time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO Alternatives

JL
Jim Lux
Fri, Dec 7, 2012 3:12 PM

On 12/6/12 5:01 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

The solution to the problem is well known in several forms. Cost is below $5 for pretty much all of them. No need to re-invent the wheel. The gotcha is that you can't do it 100% with internal CPU peripherals. You will need some glue.

I think that's the interesting aspect of this discussion (because it
mirrors many similar such discussions I've had over the years)..

The challenge is not in building a GPSDO.. there's tons of ways to do
that at minimal hardware cost..

The challenge is "how do you do it without using any additional glue
logic or hardware"  That is, given things you can buy off the shelf, and
no hardware work other than fabricating cables or soldering a wire or
two, what can you do inexpensively.

On 12/6/12 5:01 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > The solution to the problem is well known in several forms. Cost is below $5 for pretty much all of them. No need to re-invent the wheel. The gotcha is that you can't do it 100% with internal CPU peripherals. You will need *some* glue. > > I think that's the interesting aspect of this discussion (because it mirrors many similar such discussions I've had over the years).. The challenge is not in building a GPSDO.. there's tons of ways to do that at minimal hardware cost.. The challenge is "how do you do it without using any additional glue logic or hardware" That is, given things you can buy off the shelf, and no hardware work other than fabricating cables or soldering a wire or two, what can you do inexpensively.
JL
Jim Lux
Fri, Dec 7, 2012 3:16 PM

On 12/6/12 11:20 PM, Don Latham wrote:

Good thought, Bob. AD9548 $27, eval board a whopping $250, get a
thunderbolt :-). The eval board has a lot of SMA's on it...

This is a general problem with eval boards these days.. They provide a
lot of functionality on the board to make it easy to evaluate the chip
(USB interfaces, buffer memories, etc.)  but that makes it hard to use
the eval board as a sort of glorified chip carrier.

For instance, all those nice serial interface ADC and DAC parts.. it
would be nice to have a little board with the converter, power supply
filtering and maybe an opamp buffer, and bring the serial interface pins
to the edge where you could just wire it to something like a PIC eval
board or Arduino or parallel printer port.  But no.. they have a weird
connector that goes to a mother board with a fancy preprogrammed micro
and dual port memory and stuff.. all so you can just hook up a signal
generator and capture samples to run FFTs to duplicate the databook graphs.

On 12/6/12 11:20 PM, Don Latham wrote: > Good thought, Bob. AD9548 $27, eval board a whopping $250, get a > thunderbolt :-). The eval board has a lot of SMA's on it... This is a general problem with eval boards these days.. They provide a lot of functionality on the board to make it easy to evaluate the chip (USB interfaces, buffer memories, etc.) but that makes it hard to use the eval board as a sort of glorified chip carrier. For instance, all those nice serial interface ADC and DAC parts.. it would be nice to have a little board with the converter, power supply filtering and maybe an opamp buffer, and bring the serial interface pins to the edge where you could just wire it to something like a PIC eval board or Arduino or parallel printer port. But no.. they have a weird connector that goes to a mother board with a fancy preprogrammed micro and dual port memory and stuff.. all so you can just hook up a signal generator and capture samples to run FFTs to duplicate the databook graphs.
PS
paul swed
Fri, Dec 7, 2012 4:52 PM

Jim right on target for my 2 cents,
Simple is often hard.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Jim Lux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:

On 12/6/12 5:01 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

The solution to the problem is well known in several forms. Cost is below
$5 for pretty much all of them. No need to re-invent the wheel. The gotcha
is that you can't do it 100% with internal CPU peripherals. You will need
some glue.

I think that's the interesting aspect of this discussion (because it

mirrors many similar such discussions I've had over the years)..

The challenge is not in building a GPSDO.. there's tons of ways to do that
at minimal hardware cost..

The challenge is "how do you do it without using any additional glue logic
or hardware"  That is, given things you can buy off the shelf, and no
hardware work other than fabricating cables or soldering a wire or two,
what can you do inexpensively.

_____________**
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/**
mailman/listinfo/time-nutshttps://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Jim right on target for my 2 cents, Simple is often hard. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote: > On 12/6/12 5:01 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > >> Hi >> >> The solution to the problem is well known in several forms. Cost is below >> $5 for pretty much all of them. No need to re-invent the wheel. The gotcha >> is that you can't do it 100% with internal CPU peripherals. You will need >> *some* glue. >> >> >> I think that's the interesting aspect of this discussion (because it > mirrors many similar such discussions I've had over the years).. > > The challenge is not in building a GPSDO.. there's tons of ways to do that > at minimal hardware cost.. > > The challenge is "how do you do it without using any additional glue logic > or hardware" That is, given things you can buy off the shelf, and no > hardware work other than fabricating cables or soldering a wire or two, > what can you do inexpensively. > > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/** > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts> > and follow the instructions there. >
BC
Bob Camp
Fri, Dec 7, 2012 5:15 PM

Hi

Without some qualifier on "how good", we all will be talking about
hourglasses and cesium standards at the same time. That makes sorting things
out a bit difficult. It may get you into building a "controlled hourglass"
that's less accurate than a free running $10 wrist watch.

So far the only suggestion of a "how good" has been TBolt performance. At
least that's how this started out.

Building a "cpu only" GPSDO can be done with a big enough chip. If you are
limited to clip leads to wire it up, the cost advantage over a TBolt may not
be there. That makes the issue of significant performance loss a very real
issue.


Just as surplus deals on TBolts come and go, so do deals on OCXO's and
GPS's. Do I price the OCXO at the $13 that I once saw it for, or the $70
that they sell for today? Is the GPS in the junk box (that I paid $200 for)
free because it's sitting there? Let's not even wonder if any of the stuff
works...

For the sake of moving this forward, I'll suggest that half the fair cost of
a (working) TBolt is the OCXO and the GPS. Put another way, your $200 (or
what ever) is split $100 for the OCXO plus GPS and $100 for:

  1. The nice shielded case it's all in
  2. The connectors
  3. The onboard power regulation and filtering
  4. The communications in and out of it
  5. The 10 MHz and PPS buffering and generation
  6. The PC board it's all built on
  7. Putting it all together
  8. Programming all the parts in there
  9. Testing it and troubleshooting it
  10. The smarts to get it to do what it does

I'm sure we could spend at least a year splitting hairs on that division of
costs :)

To "win" the hourglass vs cesium fair trade proposition you need to come up
with a gizmo that:

  1. Does 1-10 above
  2. Works with just a GPS and OCXO added.
  3. Costs less than $100
  4. Works as well as a TBolt
  5. Has a Lady Heather like monitor program to go with it

For the sake of eliminating crazy GPS cards. Let's say you also need a
source where we can buy both the OCXO and GPS used for less than $100.

If you want to factor in lower performance, I'll grant a waver for the fact
that you can average multiple gizmos and the result will get better by the
square root of the number of gizmos. If it's half as good as a $200 TBolt it
needs to be 1/4 the price.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Jim Lux
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:13 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO Alternatives (GLUE)

On 12/6/12 5:01 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

The solution to the problem is well known in several forms. Cost is below

$5 for pretty much all of them. No need to re-invent the wheel. The gotcha
is that you can't do it 100% with internal CPU peripherals. You will need
some glue.

I think that's the interesting aspect of this discussion (because it
mirrors many similar such discussions I've had over the years)..

The challenge is not in building a GPSDO.. there's tons of ways to do
that at minimal hardware cost..

The challenge is "how do you do it without using any additional glue
logic or hardware"  That is, given things you can buy off the shelf, and
no hardware work other than fabricating cables or soldering a wire or
two, what can you do inexpensively.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Without some qualifier on "how good", we all will be talking about hourglasses and cesium standards at the same time. That makes sorting things out a bit difficult. It may get you into building a "controlled hourglass" that's less accurate than a free running $10 wrist watch. So far the only suggestion of a "how good" has been TBolt performance. At least that's how this started out. Building a "cpu only" GPSDO can be done with a big enough chip. If you are limited to clip leads to wire it up, the cost advantage over a TBolt may not be there. That makes the issue of significant performance loss a very real issue. -------------------------- Just as surplus deals on TBolts come and go, so do deals on OCXO's and GPS's. Do I price the OCXO at the $13 that I once saw it for, or the $70 that they sell for today? Is the GPS in the junk box (that I paid $200 for) free because it's sitting there? Let's not even wonder if any of the stuff works... For the sake of moving this forward, I'll suggest that half the fair cost of a (working) TBolt is the OCXO and the GPS. Put another way, your $200 (or what ever) is split $100 for the OCXO plus GPS and $100 for: 1) The nice shielded case it's all in 2) The connectors 3) The onboard power regulation and filtering 4) The communications in and out of it 5) The 10 MHz and PPS buffering and generation 6) The PC board it's all built on 7) Putting it all together 8) Programming all the parts in there 9) Testing it and troubleshooting it 10) The smarts to get it to do what it does I'm sure we could spend at least a year splitting hairs on that division of costs :) To "win" the hourglass vs cesium fair trade proposition you need to come up with a gizmo that: 1) Does 1-10 above 2) Works with just a GPS and OCXO added. 3) Costs less than $100 4) Works as well as a TBolt 5) Has a Lady Heather like monitor program to go with it For the sake of eliminating crazy GPS cards. Let's say you also need a source where we can buy both the OCXO and GPS used for less than $100. If you want to factor in lower performance, I'll grant a waver for the fact that you can average multiple gizmos and the result will get better by the square root of the number of gizmos. If it's half as good as a $200 TBolt it needs to be 1/4 the price. Bob -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Jim Lux Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:13 AM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO Alternatives (GLUE) On 12/6/12 5:01 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > The solution to the problem is well known in several forms. Cost is below $5 for pretty much all of them. No need to re-invent the wheel. The gotcha is that you can't do it 100% with internal CPU peripherals. You will need *some* glue. > > I think that's the interesting aspect of this discussion (because it mirrors many similar such discussions I've had over the years).. The challenge is not in building a GPSDO.. there's tons of ways to do that at minimal hardware cost.. The challenge is "how do you do it without using any additional glue logic or hardware" That is, given things you can buy off the shelf, and no hardware work other than fabricating cables or soldering a wire or two, what can you do inexpensively. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
TM
Tom Miller
Fri, Dec 7, 2012 5:35 PM

And then it becomes popular and guess what happens to the price?

Tom

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Camp" lists@rtty.us
To: "'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO Alternatives

To "win" the hourglass vs cesium fair trade proposition you need to come up
with a gizmo that:

  1. Does 1-10 above
  2. Works with just a GPS and OCXO added.
  3. Costs less than $100
  4. Works as well as a TBolt
  5. Has a Lady Heather like monitor program to go with it

For the sake of eliminating crazy GPS cards. Let's say you also need a
source where we can buy both the OCXO and GPS used for less than $100.

If you want to factor in lower performance, I'll grant a waver for the fact
that you can average multiple gizmos and the result will get better by the
square root of the number of gizmos. If it's half as good as a $200 TBolt it
needs to be 1/4 the price.

Bob

And then it becomes popular and guess what happens to the price? Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Camp" <lists@rtty.us> To: "'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'" <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 12:15 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO Alternatives To "win" the hourglass vs cesium fair trade proposition you need to come up with a gizmo that: 1) Does 1-10 above 2) Works with just a GPS and OCXO added. 3) Costs less than $100 4) Works as well as a TBolt 5) Has a Lady Heather like monitor program to go with it For the sake of eliminating crazy GPS cards. Let's say you also need a source where we can buy both the OCXO and GPS used for less than $100. If you want to factor in lower performance, I'll grant a waver for the fact that you can average multiple gizmos and the result will get better by the square root of the number of gizmos. If it's half as good as a $200 TBolt it needs to be 1/4 the price. Bob
PS
paul swed
Fri, Dec 7, 2012 6:37 PM

Bob
Yes would agree these are the attributes of a solution thats interesting.
Numbers of folks have created solutions over the years. But the
reference architecture should be as good as or better then the tried and
true tool we have like the HP 38XX or Tbolt. Otherwise is just another
GPSDO.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Bob Camp lists@rtty.us wrote:

Hi

Without some qualifier on "how good", we all will be talking about
hourglasses and cesium standards at the same time. That makes sorting
things
out a bit difficult. It may get you into building a "controlled hourglass"
that's less accurate than a free running $10 wrist watch.

So far the only suggestion of a "how good" has been TBolt performance. At
least that's how this started out.

Building a "cpu only" GPSDO can be done with a big enough chip. If you are
limited to clip leads to wire it up, the cost advantage over a TBolt may
not
be there. That makes the issue of significant performance loss a very real
issue.


Just as surplus deals on TBolts come and go, so do deals on OCXO's and
GPS's. Do I price the OCXO at the $13 that I once saw it for, or the $70
that they sell for today? Is the GPS in the junk box (that I paid $200 for)
free because it's sitting there? Let's not even wonder if any of the stuff
works...

For the sake of moving this forward, I'll suggest that half the fair cost
of
a (working) TBolt is the OCXO and the GPS. Put another way, your $200 (or
what ever) is split $100 for the OCXO plus GPS and $100 for:

  1. The nice shielded case it's all in
  2. The connectors
  3. The onboard power regulation and filtering
  4. The communications in and out of it
  5. The 10 MHz and PPS buffering and generation
  6. The PC board it's all built on
  7. Putting it all together
  8. Programming all the parts in there
  9. Testing it and troubleshooting it
  10. The smarts to get it to do what it does

I'm sure we could spend at least a year splitting hairs on that division of
costs :)

To "win" the hourglass vs cesium fair trade proposition you need to come up
with a gizmo that:

  1. Does 1-10 above
  2. Works with just a GPS and OCXO added.
  3. Costs less than $100
  4. Works as well as a TBolt
  5. Has a Lady Heather like monitor program to go with it

For the sake of eliminating crazy GPS cards. Let's say you also need a
source where we can buy both the OCXO and GPS used for less than $100.

If you want to factor in lower performance, I'll grant a waver for the fact
that you can average multiple gizmos and the result will get better by the
square root of the number of gizmos. If it's half as good as a $200 TBolt
it
needs to be 1/4 the price.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Jim Lux
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:13 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO Alternatives (GLUE)

On 12/6/12 5:01 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

The solution to the problem is well known in several forms. Cost is below

$5 for pretty much all of them. No need to re-invent the wheel. The gotcha
is that you can't do it 100% with internal CPU peripherals. You will need
some glue.

I think that's the interesting aspect of this discussion (because it
mirrors many similar such discussions I've had over the years)..

The challenge is not in building a GPSDO.. there's tons of ways to do
that at minimal hardware cost..

The challenge is "how do you do it without using any additional glue
logic or hardware"  That is, given things you can buy off the shelf, and
no hardware work other than fabricating cables or soldering a wire or
two, what can you do inexpensively.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Bob Yes would agree these are the attributes of a solution thats interesting. Numbers of folks have created solutions over the years. But the reference architecture should be as good as or better then the tried and true tool we have like the HP 38XX or Tbolt. Otherwise is just another GPSDO. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Bob Camp <lists@rtty.us> wrote: > Hi > > Without some qualifier on "how good", we all will be talking about > hourglasses and cesium standards at the same time. That makes sorting > things > out a bit difficult. It may get you into building a "controlled hourglass" > that's less accurate than a free running $10 wrist watch. > > So far the only suggestion of a "how good" has been TBolt performance. At > least that's how this started out. > > Building a "cpu only" GPSDO can be done with a big enough chip. If you are > limited to clip leads to wire it up, the cost advantage over a TBolt may > not > be there. That makes the issue of significant performance loss a very real > issue. > > -------------------------- > > Just as surplus deals on TBolts come and go, so do deals on OCXO's and > GPS's. Do I price the OCXO at the $13 that I once saw it for, or the $70 > that they sell for today? Is the GPS in the junk box (that I paid $200 for) > free because it's sitting there? Let's not even wonder if any of the stuff > works... > > For the sake of moving this forward, I'll suggest that half the fair cost > of > a (working) TBolt is the OCXO and the GPS. Put another way, your $200 (or > what ever) is split $100 for the OCXO plus GPS and $100 for: > > 1) The nice shielded case it's all in > 2) The connectors > 3) The onboard power regulation and filtering > 4) The communications in and out of it > 5) The 10 MHz and PPS buffering and generation > 6) The PC board it's all built on > 7) Putting it all together > 8) Programming all the parts in there > 9) Testing it and troubleshooting it > 10) The smarts to get it to do what it does > > I'm sure we could spend at least a year splitting hairs on that division of > costs :) > > To "win" the hourglass vs cesium fair trade proposition you need to come up > with a gizmo that: > > 1) Does 1-10 above > 2) Works with just a GPS and OCXO added. > 3) Costs less than $100 > 4) Works as well as a TBolt > 5) Has a Lady Heather like monitor program to go with it > > For the sake of eliminating crazy GPS cards. Let's say you also need a > source where we can buy both the OCXO and GPS used for less than $100. > > If you want to factor in lower performance, I'll grant a waver for the fact > that you can average multiple gizmos and the result will get better by the > square root of the number of gizmos. If it's half as good as a $200 TBolt > it > needs to be 1/4 the price. > > Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On > Behalf Of Jim Lux > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:13 AM > To: time-nuts@febo.com > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO Alternatives (GLUE) > > On 12/6/12 5:01 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > > Hi > > > > The solution to the problem is well known in several forms. Cost is below > $5 for pretty much all of them. No need to re-invent the wheel. The gotcha > is that you can't do it 100% with internal CPU peripherals. You will need > *some* glue. > > > > > I think that's the interesting aspect of this discussion (because it > mirrors many similar such discussions I've had over the years).. > > The challenge is not in building a GPSDO.. there's tons of ways to do > that at minimal hardware cost.. > > The challenge is "how do you do it without using any additional glue > logic or hardware" That is, given things you can buy off the shelf, and > no hardware work other than fabricating cables or soldering a wire or > two, what can you do inexpensively. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BC
Bob Camp
Fri, Dec 7, 2012 9:53 PM

Hi

At least one should compare similar to better than approaches. This is a
multi year design. Pick a goal first, then try to fit a specific approach to
the goal. If the approach makes sense, move on with the design.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of paul swed
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 1:38 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO Alternatives

Bob
Yes would agree these are the attributes of a solution thats interesting.
Numbers of folks have created solutions over the years. But the
reference architecture should be as good as or better then the tried and
true tool we have like the HP 38XX or Tbolt. Otherwise is just another
GPSDO.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Bob Camp lists@rtty.us wrote:

Hi

Without some qualifier on "how good", we all will be talking about
hourglasses and cesium standards at the same time. That makes sorting
things
out a bit difficult. It may get you into building a "controlled hourglass"
that's less accurate than a free running $10 wrist watch.

So far the only suggestion of a "how good" has been TBolt performance. At
least that's how this started out.

Building a "cpu only" GPSDO can be done with a big enough chip. If you are
limited to clip leads to wire it up, the cost advantage over a TBolt may
not
be there. That makes the issue of significant performance loss a very real
issue.


Just as surplus deals on TBolts come and go, so do deals on OCXO's and
GPS's. Do I price the OCXO at the $13 that I once saw it for, or the $70
that they sell for today? Is the GPS in the junk box (that I paid $200

for)

free because it's sitting there? Let's not even wonder if any of the stuff
works...

For the sake of moving this forward, I'll suggest that half the fair cost
of
a (working) TBolt is the OCXO and the GPS. Put another way, your $200 (or
what ever) is split $100 for the OCXO plus GPS and $100 for:

  1. The nice shielded case it's all in
  2. The connectors
  3. The onboard power regulation and filtering
  4. The communications in and out of it
  5. The 10 MHz and PPS buffering and generation
  6. The PC board it's all built on
  7. Putting it all together
  8. Programming all the parts in there
  9. Testing it and troubleshooting it
  10. The smarts to get it to do what it does

I'm sure we could spend at least a year splitting hairs on that division

of

costs :)

To "win" the hourglass vs cesium fair trade proposition you need to come

up

with a gizmo that:

  1. Does 1-10 above
  2. Works with just a GPS and OCXO added.
  3. Costs less than $100
  4. Works as well as a TBolt
  5. Has a Lady Heather like monitor program to go with it

For the sake of eliminating crazy GPS cards. Let's say you also need a
source where we can buy both the OCXO and GPS used for less than $100.

If you want to factor in lower performance, I'll grant a waver for the

fact

that you can average multiple gizmos and the result will get better by the
square root of the number of gizmos. If it's half as good as a $200 TBolt
it
needs to be 1/4 the price.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Jim Lux
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:13 AM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO Alternatives (GLUE)

On 12/6/12 5:01 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

The solution to the problem is well known in several forms. Cost is

below

$5 for pretty much all of them. No need to re-invent the wheel. The gotcha
is that you can't do it 100% with internal CPU peripherals. You will need
some glue.

I think that's the interesting aspect of this discussion (because it
mirrors many similar such discussions I've had over the years)..

The challenge is not in building a GPSDO.. there's tons of ways to do
that at minimal hardware cost..

The challenge is "how do you do it without using any additional glue
logic or hardware"  That is, given things you can buy off the shelf, and
no hardware work other than fabricating cables or soldering a wire or
two, what can you do inexpensively.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi At least one should compare similar to better than approaches. This is a multi year design. Pick a goal first, then try to fit a specific approach to the goal. If the approach makes sense, move on with the design. Bob -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of paul swed Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 1:38 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO Alternatives Bob Yes would agree these are the attributes of a solution thats interesting. Numbers of folks have created solutions over the years. But the reference architecture should be as good as or better then the tried and true tool we have like the HP 38XX or Tbolt. Otherwise is just another GPSDO. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Bob Camp <lists@rtty.us> wrote: > Hi > > Without some qualifier on "how good", we all will be talking about > hourglasses and cesium standards at the same time. That makes sorting > things > out a bit difficult. It may get you into building a "controlled hourglass" > that's less accurate than a free running $10 wrist watch. > > So far the only suggestion of a "how good" has been TBolt performance. At > least that's how this started out. > > Building a "cpu only" GPSDO can be done with a big enough chip. If you are > limited to clip leads to wire it up, the cost advantage over a TBolt may > not > be there. That makes the issue of significant performance loss a very real > issue. > > -------------------------- > > Just as surplus deals on TBolts come and go, so do deals on OCXO's and > GPS's. Do I price the OCXO at the $13 that I once saw it for, or the $70 > that they sell for today? Is the GPS in the junk box (that I paid $200 for) > free because it's sitting there? Let's not even wonder if any of the stuff > works... > > For the sake of moving this forward, I'll suggest that half the fair cost > of > a (working) TBolt is the OCXO and the GPS. Put another way, your $200 (or > what ever) is split $100 for the OCXO plus GPS and $100 for: > > 1) The nice shielded case it's all in > 2) The connectors > 3) The onboard power regulation and filtering > 4) The communications in and out of it > 5) The 10 MHz and PPS buffering and generation > 6) The PC board it's all built on > 7) Putting it all together > 8) Programming all the parts in there > 9) Testing it and troubleshooting it > 10) The smarts to get it to do what it does > > I'm sure we could spend at least a year splitting hairs on that division of > costs :) > > To "win" the hourglass vs cesium fair trade proposition you need to come up > with a gizmo that: > > 1) Does 1-10 above > 2) Works with just a GPS and OCXO added. > 3) Costs less than $100 > 4) Works as well as a TBolt > 5) Has a Lady Heather like monitor program to go with it > > For the sake of eliminating crazy GPS cards. Let's say you also need a > source where we can buy both the OCXO and GPS used for less than $100. > > If you want to factor in lower performance, I'll grant a waver for the fact > that you can average multiple gizmos and the result will get better by the > square root of the number of gizmos. If it's half as good as a $200 TBolt > it > needs to be 1/4 the price. > > Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On > Behalf Of Jim Lux > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:13 AM > To: time-nuts@febo.com > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO Alternatives (GLUE) > > On 12/6/12 5:01 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > > Hi > > > > The solution to the problem is well known in several forms. Cost is below > $5 for pretty much all of them. No need to re-invent the wheel. The gotcha > is that you can't do it 100% with internal CPU peripherals. You will need > *some* glue. > > > > > I think that's the interesting aspect of this discussion (because it > mirrors many similar such discussions I've had over the years).. > > The challenge is not in building a GPSDO.. there's tons of ways to do > that at minimal hardware cost.. > > The challenge is "how do you do it without using any additional glue > logic or hardware" That is, given things you can buy off the shelf, and > no hardware work other than fabricating cables or soldering a wire or > two, what can you do inexpensively. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.