time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: Synergy / iLotus M12M Firmware

TV
Tom Van Baak
Fri, Mar 17, 2023 8:18 AM

Hi Razvan,

I have not heard of new firmware for the Motorola M12 or iLotus M12M.
One suggestion is to look at the SSR6T from Synergy. I heard it was a
size, electrical, and software compatible board and likely includes
software fixes for GPS WNRO issues. Please verify with them.

More info here:

https://synergy-gps.com/products/gps/timing-boards-modules/

https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/EOL-M12M-GPS-receiver-2021.pdf

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/motorola-oncore-data-as-applied-in-z3801a/

https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/SSR-VP_UT-Single-Board-Datasheet-062922.pdf

Depending on your level of microcontroller and programming experience it
is also possible to make a transparent 1024 week fix yourself, even
within an opaque embedded instrument like a "IP clock server". This was
one of the factors that drove the SSR-6T market. A similar approach is
used by heoldesign.com for legacy Trimble Lassen receivers.

/tvb

On 3/10/2023 11:14 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] wrote:

Hello Tom,

This module is embedded in a "IP Clock Server" that does NTP and PTP
(IEEE 1588 v2).

The unit came without the GPS timing module option and I opened it and I
saw it has space for 3 different modules inside and I had this M12M on
hand I put it in so I can use it for sync and also 10MHz reference in my
lab. You can only install one module inside, somehow they overlap and
have different connectors for each type of GPS module.

I am afraid that next year this box will not work due to GPS week
rollover. I searched for quite some time on the net and it seems to be
no firmware available for them so I said to ask on the list.

I ordered a different module yesterday that should also fit in another
slot and the new one has a U-Blox which should be fine with GPS week
rollover.

Do you know how can I dump the firmware and flash a new one on the M12M?

Regards,
Razvan

On 3/9/2023 2:35 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] via time-nuts wrote:

Hello,

I am trying to get the latest firmware for the M12M module IL-GPS-0030-B
but I cannot find it anywhere.

I am interested to have this module updated for the GPS Week Rollover
mainly. From what I read this is based on the compiled firmware date.
The newer the compilation date the more years the module will work.

For example the modules with firmware date 2005 to 2015 will have a week
rollover on 17 August 2024. The modules with firmware 2016 will have
rollover week August 17, 2035 and the ones with 2017 firmware will have
August 17, 2036.

The module I have it is from 2006 so I expect next year to have issues.

Best regards,
Razvan

Hi Razvan, I have not heard of new firmware for the Motorola M12 or iLotus M12M. One suggestion is to look at the SSR6T from Synergy. I heard it was a size, electrical, and software compatible board and likely includes software fixes for GPS WNRO issues. Please verify with them. More info here: https://synergy-gps.com/products/gps/timing-boards-modules/ https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/EOL-M12M-GPS-receiver-2021.pdf https://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/motorola-oncore-data-as-applied-in-z3801a/ https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/SSR-VP_UT-Single-Board-Datasheet-062922.pdf Depending on your level of microcontroller and programming experience it is also possible to make a transparent 1024 week fix yourself, even within an opaque embedded instrument like a "IP clock server". This was one of the factors that drove the SSR-6T market. A similar approach is used by heoldesign.com for legacy Trimble Lassen receivers. /tvb On 3/10/2023 11:14 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] wrote: > Hello Tom, > > This module is embedded in a "IP Clock Server" that does NTP and PTP > (IEEE 1588 v2). > > The unit came without the GPS timing module option and I opened it and I > saw it has space for 3 different modules inside and I had this M12M on > hand I put it in so I can use it for sync and also 10MHz reference in my > lab. You can only install one module inside, somehow they overlap and > have different connectors for each type of GPS module. > > I am afraid that next year this box will not work due to GPS week > rollover. I searched for quite some time on the net and it seems to be > no firmware available for them so I said to ask on the list. > > I ordered a different module yesterday that should also fit in another > slot and the new one has a U-Blox which should be fine with GPS week > rollover. > > Do you know how can I dump the firmware and flash a new one on the M12M? > > Regards, > Razvan On 3/9/2023 2:35 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] via time-nuts wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to get the latest firmware for the M12M module IL-GPS-0030-B > but I cannot find it anywhere. > > I am interested to have this module updated for the GPS Week Rollover > mainly. From what I read this is based on the compiled firmware date. > The newer the compilation date the more years the module will work. > > For example the modules with firmware date 2005 to 2015 will have a week > rollover on 17 August 2024. The modules with firmware 2016 will have > rollover week August 17, 2035 and the ones with 2017 firmware will have > August 17, 2036. > > The module I have it is from 2006 so I expect next year to have issues. > > Best regards, > Razvan
RP
Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR]
Mon, Mar 20, 2023 10:56 AM

Hello Tom,

I don't use the Motorola format so I can replace it with any GPS module.

What I wanted was to get a newer firmware with a "Dynamic Base Year".
According to the document in the link below for the GPS Week Rollover
for M12M made by iLotus, they changed how the firmware works in 2016.

What I want is not to trash these modules and prolong their life. Too
much electronic garbage and not because of hardware faults but
software/firmware issues.

https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/M12M-2019-roll-over-and-base-dates-C.pdf

Regards,
Razvan

On 17/03/2023 09:18, Tom Van Baak via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Razvan,

I have not heard of new firmware for the Motorola M12 or iLotus M12M.
One suggestion is to look at the SSR6T from Synergy. I heard it was a
size, electrical, and software compatible board and likely includes
software fixes for GPS WNRO issues. Please verify with them.

More info here:

https://synergy-gps.com/products/gps/timing-boards-modules/

https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/EOL-M12M-GPS-receiver-2021.pdf

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/motorola-oncore-data-as-applied-in-z3801a/

https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/SSR-VP_UT-Single-Board-Datasheet-062922.pdf

Depending on your level of microcontroller and programming experience it
is also possible to make a transparent 1024 week fix yourself, even
within an opaque embedded instrument like a "IP clock server". This was
one of the factors that drove the SSR-6T market. A similar approach is
used by heoldesign.com for legacy Trimble Lassen receivers.

/tvb

On 3/10/2023 11:14 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] wrote:

Hello Tom,

This module is embedded in a "IP Clock Server" that does NTP and PTP
(IEEE 1588 v2).

The unit came without the GPS timing module option and I opened it and I
saw it has space for 3 different modules inside and I had this M12M on
hand I put it in so I can use it for sync and also 10MHz reference in my
lab. You can only install one module inside, somehow they overlap and
have different connectors for each type of GPS module.

I am afraid that next year this box will not work due to GPS week
rollover. I searched for quite some time on the net and it seems to be
no firmware available for them so I said to ask on the list.

I ordered a different module yesterday that should also fit in another
slot and the new one has a U-Blox which should be fine with GPS week
rollover.

Do you know how can I dump the firmware and flash a new one on the M12M?

Regards,
Razvan

On 3/9/2023 2:35 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] via time-nuts wrote:

Hello,

I am trying to get the latest firmware for the M12M module IL-GPS-0030-B
but I cannot find it anywhere.

I am interested to have this module updated for the GPS Week Rollover
mainly. From what I read this is based on the compiled firmware date.
The newer the compilation date the more years the module will work.

For example the modules with firmware date 2005 to 2015 will have a week
rollover on 17 August 2024. The modules with firmware 2016 will have
rollover week August 17, 2035 and the ones with 2017 firmware will have
August 17, 2036.

The module I have it is from 2006 so I expect next year to have issues.

Best regards,
Razvan


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hello Tom, I don't use the Motorola format so I can replace it with any GPS module. What I wanted was to get a newer firmware with a "Dynamic Base Year". According to the document in the link below for the GPS Week Rollover for M12M made by iLotus, they changed how the firmware works in 2016. What I want is not to trash these modules and prolong their life. Too much electronic garbage and not because of hardware faults but software/firmware issues. https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/M12M-2019-roll-over-and-base-dates-C.pdf Regards, Razvan On 17/03/2023 09:18, Tom Van Baak via time-nuts wrote: > Hi Razvan, > > I have not heard of new firmware for the Motorola M12 or iLotus M12M. > One suggestion is to look at the SSR6T from Synergy. I heard it was a > size, electrical, and software compatible board and likely includes > software fixes for GPS WNRO issues. Please verify with them. > > More info here: > > https://synergy-gps.com/products/gps/timing-boards-modules/ > > https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/EOL-M12M-GPS-receiver-2021.pdf > > https://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/motorola-oncore-data-as-applied-in-z3801a/ > > https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/SSR-VP_UT-Single-Board-Datasheet-062922.pdf > > Depending on your level of microcontroller and programming experience it > is also possible to make a transparent 1024 week fix yourself, even > within an opaque embedded instrument like a "IP clock server". This was > one of the factors that drove the SSR-6T market. A similar approach is > used by heoldesign.com for legacy Trimble Lassen receivers. > > /tvb > > > On 3/10/2023 11:14 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] wrote: >> Hello Tom, >> >> This module is embedded in a "IP Clock Server" that does NTP and PTP >> (IEEE 1588 v2). >> >> The unit came without the GPS timing module option and I opened it and I >> saw it has space for 3 different modules inside and I had this M12M on >> hand I put it in so I can use it for sync and also 10MHz reference in my >> lab. You can only install one module inside, somehow they overlap and >> have different connectors for each type of GPS module. >> >> I am afraid that next year this box will not work due to GPS week >> rollover. I searched for quite some time on the net and it seems to be >> no firmware available for them so I said to ask on the list. >> >> I ordered a different module yesterday that should also fit in another >> slot and the new one has a U-Blox which should be fine with GPS week >> rollover. >> >> Do you know how can I dump the firmware and flash a new one on the M12M? >> >> Regards, >> Razvan > > On 3/9/2023 2:35 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] via time-nuts wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to get the latest firmware for the M12M module IL-GPS-0030-B >> but I cannot find it anywhere. >> >> I am interested to have this module updated for the GPS Week Rollover >> mainly. From what I read this is based on the compiled firmware date. >> The newer the compilation date the more years the module will work. >> >> For example the modules with firmware date 2005 to 2015 will have a week >> rollover on 17 August 2024. The modules with firmware 2016 will have >> rollover week August 17, 2035 and the ones with 2017 firmware will have >> August 17, 2036. >> >> The module I have it is from 2006 so I expect next year to have issues. >> >> Best regards, >> Razvan > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
BC
Bob Camp
Mon, Mar 20, 2023 4:22 PM

Hi

I think you will find that many outfits went over to some sort of “future proof” setup
in the last 10 years.

Getting firmware updates for any module after a decade or two is difficult for an
individual. Even as an OEM with all the “official” ways to do it, it can be difficult.

The same is true of updates for a variety of GPS based gear, modules are not at
all unique in this regard.

To a degree changes in the silicon are at the root of a lot of this. They change
the chip  / chips in one way or another. Now the firmware for the “old” gear is unique
to that generation. They simply stop the updates rather than put (the significant)
money into the process.

Bob

On Mar 20, 2023, at 6:56 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

Hello Tom,

I don't use the Motorola format so I can replace it with any GPS module.

What I wanted was to get a newer firmware with a "Dynamic Base Year".
According to the document in the link below for the GPS Week Rollover
for M12M made by iLotus, they changed how the firmware works in 2016.

What I want is not to trash these modules and prolong their life. Too
much electronic garbage and not because of hardware faults but
software/firmware issues.

https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/M12M-2019-roll-over-and-base-dates-C.pdf

Regards,
Razvan

On 17/03/2023 09:18, Tom Van Baak via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Razvan,

I have not heard of new firmware for the Motorola M12 or iLotus M12M.
One suggestion is to look at the SSR6T from Synergy. I heard it was a
size, electrical, and software compatible board and likely includes
software fixes for GPS WNRO issues. Please verify with them.

More info here:

https://synergy-gps.com/products/gps/timing-boards-modules/

https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/EOL-M12M-GPS-receiver-2021.pdf

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/motorola-oncore-data-as-applied-in-z3801a/

https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/SSR-VP_UT-Single-Board-Datasheet-062922.pdf

Depending on your level of microcontroller and programming experience it
is also possible to make a transparent 1024 week fix yourself, even
within an opaque embedded instrument like a "IP clock server". This was
one of the factors that drove the SSR-6T market. A similar approach is
used by heoldesign.com for legacy Trimble Lassen receivers.

/tvb

On 3/10/2023 11:14 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] wrote:

Hello Tom,

This module is embedded in a "IP Clock Server" that does NTP and PTP
(IEEE 1588 v2).

The unit came without the GPS timing module option and I opened it and I
saw it has space for 3 different modules inside and I had this M12M on
hand I put it in so I can use it for sync and also 10MHz reference in my
lab. You can only install one module inside, somehow they overlap and
have different connectors for each type of GPS module.

I am afraid that next year this box will not work due to GPS week
rollover. I searched for quite some time on the net and it seems to be
no firmware available for them so I said to ask on the list.

I ordered a different module yesterday that should also fit in another
slot and the new one has a U-Blox which should be fine with GPS week
rollover.

Do you know how can I dump the firmware and flash a new one on the M12M?

Regards,
Razvan

On 3/9/2023 2:35 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] via time-nuts wrote:

Hello,

I am trying to get the latest firmware for the M12M module IL-GPS-0030-B
but I cannot find it anywhere.

I am interested to have this module updated for the GPS Week Rollover
mainly. From what I read this is based on the compiled firmware date.
The newer the compilation date the more years the module will work.

For example the modules with firmware date 2005 to 2015 will have a week
rollover on 17 August 2024. The modules with firmware 2016 will have
rollover week August 17, 2035 and the ones with 2017 firmware will have
August 17, 2036.

The module I have it is from 2006 so I expect next year to have issues.

Best regards,
Razvan


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi I think you will find that many outfits went over to some sort of “future proof” setup in the last 10 years. Getting firmware updates for *any* module after a decade or two is difficult for an individual. Even as an OEM with all the “official” ways to do it, it can be difficult. The same is true of updates for a variety of GPS based gear, modules are not at all unique in this regard. To a degree changes in the silicon are at the root of a lot of this. They change the chip / chips in one way or another. Now the firmware for the “old” gear is unique to that generation. They simply stop the updates rather than put (the significant) money into the process. Bob > On Mar 20, 2023, at 6:56 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > > Hello Tom, > > I don't use the Motorola format so I can replace it with any GPS module. > > What I wanted was to get a newer firmware with a "Dynamic Base Year". > According to the document in the link below for the GPS Week Rollover > for M12M made by iLotus, they changed how the firmware works in 2016. > > What I want is not to trash these modules and prolong their life. Too > much electronic garbage and not because of hardware faults but > software/firmware issues. > > https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/M12M-2019-roll-over-and-base-dates-C.pdf > > Regards, > Razvan > > On 17/03/2023 09:18, Tom Van Baak via time-nuts wrote: >> Hi Razvan, >> >> I have not heard of new firmware for the Motorola M12 or iLotus M12M. >> One suggestion is to look at the SSR6T from Synergy. I heard it was a >> size, electrical, and software compatible board and likely includes >> software fixes for GPS WNRO issues. Please verify with them. >> >> More info here: >> >> https://synergy-gps.com/products/gps/timing-boards-modules/ >> >> https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/EOL-M12M-GPS-receiver-2021.pdf >> >> https://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/motorola-oncore-data-as-applied-in-z3801a/ >> >> https://synergy-gps.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/SSR-VP_UT-Single-Board-Datasheet-062922.pdf >> >> Depending on your level of microcontroller and programming experience it >> is also possible to make a transparent 1024 week fix yourself, even >> within an opaque embedded instrument like a "IP clock server". This was >> one of the factors that drove the SSR-6T market. A similar approach is >> used by heoldesign.com for legacy Trimble Lassen receivers. >> >> /tvb >> >> >> On 3/10/2023 11:14 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] wrote: >>> Hello Tom, >>> >>> This module is embedded in a "IP Clock Server" that does NTP and PTP >>> (IEEE 1588 v2). >>> >>> The unit came without the GPS timing module option and I opened it and I >>> saw it has space for 3 different modules inside and I had this M12M on >>> hand I put it in so I can use it for sync and also 10MHz reference in my >>> lab. You can only install one module inside, somehow they overlap and >>> have different connectors for each type of GPS module. >>> >>> I am afraid that next year this box will not work due to GPS week >>> rollover. I searched for quite some time on the net and it seems to be >>> no firmware available for them so I said to ask on the list. >>> >>> I ordered a different module yesterday that should also fit in another >>> slot and the new one has a U-Blox which should be fine with GPS week >>> rollover. >>> >>> Do you know how can I dump the firmware and flash a new one on the M12M? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Razvan >> >> On 3/9/2023 2:35 AM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] via time-nuts wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am trying to get the latest firmware for the M12M module IL-GPS-0030-B >>> but I cannot find it anywhere. >>> >>> I am interested to have this module updated for the GPS Week Rollover >>> mainly. From what I read this is based on the compiled firmware date. >>> The newer the compilation date the more years the module will work. >>> >>> For example the modules with firmware date 2005 to 2015 will have a week >>> rollover on 17 August 2024. The modules with firmware 2016 will have >>> rollover week August 17, 2035 and the ones with 2017 firmware will have >>> August 17, 2036. >>> >>> The module I have it is from 2006 so I expect next year to have issues. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Razvan >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
RP
Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR]
Tue, Mar 21, 2023 7:31 PM

Hello Bob,

You are right, it is difficult to get updates but if the firmware is
designed correctly from start there should be no issues and making small
adjustments to correct something like week rollover would not be much
investment for a big company. I saw firmware engineers fixing problems
in less than 2 minutes and creating a new file.

In the end if support is not OK they will loose in the long run.

I can tell what I saw is happening with vendors that offer bad support,
they are excluded from future contracts and customers don't even
consider their products anymore once they are on the "list".

Maybe new chips are needed for navigation applications but for 1PPS and
time/date I would say 20 year old modules should be fine.

73!
Razvan

On 20/03/2023 17:22, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

I think you will find that many outfits went over to some sort of “future proof” setup
in the last 10 years.

Getting firmware updates for any module after a decade or two is difficult for an
individual. Even as an OEM with all the “official” ways to do it, it can be difficult.

The same is true of updates for a variety of GPS based gear, modules are not at
all unique in this regard.

To a degree changes in the silicon are at the root of a lot of this. They change
the chip  / chips in one way or another. Now the firmware for the “old” gear is unique
to that generation. They simply stop the updates rather than put (the significant)
money into the process.

Bob

Hello Bob, You are right, it is difficult to get updates but if the firmware is designed correctly from start there should be no issues and making small adjustments to correct something like week rollover would not be much investment for a big company. I saw firmware engineers fixing problems in less than 2 minutes and creating a new file. In the end if support is not OK they will loose in the long run. I can tell what I saw is happening with vendors that offer bad support, they are excluded from future contracts and customers don't even consider their products anymore once they are on the "list". Maybe new chips are needed for navigation applications but for 1PPS and time/date I would say 20 year old modules should be fine. 73! Razvan On 20/03/2023 17:22, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > I think you will find that many outfits went over to some sort of “future proof” setup > in the last 10 years. > > Getting firmware updates for *any* module after a decade or two is difficult for an > individual. Even as an OEM with all the “official” ways to do it, it can be difficult. > > The same is true of updates for a variety of GPS based gear, modules are not at > all unique in this regard. > > To a degree changes in the silicon are at the root of a lot of this. They change > the chip / chips in one way or another. Now the firmware for the “old” gear is unique > to that generation. They simply stop the updates rather than put (the significant) > money into the process. > > Bob >
BC
Bob Camp
Tue, Mar 21, 2023 8:51 PM

Hi

If you sit down with the folks who actually do this, things change a lot when there is
a silicon change. Going from one toolset to a completely different one is only a minor
part of it.

The customer base that matters to all the module outfits are the large OEM’s. Many
of them are reluctant to even engage with individual users. Their customer service
is focused on the “thousand a month” folks.

Bob

On Mar 21, 2023, at 3:31 PM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] yo8ryr@gmx.net wrote:

Hello Bob,

You are right, it is difficult to get updates but if the firmware is
designed correctly from start there should be no issues and making small
adjustments to correct something like week rollover would not be much
investment for a big company. I saw firmware engineers fixing problems
in less than 2 minutes and creating a new file.

In the end if support is not OK they will loose in the long run.

I can tell what I saw is happening with vendors that offer bad support,
they are excluded from future contracts and customers don't even
consider their products anymore once they are on the "list".

Maybe new chips are needed for navigation applications but for 1PPS and
time/date I would say 20 year old modules should be fine.

73!
Razvan

On 20/03/2023 17:22, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

I think you will find that many outfits went over to some sort of “future proof” setup
in the last 10 years.

Getting firmware updates for any module after a decade or two is difficult for an
individual. Even as an OEM with all the “official” ways to do it, it can be difficult.

The same is true of updates for a variety of GPS based gear, modules are not at
all unique in this regard.

To a degree changes in the silicon are at the root of a lot of this. They change
the chip  / chips in one way or another. Now the firmware for the “old” gear is unique
to that generation. They simply stop the updates rather than put (the significant)
money into the process.

Bob

Hi If you sit down with the folks who actually do this, things change a *lot* when there is a silicon change. Going from one toolset to a completely different one is only a minor part of it. The customer base that matters to all the module outfits are the large OEM’s. Many of them are reluctant to even engage with individual users. Their customer service is focused on the “thousand a month” folks. Bob > On Mar 21, 2023, at 3:31 PM, Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR] <yo8ryr@gmx.net> wrote: > > Hello Bob, > > You are right, it is difficult to get updates but if the firmware is > designed correctly from start there should be no issues and making small > adjustments to correct something like week rollover would not be much > investment for a big company. I saw firmware engineers fixing problems > in less than 2 minutes and creating a new file. > > In the end if support is not OK they will loose in the long run. > > I can tell what I saw is happening with vendors that offer bad support, > they are excluded from future contracts and customers don't even > consider their products anymore once they are on the "list". > > Maybe new chips are needed for navigation applications but for 1PPS and > time/date I would say 20 year old modules should be fine. > > 73! > Razvan > > On 20/03/2023 17:22, Bob Camp wrote: >> Hi >> >> I think you will find that many outfits went over to some sort of “future proof” setup >> in the last 10 years. >> >> Getting firmware updates for *any* module after a decade or two is difficult for an >> individual. Even as an OEM with all the “official” ways to do it, it can be difficult. >> >> The same is true of updates for a variety of GPS based gear, modules are not at >> all unique in this regard. >> >> To a degree changes in the silicon are at the root of a lot of this. They change >> the chip / chips in one way or another. Now the firmware for the “old” gear is unique >> to that generation. They simply stop the updates rather than put (the significant) >> money into the process. >> >> Bob >>
PK
Poul-Henning Kamp
Tue, Mar 21, 2023 10:24 PM

If anybody have /any/ firmware files for either the UT+ or the M12
receivers, I would very much like to receive a copy to feed my
disassembly/reverse-engineering hobby.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp      | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG        | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer      | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

If anybody have /any/ firmware files for either the UT+ or the M12 receivers, I would very much like to receive a copy to feed my disassembly/reverse-engineering hobby. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
MD
Magnus Danielson
Wed, Mar 22, 2023 4:14 PM

Hi,

On 2023-03-21 23:24, Poul-Henning Kamp via time-nuts wrote:

If anybody have /any/ firmware files for either the UT+ or the M12
receivers, I would very much like to receive a copy to feed my
disassembly/reverse-engineering hobby.

Speaking of which, there used to be datasheets online for the chips
being used, but later got pulled. It would be good if they could be
gathered so that such reverse-engineering hobbies (bitten too) can progress.

I have checked every now and then, and do not seem to find any on our
usual waterholes for documentations.

Cheers,
Magnus

Hi, On 2023-03-21 23:24, Poul-Henning Kamp via time-nuts wrote: > If anybody have /any/ firmware files for either the UT+ or the M12 > receivers, I would very much like to receive a copy to feed my > disassembly/reverse-engineering hobby. > Speaking of which, there used to be datasheets online for the chips being used, but later got pulled. It would be good if they could be gathered so that such reverse-engineering hobbies (bitten too) can progress. I have checked every now and then, and do not seem to find any on our usual waterholes for documentations. Cheers, Magnus
RP
Razvan Popescu [YO8RYR]
Thu, Mar 23, 2023 9:06 AM

There is NOR 8Mbit TSOP flash chip on the M12M module that I have and in
case I cannot find a way to backup the firmware via software maybe I
will desolder the chip and read it in my programmer.

Problem is I don't have much time for hobbies right now so I am not sure
when this will happen.

On 22/03/2023 17:14, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote:

Hi,

On 2023-03-21 23:24, Poul-Henning Kamp via time-nuts wrote:

If anybody have /any/ firmware files for either the UT+ or the M12
receivers, I would very much like to receive a copy to feed my
disassembly/reverse-engineering hobby.

Speaking of which, there used to be datasheets online for the chips
being used, but later got pulled. It would be good if they could be
gathered so that such reverse-engineering hobbies (bitten too) can
progress.

I have checked every now and then, and do not seem to find any on our
usual waterholes for documentations.

Cheers,
Magnus


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

There is NOR 8Mbit TSOP flash chip on the M12M module that I have and in case I cannot find a way to backup the firmware via software maybe I will desolder the chip and read it in my programmer. Problem is I don't have much time for hobbies right now so I am not sure when this will happen. On 22/03/2023 17:14, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote: > Hi, > > On 2023-03-21 23:24, Poul-Henning Kamp via time-nuts wrote: >> If anybody have /any/ firmware files for either the UT+ or the M12 >> receivers, I would very much like to receive a copy to feed my >> disassembly/reverse-engineering hobby. >> > Speaking of which, there used to be datasheets online for the chips > being used, but later got pulled. It would be good if they could be > gathered so that such reverse-engineering hobbies (bitten too) can > progress. > > I have checked every now and then, and do not seem to find any on our > usual waterholes for documentations. > > Cheers, > Magnus > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com