time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

10 MHz DMTD

BC
Bob Camp
Thu, Jan 13, 2011 5:57 PM

Hi

We have headed off on the error multiplier thing and not addressed a
question that came up. Since that thread is a bit tangled, probably better
to split this off.

DMTD = dual mixer time difference.

You have two mixers, a local offset reference, and get two audio beat notes.
Both are processed to get the difference between them and to get the
contribution of the offset reference  oscillator to drop out. The nice thing
here is that you don't need a super duper reference, one that's just "in the
same league" as the standards being compared will do fine. Boards for the
DMTD are floating around the list. I'd guess that if there was enough
interest, we could get a buy going

Another thing mentioned was a simple beat note system. All that's involved
here is half of a DMTD board. If you have a "known best" local reference,
you simply mix it with the device you are looking at. That's a nice system
if you can offset the test unit, and are looking at ADEV. Not so useful for
setting a part on frequency, or for testing stuff that can not be offset.
The limitations of this approach are what got us the DMTD.

While a DMTD is normally looked at as an ADEV tester, it's very possible to
use one to set a device on frequency. The "error multiplication" can be
huge. A 1 Hz beat note system will give you 1x10^7. You would need two
computing counters (or similar PIC TIC stuff) to get the data into something
you could understand. Weather 5334 counters or PIC TIC's are cheaper,
depends on your scrounging skills.

Bob

Hi We have headed off on the error multiplier thing and not addressed a question that came up. Since that thread is a bit tangled, probably better to split this off. DMTD = dual mixer time difference. You have two mixers, a local offset reference, and get two audio beat notes. Both are processed to get the difference between them and to get the contribution of the offset reference oscillator to drop out. The nice thing here is that you don't need a super duper reference, one that's just "in the same league" as the standards being compared will do fine. Boards for the DMTD are floating around the list. I'd guess that if there was enough interest, we could get a buy going Another thing mentioned was a simple beat note system. All that's involved here is half of a DMTD board. If you have a "known best" local reference, you simply mix it with the device you are looking at. That's a nice system if you can offset the test unit, and are looking at ADEV. Not so useful for setting a part on frequency, or for testing stuff that can not be offset. The limitations of this approach are what got us the DMTD. While a DMTD is normally looked at as an ADEV tester, it's very possible to use one to set a device on frequency. The "error multiplication" can be huge. A 1 Hz beat note system will give you 1x10^7. You would need two computing counters (or similar PIC TIC stuff) to get the data into something you could understand. Weather 5334 counters or PIC TIC's are cheaper, depends on your scrounging skills. Bob