JN
Jeremy Nichols
Wed, Sep 14, 2016 10:35 PM
I recently acquired a nice HP-105B, serial prefix 1240A, and like Perry
Sandeen (posted here 10 May 2016) was pleasantly surprised to find a
10811-type oscillator inside in place of the old blue oven. Well, the
oscillator isn't actually labelled "10811" but has a label "Serial No.
3010A62646 / Hewlett Packard / Made in U.S.A. / R11 147K." So, this is
essentially the same oscillator as Perry found in his 105B.
The oscillator works well although the meter reading for the 5 MHz
output is low, about 30 instead of the expected 80 (per the 105B manual
for the 1240A series). The measured output is also low, about 1 Volt
where 1.5 Volt is the expected minimum. Might this be due to the change
from the old 105 crystal oven to the 10811?
What is the received wisdom on replacement of the previously-removed
factory Ni-Cad pack? There are many small 12 Volt batteries available,
two of which would easily fit into the space available and some of which
might not even catch fire! Other options are an external battery+charger
or even a UPS on the AC line. Opinions?
Jeremy / N6WFO
I recently acquired a nice HP-105B, serial prefix 1240A, and like Perry
Sandeen (posted here 10 May 2016) was pleasantly surprised to find a
10811-type oscillator inside in place of the old blue oven. Well, the
oscillator isn't actually labelled "10811" but has a label "Serial No.
3010A62646 / Hewlett Packard / Made in U.S.A. / R11 147K." So, this is
essentially the same oscillator as Perry found in his 105B.
The oscillator works well although the meter reading for the 5 MHz
output is low, about 30 instead of the expected 80 (per the 105B manual
for the 1240A series). The measured output is also low, about 1 Volt
where 1.5 Volt is the expected minimum. Might this be due to the change
from the old 105 crystal oven to the 10811?
What is the received wisdom on replacement of the previously-removed
factory Ni-Cad pack? There are many small 12 Volt batteries available,
two of which would easily fit into the space available and some of which
might not even catch fire! Other options are an external battery+charger
or even a UPS on the AC line. Opinions?
Jeremy / N6WFO
BC
Brooke Clarke
Wed, Sep 14, 2016 11:45 PM
Hi Jeremy:
It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that has electronics since if it vents the acid will
etch the PCBs.
Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency Standard because the oven no longer worked.
http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no longer have a memory effect. They are also very
easy to charge, so why not just replace the old cells?
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke, N6GCE
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
The lesser of evils is still evil.
-------- Original Message --------
I recently acquired a nice HP-105B, serial prefix 1240A, and like Perry Sandeen (posted here 10 May 2016) was
pleasantly surprised to find a 10811-type oscillator inside in place of the old blue oven. Well, the oscillator isn't
actually labelled "10811" but has a label "Serial No. 3010A62646 / Hewlett Packard / Made in U.S.A. / R11 147K." So,
this is essentially the same oscillator as Perry found in his 105B.
The oscillator works well although the meter reading for the 5 MHz output is low, about 30 instead of the expected 80
(per the 105B manual for the 1240A series). The measured output is also low, about 1 Volt where 1.5 Volt is the
expected minimum. Might this be due to the change from the old 105 crystal oven to the 10811?
What is the received wisdom on replacement of the previously-removed factory Ni-Cad pack? There are many small 12 Volt
batteries available, two of which would easily fit into the space available and some of which might not even catch
fire! Other options are an external battery+charger or even a UPS on the AC line. Opinions?
Jeremy / N6WFO
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi Jeremy:
It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that has electronics since if it vents the acid will
etch the PCBs.
Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency Standard because the oven no longer worked.
http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no longer have a memory effect. They are also very
easy to charge, so why not just replace the old cells?
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke, N6GCE
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
The lesser of evils is still evil.
-------- Original Message --------
> I recently acquired a nice HP-105B, serial prefix 1240A, and like Perry Sandeen (posted here 10 May 2016) was
> pleasantly surprised to find a 10811-type oscillator inside in place of the old blue oven. Well, the oscillator isn't
> actually labelled "10811" but has a label "Serial No. 3010A62646 / Hewlett Packard / Made in U.S.A. / R11 147K." So,
> this is essentially the same oscillator as Perry found in his 105B.
>
> The oscillator works well although the meter reading for the 5 MHz output is low, about 30 instead of the expected 80
> (per the 105B manual for the 1240A series). The measured output is also low, about 1 Volt where 1.5 Volt is the
> expected minimum. Might this be due to the change from the old 105 crystal oven to the 10811?
>
> What is the received wisdom on replacement of the previously-removed factory Ni-Cad pack? There are many small 12 Volt
> batteries available, two of which would easily fit into the space available and some of which might not even catch
> fire! Other options are an external battery+charger or even a UPS on the AC line. Opinions?
>
> Jeremy / N6WFO
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
AP
Alexander Pummer
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 1:41 AM
Hi Brooke,
sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid,
they have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ]
as electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in
radios.
73
KJ6UHN
Alex
On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
Standard because the oven no longer worked.
http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so
why not just replace the old cells?
Hi Brooke,
sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid,
they have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ]
as electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in
radios.
73
KJ6UHN
Alex
On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
> Hi Jeremy:
>
> It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
> has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
> Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
> Standard because the oven no longer worked.
> http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
>
>
> Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
> longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so
> why not just replace the old cells?
>
BC
Brooke Clarke
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 2:08 AM
Hi Brooke,
sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid, they have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium
hydroxide for anglophone ] as electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in radios.
73
KJ6UHN
Alex
On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that has electronics since if it vents the acid
will etch the PCBs.
Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency Standard because the oven no longer worked.
http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no longer have a memory effect. They are also
very easy to charge, so why not just replace the old cells?
Hi Alex:
Yes, I'm recommending Ni-Cad but NOT any acid type.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
The lesser of evils is still evil.
-------- Original Message --------
> Hi Brooke,
>
> sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid, they have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium
> hydroxide for anglophone ] as electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in radios.
>
> 73
>
> KJ6UHN
>
> Alex
>
> On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
>> Hi Jeremy:
>>
>> It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that has electronics since if it vents the acid
>> will etch the PCBs.
>> Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency Standard because the oven no longer worked.
>> http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
>>
>>
>> Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no longer have a memory effect. They are also
>> very easy to charge, so why not just replace the old cells?
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
JN
Jeremy Nichols
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 2:19 AM
Thanks, Brooke, I'll price new Ni-Cads. I wasn't thinking of lead-acid (gel
cells) but rather lithium rechargeable, providing I can find a type that
won't catch fire and will work with the 105B'scircuits.
Jeremy
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:
Hi Brooke,
sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid, they
have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ] as
electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in radios.
73
KJ6UHN
Alex
On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
Standard because the oven no longer worked.
http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so why not
just replace the old cells?
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
Thanks, Brooke, I'll price new Ni-Cads. I wasn't thinking of lead-acid (gel
cells) but rather lithium rechargeable, providing I can find a type that
won't catch fire and will work with the 105B'scircuits.
Jeremy
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> wrote:
> Hi Alex:
>
> Yes, I'm recommending Ni-Cad but NOT any acid type.
>
> --
> Have Fun,
>
> Brooke Clarke
> http://www.PRC68.com
> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
> The lesser of evils is still evil.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>
>> Hi Brooke,
>>
>> sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid, they
>> have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ] as
>> electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in radios.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> KJ6UHN
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jeremy:
>>>
>>> It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
>>> has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
>>> Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
>>> Standard because the oven no longer worked.
>>> http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
>>> longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so why not
>>> just replace the old cells?
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
DG
David G. McGaw
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 5:02 AM
NiMH batteries are close the same voltage and charge the same as NiCd
and are more available and not toxic when disposing of them. They should
be a good replacement. Lithiums are very different in voltage and charging.
David N1HAC
On 9/14/16 10:19 PM, Jeremy Nichols wrote:
Thanks, Brooke, I'll price new Ni-Cads. I wasn't thinking of lead-acid (gel
cells) but rather lithium rechargeable, providing I can find a type that
won't catch fire and will work with the 105B'scircuits.
Jeremy
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:
Hi Brooke,
sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid, they
have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ] as
electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in radios.
73
KJ6UHN
Alex
On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
Standard because the oven no longer worked.
http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so why not
just replace the old cells?
NiMH batteries are close the same voltage and charge the same as NiCd
and are more available and not toxic when disposing of them. They should
be a good replacement. Lithiums are very different in voltage and charging.
David N1HAC
On 9/14/16 10:19 PM, Jeremy Nichols wrote:
> Thanks, Brooke, I'll price new Ni-Cads. I wasn't thinking of lead-acid (gel
> cells) but rather lithium rechargeable, providing I can find a type that
> won't catch fire and will work with the 105B'scircuits.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex:
>>
>> Yes, I'm recommending Ni-Cad but NOT any acid type.
>>
>> --
>> Have Fun,
>>
>> Brooke Clarke
>> http://www.PRC68.com
>> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
>> The lesser of evils is still evil.
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>>
>>> Hi Brooke,
>>>
>>> sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid, they
>>> have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ] as
>>> electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in radios.
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>> KJ6UHN
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jeremy:
>>>>
>>>> It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
>>>> has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
>>>> Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
>>>> Standard because the oven no longer worked.
>>>> http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
>>>> longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so why not
>>>> just replace the old cells?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>
BC
Brooke Clarke
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 4:59 PM
Hi Jeremy:
I'm currently having fun playing with various rechargeable battery related stuff which includes Li-Ion cells.
http://www.prc68.com/I/BatTst.shtml#Resistor
The cells come in three configurations:
- the raw flat top cell with optional tabs to allow easy soldering into a pack,
- cell plus positive button cap which includes a Positive Temperature Coefficient (PTC) fuse and an over pressure vent,
- fully protected, like 2, plus circuit that turns off the battery if charging and over voltage or loaded and under
voltage. On these you can feel a wire/ribbon running from positive to negative under the shrink wrap and they are
slightly longer.
These configurations are independent of the flavor of Li chemistry.
To go with any of the above you need a charger specific to the particular Li chemistry (the charging voltage is not the
same) and if a pack you also need a either cells like 3 above or a protection circuit for the pack. For optimum
performance in addition a tap between each virtual cell (made of of parallel cells) so that the charge can be balanced
and a charger that can do that. This is not easy, witness the current recall of the Galaxy Note 7s phones.
I would just use modern Ni-Cad cells mainly because of the ease of charging and maintaining them and use the existing
charging circuitry.
Li chemistry has advantages for portable equipment, but not so much for rack mounted equipment.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
The lesser of evils is still evil.
-------- Original Message --------
Thanks, Brooke, I'll price new Ni-Cads. I wasn't thinking of lead-acid (gel
cells) but rather lithium rechargeable, providing I can find a type that
won't catch fire and will work with the 105B'scircuits.
Jeremy
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:
Hi Brooke,
sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid, they
have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ] as
electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in radios.
73
KJ6UHN
Alex
On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
Standard because the oven no longer worked.
http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so why not
just replace the old cells?
Hi Jeremy:
I'm currently having fun playing with various rechargeable battery related stuff which includes Li-Ion cells.
http://www.prc68.com/I/BatTst.shtml#Resistor
The cells come in three configurations:
1. the raw flat top cell with optional tabs to allow easy soldering into a pack,
2. cell plus positive button cap which includes a Positive Temperature Coefficient (PTC) fuse and an over pressure vent,
3. fully protected, like 2, plus circuit that turns off the battery if charging and over voltage or loaded and under
voltage. On these you can feel a wire/ribbon running from positive to negative under the shrink wrap and they are
slightly longer.
These configurations are independent of the flavor of Li chemistry.
To go with any of the above you need a charger specific to the particular Li chemistry (the charging voltage is not the
same) and if a pack you also need a either cells like 3 above or a protection circuit for the pack. For optimum
performance in addition a tap between each virtual cell (made of of parallel cells) so that the charge can be balanced
and a charger that can do that. This is not easy, witness the current recall of the Galaxy Note 7s phones.
I would just use modern Ni-Cad cells mainly because of the ease of charging and maintaining them and use the existing
charging circuitry.
Li chemistry has advantages for portable equipment, but not so much for rack mounted equipment.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
The lesser of evils is still evil.
-------- Original Message --------
> Thanks, Brooke, I'll price new Ni-Cads. I wasn't thinking of lead-acid (gel
> cells) but rather lithium rechargeable, providing I can find a type that
> won't catch fire and will work with the 105B'scircuits.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex:
>>
>> Yes, I'm recommending Ni-Cad but NOT any acid type.
>>
>> --
>> Have Fun,
>>
>> Brooke Clarke
>> http://www.PRC68.com
>> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
>> The lesser of evils is still evil.
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>>
>>> Hi Brooke,
>>>
>>> sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid, they
>>> have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ] as
>>> electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in radios.
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>> KJ6UHN
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jeremy:
>>>>
>>>> It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
>>>> has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
>>>> Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
>>>> Standard because the oven no longer worked.
>>>> http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
>>>> longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so why not
>>>> just replace the old cells?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>
BC
Bob Camp
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 5:15 PM
Hi
A bigger question becomes:
Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone area. Powering
the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff is one obvious
answer.
The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is external to all
the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack. That way you have
a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch scattered about. Things like
lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option in an independent
battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest in something with real
smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the conversion to instrument
voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12, 24, or 48V and run with it.
My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become “don’t do it”. It makes
them a lot lighter weight !!!
Bob
On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
I'm currently having fun playing with various rechargeable battery related stuff which includes Li-Ion cells.
http://www.prc68.com/I/BatTst.shtml#Resistor
The cells come in three configurations:
- the raw flat top cell with optional tabs to allow easy soldering into a pack,
- cell plus positive button cap which includes a Positive Temperature Coefficient (PTC) fuse and an over pressure vent,
- fully protected, like 2, plus circuit that turns off the battery if charging and over voltage or loaded and under voltage. On these you can feel a wire/ribbon running from positive to negative under the shrink wrap and they are slightly longer.
These configurations are independent of the flavor of Li chemistry.
To go with any of the above you need a charger specific to the particular Li chemistry (the charging voltage is not the same) and if a pack you also need a either cells like 3 above or a protection circuit for the pack. For optimum performance in addition a tap between each virtual cell (made of of parallel cells) so that the charge can be balanced and a charger that can do that. This is not easy, witness the current recall of the Galaxy Note 7s phones.
I would just use modern Ni-Cad cells mainly because of the ease of charging and maintaining them and use the existing charging circuitry.
Li chemistry has advantages for portable equipment, but not so much for rack mounted equipment.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
The lesser of evils is still evil.
-------- Original Message --------
Thanks, Brooke, I'll price new Ni-Cads. I wasn't thinking of lead-acid (gel
cells) but rather lithium rechargeable, providing I can find a type that
won't catch fire and will work with the 105B'scircuits.
Jeremy
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:
Hi Brooke,
sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid, they
have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ] as
electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in radios.
73
KJ6UHN
Alex
On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
Standard because the oven no longer worked.
http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so why not
just replace the old cells?
Hi
A bigger question becomes:
Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone area. Powering
the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff is one obvious
answer.
The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is external to all
the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack. That way you have
a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch scattered about. Things like
lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option in an independent
battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest in something with real
smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the conversion to instrument
voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12, 24, or 48V and run with it.
My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become “don’t do it”. It makes
them a *lot* lighter weight !!!
Bob
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeremy:
>
> I'm currently having fun playing with various rechargeable battery related stuff which includes Li-Ion cells.
> http://www.prc68.com/I/BatTst.shtml#Resistor
> The cells come in three configurations:
> 1. the raw flat top cell with optional tabs to allow easy soldering into a pack,
> 2. cell plus positive button cap which includes a Positive Temperature Coefficient (PTC) fuse and an over pressure vent,
> 3. fully protected, like 2, plus circuit that turns off the battery if charging and over voltage or loaded and under voltage. On these you can feel a wire/ribbon running from positive to negative under the shrink wrap and they are slightly longer.
> These configurations are independent of the flavor of Li chemistry.
>
> To go with any of the above you need a charger specific to the particular Li chemistry (the charging voltage is not the same) and if a pack you also need a either cells like 3 above or a protection circuit for the pack. For optimum performance in addition a tap between each virtual cell (made of of parallel cells) so that the charge can be balanced and a charger that can do that. This is not easy, witness the current recall of the Galaxy Note 7s phones.
>
> I would just use modern Ni-Cad cells mainly because of the ease of charging and maintaining them and use the existing charging circuitry.
> Li chemistry has advantages for portable equipment, but not so much for rack mounted equipment.
>
> --
> Have Fun,
>
> Brooke Clarke
> http://www.PRC68.com
> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
> The lesser of evils is still evil.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>> Thanks, Brooke, I'll price new Ni-Cads. I wasn't thinking of lead-acid (gel
>> cells) but rather lithium rechargeable, providing I can find a type that
>> won't catch fire and will work with the 105B'scircuits.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Alex:
>>>
>>> Yes, I'm recommending Ni-Cad but NOT any acid type.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Have Fun,
>>>
>>> Brooke Clarke
>>> http://www.PRC68.com
>>> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
>>> The lesser of evils is still evil.
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>
>>>> Hi Brooke,
>>>>
>>>> sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid, they
>>>> have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ] as
>>>> electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in radios.
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>>
>>>> KJ6UHN
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jeremy:
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
>>>>> has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
>>>>> Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
>>>>> Standard because the oven no longer worked.
>>>>> http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
>>>>> longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so why not
>>>>> just replace the old cells?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>>>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
PS
paul swed
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 5:16 PM
Brookes comments are the facts you can not use simple charging circuits.
But smart charging circuits seem to be available on various sites for low
cost. It seems the RC modelers have helped us out.
The thing I will say is I have ordered new nicad C cell batteries from
major a major vendor and they did not last long at all for the cost I was
quite disappointed.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
I'm currently having fun playing with various rechargeable battery related
stuff which includes Li-Ion cells.
http://www.prc68.com/I/BatTst.shtml#Resistor
The cells come in three configurations:
- the raw flat top cell with optional tabs to allow easy soldering into a
pack,
- cell plus positive button cap which includes a Positive Temperature
Coefficient (PTC) fuse and an over pressure vent,
- fully protected, like 2, plus circuit that turns off the battery if
charging and over voltage or loaded and under voltage. On these you can
feel a wire/ribbon running from positive to negative under the shrink wrap
and they are slightly longer.
These configurations are independent of the flavor of Li chemistry.
To go with any of the above you need a charger specific to the particular
Li chemistry (the charging voltage is not the same) and if a pack you also
need a either cells like 3 above or a protection circuit for the pack. For
optimum performance in addition a tap between each virtual cell (made of of
parallel cells) so that the charge can be balanced and a charger that can
do that. This is not easy, witness the current recall of the Galaxy Note
7s phones.
I would just use modern Ni-Cad cells mainly because of the ease of
charging and maintaining them and use the existing charging circuitry.
Li chemistry has advantages for portable equipment, but not so much for
rack mounted equipment.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
The lesser of evils is still evil.
-------- Original Message --------
Thanks, Brooke, I'll price new Ni-Cads. I wasn't thinking of lead-acid
(gel
cells) but rather lithium rechargeable, providing I can find a type that
won't catch fire and will work with the 105B'scircuits.
Jeremy
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net
wrote:
Hi Alex:
sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid,
they
have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ] as
electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in
radios.
73
KJ6UHN
Alex
On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
Standard because the oven no longer worked.
http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so
why not
just replace the old cells?
Brookes comments are the facts you can not use simple charging circuits.
But smart charging circuits seem to be available on various sites for low
cost. It seems the RC modelers have helped us out.
The thing I will say is I have ordered new nicad C cell batteries from
major a major vendor and they did not last long at all for the cost I was
quite disappointed.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> wrote:
> Hi Jeremy:
>
> I'm currently having fun playing with various rechargeable battery related
> stuff which includes Li-Ion cells.
> http://www.prc68.com/I/BatTst.shtml#Resistor
> The cells come in three configurations:
> 1. the raw flat top cell with optional tabs to allow easy soldering into a
> pack,
> 2. cell plus positive button cap which includes a Positive Temperature
> Coefficient (PTC) fuse and an over pressure vent,
> 3. fully protected, like 2, plus circuit that turns off the battery if
> charging and over voltage or loaded and under voltage. On these you can
> feel a wire/ribbon running from positive to negative under the shrink wrap
> and they are slightly longer.
> These configurations are independent of the flavor of Li chemistry.
>
> To go with any of the above you need a charger specific to the particular
> Li chemistry (the charging voltage is not the same) and if a pack you also
> need a either cells like 3 above or a protection circuit for the pack. For
> optimum performance in addition a tap between each virtual cell (made of of
> parallel cells) so that the charge can be balanced and a charger that can
> do that. This is not easy, witness the current recall of the Galaxy Note
> 7s phones.
>
> I would just use modern Ni-Cad cells mainly because of the ease of
> charging and maintaining them and use the existing charging circuitry.
> Li chemistry has advantages for portable equipment, but not so much for
> rack mounted equipment.
>
> --
> Have Fun,
>
> Brooke Clarke
> http://www.PRC68.com
> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
> The lesser of evils is still evil.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>
>> Thanks, Brooke, I'll price new Ni-Cads. I wasn't thinking of lead-acid
>> (gel
>> cells) but rather lithium rechargeable, providing I can find a type that
>> won't catch fire and will work with the 105B'scircuits.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex:
>>>
>>> Yes, I'm recommending Ni-Cad but NOT any acid type.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Have Fun,
>>>
>>> Brooke Clarke
>>> http://www.PRC68.com
>>> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
>>> The lesser of evils is still evil.
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>
>>> Hi Brooke,
>>>>
>>>> sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid,
>>>> they
>>>> have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ] as
>>>> electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in
>>>> radios.
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>>
>>>> KJ6UHN
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jeremy:
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
>>>>> has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
>>>>> Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
>>>>> Standard because the oven no longer worked.
>>>>> http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
>>>>> longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so
>>>>> why not
>>>>> just replace the old cells?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>>>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
SM
Scott McGrath
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 5:54 PM
I had my local BatteriesPlus rebuild my pack for my 105B about 4 years ago and it's still working well as I recall the cost was about 175. But I specified use best quality cells. Plus they have the proper battery welder and test gear and they have more vendor clout to get consistently good cells as opposed to getting them mail order or through the well known auction sites
Content by Scott
Typos by Siri
On Sep 15, 2016, at 1:16 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:
Brookes comments are the facts you can not use simple charging circuits.
But smart charging circuits seem to be available on various sites for low
cost. It seems the RC modelers have helped us out.
The thing I will say is I have ordered new nicad C cell batteries from
major a major vendor and they did not last long at all for the cost I was
quite disappointed.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
I'm currently having fun playing with various rechargeable battery related
stuff which includes Li-Ion cells.
http://www.prc68.com/I/BatTst.shtml#Resistor
The cells come in three configurations:
- the raw flat top cell with optional tabs to allow easy soldering into a
pack,
- cell plus positive button cap which includes a Positive Temperature
Coefficient (PTC) fuse and an over pressure vent,
- fully protected, like 2, plus circuit that turns off the battery if
charging and over voltage or loaded and under voltage. On these you can
feel a wire/ribbon running from positive to negative under the shrink wrap
and they are slightly longer.
These configurations are independent of the flavor of Li chemistry.
To go with any of the above you need a charger specific to the particular
Li chemistry (the charging voltage is not the same) and if a pack you also
need a either cells like 3 above or a protection circuit for the pack. For
optimum performance in addition a tap between each virtual cell (made of of
parallel cells) so that the charge can be balanced and a charger that can
do that. This is not easy, witness the current recall of the Galaxy Note
7s phones.
I would just use modern Ni-Cad cells mainly because of the ease of
charging and maintaining them and use the existing charging circuitry.
Li chemistry has advantages for portable equipment, but not so much for
rack mounted equipment.
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
The lesser of evils is still evil.
-------- Original Message --------
Thanks, Brooke, I'll price new Ni-Cads. I wasn't thinking of lead-acid
(gel
cells) but rather lithium rechargeable, providing I can find a type that
won't catch fire and will work with the 105B'scircuits.
Jeremy
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net
wrote:
Hi Alex:
sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid,
they
have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ] as
electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in
radios.
73
KJ6UHN
Alex
On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
Standard because the oven no longer worked.
http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so
why not
just replace the old cells?
I had my local BatteriesPlus rebuild my pack for my 105B about 4 years ago and it's still working well as I recall the cost was about 175. But I specified use best quality cells. Plus they have the proper battery welder and test gear and they have more vendor clout to get consistently good cells as opposed to getting them mail order or through the well known auction sites
Content by Scott
Typos by Siri
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 1:16 PM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Brookes comments are the facts you can not use simple charging circuits.
> But smart charging circuits seem to be available on various sites for low
> cost. It seems the RC modelers have helped us out.
> The thing I will say is I have ordered new nicad C cell batteries from
> major a major vendor and they did not last long at all for the cost I was
> quite disappointed.
> Regards
> Paul
> WB8TSL
>
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeremy:
>>
>> I'm currently having fun playing with various rechargeable battery related
>> stuff which includes Li-Ion cells.
>> http://www.prc68.com/I/BatTst.shtml#Resistor
>> The cells come in three configurations:
>> 1. the raw flat top cell with optional tabs to allow easy soldering into a
>> pack,
>> 2. cell plus positive button cap which includes a Positive Temperature
>> Coefficient (PTC) fuse and an over pressure vent,
>> 3. fully protected, like 2, plus circuit that turns off the battery if
>> charging and over voltage or loaded and under voltage. On these you can
>> feel a wire/ribbon running from positive to negative under the shrink wrap
>> and they are slightly longer.
>> These configurations are independent of the flavor of Li chemistry.
>>
>> To go with any of the above you need a charger specific to the particular
>> Li chemistry (the charging voltage is not the same) and if a pack you also
>> need a either cells like 3 above or a protection circuit for the pack. For
>> optimum performance in addition a tap between each virtual cell (made of of
>> parallel cells) so that the charge can be balanced and a charger that can
>> do that. This is not easy, witness the current recall of the Galaxy Note
>> 7s phones.
>>
>> I would just use modern Ni-Cad cells mainly because of the ease of
>> charging and maintaining them and use the existing charging circuitry.
>> Li chemistry has advantages for portable equipment, but not so much for
>> rack mounted equipment.
>>
>> --
>> Have Fun,
>>
>> Brooke Clarke
>> http://www.PRC68.com
>> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
>> The lesser of evils is still evil.
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>>
>>> Thanks, Brooke, I'll price new Ni-Cads. I wasn't thinking of lead-acid
>>> (gel
>>> cells) but rather lithium rechargeable, providing I can find a type that
>>> won't catch fire and will work with the 105B'scircuits.
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alex:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I'm recommending Ni-Cad but NOT any acid type.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Have Fun,
>>>>
>>>> Brooke Clarke
>>>> http://www.PRC68.com
>>>> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
>>>> The lesser of evils is still evil.
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>
>>>> Hi Brooke,
>>>>>
>>>>> sorry I have to disappoint you; Ni-Cd batteries do not use any acid,
>>>>> they
>>>>> have K-OH kalium hidrioxid [potassium hydroxide for anglophone ] as
>>>>> electrolyte and they are normally very air-tide, and widely used in
>>>>> radios.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73
>>>>>
>>>>> KJ6UHN
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/14/2016 4:45 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jeremy:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a very bad idea to put any battery with acid in an enclosure that
>>>>>> has electronics since if it vents the acid will etch the PCBs.
>>>>>> Guess how I learned this. I got a great price on a Gibbs Frequency
>>>>>> Standard because the oven no longer worked.
>>>>>> http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modern Ni-Cad batteries have much more capacity than older ones and no
>>>>>> longer have a memory effect. They are also very easy to charge, so
>>>>>> why not
>>>>>> just replace the old cells?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>>>>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>>>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/m
>> ailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
JN
Jeremy Nichols
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 6:04 PM
Brooke, I priced Ni-Cds and was not happy with the numbers: a set of 20
D-size cells will cost me ~US$100 by the time I get them delivered. That
plus the 8-pound weight penalty makes replacement Ni-Cd cells
unattractive. (105A = 16 pounds, 105B = 24 pounds including the battery
box and charging circuitry) There is no question that Ni-Cds are the
answer for anyone attempting to restore a 105B for competition in the
neighborhood Concours d'Elegance.
I do appreciate your work on the relative merits of the various Lithium
types. I was afraid the existing charge circuitry in the 105B would not
mate well with Lithium-anything batteries. Having twice set the house
afire through assorted misadventures (thank goodness for smoke alarms
and fire extinguishers), I don't want to try for "Number 3".
Jeremy
On 9/15/2016 9:59 AM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
I'm currently having fun playing with various rechargeable battery
related stuff which includes Li-Ion cells.
http://www.prc68.com/I/BatTst.shtml#Resistor
The cells come in three configurations:
- the raw flat top cell with optional tabs to allow easy soldering
into a pack,
- cell plus positive button cap which includes a Positive Temperature
Coefficient (PTC) fuse and an over pressure vent,
- fully protected, like 2, plus circuit that turns off the battery if
charging and over voltage or loaded and under voltage. On these you
can feel a wire/ribbon running from positive to negative under the
shrink wrap and they are slightly longer.
These configurations are independent of the flavor of Li chemistry.
To go with any of the above you need a charger specific to the
particular Li chemistry (the charging voltage is not the same) and if
a pack you also need a either cells like 3 above or a protection
circuit for the pack. For optimum performance in addition a tap
between each virtual cell (made of of parallel cells) so that the
charge can be balanced and a charger that can do that. This is not
easy, witness the current recall of the Galaxy Note 7s phones.
I would just use modern Ni-Cad cells mainly because of the ease of
charging and maintaining them and use the existing charging circuitry.
Li chemistry has advantages for portable equipment, but not so much
for rack mounted equipment.
Brooke, I priced Ni-Cds and was not happy with the numbers: a set of 20
D-size cells will cost me ~US$100 by the time I get them delivered. That
plus the 8-pound weight penalty makes replacement Ni-Cd cells
unattractive. (105A = 16 pounds, 105B = 24 pounds including the battery
box and charging circuitry) There is no question that Ni-Cds are the
answer for anyone attempting to restore a 105B for competition in the
neighborhood Concours d'Elegance.
I do appreciate your work on the relative merits of the various Lithium
types. I was afraid the existing charge circuitry in the 105B would not
mate well with Lithium-anything batteries. Having twice set the house
afire through assorted misadventures (thank goodness for smoke alarms
and fire extinguishers), I don't want to try for "Number 3".
Jeremy
On 9/15/2016 9:59 AM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
> Hi Jeremy:
>
> I'm currently having fun playing with various rechargeable battery
> related stuff which includes Li-Ion cells.
> http://www.prc68.com/I/BatTst.shtml#Resistor
> The cells come in three configurations:
> 1. the raw flat top cell with optional tabs to allow easy soldering
> into a pack,
> 2. cell plus positive button cap which includes a Positive Temperature
> Coefficient (PTC) fuse and an over pressure vent,
> 3. fully protected, like 2, plus circuit that turns off the battery if
> charging and over voltage or loaded and under voltage. On these you
> can feel a wire/ribbon running from positive to negative under the
> shrink wrap and they are slightly longer.
> These configurations are independent of the flavor of Li chemistry.
>
> To go with any of the above you need a charger specific to the
> particular Li chemistry (the charging voltage is not the same) and if
> a pack you also need a either cells like 3 above or a protection
> circuit for the pack. For optimum performance in addition a tap
> between each virtual cell (made of of parallel cells) so that the
> charge can be balanced and a charger that can do that. This is not
> easy, witness the current recall of the Galaxy Note 7s phones.
>
> I would just use modern Ni-Cad cells mainly because of the ease of
> charging and maintaining them and use the existing charging circuitry.
> Li chemistry has advantages for portable equipment, but not so much
> for rack mounted equipment.
>
JN
Jeremy Nichols
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 6:13 PM
Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of
the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave
(i.e., expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave
(aka modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B.
Anyone have experience?
A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like
another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have
such a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
Jeremy
On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
A bigger question becomes:
Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone area. Powering
the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff is one obvious
answer.
The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is external to all
the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack. That way you have
a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch scattered about. Things like
lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option in an independent
battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest in something with real
smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the conversion to instrument
voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12, 24, or 48V and run with it.
My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become “don’t do it”. It makes
them a lot lighter weight !!!
Bob
Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of
the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave
(i.e., expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave
(aka modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B.
Anyone have experience?
A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like
another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have
such a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
Jeremy
On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> A bigger question becomes:
>
> Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
>
> These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone area. Powering
> the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff is one obvious
> answer.
>
> The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is external to all
> the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack. That way you have
> a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch scattered about. Things like
> lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option in an independent
> battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest in something with real
> smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the conversion to instrument
> voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12, 24, or 48V and run with it.
>
> My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become “don’t do it”. It makes
> them a *lot* lighter weight !!!
>
> Bob
>
>
MS
Mark Spencer
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 9:26 PM
Hi I've run my HP105B (with the old style oscillator) from AC power via a consumer grade UPS, 24 Vdc from a lead acid battery bank and briefly from the internal battery pack with out any notable changes in performance (that being said I can't measure phase noise so this observation may or may not be of use.)
I'm not to fussed over the internal Nicad pack and rely on an external battery bank in case I loose AC power for an extended time period.
During a two day outage my HP105B and FTS1050 ran nicely from a 100 AH battery bank but the batteries needed to be replaced shortly afterwards.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 15, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Jeremy Nichols jn6wfo@gmail.com wrote:
Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e., expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone have experience?
A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
Jeremy
On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
A bigger question becomes:
Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone area. Powering
the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff is one obvious
answer.
The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is external to all
the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack. That way you have
a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch scattered about. Things like
lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option in an independent
battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest in something with real
smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the conversion to instrument
voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12, 24, or 48V and run with it.
My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become “don’t do it”. It makes
them a lot lighter weight !!!
Bob
Hi I've run my HP105B (with the old style oscillator) from AC power via a consumer grade UPS, 24 Vdc from a lead acid battery bank and briefly from the internal battery pack with out any notable changes in performance (that being said I can't measure phase noise so this observation may or may not be of use.)
I'm not to fussed over the internal Nicad pack and rely on an external battery bank in case I loose AC power for an extended time period.
During a two day outage my HP105B and FTS1050 ran nicely from a 100 AH battery bank but the batteries needed to be replaced shortly afterwards.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Jeremy Nichols <jn6wfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e., expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone have experience?
>
> A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>> On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> A bigger question becomes:
>>
>> Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
>>
>> These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone area. Powering
>> the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff is one obvious
>> answer.
>>
>> The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is external to all
>> the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack. That way you have
>> a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch scattered about. Things like
>> lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option in an independent
>> battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest in something with real
>> smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the conversion to instrument
>> voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12, 24, or 48V and run with it.
>>
>> My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become “don’t do it”. It makes
>> them a *lot* lighter weight !!!
>>
>> Bob
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
BC
Bob Camp
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 9:32 PM
Hi
It’s been quite a while since I bought anything other than a pure sine UPS. They really aren’t as expensive
as they once were. You may find them a bit cheaper from outfits like CyberPower than from APC. Sometimes
it s a bit tough to work out exactly what is or is not a pure sine wave unit. If you want a full “always on” pure
sine device, they are still a bit expensive.
Bob
On Sep 15, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols jn6wfo@gmail.com wrote:
Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e., expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone have experience?
A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
Jeremy
On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
A bigger question becomes:
Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone area. Powering
the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff is one obvious
answer.
The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is external to all
the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack. That way you have
a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch scattered about. Things like
lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option in an independent
battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest in something with real
smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the conversion to instrument
voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12, 24, or 48V and run with it.
My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become “don’t do it”. It makes
them a lot lighter weight !!!
Bob
Hi
It’s been quite a while since I bought anything other than a pure sine UPS. They really aren’t as expensive
as they once were. You may find them a bit cheaper from outfits like CyberPower than from APC. Sometimes
it s a bit tough to work out exactly what is or is not a pure sine wave unit. If you want a full “always on” pure
sine device, they are still a bit expensive.
Bob
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols <jn6wfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e., expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone have experience?
>
> A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> A bigger question becomes:
>>
>> Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
>>
>> These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone area. Powering
>> the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff is one obvious
>> answer.
>>
>> The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is external to all
>> the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack. That way you have
>> a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch scattered about. Things like
>> lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option in an independent
>> battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest in something with real
>> smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the conversion to instrument
>> voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12, 24, or 48V and run with it.
>>
>> My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become “don’t do it”. It makes
>> them a *lot* lighter weight !!!
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
AP
Alexander Pummer
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 10:13 PM
if you deep discharge led acid batteries -- which are not made special
for deep discharge -- you will have to replace them quite often, on the
other hand Ni-Fe batteries you could short out, overcharge they are
undisrtuktable that is the reason why they are not produced any more in
the US, they do not fit into the American business-model, but phone
companies, railway and aviation still using them, you could still find
old electrical forklifts with Ni-Fe battery made by Edison Batteries in
the sixties in the past century the batteries are still fine. Tudor -- a
led-acid battery producer -- purchased Edison Batteries and closed down
the formidable competitor
73
KL6UHN
Alex
On 9/15/2016 2:26 PM, Mark Spencer wrote:
Hi I've run my HP105B (with the old style oscillator) from AC power via a consumer grade UPS, 24 Vdc from a lead acid battery bank and briefly from the internal battery pack with out any notable changes in performance (that being said I can't measure phase noise so this observation may or may not be of use.)
I'm not to fussed over the internal Nicad pack and rely on an external battery bank in case I loose AC power for an extended time period.
During a two day outage my HP105B and FTS1050 ran nicely from a 100 AH battery bank but the batteries needed to be replaced shortly afterwards.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 15, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Jeremy Nichols jn6wfo@gmail.com wrote:
Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e., expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone have experience?
A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
Jeremy
On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
A bigger question becomes:
Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone area. Powering
the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff is one obvious
answer.
The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is external to all
the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack. That way you have
a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch scattered about. Things like
lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option in an independent
battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest in something with real
smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the conversion to instrument
voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12, 24, or 48V and run with it.
My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become “don’t do it”. It makes
them a lot lighter weight !!!
Bob
if you deep discharge led acid batteries -- which are not made special
for deep discharge -- you will have to replace them quite often, on the
other hand Ni-Fe batteries you could short out, overcharge they are
undisrtuktable that is the reason why they are not produced any more in
the US, they do not fit into the American business-model, but phone
companies, railway and aviation still using them, you could still find
old electrical forklifts with Ni-Fe battery made by Edison Batteries in
the sixties in the past century the batteries are still fine. Tudor -- a
led-acid battery producer -- purchased Edison Batteries and closed down
the formidable competitor
73
KL6UHN
Alex
On 9/15/2016 2:26 PM, Mark Spencer wrote:
> Hi I've run my HP105B (with the old style oscillator) from AC power via a consumer grade UPS, 24 Vdc from a lead acid battery bank and briefly from the internal battery pack with out any notable changes in performance (that being said I can't measure phase noise so this observation may or may not be of use.)
>
> I'm not to fussed over the internal Nicad pack and rely on an external battery bank in case I loose AC power for an extended time period.
>
> During a two day outage my HP105B and FTS1050 ran nicely from a 100 AH battery bank but the batteries needed to be replaced shortly afterwards.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Jeremy Nichols <jn6wfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e., expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone have experience?
>>
>> A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>>> On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> A bigger question becomes:
>>>
>>> Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
>>>
>>> These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone area. Powering
>>> the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff is one obvious
>>> answer.
>>>
>>> The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is external to all
>>> the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack. That way you have
>>> a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch scattered about. Things like
>>> lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option in an independent
>>> battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest in something with real
>>> smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the conversion to instrument
>>> voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12, 24, or 48V and run with it.
>>>
>>> My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become “don’t do it”. It makes
>>> them a *lot* lighter weight !!!
>>>
>>> Bob
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7797 / Virus Database: 4656/13022 - Release Date: 09/15/16
JN
Jeremy Nichols
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 10:13 PM
Since I have a 12V 100 A-H gelled electrolyte battery as a
short-term backup (for those outages not worth firing up the generator),
I'd like to find a UPS that uses an external battery. So far I don't see
such a thing--do they exist?
Jeremy
On Thursday, September 15, 2016, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
It’s been quite a while since I bought anything other than a pure sine
UPS. They really aren’t as expensive
as they once were. You may find them a bit cheaper from outfits like
CyberPower than from APC. Sometimes
it s a bit tough to work out exactly what is or is not a pure sine wave
unit. If you want a full “always on” pure
sine device, they are still a bit expensive.
Bob
Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of
the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e.,
expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka
modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone
have experience?
A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like
another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such
a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
Jeremy
On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
A bigger question becomes:
Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone
the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff
answer.
The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is
the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack.
a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch
scattered about. Things like
lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option
battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest
smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the
voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12,
24, or 48V and run with it.
My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become
them a lot lighter weight !!!
Bob
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
Since I have a 12V 100 A-H gelled electrolyte battery as a
short-term backup (for those outages not worth firing up the generator),
I'd like to find a UPS that uses an external battery. So far I don't see
such a thing--do they exist?
Jeremy
On Thursday, September 15, 2016, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> It’s been quite a while since I bought anything other than a pure sine
> UPS. They really aren’t as expensive
> as they once were. You may find them a bit cheaper from outfits like
> CyberPower than from APC. Sometimes
> it s a bit tough to work out exactly what is or is not a pure sine wave
> unit. If you want a full “always on” pure
> sine device, they are still a bit expensive.
>
> Bob
>
> > On Sep 15, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols <jn6wfo@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of
> the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e.,
> expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka
> modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone
> have experience?
> >
> > A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like
> another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such
> a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
> >
> > On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> A bigger question becomes:
> >>
> >> Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
> >>
> >> These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone
> area. Powering
> >> the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff
> is one obvious
> >> answer.
> >>
> >> The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is
> external to all
> >> the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack.
> That way you have
> >> a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch
> scattered about. Things like
> >> lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option
> in an independent
> >> battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest
> in something with real
> >> smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the
> conversion to instrument
> >> voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12,
> 24, or 48V and run with it.
> >>
> >> My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become
> “don’t do it”. It makes
> >> them a *lot* lighter weight !!!
> >>
> >> Bob
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>
> > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
MS
Mark Spencer
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 10:21 PM
They do exist. I've seen them in service at Telecom sites outside of the U.S. and Canada. I believe there was a thread re this a few years ago ?
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 15, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols jn6wfo@gmail.com wrote:
Since I have a 12V 100 A-H gelled electrolyte battery as a
short-term backup (for those outages not worth firing up the generator),
I'd like to find a UPS that uses an external battery. So far I don't see
such a thing--do they exist?
Jeremy
On Thursday, September 15, 2016, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
It’s been quite a while since I bought anything other than a pure sine
UPS. They really aren’t as expensive
as they once were. You may find them a bit cheaper from outfits like
CyberPower than from APC. Sometimes
it s a bit tough to work out exactly what is or is not a pure sine wave
unit. If you want a full “always on” pure
sine device, they are still a bit expensive.
Bob
javascript:;> wrote:
Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of
the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e.,
expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka
modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone
have experience?
A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like
another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such
a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
A bigger question becomes:
Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone
the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff
answer.
The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is
the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack.
a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch
scattered about. Things like
lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option
battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest
smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the
voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12,
24, or 48V and run with it.
My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become
them a lot lighter weight !!!
Bob
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
They do exist. I've seen them in service at Telecom sites outside of the U.S. and Canada. I believe there was a thread re this a few years ago ?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols <jn6wfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Since I have a 12V 100 A-H gelled electrolyte battery as a
> short-term backup (for those outages not worth firing up the generator),
> I'd like to find a UPS that uses an external battery. So far I don't see
> such a thing--do they exist?
>
> Jeremy
>
>> On Thursday, September 15, 2016, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> It’s been quite a while since I bought anything other than a pure sine
>> UPS. They really aren’t as expensive
>> as they once were. You may find them a bit cheaper from outfits like
>> CyberPower than from APC. Sometimes
>> it s a bit tough to work out exactly what is or is not a pure sine wave
>> unit. If you want a full “always on” pure
>> sine device, they are still a bit expensive.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols <jn6wfo@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of
>> the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e.,
>> expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka
>> modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone
>> have experience?
>>>
>>> A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like
>> another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such
>> a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> A bigger question becomes:
>>>>
>>>> Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
>>>>
>>>> These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone
>> area. Powering
>>>> the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff
>> is one obvious
>>>> answer.
>>>>
>>>> The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is
>> external to all
>>>> the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack.
>> That way you have
>>>> a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch
>> scattered about. Things like
>>>> lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option
>> in an independent
>>>> battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest
>> in something with real
>>>> smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the
>> conversion to instrument
>>>> voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12,
>> 24, or 48V and run with it.
>>>>
>>>> My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become
>> “don’t do it”. It makes
>>>> them a *lot* lighter weight !!!
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
>> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
>> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
MS
Mark Spencer
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 10:38 PM
Thanks I was aware of Ni Fe batteries but have never seen them for sale at the local "battery store" where I buy batteries for my vehicles, time nuts and amateur radio pursuits (:
I view lead acid batteries (especially ones designed for in door use) as semi expendable for my various hobbies. I figure I got my monies worth from the ones backing up the HP105B and FTS 1050 as I am well on my way to 10 years of up time for those two devices.
I tend to replace batteries on general principles every 5 years or so or at least move them to a less demanding application. (Ie. shuffle them from time nuts backup use to portable power use for amateur radio.)
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 15, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Alexander Pummer alexpcs@ieee.org wrote:
if you deep discharge led acid batteries -- which are not made special for deep discharge -- you will have to replace them quite often, on the other hand Ni-Fe batteries you could short out, overcharge they are undisrtuktable that is the reason why they are not produced any more in the US, they do not fit into the American business-model, but phone companies, railway and aviation still using them, you could still find old electrical forklifts with Ni-Fe battery made by Edison Batteries in the sixties in the past century the batteries are still fine. Tudor -- a led-acid battery producer -- purchased Edison Batteries and closed down the formidable competitor
73
KL6UHN
Alex
On 9/15/2016 2:26 PM, Mark Spencer wrote:
Hi I've run my HP105B (with the old style oscillator) from AC power via a consumer grade UPS, 24 Vdc from a lead acid battery bank and briefly from the internal battery pack with out any notable changes in performance (that being said I can't measure phase noise so this observation may or may not be of use.)
I'm not to fussed over the internal Nicad pack and rely on an external battery bank in case I loose AC power for an extended time period.
During a two day outage my HP105B and FTS1050 ran nicely from a 100 AH battery bank but the batteries needed to be replaced shortly afterwards.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 15, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Jeremy Nichols jn6wfo@gmail.com wrote:
Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e., expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone have experience?
A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
Jeremy
On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
A bigger question becomes:
Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone area. Powering
the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff is one obvious
answer.
The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is external to all
the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack. That way you have
a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch scattered about. Things like
lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option in an independent
battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest in something with real
smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the conversion to instrument
voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12, 24, or 48V and run with it.
My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become “don’t do it”. It makes
them a lot lighter weight !!!
Bob
Thanks I was aware of Ni Fe batteries but have never seen them for sale at the local "battery store" where I buy batteries for my vehicles, time nuts and amateur radio pursuits (:
I view lead acid batteries (especially ones designed for in door use) as semi expendable for my various hobbies. I figure I got my monies worth from the ones backing up the HP105B and FTS 1050 as I am well on my way to 10 years of up time for those two devices.
I tend to replace batteries on general principles every 5 years or so or at least move them to a less demanding application. (Ie. shuffle them from time nuts backup use to portable power use for amateur radio.)
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Alexander Pummer <alexpcs@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> if you deep discharge led acid batteries -- which are not made special for deep discharge -- you will have to replace them quite often, on the other hand Ni-Fe batteries you could short out, overcharge they are undisrtuktable that is the reason why they are not produced any more in the US, they do not fit into the American business-model, but phone companies, railway and aviation still using them, you could still find old electrical forklifts with Ni-Fe battery made by Edison Batteries in the sixties in the past century the batteries are still fine. Tudor -- a led-acid battery producer -- purchased Edison Batteries and closed down the formidable competitor
>
> 73
> KL6UHN
> Alex
>
>> On 9/15/2016 2:26 PM, Mark Spencer wrote:
>> Hi I've run my HP105B (with the old style oscillator) from AC power via a consumer grade UPS, 24 Vdc from a lead acid battery bank and briefly from the internal battery pack with out any notable changes in performance (that being said I can't measure phase noise so this observation may or may not be of use.)
>>
>> I'm not to fussed over the internal Nicad pack and rely on an external battery bank in case I loose AC power for an extended time period.
>>
>> During a two day outage my HP105B and FTS1050 ran nicely from a 100 AH battery bank but the batteries needed to be replaced shortly afterwards.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Jeremy Nichols <jn6wfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e., expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone have experience?
>>>
>>> A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> A bigger question becomes:
>>>>
>>>> Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
>>>>
>>>> These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone area. Powering
>>>> the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff is one obvious
>>>> answer.
>>>>
>>>> The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is external to all
>>>> the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack. That way you have
>>>> a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch scattered about. Things like
>>>> lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option in an independent
>>>> battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest in something with real
>>>> smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the conversion to instrument
>>>> voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12, 24, or 48V and run with it.
>>>>
>>>> My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become “don’t do it”. It makes
>>>> them a *lot* lighter weight !!!
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2016.0.7797 / Virus Database: 4656/13022 - Release Date: 09/15/16
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
GE
Gary E. Miller
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 10:41 PM
Yo Jeremy!
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:13:59 -0700
Jeremy Nichols jn6wfo@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to find a UPS that uses an external battery. So
far I don't see such a thing--do they exist?
Not in the store, but they are easy to make. I take consumer grade
CyberPower sine wave supplies. Remove the expensive and wimpy 12V9A
gells cells. Then I put two 6V deep cycle tractor batteries in a
battery box and cable them into the UPS with #6 wire from old jumper
cables. To make it nice and neat, I fuse it with inline 50Amp fuses and
50Amp DC connectors. Total cost about $200.
I've been doing that for almost two decades and have 6 running now.
I'll get two or three hours of backup from them. Two weeks ago I had a
45 minute power outage, my network never hiccuped. The batteries need
replacing about every five years.
APC UPS can't handle the longer runtime, but never had a problem with
any version of CyberPower.
Just be sure that everything you need to stay up is on a UPS, and that
they are well within their load rating.
I can post pictures if anyone wants.
RGDS
GARY
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Yo Jeremy!
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:13:59 -0700
Jeremy Nichols <jn6wfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to find a UPS that uses an external battery. So
> far I don't see such a thing--do they exist?
Not in the store, but they are easy to make. I take consumer grade
CyberPower sine wave supplies. Remove the expensive and wimpy 12V9A
gells cells. Then I put two 6V deep cycle tractor batteries in a
battery box and cable them into the UPS with #6 wire from old jumper
cables. To make it nice and neat, I fuse it with inline 50Amp fuses and
50Amp DC connectors. Total cost about $200.
I've been doing that for almost two decades and have 6 running now.
I'll get two or three hours of backup from them. Two weeks ago I had a
45 minute power outage, my network never hiccuped. The batteries need
replacing about every five years.
APC UPS can't handle the longer runtime, but never had a problem with
any version of CyberPower.
Just be sure that everything you need to stay up is on a UPS, and that
they are well within their load rating.
I can post pictures if anyone wants.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
MA
Martin A Flynn
Thu, Sep 15, 2016 10:50 PM
Look for a POWERVAR model ABCE150-11M2. It has an IEC plug and
connector for 120 Volt in and out along with a yellow SB-50 connector
for the 12 VDC battery connector. Compatible with LiFePO4 and SLA
battery chemistries
On 9/15/2016 6:21 PM, Mark Spencer wrote:
They do exist. I've seen them in service at Telecom sites outside of the U.S. and Canada. I believe there was a thread re this a few years ago ?
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 15, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols jn6wfo@gmail.com wrote:
Since I have a 12V 100 A-H gelled electrolyte battery as a
short-term backup (for those outages not worth firing up the generator),
I'd like to find a UPS that uses an external battery. So far I don't see
such a thing--do they exist?
Jeremy
On Thursday, September 15, 2016, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
It’s been quite a while since I bought anything other than a pure sine
UPS. They really aren’t as expensive
as they once were. You may find them a bit cheaper from outfits like
CyberPower than from APC. Sometimes
it s a bit tough to work out exactly what is or is not a pure sine wave
unit. If you want a full “always on” pure
sine device, they are still a bit expensive.
Bob
javascript:;> wrote:
Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of
the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e.,
expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka
modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone
have experience?
A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like
another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such
a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
A bigger question becomes:
Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone
the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff
answer.
The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is
the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack.
a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch
scattered about. Things like
lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option
battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest
smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the
voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12,
24, or 48V and run with it.
My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become
them a lot lighter weight !!!
Bob
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Look for a POWERVAR model ABCE150-11M2. It has an IEC plug and
connector for 120 Volt in and out along with a yellow SB-50 connector
for the 12 VDC battery connector. Compatible with LiFePO4 and SLA
battery chemistries
On 9/15/2016 6:21 PM, Mark Spencer wrote:
> They do exist. I've seen them in service at Telecom sites outside of the U.S. and Canada. I believe there was a thread re this a few years ago ?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols <jn6wfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Since I have a 12V 100 A-H gelled electrolyte battery as a
>> short-term backup (for those outages not worth firing up the generator),
>> I'd like to find a UPS that uses an external battery. So far I don't see
>> such a thing--do they exist?
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2016, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> It’s been quite a while since I bought anything other than a pure sine
>>> UPS. They really aren’t as expensive
>>> as they once were. You may find them a bit cheaper from outfits like
>>> CyberPower than from APC. Sometimes
>>> it s a bit tough to work out exactly what is or is not a pure sine wave
>>> unit. If you want a full “always on” pure
>>> sine device, they are still a bit expensive.
>>>
>>> Bob
>>>
>>>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Jeremy Nichols <jn6wfo@gmail.com
>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Your point is well made. My question is: what happens to the quality of
>>> the output sine wave if I use anything other than a true sine-wave (i.e.,
>>> expensive) UPS? Most of them these days produce a semi-sine wave (aka
>>> modified square wave) that may or may not play well with the 105B. Anyone
>>> have experience?
>>>> A external battery and appropriate chargers and cabling does sound like
>>> another good alternative. Harder to move around but I don't (yet) have such
>>> a need, only that the 105B stay "on" regardless of power failures.
>>>> Jeremy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/15/2016 10:15 AM, Bob Camp wrote:
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> A bigger question becomes:
>>>>>
>>>>> Do batteries inside equipment make much sense anymore?
>>>>>
>>>>> These days, a UPS is often a standard part of a rack in an outage prone
>>> area. Powering
>>>>> the “whatever” instrument off of the same UPS as the rest of the stuff
>>> is one obvious
>>>>> answer.
>>>>>
>>>>> The other answer is an even older approach. Use a battery bank that is
>>> external to all
>>>>> the gear in the rack and tend it independently of each box in the rack.
>>> That way you have
>>>>> a few very large cells to worry about rather than a whole bunch
>>> scattered about. Things like
>>>>> lead acid that are impractical in a piece of gear are more of an option
>>> in an independent
>>>>> battery box. A single charger / line supply makes it easier to invest
>>> in something with real
>>>>> smarts in it. The advent of dirt cheap isolated switchers makes the
>>> conversion to instrument
>>>>> voltages a lot easier than it once was. Pick a common voltage like 12,
>>> 24, or 48V and run with it.
>>>>> My answer to the frequency standard battery pack question has become
>>> “don’t do it”. It makes
>>>>> them a *lot* lighter weight !!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
>>> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com <javascript:;>
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
>>> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.