time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Time nuttery in space

TA
Thomas Abbott
Tue, Aug 20, 2024 7:00 AM

Unwrapped phase is in seconds.

I'm a happy user of the tinyPFA for my clock tinkering. I always use the
unwrapped phase USB output, logged to a file on a raspberry pi, then copied
away for analysis. No trouble logging like this for a week.
With USB logging the terminal must be open before you turn on logging,
otherwise some buffer fills up and the device freezes. Shutting down is the
reverse.

73, Thomas VE7TOA

On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 19:55, James Spottiswoode via time-nuts <
time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote:

Dear Brian,

As it turned out converting the nanoVNA to a tinyPFA was almost
effortless.  The only slight hiccup was installing UNIX utility for loading
the inlay correctly.  So I have recorded the noise floor of the system and
am starting to compare phase of OXCOs.

One question to the group: When you output wrapped phase (logged) from the
tinyPFA what are the Units?  Radians, degrees…?  Neither look right when I
unlog the numbers. This matters for me as I have written all my own code
(in R) for getting ADEV and MADEV and for logging the phase data.  As I
mentioned have a very bad relationship with Windows particularly when it
comes to using a cheap Windows 10 box for data logging.  I also want to log
the phase data continuously as control data and a machine which reboots
every few nights for updates is a PITA.  I have spent several hours
googling and modifying Windoze settings to no avail.  Basically it behaves
like a corporate machine which one can't control.  Off hobbyhorse :-)

73s James

On Aug 19, 2024, at 2:19 PM, Brian Flynn via time-nuts <

Dear James,

I am new to this list but have been taking an interest in accurate

frequency standards for my ham radio interests. I have just bought a Hugen
NanoVNA-H4 from Zeenko on Aliexpress, for conversion to a TinyPFA. I was
doing it on a Windoze system but the process went very smoothly for me. I
hope that was of use.  I followed the instructions on:

https://www.tinydevices.org/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=TinyPFA.FW

and all went well.

I have various linux systems around the place but have a fairly catholic

taste in operating systems but also understand your caution. ;-)

73s

Brian GM8BJF

On 18/08/2024 18:00, James Spottiswoode via time-nuts wrote:

Erik,

Many thanks indeed for your comments.  I note that in the last link you

sent:  https://www.tinydevices.org/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=TinyPFA.Examples the
instrument used is listed in the results is a tinyDMTD - is this the same
device as the tinyPFA?  I happen to already have a nanoVNA-H4 so it looks
like I can load the SW and convert it to a tinyPFA.  Are there any gotchas
in this process?  I try to maintain a Windows free zone here :-) but it
looks like dfu-util will run under BSD on a Mac which is my preferred OS.
This may a quick and cheap way to get a Dual Mixer Time Difference going
but I suspect that for publication purposes I’ll eventually have to get a
N210.

Many thanks - James

On Aug 16, 2024, at 10:36 PM, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts <

Jim,

For accurate phase comparison without much effort and cost you may

An example of the expected performance when connected to Timelab:

Some measurements use the name tinyDMTD instead of tinyPFA but its the

same device.

Here is are some examples measuring OCXO/DOCXO and Rb:

You can search this list for more info

Erik.

On 16-8-2024 23:00, James Spottiswoode via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Time-nuts Experts,

I’ve found the time-nuts archive to be incredibly useful over the

last year - thank you all!  I have an unusual question.

I’m interested in getting the lowest possible ADEV at tau’s ~< 1000s

and am not concerned about longer term drifts.  The protocol I’m using is
based on comparing phase or frequency between two 10 MHz frequency
standards a few meters apart in the lab.  Currently I am comparing a pair
of OSC5A2BO2 OXCOs using an Agilent 53230A running with a 1 sec gate time
and using the undocumented RCON command.  I am seeing a short term ADEV of
3e-11 at tau = 100s. I would like to get an order of magnitude or more
better than this if possible without breaking the bank!

From the research I’ve done it looks like high end OCXOs are the best

bet for lowest ADEV but many are designed for high acceleration
environments, which I do not need for static references. The best I’ve
found so far is the Connor-Winfield OH320-LA.  Does anyone here have a
better suggestion? Are double oven controlled oscillators a better way to
go?

For frequency or phase comparisons between the pair of OCXOs an SDR

looks like a better option than the 53230. This paper: "High-Precision
Measurement of Sine and Pulse Reference Signals using Software-Defined
Radio” which can be found here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.01438 states
in the abstract:  “… The measurement system is implemented and verified
using the Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP) N210 by Ettus Research
LLC. Applying standard 10MHz and 1PPS reference signals for testing, a
measurement precision (standard deviation) of 0.36ps and 16.6 ps is
obtained, respectively.”  This is considerably better than is achievable
with the 53230A.

So I have two asks:  Advice on the lowest ADEV OCXO for tau < 1000s

and your thoughts on the SDR based method described above for high
precision phase measurements.

With many thanks in advance,

James

James Spottiswoode  KG6SMH


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

James Spottiswoode
Applied Mathematics & Statistics
310-270-6220
James.spottiswoode@gmail.com
Zoom:


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

--
Brian Flynn, 22A Biggiesknowe, Peebles, EH45 8HS. +44 (0)7969668147


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

James Spottiswoode
Applied Mathematics & Statistics
310-270-6220
James.spottiswoode@gmail.com
Zoom:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/5657505742?pwd=d1hQUzR5SE8yMXo3ZUliRGwva2RvQT09


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Unwrapped phase is in seconds. I'm a happy user of the tinyPFA for my clock tinkering. I always use the unwrapped phase USB output, logged to a file on a raspberry pi, then copied away for analysis. No trouble logging like this for a week. With USB logging the terminal must be open before you turn on logging, otherwise some buffer fills up and the device freezes. Shutting down is the reverse. 73, Thomas VE7TOA On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 19:55, James Spottiswoode via time-nuts < time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > Dear Brian, > > As it turned out converting the nanoVNA to a tinyPFA was almost > effortless. The only slight hiccup was installing UNIX utility for loading > the inlay correctly. So I have recorded the noise floor of the system and > am starting to compare phase of OXCOs. > > One question to the group: When you output wrapped phase (logged) from the > tinyPFA what are the Units? Radians, degrees…? Neither look right when I > unlog the numbers. This matters for me as I have written all my own code > (in R) for getting ADEV and MADEV and for logging the phase data. As I > mentioned have a very bad relationship with Windows particularly when it > comes to using a cheap Windows 10 box for data logging. I also want to log > the phase data continuously as control data and a machine which reboots > every few nights for updates is a PITA. I have spent several hours > googling and modifying Windoze settings to no avail. Basically it behaves > like a corporate machine which one can't control. Off hobbyhorse :-) > > 73s James > > > On Aug 19, 2024, at 2:19 PM, Brian Flynn via time-nuts < > time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > > > > Dear James, > > > > I am new to this list but have been taking an interest in accurate > frequency standards for my ham radio interests. I have just bought a Hugen > NanoVNA-H4 from Zeenko on Aliexpress, for conversion to a TinyPFA. I was > doing it on a Windoze system but the process went very smoothly for me. I > hope that was of use. I followed the instructions on: > > > > https://www.tinydevices.org/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=TinyPFA.FW > > > > and all went well. > > > > I have various linux systems around the place but have a fairly catholic > taste in operating systems but also understand your caution. ;-) > > > > 73s > > > > Brian GM8BJF > > > > On 18/08/2024 18:00, James Spottiswoode via time-nuts wrote: > >> Erik, > >> > >> Many thanks indeed for your comments. I note that in the last link you > sent: https://www.tinydevices.org/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=TinyPFA.Examples the > instrument used is listed in the results is a tinyDMTD - is this the same > device as the tinyPFA? I happen to already have a nanoVNA-H4 so it looks > like I can load the SW and convert it to a tinyPFA. Are there any gotchas > in this process? I try to maintain a Windows free zone here :-) but it > looks like dfu-util will run under BSD on a Mac which is my preferred OS. > This may a quick and cheap way to get a Dual Mixer Time Difference going > but I suspect that for publication purposes I’ll eventually have to get a > N210. > >> > >> Many thanks - James > >> > >> > >>> On Aug 16, 2024, at 10:36 PM, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts < > time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Jim, > >>> > >>> For accurate phase comparison without much effort and cost you may > have a look at the tinyPFA : > https://www.tinydevices.org/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=TinyPFA.HomePage > >>> An example of the expected performance when connected to Timelab: > https://www.tinydevices.org/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=TinyPFA.TimeLab > >>> Some measurements use the name tinyDMTD instead of tinyPFA but its the > same device. > >>> Here is are some examples measuring OCXO/DOCXO and Rb: > https://www.tinydevices.org/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=TinyPFA.Examples > >>> You can search this list for more info > >>> > >>> Erik. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 16-8-2024 23:00, James Spottiswoode via time-nuts wrote: > >>>> Hi Time-nuts Experts, > >>>> > >>>> I’ve found the time-nuts archive to be incredibly useful over the > last year - thank you all! I have an unusual question. > >>>> > >>>> I’m interested in getting the lowest possible ADEV at tau’s ~< 1000s > and am not concerned about longer term drifts. The protocol I’m using is > based on comparing phase or frequency between two 10 MHz frequency > standards a few meters apart in the lab. Currently I am comparing a pair > of OSC5A2BO2 OXCOs using an Agilent 53230A running with a 1 sec gate time > and using the undocumented RCON command. I am seeing a short term ADEV of > 3e-11 at tau = 100s. I would like to get an order of magnitude or more > better than this if possible without breaking the bank! > >>>> > >>>> From the research I’ve done it looks like high end OCXOs are the best > bet for lowest ADEV but many are designed for high acceleration > environments, which I do not need for static references. The best I’ve > found so far is the Connor-Winfield OH320-LA. Does anyone here have a > better suggestion? Are double oven controlled oscillators a better way to > go? > >>>> > >>>> For frequency or phase comparisons between the pair of OCXOs an SDR > looks like a better option than the 53230. This paper: "High-Precision > Measurement of Sine and Pulse Reference Signals using Software-Defined > Radio” which can be found here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.01438 states > in the abstract: “… The measurement system is implemented and verified > using the Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP) N210 by Ettus Research > LLC. Applying standard 10MHz and 1PPS reference signals for testing, a > measurement precision (standard deviation) of 0.36ps and 16.6 ps is > obtained, respectively.” This is considerably better than is achievable > with the 53230A. > >>>> > >>>> So I have two asks: Advice on the lowest ADEV OCXO for tau < 1000s > and your thoughts on the SDR based method described above for high > precision phase measurements. > >>>> > >>>> With many thanks in advance, > >>>> > >>>> James > >>>> > >>>> James Spottiswoode KG6SMH > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > >>> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > >> James Spottiswoode > >> Applied Mathematics & Statistics > >> 310-270-6220 > >> James.spottiswoode@gmail.com > >> Zoom: > https://us06web.zoom.us/j/5657505742?pwd=d1hQUzR5SE8yMXo3ZUliRGwva2RvQT09 > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > > -- > > Brian Flynn, 22A Biggiesknowe, Peebles, EH45 8HS. +44 (0)7969668147 > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > > James Spottiswoode > Applied Mathematics & Statistics > 310-270-6220 > James.spottiswoode@gmail.com > Zoom: > https://us06web.zoom.us/j/5657505742?pwd=d1hQUzR5SE8yMXo3ZUliRGwva2RvQT09 > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com