Hi Dave:
The article shows a photo of a Predator, yet what the UoT guys did was hack a toy helicopter that used only the L1
civilian GPS signal.
My guess is that they used a home made 3rd generation GPS simulator with a moderate power amp and antenna.
http://www.prc68.com/I/5001A.html <- first generation single satellite single signal
http://www.prc68.com/I/NTgpsSTR2760.shtml <- second generation multi satellite and multi signal
Note that all GPS satellites transmit on the same frequency and so in a sense interfere with each other.
But because of the orthogonally of the codes the receiver can process each signal.
When a higher power signal is received the "capture" effect eliminates the weaker signals so a high power signal can
easily "capture" the receiver.
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
DaveH wrote:
http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-1000-us-government-906/
Dave
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
The picture is not of a Predator, it's a Global Hawk, a much larger
aircraft.
Didier KO4BB
On Jun 28, 2012 11:47 AM, "Brooke Clarke" brooke@pacific.net wrote:
Hi Dave:
The article shows a photo of a Predator, yet what the UoT guys did was
hack a toy helicopter that used only the L1 civilian GPS signal.
My guess is that they used a home made 3rd generation GPS simulator with a
moderate power amp and antenna.
http://www.prc68.com/I/5001A.**html http://www.prc68.com/I/5001A.html<- first generation single satellite single signal
http://www.prc68.com/I/**NTgpsSTR2760.shtmlhttp://www.prc68.com/I/NTgpsSTR2760.shtml<- second generation multi satellite and multi signal
Note that all GPS satellites transmit on the same frequency and so in a
sense interfere with each other.
But because of the orthogonally of the codes the receiver can process each
signal.
When a higher power signal is received the "capture" effect eliminates the
weaker signals so a high power signal can easily "capture" the receiver.
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.**end2partygovernment.com/**2012Issues.htmlhttp://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
DaveH wrote:
http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-**1000-us-government-906/http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-1000-us-government-906/
Dave
_____________**
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_____________**
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
And not the UAV of the story, I'm sure.
-John
=================
The picture is not of a Predator, it's a Global Hawk, a much larger
aircraft.
Didier KO4BB
On Jun 28, 2012 11:47 AM, "Brooke Clarke" brooke@pacific.net wrote:
Hi Dave:
The article shows a photo of a Predator, yet what the UoT guys did was
hack a toy helicopter that used only the L1 civilian GPS signal.
My guess is that they used a home made 3rd generation GPS simulator with
a
moderate power amp and antenna.
http://www.prc68.com/I/5001A.**html
http://www.prc68.com/I/5001A.html<- first generation single satellite
single signal
http://www.prc68.com/I/**NTgpsSTR2760.shtmlhttp://www.prc68.com/I/NTgpsSTR2760.shtml<-
second generation multi satellite and multi signal
Note that all GPS satellites transmit on the same frequency and so in a
sense interfere with each other.
But because of the orthogonally of the codes the receiver can process
each
signal.
When a higher power signal is received the "capture" effect eliminates
the
weaker signals so a high power signal can easily "capture" the receiver.
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.**end2partygovernment.com/**2012Issues.htmlhttp://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
DaveH wrote:
http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-**1000-us-government-906/http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-1000-us-government-906/
Dave
_____________**
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_____________**
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
I can't imagine that we don't sanity check without baro , altimeters . Isn't that the inspiration
for the Kalman filter ?
--- On Thu, 6/28/12, J. Forster jfor@quikus.com wrote:
From: J. Forster jfor@quikus.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Spoofing GPS - news article
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" time-nuts@febo.com
Date: Thursday, June 28, 2012, 9:53 AM
And not the UAV of the story, I'm sure.
-John
=================
The picture is not of a Predator, it's a Global Hawk, a much larger
aircraft.
Didier KO4BB
On Jun 28, 2012 11:47 AM, "Brooke Clarke" brooke@pacific.net wrote:
Hi Dave:
The article shows a photo of a Predator, yet what the UoT guys did was
hack a toy helicopter that used only the L1 civilian GPS signal.
My guess is that they used a home made 3rd generation GPS simulator with
a
moderate power amp and antenna.
http://www.prc68.com/I/5001A.**html
http://www.prc68.com/I/5001A.html<- first generation single satellite
single signal
http://www.prc68.com/I/**NTgpsSTR2760.shtmlhttp://www.prc68.com/I/NTgpsSTR2760.shtml<-
second generation multi satellite and multi signal
Note that all GPS satellites transmit on the same frequency and so in a
sense interfere with each other.
But because of the orthogonally of the codes the receiver can process
each
signal.
When a higher power signal is received the "capture" effect eliminates
the
weaker signals so a high power signal can easily "capture" the receiver.
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.**end2partygovernment.com/**2012Issues.htmlhttp://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
DaveH wrote:
http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-**1000-us-government-906/http://rt.com/usa/news/texas-1000-us-government-906/
Dave
_____________**
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_____________**
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi Steve:
It's my understanding that they do have baro altimeters, gyros and accelerometers plus some other flight stability inputs.
But . . . they seem to be vulnerable to some forms of GPS jamming or spoofing.
If jamming started out with the same satellite positions as were currently in the sky then I don't see how the physical
sensors would be of any help.
It's similar to range gate walk off RADAR jamming.
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
steve heidmann wrote:
I can't imagine that we don't sanity check without baro , altimeters . Isn't that the inspiration
for the Kalman filter ?