time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz

J
johncroos@aol.com
Wed, May 15, 2013 5:05 PM

Re: Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz

Richard -

I can think of several ways to do this, but "easy" depends upon your skill set and the equipment you have. Actually - none of these are easy!

I have done a lot of synthesizers and sources over the years and here are some thoughts; hopefully helpful.

  1. A straight class C multiplier chain. If you use push pull odd order multipleirs and push push doublers to cancel out the fundamentals, the inter stage filtering becomes easier. Requires discrete old-fashioned RF Design methods and perhaps a filter design program. X5 filter, X2, filter, X5, filter will do it, with low power bi-polars, but the filters have to be multi-pole to keep the spurs down.

  2. Use one of the modern phase lock loop chips with internal VCO from National, Analog Devices, and others. The down side is that most of these require an associated PIC or similar processor to load - even for one frequency. However for one with the required software skills this would most likely be the lowest cost and most straight forward approach.

  3. Cook up your own PLL with discrete pre-scaler, phase detector and loop amplifier. Easier than #1, harder than #2 except for the software advantaged.

  4. Mix down to IF PLL - eliminates the high speed counters but required a low output multiplier to create a reference line near 500 MHz. Complex.

Any of the PLL schemes will have fewer non-harmonic spurs and some makers web sites have tools to help with the design of the loop filter.

-73 john k6iql

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-request time-nuts-request@febo.com
To: time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Wed, May 15, 2013 12:00 pm
Subject: time-nuts Digest, Vol 106, Issue 72

Send time-nuts mailing list submissions to
time-nuts@febo.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
time-nuts-request@febo.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
time-nuts-owner@febo.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of time-nuts digest..."

Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz
    reference from one? (Richard Solomon)
  2. Re: A Time-Nut's Worst Nightmare (Tony Finch)
  3. Embarrassing stuff... (Burt I. Weiner)

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 08:16:59 -0700
From: Richard Solomon w1ksz@earthlink.net
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create
500 MHz reference from one?
Message-ID: 5193A6EB.60203@earthlink.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

There are a number of phase-locked oscillators over on the "evil empire"
that might do,
but if you need exactly 500 MHz, you might not find that one so easily.

I found one that had outputs of 72.5, 725 and 7,975 MHz that locks to my
GPSDO. Very
useful for checking Frequency Counters, Service Monitors and the like.

73, Dick, W1KSZ

On 5/15/2013 5:14 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:

15/05/2013 13:13

Is there any fairly easy way to multiply the output of a Thunderbolt to
have a 500MHz reference at about 4dBm? Thanks.


Message: 2
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 16:29:28 +0100
From: Tony Finch dot@dotat.at
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] A Time-Nut's Worst Nightmare
Message-ID:
alpine.LSU.2.00.1305151622280.19357@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Ed Palmer ed_palmer@sasktel.net wrote:

Part of me thinks it's cute, part of me wants to kill it.  :-)

https://www.tindie.com/products/akafugu/vetinari-clock

Amusing! Reminds me of the Chronophage:

http://www.johnctaylor.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Clock
http://fanf.livejournal.com/98545.html
http://fanf.livejournal.com/94043.html

Note that the Wikipedia article is incorrect when it says the clock is
entirely mechanical: the clock depends on a computerized regulator which
is responsible for stopping the spring from over-driving the pendulum, and
for the erratic ticking, and for keeping it in sync with MSF every five
minutes.

Tony.

f.anthony.n.finch  dot@dotat.at  http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first.
Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good,
occasionally poor at first.


Message: 3
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 08:54:45 -0700
From: "Burt I. Weiner" biwa@att.net
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Embarrassing stuff...
Message-ID: 384165.26368.bm@smtp106.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

David,

I'm sure it's nothing compared to what I did many years ago to my
Singer FM-10C Synthesizer.  You tell us your story and I'll tell you
mine.  You're among friends.  Every time my life flashes before my
eyes it's mostly embarrassing stuff.

Burt, K6OQK

From: David Hooke dhooke@gmail.com

Subject: Re: [time-nuts] three cornered comparison tools

Hi All,

I've managed to blow up the DAC output on my TBOLT; it now has about
0.5V 42kHz ripple on it. I think I know how I did this, but it's too
embarrassing to share in public.

Burt I. Weiner Associates
Broadcast Technical Services
Glendale, California  U.S.A.
biwa@att.net
www.biwa.cc
K6OQK



time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

End of time-nuts Digest, Vol 106, Issue 72


Re: Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz Richard - I can think of several ways to do this, but "easy" depends upon your skill set and the equipment you have. Actually - none of these are easy! I have done a lot of synthesizers and sources over the years and here are some thoughts; hopefully helpful. 1. A straight class C multiplier chain. If you use push pull odd order multipleirs and push push doublers to cancel out the fundamentals, the inter stage filtering becomes easier. Requires discrete old-fashioned RF Design methods and perhaps a filter design program. X5 filter, X2, filter, X5, filter will do it, with low power bi-polars, but the filters have to be multi-pole to keep the spurs down. 2. Use one of the modern phase lock loop chips with internal VCO from National, Analog Devices, and others. The down side is that most of these require an associated PIC or similar processor to load - even for one frequency. However for one with the required software skills this would most likely be the lowest cost and most straight forward approach. 3. Cook up your own PLL with discrete pre-scaler, phase detector and loop amplifier. Easier than #1, harder than #2 except for the software advantaged. 4. Mix down to IF PLL - eliminates the high speed counters but required a low output multiplier to create a reference line near 500 MHz. Complex. Any of the PLL schemes will have fewer non-harmonic spurs and some makers web sites have tools to help with the design of the loop filter. -73 john k6iql -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-request <time-nuts-request@febo.com> To: time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Wed, May 15, 2013 12:00 pm Subject: time-nuts Digest, Vol 106, Issue 72 Send time-nuts mailing list submissions to time-nuts@febo.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to time-nuts-request@febo.com You can reach the person managing the list at time-nuts-owner@febo.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of time-nuts digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz reference from one? (Richard Solomon) 2. Re: A Time-Nut's Worst Nightmare (Tony Finch) 3. Embarrassing stuff... (Burt I. Weiner) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 08:16:59 -0700 From: Richard Solomon <w1ksz@earthlink.net> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz reference from one? Message-ID: <5193A6EB.60203@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed There are a number of phase-locked oscillators over on the "evil empire" that might do, but if you need exactly 500 MHz, you might not find that one so easily. I found one that had outputs of 72.5, 725 and 7,975 MHz that locks to my GPSDO. Very useful for checking Frequency Counters, Service Monitors and the like. 73, Dick, W1KSZ On 5/15/2013 5:14 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > 15/05/2013 13:13 > > Is there any fairly easy way to multiply the output of a Thunderbolt to > have a 500MHz reference at about 4dBm? Thanks. > ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 16:29:28 +0100 From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] A Time-Nut's Worst Nightmare Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1305151622280.19357@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Ed Palmer <ed_palmer@sasktel.net> wrote: > Part of me thinks it's cute, part of me wants to kill it. :-) > > https://www.tindie.com/products/akafugu/vetinari-clock Amusing! Reminds me of the Chronophage: http://www.johnctaylor.com/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Clock http://fanf.livejournal.com/98545.html http://fanf.livejournal.com/94043.html Note that the Wikipedia article is incorrect when it says the clock is entirely mechanical: the clock depends on a computerized regulator which is responsible for stopping the spring from over-driving the pendulum, and for the erratic ticking, and for keeping it in sync with MSF every five minutes. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first. Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good, occasionally poor at first. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 08:54:45 -0700 From: "Burt I. Weiner" <biwa@att.net> To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] Embarrassing stuff... Message-ID: <384165.26368.bm@smtp106.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed David, I'm sure it's nothing compared to what I did many years ago to my Singer FM-10C Synthesizer. You tell us your story and I'll tell you mine. You're among friends. Every time my life flashes before my eyes it's mostly embarrassing stuff. Burt, K6OQK >From: David Hooke <dhooke@gmail.com> > >Subject: Re: [time-nuts] three cornered comparison tools > >Hi All, > >I've managed to blow up the DAC output on my TBOLT; it now has about >0.5V 42kHz ripple on it. I think I know how I did this, but it's too >embarrassing to share in public. Burt I. Weiner Associates Broadcast Technical Services Glendale, California U.S.A. biwa@att.net www.biwa.cc K6OQK ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts End of time-nuts Digest, Vol 106, Issue 72 ******************************************
CW
Chris Wilson
Wed, May 15, 2013 5:14 PM

Re: Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz

Richard -

I can think of several ways to do this, but "easy" depends upon
your skill set and the equipment you have. Actually - none of these are easy!

I have done a lot of synthesizers and sources over the years and
here are some thoughts; hopefully helpful.

  1. A straight class C multiplier chain. If you use push pull odd
    order multipleirs and push push doublers to cancel out the
    fundamentals, the inter stage filtering becomes easier. Requires
    discrete old-fashioned RF Design methods and perhaps a filter design
    program. X5 filter, X2, filter, X5, filter will do it, with low
    power bi-polars, but the filters have to be multi-pole to keep the spurs down.
  1. Use one of the modern phase lock loop chips with internal VCO
    from National, Analog Devices, and others. The down side is that
    most of these require an associated PIC or similar processor to load
  • even for one frequency. However for one with the required software
    skills this would most likely be the lowest cost and most straight forward approach.
  1. Cook up your own PLL with discrete pre-scaler, phase detector
    and loop amplifier. Easier than #1, harder than #2 except for the software advantaged.
  1. Mix down to IF PLL - eliminates the high speed counters but
    required a low output multiplier to create a reference line near 500 MHz. Complex.

Any of the PLL schemes will have fewer non-harmonic spurs and some
makers web sites have tools to help with the design of the loop filter.

-73 john k6iql

15/05/2013 18:12

My skill level is pretty low, so was hoping a fairly cheap
commercially made solution was possible? Thanks for the ideas so far
everyone, appreciated.

Will draft out a basic description of what I am attempting to do
later, should still be working :)

--
Best Regards,
Chris Wilson.

> Re: Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz > > Richard - > I can think of several ways to do this, but "easy" depends upon > your skill set and the equipment you have. Actually - none of these are easy! > I have done a lot of synthesizers and sources over the years and > here are some thoughts; hopefully helpful. > 1. A straight class C multiplier chain. If you use push pull odd > order multipleirs and push push doublers to cancel out the > fundamentals, the inter stage filtering becomes easier. Requires > discrete old-fashioned RF Design methods and perhaps a filter design > program. X5 filter, X2, filter, X5, filter will do it, with low > power bi-polars, but the filters have to be multi-pole to keep the spurs down. > 2. Use one of the modern phase lock loop chips with internal VCO > from National, Analog Devices, and others. The down side is that > most of these require an associated PIC or similar processor to load > - even for one frequency. However for one with the required software > skills this would most likely be the lowest cost and most straight forward approach. > 3. Cook up your own PLL with discrete pre-scaler, phase detector > and loop amplifier. Easier than #1, harder than #2 except for the software advantaged. > 4. Mix down to IF PLL - eliminates the high speed counters but > required a low output multiplier to create a reference line near 500 MHz. Complex. > Any of the PLL schemes will have fewer non-harmonic spurs and some > makers web sites have tools to help with the design of the loop filter. > -73 john k6iql 15/05/2013 18:12 My skill level is pretty low, so was hoping a fairly cheap commercially made solution was possible? Thanks for the ideas so far everyone, appreciated. Will draft out a basic description of what I am attempting to do later, should still be working :) -- Best Regards, Chris Wilson.
PS
paul swed
Wed, May 15, 2013 5:17 PM

Cheap commercial????
Expensive comercial yes. Lots of vendors who will take your money.
OK
We have more definition. Its Epay time go purchase a PTS synthesizer. I
picked them up non Epay for $100 or less. Very nice and its far less
expensive then buying new.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Chris Wilson chris@chriswilson.tv wrote:

Re: Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz

Richard -

I can think of several ways to do this, but "easy" depends upon
your skill set and the equipment you have. Actually - none of these are

easy!

I have done a lot of synthesizers and sources over the years and
here are some thoughts; hopefully helpful.

  1. A straight class C multiplier chain. If you use push pull odd
    order multipleirs and push push doublers to cancel out the
    fundamentals, the inter stage filtering becomes easier. Requires
    discrete old-fashioned RF Design methods and perhaps a filter design
    program. X5 filter, X2, filter, X5, filter will do it, with low
    power bi-polars, but the filters have to be multi-pole to keep the spurs

down.

  1. Use one of the modern phase lock loop chips with internal VCO
    from National, Analog Devices, and others. The down side is that
    most of these require an associated PIC or similar processor to load
  • even for one frequency. However for one with the required software
    skills this would most likely be the lowest cost and most straight

forward approach.

  1. Cook up your own PLL with discrete pre-scaler, phase detector
    and loop amplifier. Easier than #1, harder than #2 except for the

software advantaged.

  1. Mix down to IF PLL - eliminates the high speed counters but
    required a low output multiplier to create a reference line near 500

MHz. Complex.

Any of the PLL schemes will have fewer non-harmonic spurs and some
makers web sites have tools to help with the design of the loop filter.

-73 john k6iql

15/05/2013 18:12

My skill level is pretty low, so was hoping a fairly cheap
commercially made solution was possible? Thanks for the ideas so far
everyone, appreciated.

Will draft out a basic description of what I am attempting to do
later, should still be working :)

--
Best Regards,
Chris Wilson.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Cheap commercial???? Expensive comercial yes. Lots of vendors who will take your money. OK We have more definition. Its Epay time go purchase a PTS synthesizer. I picked them up non Epay for $100 or less. Very nice and its far less expensive then buying new. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@chriswilson.tv> wrote: > > > > Re: Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz > > > > Richard - > > > I can think of several ways to do this, but "easy" depends upon > > your skill set and the equipment you have. Actually - none of these are > easy! > > > I have done a lot of synthesizers and sources over the years and > > here are some thoughts; hopefully helpful. > > > 1. A straight class C multiplier chain. If you use push pull odd > > order multipleirs and push push doublers to cancel out the > > fundamentals, the inter stage filtering becomes easier. Requires > > discrete old-fashioned RF Design methods and perhaps a filter design > > program. X5 filter, X2, filter, X5, filter will do it, with low > > power bi-polars, but the filters have to be multi-pole to keep the spurs > down. > > > 2. Use one of the modern phase lock loop chips with internal VCO > > from National, Analog Devices, and others. The down side is that > > most of these require an associated PIC or similar processor to load > > - even for one frequency. However for one with the required software > > skills this would most likely be the lowest cost and most straight > forward approach. > > > 3. Cook up your own PLL with discrete pre-scaler, phase detector > > and loop amplifier. Easier than #1, harder than #2 except for the > software advantaged. > > > 4. Mix down to IF PLL - eliminates the high speed counters but > > required a low output multiplier to create a reference line near 500 > MHz. Complex. > > > Any of the PLL schemes will have fewer non-harmonic spurs and some > > makers web sites have tools to help with the design of the loop filter. > > > -73 john k6iql > > 15/05/2013 18:12 > > > My skill level is pretty low, so was hoping a fairly cheap > commercially made solution was possible? Thanks for the ideas so far > everyone, appreciated. > > > Will draft out a basic description of what I am attempting to do > later, should still be working :) > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Chris Wilson. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
CA
Chris Albertson
Wed, May 15, 2013 5:41 PM

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:05 AM, johncroos@aol.com wrote:

Re: Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz

  1. Use one of the modern phase lock loop chips with internal VCO from
    National, Analog Devices, and others. The down side is that most of these
    require an associated PIC or similar processor to load - even for one
    frequency. However for one with the required software skills this would
    most likely be the lowest cost and most straight forward approach.

Which chips to look at?  I've used a 4046 but it looks like there is
something better with a digital interface that works a higher frequency.
What is the easiest to use and with affordable prices.

BTW While working with a bare PIC requires some hard to acquire skills,
new uP platforms like Arduino make software easy for just about anyone.

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:05 AM, <johncroos@aol.com> wrote: > Re: Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz > > 2. Use one of the modern phase lock loop chips with internal VCO from > National, Analog Devices, and others. The down side is that most of these > require an associated PIC or similar processor to load - even for one > frequency. However for one with the required software skills this would > most likely be the lowest cost and most straight forward approach. > > Which chips to look at? I've used a 4046 but it looks like there is something better with a digital interface that works a higher frequency. What is the easiest to use and with affordable prices. BTW While working with a bare PIC requires some hard to acquire skills, new uP platforms like Arduino make software easy for just about anyone. -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California
DL
Don Latham
Wed, May 15, 2013 7:53 PM

I have a 500 MHz Hi-Q bandpass cavity. 15 pounds, silver plated brass.
All you need is a step recovery diode driven by the 10 MHz sq wave or
spikes, and a couple of amplifiers. Might have to keep it in a beer
cooler, but nothing's perfect :-)
Don

Chris Albertson

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:05 AM, johncroos@aol.com wrote:

Re: Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz

  1. Use one of the modern phase lock loop chips with internal VCO from
    National, Analog Devices, and others. The down side is that most of
    these
    require an associated PIC or similar processor to load - even for one
    frequency. However for one with the required software skills this
    would
    most likely be the lowest cost and most straight forward approach.

Which chips to look at?  I've used a 4046 but it looks like there is
something better with a digital interface that works a higher frequency.
What is the easiest to use and with affordable prices.

BTW While working with a bare PIC requires some hard to acquire

skills,
new uP platforms like Arduino make software easy for just about anyone.

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
"If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
Ghost in the Shell

Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com

I have a 500 MHz Hi-Q bandpass cavity. 15 pounds, silver plated brass. All you need is a step recovery diode driven by the 10 MHz sq wave or spikes, and a couple of amplifiers. Might have to keep it in a beer cooler, but nothing's perfect :-) Don Chris Albertson > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:05 AM, <johncroos@aol.com> wrote: > >> Re: Trimble Thunderbolt, any easy way to create 500 MHz >> >> 2. Use one of the modern phase lock loop chips with internal VCO from >> National, Analog Devices, and others. The down side is that most of >> these >> require an associated PIC or similar processor to load - even for one >> frequency. However for one with the required software skills this >> would >> most likely be the lowest cost and most straight forward approach. >> >> > Which chips to look at? I've used a 4046 but it looks like there is > something better with a digital interface that works a higher frequency. > What is the easiest to use and with affordable prices. > > BTW While working with a bare PIC requires some hard to acquire > skills, > new uP platforms like Arduino make software easy for just about anyone. > -- > > Chris Albertson > Redondo Beach, California > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- "Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind." De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century. "If you don't know what it is, don't poke it." Ghost in the Shell Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL Six Mile Systems LLP 17850 Six Mile Road POB 134 Huson, MT, 59846 VOX 406-626-4304 www.lightningforensics.com www.sixmilesystems.com