"Paolo Bonzini"<bonzini@gnu.org> wrote: > Ability to work seamlessly with people that use the tools outside > Smalltalk is already a big step forward. It will often do even if the > integration with the tool is kind of fake. Sure, but that just helps you to do part of a project in smalltalk, it doesn't help much with attracting new people to Smalltalk.

On 10/29/2010 05:58 PM, mkobetic@cincom.com wrote: > "Paolo Bonzini"<bonzini@gnu.org> wrote: >> Ability to work seamlessly with people that use the tools outside >> Smalltalk is already a big step forward. It will often do even if the >> integration with the tool is kind of fake. > > Sure, but that just helps you to do part of a project in smalltalk, > it doesn't help much with attracting new people to Smalltalk. It's definitely a step towards that, though. Does your experience with CVST suggest that it's better to do both steps at the same time? I would be worried that including in an "initial battle plan" an editor-friendly syntax would lead to endless discussions and no code produced. Paolo