to be adjusted to make it as user friendly as possible. I am willing to serve as overall editor/moderator (in case some of our wonderful members get up on the wrong side of the bed and express their discontent in delightful and poetic - though not always appropriate - language); however, the wiki is open to all and I have no intention of editing content. On a personal note, I am NOT an expert on trawlers or passagemakers. I do not own a boat, and have never owned a boat. I have no stake in anything other than a lively, informed source of information on passagemakers. There is a selfish motive to my endeavors. My wife, Winifred, and I will be buying a passagemaker in the relatively near future and we would really appreciate learning as much as we can from the collective expertise of the PUP group as a whole. All the best, Jonathan Haas --- On Thu, 11/13/08, Ross Anderson <10and2@gmail.com> wrote: From: Ross Anderson <10and2@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PUP] PPM - An idea for how to restructure the topic To: kenw@talkspot.com, "Passagemaking Under Power List" <passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com> Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 7:13 AM I agree on changing focus to systems and construction, especially for those that are "First timers" or moving from coastal to offshore and passaging. As I have said before as a previous owner of Seahorse, a 53' Skookum (Great sea kindly boat in tough conditions) to our new custom built 47+2 Duck I don't believe there is a perfect design that fits all conditions. Since most reading this blog will buy used in a various stages of condition and I imagine in the 300 to 750K price range a discussion on retrofitting I think would be a good topic. I know after both retro-fitting and building new that improvements and up-grades are done almost annually. In addition, the relative longevity of systems being considered before major and costly repairs from our personal experiences might also help those who are thinking of new or used. God Bless - Ross - 10&2 On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Ken Williams <kenw@talkspot.com> wrote: > As many people have said, there is no such thing as a Perfect Passagemaker. > Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Everyone has different budgets, > cruising plans, and comfort needs. No one boat can be perfect for everyone. > > > > That said, here's a thought for the group. Could we swap the topic to > "Things to think about when buying a Passagemaker?". > > > > Hardly a week goes by that I am not contacted by someone who is putting > together a boat order, and asking my advice in selecting equipment for their > boat. I tend to have lots of opinions, and certainly share them, but suspect > there is a better way to do this, than for new boat buyers to contact each > of us, and solicit our opinions one by one. Worst yet, most don't know > anyone to ask questions of (other than their salesman, which can have mixed > results), and don't know what questions to ask. I suspect many of you get > these same queries. Perhaps it is possible to pool our thinking and come out > with a simple list (or book) we could email to people that gives them lots > to think about (and, hopefully doesn't frighten them). > > > > Specifically, I'm suggesting that to the extent we want to continue this > discussion, and convert it to something that might have some real merit, we > consider changing the goal for the discussion. I am suggesting we break a > passagemaker into its component systems, and then think about the kinds of > decisions that someone should be thinking about as they pick out the > systems for their boat, OR, as they do a refit of their boats. My thought is > that there are lots and lots of options and upgrades that are never > considered because people weren't smart enough to ask the questions. > > > > If we were to do this, I'd say that a basic ground rule should be that there > are no wrong answers. Virtually any device or option has a place in the > market. One device might be better suited to someone on a tight budget than > another. Different devices (decisions) have pros and cons. An option that > makes no sense on a million dollar boat that will rarely leave the dock, > might be a "must have" on a half million dollar boat that will be > circumnavigating. For instance, I would argue, with respect to > stabilization, that active stabilizers, paravanes, anti-roll tanks, and the > complete absence of stabilizers, are ALL valid options. Which is "the" best > solution for a particular buyer depends on the buyer, and what they plan to > do with the boat. As a group, we can probably outline what the options are, > and what the criteria are that someone might want to think about as they > choose "their perfect passagemaker." > > > > I was thinking we could slice the pie something like: > > > > Hull > > - Material > > - Type of hull (semi-displacement, displacement) > > - Aft pilot house, forward pilothouse > > - Narrow beam, wide beam > > - Etc > > Propulsion > > - Twins vs singles > > - Get home options > > - Props (normal, feathering, hundestat) > > - Transmissions (normal, v-drives) > > - Etc > > Interior > > - Sound proofing > > - Layout > > Electronics > > - Options for internet (vsat, bgan, wifi, cellular, ocens, ssb, > etc) > > - Nav systems > > - Auto pilots > > - Radars > > - Sonar > > - Monitoring Systems > > Watermakers > > Electrical Systems > > - Shore power converters > > - Isolation transformers > > - Step up/down transformers > > - Grounding > > - Shore power cables > > - International power > > - Generators > > Ground Tackle > > - Anchoring > > Tenders > > Misc > > - Licensing > > - Taxes > > - Davits > > - Fuel (polishing systems, bladders, ???) > > - Security systems > > > > I only had a few minutes to think about this list, but suspect the group > could easily double it in size, and that each of us has good information > about each of these categories, and what the right option is at different > budgets, and cruising plans. > > > > Were we to work this list in a organized manner, one system at a time, I > suspect we would come out with something that would teach all of us a great > deal (via learning from others), plus be of tremendous benefit to newbies, > and even ourselves as we think about refitting our boats. > > > > -Ken Williams > > <http://www.kensblog.com> www.kensblog.com > > Sans Souci, Nordhavn 68 > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power > > To unsubscribe send email to > passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com with the word > UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message. > > Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are trademarks of Water World Productions, formerly known as Trawler World Productions. _______________________________________________ http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power To unsubscribe send email to passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com with the word UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message. Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are trademarks of Water World Productions, formerly known as Trawler World Productions.
JH
John Harris
Thu, Nov 13, 2008 9:18 PM

Jonathan,

A great idea - it is easy to use and a great start.  I have added one
paragraph for starters.

John Harris

--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 5.6 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 451 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message

Jonathan, A great idea - it is easy to use and a great start. I have added one paragraph for starters. John Harris -- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter. We are a community of 5.6 million users fighting spam. SPAMfighter has removed 451 of my spam emails to date. Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len The Professional version does not have this message
JH
Jonathan Haas
Tue, Nov 18, 2008 2:47 AM

Friends:  The Passagemaker wiki is up and running and people are starting to
add information and comments.  For those who think this is a good idea, I
encourage you to take at look at the site:
http://passagemaker.wikispaces.com/
I'm adding everyone who requests membership, plus anyone can add information
to the pages.

Jonathan Haas

Friends: The Passagemaker wiki is up and running and people are starting to add information and comments. For those who think this is a good idea, I encourage you to take at look at the site: http://passagemaker.wikispaces.com/ I'm adding everyone who requests membership, plus anyone can add information to the pages. Jonathan Haas
DC
Douglas Cochrane
Wed, Nov 19, 2008 3:28 AM

Jonathan,

Thank you for this effort. I look forward to seeing the details filled in by
the more experienced amongst us.

Douglas Cochrane
Douglas_Cochrane@msn.com

You said, "Friends:  The Passagemaker wiki is up and running and people are
starting to
add information and comments.

Jonathan, Thank you for this effort. I look forward to seeing the details filled in by the more experienced amongst us. Douglas Cochrane Douglas_Cochrane@msn.com You said, "Friends: The Passagemaker wiki is up and running and people are starting to add information and comments.