time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

10 MHz -> 16 MHz clock multiplier

BF
Bill Fuqua
Thu, Jan 3, 2013 6:13 PM
 One way is to divide by  10 and then multiply by 16.

Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers.
This should introduce little phase noise.
Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru a
narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can be one
or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the
reference input circuit for a PTS-160.  The output of the divide by 10 needs to
be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a
divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5.
Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the maximum
harmonic content at 16 MHz.
You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a NAND
gate.
One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed. You can
use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right.
Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your
filter amplifier.
73
Bill wa4lav

At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote:

What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be for
clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO). Low price
and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but absolute
long-term phase coherence is a must.

The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was
wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe not
SSOP. Any suggestions?

Thanks,
/tvb

One way is to divide by 10 and then multiply by 16. Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers. This should introduce little phase noise. Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru a narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can be one or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the reference input circuit for a PTS-160. The output of the divide by 10 needs to be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5. Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz. You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a NAND gate. One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed. You can use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right. Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your filter amplifier. 73 Bill wa4lav At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote: >What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be for >clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO). Low price >and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but absolute >long-term phase coherence is a must. > >The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was >wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe not >SSOP. Any suggestions? > >Thanks, >/tvb
M
Max
Fri, Jan 4, 2013 12:59 AM

Where can one get some of these mythical  74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that
have been mentioned.
None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or
even the Chinese.
Also data-sheets are not to be found.
Thanks

On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote:

 One way is to divide by  10 and then multiply by 16.

Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers.
This should introduce little phase noise.
Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru a
narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can
be one
or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the
reference input circuit for a PTS-160.  The output of the divide by 10
needs to
be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a
divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5.
Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the
maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz.
You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a
NAND gate.
One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed.
You can
use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right.
Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your
filter amplifier.
73
Bill wa4lav

At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote:

What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be
for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO).
Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but
absolute long-term phase coherence is a must.

The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was
wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe
not SSOP. Any suggestions?

Thanks,
/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Where can one get some of these mythical 74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that have been mentioned. None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or even the Chinese. Also data-sheets are not to be found. Thanks On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote: > One way is to divide by 10 and then multiply by 16. > Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers. > This should introduce little phase noise. > Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru a > narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can > be one > or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the > reference input circuit for a PTS-160. The output of the divide by 10 > needs to > be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a > divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5. > Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the > maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz. > You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a > NAND gate. > One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed. > You can > use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right. > Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your > filter amplifier. > 73 > Bill wa4lav > > > > At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote: >> What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be >> for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO). >> Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but >> absolute long-term phase coherence is a must. >> >> The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was >> wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe >> not SSOP. Any suggestions? >> >> Thanks, >> /tvb > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
GH
Gerhard Hoffmann
Fri, Jan 4, 2013 1:06 AM

Am 04.01.2013 01:59, schrieb Max:

Where can one get some of these mythical  74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that
have been mentioned.
None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or
even the Chinese.
Also data-sheets are not to be found.

you can't find 'em because they're not there    (Lou Reed,  "Busload Of
Faith")

regards, Gerhard

Am 04.01.2013 01:59, schrieb Max: > Where can one get some of these mythical 74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that > have been mentioned. > None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or > even the Chinese. > Also data-sheets are not to be found. > you can't find 'em because they're not there (Lou Reed, "Busload Of Faith") regards, Gerhard
D
David
Fri, Jan 4, 2013 1:49 AM

They do not exist as I found out (again) not long ago.  The last 7490
made was LS (low power schottky) and I use quite a few of them.
Actually, I have seen a datasheet for a 74HC90 and 74HCT90 but they
apparently either never went into production or very few were
produced.

The closest non-TTL alternative that I found was the 74HC390 or
74HCT390 which is basically two 7490 counters in one package.

On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:59:01 +1100, Max vk3yba@gmail.com wrote:

Where can one get some of these mythical  74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that
have been mentioned.
None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or
even the Chinese.
Also data-sheets are not to be found.
Thanks

On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote:

 One way is to divide by  10 and then multiply by 16.

Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers.
This should introduce little phase noise.
Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru a
narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can
be one
or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the
reference input circuit for a PTS-160.  The output of the divide by 10
needs to
be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a
divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5.
Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the
maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz.
You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a
NAND gate.
One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed.
You can
use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right.
Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your
filter amplifier.
73
Bill wa4lav

At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote:

What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be
for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO).
Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but
absolute long-term phase coherence is a must.

The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was
wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe
not SSOP. Any suggestions?

Thanks,
/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

They do not exist as I found out (again) not long ago. The last 7490 made was LS (low power schottky) and I use quite a few of them. Actually, I have seen a datasheet for a 74HC90 and 74HCT90 but they apparently either never went into production or very few were produced. The closest non-TTL alternative that I found was the 74HC390 or 74HCT390 which is basically two 7490 counters in one package. On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:59:01 +1100, Max <vk3yba@gmail.com> wrote: >Where can one get some of these mythical 74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that >have been mentioned. > None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or >even the Chinese. > Also data-sheets are not to be found. >Thanks > > > >On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote: >> One way is to divide by 10 and then multiply by 16. >> Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers. >> This should introduce little phase noise. >> Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru a >> narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can >> be one >> or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the >> reference input circuit for a PTS-160. The output of the divide by 10 >> needs to >> be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a >> divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5. >> Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the >> maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz. >> You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a >> NAND gate. >> One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed. >> You can >> use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right. >> Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your >> filter amplifier. >> 73 >> Bill wa4lav >> >> >> >> At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote: >>> What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be >>> for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO). >>> Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but >>> absolute long-term phase coherence is a must. >>> >>> The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was >>> wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe >>> not SSOP. Any suggestions? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> /tvb >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >and follow the instructions there.
TM
Tom Miller
Fri, Jan 4, 2013 2:02 AM

Isn't there a fast divide by N counter that you could set to 10? Maybe even
in ECL?

----- Original Message -----
From: "David" davidwhess@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz -> 16 MHz clock multiplier

They do not exist as I found out (again) not long ago.  The last 7490
made was LS (low power schottky) and I use quite a few of them.
Actually, I have seen a datasheet for a 74HC90 and 74HCT90 but they
apparently either never went into production or very few were
produced.

The closest non-TTL alternative that I found was the 74HC390 or
74HCT390 which is basically two 7490 counters in one package.

On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:59:01 +1100, Max vk3yba@gmail.com wrote:

Where can one get some of these mythical  74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that
have been mentioned.
None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or
even the Chinese.
Also data-sheets are not to be found.
Thanks

On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote:

 One way is to divide by  10 and then multiply by 16.

Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers.
This should introduce little phase noise.
Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru a
narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can
be one
or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the
reference input circuit for a PTS-160.  The output of the divide by 10
needs to
be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a
divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5.
Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the
maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz.
You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a
NAND gate.
One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed.
You can
use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right.
Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your
filter amplifier.
73
Bill wa4lav

At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote:

What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be
for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO).
Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but
absolute long-term phase coherence is a must.

The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was
wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe
not SSOP. Any suggestions?

Thanks,
/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Isn't there a fast divide by N counter that you could set to 10? Maybe even in ECL? ----- Original Message ----- From: "David" <davidwhess@gmail.com> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:49 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz -> 16 MHz clock multiplier They do not exist as I found out (again) not long ago. The last 7490 made was LS (low power schottky) and I use quite a few of them. Actually, I have seen a datasheet for a 74HC90 and 74HCT90 but they apparently either never went into production or very few were produced. The closest non-TTL alternative that I found was the 74HC390 or 74HCT390 which is basically two 7490 counters in one package. On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:59:01 +1100, Max <vk3yba@gmail.com> wrote: >Where can one get some of these mythical 74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that >have been mentioned. > None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or >even the Chinese. > Also data-sheets are not to be found. >Thanks > > > >On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote: >> One way is to divide by 10 and then multiply by 16. >> Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers. >> This should introduce little phase noise. >> Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru a >> narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can >> be one >> or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the >> reference input circuit for a PTS-160. The output of the divide by 10 >> needs to >> be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a >> divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5. >> Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the >> maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz. >> You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a >> NAND gate. >> One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed. >> You can >> use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right. >> Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your >> filter amplifier. >> 73 >> Bill wa4lav >> >> >> >> At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote: >>> What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be >>> for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO). >>> Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but >>> absolute long-term phase coherence is a must. >>> >>> The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was >>> wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe >>> not SSOP. Any suggestions? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> /tvb >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >To unsubscribe, go to >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
M
Max
Fri, Jan 4, 2013 2:04 AM

Ahhh,  the beauty of the 74xx90 is that you can have a symetrical output
by using the divide by two after the divide by five.

Max

On 4/01/2013 1:02 PM, Tom Miller wrote:

Isn't there a fast divide by N counter that you could set to 10? Maybe
even in ECL?

----- Original Message ----- From: "David" davidwhess@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz -> 16 MHz clock multiplier

They do not exist as I found out (again) not long ago.  The last 7490
made was LS (low power schottky) and I use quite a few of them.
Actually, I have seen a datasheet for a 74HC90 and 74HCT90 but they
apparently either never went into production or very few were
produced.

The closest non-TTL alternative that I found was the 74HC390 or
74HCT390 which is basically two 7490 counters in one package.

On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:59:01 +1100, Max vk3yba@gmail.com wrote:

Where can one get some of these mythical 74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that
have been mentioned.
None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or
even the Chinese.
Also data-sheets are not to be found.
Thanks

On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote:

 One way is to divide by  10 and then multiply by 16.

Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers.
This should introduce little phase noise.
Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output
thru a
narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can
be one
or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the
reference input circuit for a PTS-160.  The output of the divide by 10
needs to
be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a
divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5.
Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the
maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz.
You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a
NAND gate.
One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed.
You can
use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right.
Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your
filter amplifier.
73
Bill wa4lav

At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote:

What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be
for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO).
Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but
absolute long-term phase coherence is a must.

The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was
wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe
not SSOP. Any suggestions?

Thanks,
/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Ahhh, the beauty of the 74xx90 is that you can have a symetrical output by using the divide by two after the divide by five. Max On 4/01/2013 1:02 PM, Tom Miller wrote: > Isn't there a fast divide by N counter that you could set to 10? Maybe > even in ECL? > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "David" <davidwhess@gmail.com> > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" > <time-nuts@febo.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:49 PM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz -> 16 MHz clock multiplier > > > They do not exist as I found out (again) not long ago. The last 7490 > made was LS (low power schottky) and I use quite a few of them. > Actually, I have seen a datasheet for a 74HC90 and 74HCT90 but they > apparently either never went into production or very few were > produced. > > The closest non-TTL alternative that I found was the 74HC390 or > 74HCT390 which is basically two 7490 counters in one package. > > On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:59:01 +1100, Max <vk3yba@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Where can one get some of these mythical 74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that >> have been mentioned. >> None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or >> even the Chinese. >> Also data-sheets are not to be found. >> Thanks >> >> >> >> On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote: >>> One way is to divide by 10 and then multiply by 16. >>> Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers. >>> This should introduce little phase noise. >>> Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output >>> thru a >>> narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can >>> be one >>> or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the >>> reference input circuit for a PTS-160. The output of the divide by 10 >>> needs to >>> be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a >>> divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5. >>> Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the >>> maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz. >>> You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a >>> NAND gate. >>> One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed. >>> You can >>> use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right. >>> Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your >>> filter amplifier. >>> 73 >>> Bill wa4lav >>> >>> >>> >>> At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote: >>>> What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be >>>> for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO). >>>> Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but >>>> absolute long-term phase coherence is a must. >>>> >>>> The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was >>>> wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe >>>> not SSOP. Any suggestions? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> /tvb >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
D
David
Fri, Jan 4, 2013 2:22 AM

Oh, there are lots, well, at least some presetable synchronous
counters in fast logic families that could be used but that would
require extra glue logic.  Alternatively if you just want to divide by
5 or some other small fixed number, you can use a couple of flip-flips
and gates.

On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:02:32 -0500, "Tom Miller"
tmiller@skylinenet.net wrote:

Isn't there a fast divide by N counter that you could set to 10? Maybe even
in ECL?

----- Original Message -----
From: "David" davidwhess@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz -> 16 MHz clock multiplier

They do not exist as I found out (again) not long ago.  The last 7490
made was LS (low power schottky) and I use quite a few of them.
Actually, I have seen a datasheet for a 74HC90 and 74HCT90 but they
apparently either never went into production or very few were
produced.

The closest non-TTL alternative that I found was the 74HC390 or
74HCT390 which is basically two 7490 counters in one package.

On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:59:01 +1100, Max vk3yba@gmail.com wrote:

Where can one get some of these mythical  74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that
have been mentioned.
None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or
even the Chinese.
Also data-sheets are not to be found.
Thanks

On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote:

 One way is to divide by  10 and then multiply by 16.

Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers.
This should introduce little phase noise.
Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru a
narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can
be one
or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the
reference input circuit for a PTS-160.  The output of the divide by 10
needs to
be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a
divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5.
Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the
maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz.
You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a
NAND gate.
One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed.
You can
use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right.
Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your
filter amplifier.
73
Bill wa4lav

At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote:

What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be
for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO).
Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but
absolute long-term phase coherence is a must.

The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was
wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe
not SSOP. Any suggestions?

Thanks,
/tvb

Oh, there are lots, well, at least some presetable synchronous counters in fast logic families that could be used but that would require extra glue logic. Alternatively if you just want to divide by 5 or some other small fixed number, you can use a couple of flip-flips and gates. On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:02:32 -0500, "Tom Miller" <tmiller@skylinenet.net> wrote: >Isn't there a fast divide by N counter that you could set to 10? Maybe even >in ECL? > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "David" <davidwhess@gmail.com> >To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" ><time-nuts@febo.com> >Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:49 PM >Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz -> 16 MHz clock multiplier > > >They do not exist as I found out (again) not long ago. The last 7490 >made was LS (low power schottky) and I use quite a few of them. >Actually, I have seen a datasheet for a 74HC90 and 74HCT90 but they >apparently either never went into production or very few were >produced. > >The closest non-TTL alternative that I found was the 74HC390 or >74HCT390 which is basically two 7490 counters in one package. > >On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:59:01 +1100, Max <vk3yba@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Where can one get some of these mythical 74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that >>have been mentioned. >> None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or >>even the Chinese. >> Also data-sheets are not to be found. >>Thanks >> >> >> >>On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote: >>> One way is to divide by 10 and then multiply by 16. >>> Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers. >>> This should introduce little phase noise. >>> Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru a >>> narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can >>> be one >>> or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the >>> reference input circuit for a PTS-160. The output of the divide by 10 >>> needs to >>> be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a >>> divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5. >>> Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the >>> maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz. >>> You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a >>> NAND gate. >>> One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed. >>> You can >>> use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right. >>> Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your >>> filter amplifier. >>> 73 >>> Bill wa4lav >>> >>> >>> >>> At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote: >>>> What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be >>>> for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO). >>>> Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but >>>> absolute long-term phase coherence is a must. >>>> >>>> The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was >>>> wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe >>>> not SSOP. Any suggestions? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> /tvb
R
Rex
Fri, Jan 4, 2013 7:05 AM

On 1/3/2013 6:22 PM, David wrote:

Alternatively if you just want to divide by
5 or some other small fixed number, you can use a couple of flip-flips
and gates.

Flip-flips are good for digitally implementing tick-tick clocks, right?
:-) (Use flop-flops for tock-tock.)

On 1/3/2013 6:22 PM, David wrote: > Alternatively if you just want to divide by > 5 or some other small fixed number, you can use a couple of flip-flips > and gates. > Flip-flips are good for digitally implementing tick-tick clocks, right? :-) (Use flop-flops for tock-tock.)
CA
Chris Albertson
Fri, Jan 4, 2013 5:16 PM

THis is exactly what they are talking about the 74HC390 can do over
50MHz and costs abut 30 cents.  You don't need ECL or anything so
exotic the 30 cent part will work.  Set it for divide by 5.  I guess
this is imperfect enough that there is some fourth harmonic content in
the 2MHz square wave, then you select that with a narrow band filter
and amplify it to whatever you need.  A smart design might try and
add fourth harmonics be using a slightly not-symetric 2MHz square wave

My question is about the phase noise of the final 16MHz signal.  Do
crystal filters "clean up" the signal.  It seems that after several
16MHz crystals in series the output should look a lot like an XO.

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Tom Miller tmiller@skylinenet.net wrote:

Isn't there a fast divide by N counter that you could set to 10? Maybe even
in ECL?

----- Original Message ----- From: "David" davidwhess@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz -> 16 MHz clock multiplier

They do not exist as I found out (again) not long ago.  The last 7490
made was LS (low power schottky) and I use quite a few of them.
Actually, I have seen a datasheet for a 74HC90 and 74HCT90 but they
apparently either never went into production or very few were
produced.

The closest non-TTL alternative that I found was the 74HC390 or
74HCT390 which is basically two 7490 counters in one package.

On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:59:01 +1100, Max vk3yba@gmail.com wrote:

Where can one get some of these mythical  74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that
have been mentioned.
None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or
even the Chinese.
Also data-sheets are not to be found.
Thanks

On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote:

 One way is to divide by  10 and then multiply by 16.

Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers.
This should introduce little phase noise.
Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru a
narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can
be one
or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the
reference input circuit for a PTS-160.  The output of the divide by 10
needs to
be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a
divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5.
Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the
maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz.
You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a
NAND gate.
One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed.
You can
use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right.
Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your
filter amplifier.
73
Bill wa4lav

At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote:

What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be
for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO).
Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but
absolute long-term phase coherence is a must.

The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was
wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe
not SSOP. Any suggestions?

Thanks,
/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

THis is exactly what they are talking about the 74HC390 can do over 50MHz and costs abut 30 cents. You don't need ECL or anything so exotic the 30 cent part will work. Set it for divide by 5. I guess this is imperfect enough that there is some fourth harmonic content in the 2MHz square wave, then you select that with a narrow band filter and amplify it to whatever you need. A smart design might try and add fourth harmonics be using a slightly not-symetric 2MHz square wave My question is about the phase noise of the final 16MHz signal. Do crystal filters "clean up" the signal. It seems that after several 16MHz crystals in series the output should look a lot like an XO. On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Tom Miller <tmiller@skylinenet.net> wrote: > Isn't there a fast divide by N counter that you could set to 10? Maybe even > in ECL? > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "David" <davidwhess@gmail.com> > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" > <time-nuts@febo.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:49 PM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz -> 16 MHz clock multiplier > > > > They do not exist as I found out (again) not long ago. The last 7490 > made was LS (low power schottky) and I use quite a few of them. > Actually, I have seen a datasheet for a 74HC90 and 74HCT90 but they > apparently either never went into production or very few were > produced. > > The closest non-TTL alternative that I found was the 74HC390 or > 74HCT390 which is basically two 7490 counters in one package. > > On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:59:01 +1100, Max <vk3yba@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Where can one get some of these mythical 74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that >> have been mentioned. >> None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or >> even the Chinese. >> Also data-sheets are not to be found. >> Thanks >> >> >> >> On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote: >>> >>> One way is to divide by 10 and then multiply by 16. >>> Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers. >>> This should introduce little phase noise. >>> Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru a >>> narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can >>> be one >>> or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the >>> reference input circuit for a PTS-160. The output of the divide by 10 >>> needs to >>> be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a >>> divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5. >>> Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the >>> maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz. >>> You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a >>> NAND gate. >>> One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed. >>> You can >>> use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right. >>> Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your >>> filter amplifier. >>> 73 >>> Bill wa4lav >>> >>> >>> >>> At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote: >>>> >>>> What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be >>>> for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO). >>>> Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but >>>> absolute long-term phase coherence is a must. >>>> >>>> The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was >>>> wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe >>>> not SSOP. Any suggestions? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> /tvb >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California
BB
Bob Bownes
Fri, Jan 4, 2013 5:22 PM

Paul Wade built a board recently to do just this. www.w1ghz.org.

Bob

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Chris Albertson
albertson.chris@gmail.comwrote:

THis is exactly what they are talking about the 74HC390 can do over
50MHz and costs abut 30 cents.  You don't need ECL or anything so
exotic the 30 cent part will work.  Set it for divide by 5.  I guess
this is imperfect enough that there is some fourth harmonic content in
the 2MHz square wave, then you select that with a narrow band filter
and amplify it to whatever you need.  A smart design might try and
add fourth harmonics be using a slightly not-symetric 2MHz square wave

My question is about the phase noise of the final 16MHz signal.  Do
crystal filters "clean up" the signal.  It seems that after several
16MHz crystals in series the output should look a lot like an XO.

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Tom Miller tmiller@skylinenet.net wrote:

Isn't there a fast divide by N counter that you could set to 10? Maybe

even

in ECL?

----- Original Message ----- From: "David" davidwhess@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz -> 16 MHz clock multiplier

They do not exist as I found out (again) not long ago.  The last 7490
made was LS (low power schottky) and I use quite a few of them.
Actually, I have seen a datasheet for a 74HC90 and 74HCT90 but they
apparently either never went into production or very few were
produced.

The closest non-TTL alternative that I found was the 74HC390 or
74HCT390 which is basically two 7490 counters in one package.

On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:59:01 +1100, Max vk3yba@gmail.com wrote:

Where can one get some of these mythical  74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that
have been mentioned.
None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or
even the Chinese.
Also data-sheets are not to be found.
Thanks

On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote:

 One way is to divide by  10 and then multiply by 16.

Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers.
This should introduce little phase noise.
Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru

a

narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can
be one
or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the
reference input circuit for a PTS-160.  The output of the divide by 10
needs to
be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a
divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5.
Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the
maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz.
You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a
NAND gate.
One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed.
You can
use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right.
Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your
filter amplifier.
73
Bill wa4lav

At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote:

What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be
for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO).
Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but
absolute long-term phase coherence is a must.

The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was
wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe
not SSOP. Any suggestions?

Thanks,
/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Paul Wade built a board recently to do just this. www.w1ghz.org. Bob On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Chris Albertson <albertson.chris@gmail.com>wrote: > THis is exactly what they are talking about the 74HC390 can do over > 50MHz and costs abut 30 cents. You don't need ECL or anything so > exotic the 30 cent part will work. Set it for divide by 5. I guess > this is imperfect enough that there is some fourth harmonic content in > the 2MHz square wave, then you select that with a narrow band filter > and amplify it to whatever you need. A smart design might try and > add fourth harmonics be using a slightly not-symetric 2MHz square wave > > My question is about the phase noise of the final 16MHz signal. Do > crystal filters "clean up" the signal. It seems that after several > 16MHz crystals in series the output should look a lot like an XO. > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Tom Miller <tmiller@skylinenet.net> wrote: > > Isn't there a fast divide by N counter that you could set to 10? Maybe > even > > in ECL? > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "David" <davidwhess@gmail.com> > > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" > > <time-nuts@febo.com> > > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:49 PM > > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10 MHz -> 16 MHz clock multiplier > > > > > > > > They do not exist as I found out (again) not long ago. The last 7490 > > made was LS (low power schottky) and I use quite a few of them. > > Actually, I have seen a datasheet for a 74HC90 and 74HCT90 but they > > apparently either never went into production or very few were > > produced. > > > > The closest non-TTL alternative that I found was the 74HC390 or > > 74HCT390 which is basically two 7490 counters in one package. > > > > On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:59:01 +1100, Max <vk3yba@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Where can one get some of these mythical 74HC90 's and 74AC90 's that > >> have been mentioned. > >> None of the usual places have them, ie ebay, digi-key, farnell, or > >> even the Chinese. > >> Also data-sheets are not to be found. > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >> > >> On 4/01/2013 5:13 AM, Bill Fuqua wrote: > >>> > >>> One way is to divide by 10 and then multiply by 16. > >>> Divide by 10 and then follow by 4 tuned frequency doublers. > >>> This should introduce little phase noise. > >>> Another way to do it is to divide by 10, then pass the output thru > a > >>> narrow 16 MHz filter and amplify. Sounds difficult but the filter can > >>> be one > >>> or two 16 MHz crystals followed by a simple amplifier. Look at the > >>> reference input circuit for a PTS-160. The output of the divide by 10 > >>> needs to > >>> be asymmetrical so it produces even harmonics. If you are using a > >>> divide divide by 5&2 such as a 74HC90, divide by 2 first then by 5. > >>> Ideally the pulse width should be a half period of 16 MHz for the > >>> maximum harmonic content at 16 MHz. > >>> You can take the output of the frequency divider and send it to a > >>> NAND gate. > >>> One input of the gate is directly connected and the other is delayed. > >>> You can > >>> use an RC with a variable capacitor to ground to get it just right. > >>> Just adjust the capacitor to get the maximum output from your > >>> filter amplifier. > >>> 73 > >>> Bill wa4lav > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> At 07:41 PM 1/2/2013 +0000, you wrote: > >>>> > >>>> What's the simplest way to generate 16 MHz from 10 MHz? This will be > >>>> for clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO). > >>>> Low price and low parts count is a goal; jitter is not a concern but > >>>> absolute long-term phase coherence is a must. > >>>> > >>>> The ICS525 (as in TAPR Clock-Block) is a good candidate but I was > >>>> wondering if there's something cheaper, less functional, and maybe > >>>> not SSOP. Any suggestions? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> /tvb > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > >>> To unsubscribe, go to > >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >>> and follow the instructions there. > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > >> To unsubscribe, go to > >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >> and follow the instructions there. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > -- > > Chris Albertson > Redondo Beach, California > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >