time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Frequency satndard on ebay UK

E
EB4APL
Tue, Sep 11, 2012 11:28 PM

Hi,

Has anybody in UK noticed ebay item #140845930763 ?  It reminds me the
old Sulzer units, but longer.

Ignacio, EB4APL

Hi, Has anybody in UK noticed ebay item #140845930763 ? It reminds me the old Sulzer units, but longer. Ignacio, EB4APL
JB
Jeroen Bastemeijer
Thu, Sep 13, 2012 1:31 PM

Hi Ignacio,

I got one of these units, from the same seller (actually it is the one
which is pictured). It had a broken connector and a dent in the cylinder
casing.

Luckily the unit powers up! And it generates the frequencies it should
generate.

But: the frequency tuning is a bit stiff/non-responsive and the tape
which is used in the oven is a bit old. Fixing this unit seems like a
nice winter-project ;-)

Is there anyone on the list who knows where to find the Sulzer manuals
(preferably as PDF)? As it is basically a Sulzer 2.5 / Sulzer 5.0.

Thank you, best regards, Jeroen

On 09/12/2012 01:28 AM, EB4APL wrote:

Hi,

Has anybody in UK noticed ebay item #140845930763 ?  It reminds me the
old Sulzer units, but longer.

Ignacio, EB4APL


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Ignacio, I got one of these units, from the same seller (actually it is the one which is pictured). It had a broken connector and a dent in the cylinder casing. Luckily the unit powers up! And it generates the frequencies it should generate. But: the frequency tuning is a bit stiff/non-responsive and the tape which is used in the oven is a bit old. Fixing this unit seems like a nice winter-project ;-) Is there anyone on the list who knows where to find the Sulzer manuals (preferably as PDF)? As it is basically a Sulzer 2.5 / Sulzer 5.0. Thank you, best regards, Jeroen On 09/12/2012 01:28 AM, EB4APL wrote: > Hi, > > Has anybody in UK noticed ebay item #140845930763 ? It reminds me the > old Sulzer units, but longer. > > Ignacio, EB4APL > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
T
Timeok
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 7:44 AM

This unit on ebay is made from Racal. The complete unit, oscillator and
power supply is the MA259. It is a +/- 5 e-10 day stablity.

This equipment is only good to spend winter time or for museum. Several
newer oscillator,like HP10811/10544, have the same characteristics or
better in smaller size.
The component used ar not the best and you can have fault expecially on
the power supply.

I have a paper copy of the manual also for the Sulzer 5A (AN/URQ10).

Luciano
www.timeok@timeok.it
IZ5JHJ

Il 2012-09-13 15:31 Jeroen Bastemeijer ha scritto:

Hi Ignacio,

I got one of these units, from the same seller (actually it is the
one which is pictured). It had a broken connector and a dent in the
cylinder casing.

Luckily the unit powers up! And it generates the frequencies it
should generate.

But: the frequency tuning is a bit stiff/non-responsive and the tape
which is used in the oven is a bit old. Fixing this unit seems like a
nice winter-project ;-)

Is there anyone on the list who knows where to find the Sulzer
manuals (preferably as PDF)? As it is basically a Sulzer 2.5 / Sulzer
5.0.

Thank you, best regards, Jeroen

On 09/12/2012 01:28 AM, EB4APL wrote:

Hi,

Has anybody in UK noticed ebay item #140845930763 ?  It reminds me
the old Sulzer units, but longer.

Ignacio, EB4APL


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
timeok

This unit on ebay is made from Racal. The complete unit, oscillator and power supply is the MA259. It is a +/- 5 e-10 day stablity. This equipment is only good to spend winter time or for museum. Several newer oscillator,like HP10811/10544, have the same characteristics or better in smaller size. The component used ar not the best and you can have fault expecially on the power supply. I have a paper copy of the manual also for the Sulzer 5A (AN/URQ10). Luciano www.timeok@timeok.it IZ5JHJ Il 2012-09-13 15:31 Jeroen Bastemeijer ha scritto: > Hi Ignacio, > > I got one of these units, from the same seller (actually it is the > one which is pictured). It had a broken connector and a dent in the > cylinder casing. > > Luckily the unit powers up! And it generates the frequencies it > should generate. > > But: the frequency tuning is a bit stiff/non-responsive and the tape > which is used in the oven is a bit old. Fixing this unit seems like a > nice winter-project ;-) > > Is there anyone on the list who knows where to find the Sulzer > manuals (preferably as PDF)? As it is basically a Sulzer 2.5 / Sulzer > 5.0. > > Thank you, best regards, Jeroen > > > > On 09/12/2012 01:28 AM, EB4APL wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Has anybody in UK noticed ebay item #140845930763 ? It reminds me >> the old Sulzer units, but longer. >> >> Ignacio, EB4APL >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. -- timeok
TV
Tom Van Baak
Fri, Sep 14, 2012 5:32 PM

This equipment is only good to spend winter time or for museum. Several
newer oscillator,like HP10811/10544, have the same characteristics or
better in smaller size.
The component used ar not the best and you can have fault expecially on
the power supply.

Luciano,

My experience is that some of these old 2.5 or 5 MHz Sulzer oscillators have vastly better performance than most 10811/10544. For example, see:
http://www.febo.com/pages/oscillators/sulzer/
http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-1/
http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-2/

While it is true that they don't always work out-of-the-box when you find them cheap on eBay, once fixed, their performance is stunning. That's why these rare old Sulzer's are highly prized.

/tvb

> This equipment is only good to spend winter time or for museum. Several > newer oscillator,like HP10811/10544, have the same characteristics or > better in smaller size. > The component used ar not the best and you can have fault expecially on > the power supply. Luciano, My experience is that some of these old 2.5 or 5 MHz Sulzer oscillators have vastly better performance than most 10811/10544. For example, see: http://www.febo.com/pages/oscillators/sulzer/ http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-1/ http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-2/ While it is true that they don't always work out-of-the-box when you find them cheap on eBay, once fixed, their performance is stunning. That's why these rare old Sulzer's are highly prized. /tvb
T
Timeok
Mon, Sep 17, 2012 12:50 PM

Yes Tom you right,
but your example is on a rare Sulzer 2.5 MHz. Another very good
reference can be an HP 106 (quasi impossible to find). This is not valid
for the Racal model as described. I have had several unit of this
standar under test and I keep one for my personal small museum. I have
also a Suzer 5 MHz, it is better than Racal but same as performance to
several others. I have an HP 107Br but it is not working and I cannot
test it at the moment.

All us are looking to find some units in flea market, old and good, but
this is a very rare event due the fact there is a large 5e-10
(OCXO)production or lower, and few top performance  products as you
describe.

good luck to us!

Luciano

Il 2012-09-14 19:32 Tom Van Baak ha scritto:

This equipment is only good to spend winter time or for museum.
Several
newer oscillator,like HP10811/10544, have the same characteristics
or
better in smaller size.
The component used ar not the best and you can have fault expecially
on
the power supply.

Luciano,

My experience is that some of these old 2.5 or 5 MHz Sulzer
oscillators have vastly better performance than most 10811/10544. For
example, see:
http://www.febo.com/pages/oscillators/sulzer/
http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-1/
http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-2/

While it is true that they don't always work out-of-the-box when you
find them cheap on eBay, once fixed, their performance is stunning.
That's why these rare old Sulzer's are highly prized.

/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
timeok

Yes Tom you right, but your example is on a rare Sulzer 2.5 MHz. Another very good reference can be an HP 106 (quasi impossible to find). This is not valid for the Racal model as described. I have had several unit of this standar under test and I keep one for my personal small museum. I have also a Suzer 5 MHz, it is better than Racal but same as performance to several others. I have an HP 107Br but it is not working and I cannot test it at the moment. All us are looking to find some units in flea market, old and good, but this is a very rare event due the fact there is a large 5e-10 (OCXO)production or lower, and few top performance products as you describe. good luck to us! Luciano Il 2012-09-14 19:32 Tom Van Baak ha scritto: >> This equipment is only good to spend winter time or for museum. >> Several >> newer oscillator,like HP10811/10544, have the same characteristics >> or >> better in smaller size. >> The component used ar not the best and you can have fault expecially >> on >> the power supply. > > Luciano, > > My experience is that some of these old 2.5 or 5 MHz Sulzer > oscillators have vastly better performance than most 10811/10544. For > example, see: > http://www.febo.com/pages/oscillators/sulzer/ > http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-1/ > http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-2/ > > While it is true that they don't always work out-of-the-box when you > find them cheap on eBay, once fixed, their performance is stunning. > That's why these rare old Sulzer's are highly prized. > > /tvb > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. -- timeok
GR
George Race
Mon, Sep 17, 2012 3:27 PM

I am a new user here.  Have recently gotten a Thunderbolt 10 MHz time base
up and running.
I am using the latest version of Lady Heather, 3.10 I think, to see the
overall operation.

I am very confused by all the various categories on the screen.  Things
like, PPS ADEV, OSC AEEV, PRN, etc...

Is there a place where I can download a comprehensive explanation of ALL the
terms that appear on the Lady Heather screen?

Thanks,
George, WB8BGY in Michigan

I am a new user here. Have recently gotten a Thunderbolt 10 MHz time base up and running. I am using the latest version of Lady Heather, 3.10 I think, to see the overall operation. I am very confused by all the various categories on the screen. Things like, PPS ADEV, OSC AEEV, PRN, etc... Is there a place where I can download a comprehensive explanation of ALL the terms that appear on the Lady Heather screen? Thanks, George, WB8BGY in Michigan
AB
Azelio Boriani
Mon, Sep 17, 2012 7:03 PM

Welcome aboard,
there are terms that are simple to explain, the others require a more
extended study. For example, the PRN is the GPS satellite identification
number, nothing more to be said. Yes, you can then learn more but complete
meaning is that. The term ADEV requires a more extended attention than
saying: it is a measure of the oscillator stability. There are tons of
papers on the ADEV (Allan deviation), just google for it and you can really
learn a lot of things.

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:27 PM, George Race george@mrrace.com wrote:

I am a new user here.  Have recently gotten a Thunderbolt 10 MHz time base
up and running.
I am using the latest version of Lady Heather, 3.10 I think, to see the
overall operation.

I am very confused by all the various categories on the screen.  Things
like, PPS ADEV, OSC AEEV, PRN, etc...

Is there a place where I can download a comprehensive explanation of ALL
the
terms that appear on the Lady Heather screen?

Thanks,
George, WB8BGY in Michigan


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Welcome aboard, there are terms that are simple to explain, the others require a more extended study. For example, the PRN is the GPS satellite identification number, nothing more to be said. Yes, you can then learn more but complete meaning is that. The term ADEV requires a more extended attention than saying: it is a measure of the oscillator stability. There are tons of papers on the ADEV (Allan deviation), just google for it and you can really learn a lot of things. On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:27 PM, George Race <george@mrrace.com> wrote: > I am a new user here. Have recently gotten a Thunderbolt 10 MHz time base > up and running. > I am using the latest version of Lady Heather, 3.10 I think, to see the > overall operation. > > I am very confused by all the various categories on the screen. Things > like, PPS ADEV, OSC AEEV, PRN, etc... > > Is there a place where I can download a comprehensive explanation of ALL > the > terms that appear on the Lady Heather screen? > > Thanks, > George, WB8BGY in Michigan > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
JB
Jeroen Bastemeijer
Tue, Sep 18, 2012 7:04 AM

Dear Tom, Luciano, all,

Thank you for your comments. The Sulzer is not intended to be used as a
high accuracy standard. The oscillator fits nicely to some old radio's
;-) However, I think (not measured) that stability of the oscillator is
better then the average stability of a modern low budget oscillator.

Therefore it would be nice to have it up and running. The schematic on
the website of  Tom was very helpful. Basically it would be sufficient
for trouble-shooting/repair. However, I would like to figure out the
numbers which should be indicated by the moving coil meter on the front.

I did a quick measurement with a HP counter 53230A (without a very
stable reference). The number shown for the allen variation (after a
couple of hours) was 1.5mHz on the 5MHz signal. (Maybe this number shows
the stability of the HP....??) This number gives good hope, according to me.

Is there a source for manuals on these instruments? I checked the site
of KO4BB, unfortunately he doesn't have a PDF of the manual.

Best regards, Jeroen

On 09/17/2012 02:50 PM, Timeok wrote:

Yes Tom you right,
but your example is on a rare Sulzer 2.5 MHz. Another very good
reference can be an HP 106 (quasi impossible to find). This is not
valid for the Racal model as described. I have had several unit of
this standar under test and I keep one for my personal small museum. I
have also a Suzer 5 MHz, it is better than Racal but same as
performance to several others. I have an HP 107Br but it is not
working and I cannot test it at the moment.

All us are looking to find some units in flea market, old and good,
but this is a very rare event due the fact there is a large 5e-10
(OCXO)production or lower, and few top performance  products as you
describe.

good luck to us!

Luciano

Il 2012-09-14 19:32 Tom Van Baak ha scritto:

This equipment is only good to spend winter time or for museum. Several
newer oscillator,like HP10811/10544, have the same characteristics or
better in smaller size.
The component used ar not the best and you can have fault expecially on
the power supply.

Luciano,

My experience is that some of these old 2.5 or 5 MHz Sulzer
oscillators have vastly better performance than most 10811/10544. For
example, see:
http://www.febo.com/pages/oscillators/sulzer/
http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-1/
http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-2/

While it is true that they don't always work out-of-the-box when you
find them cheap on eBay, once fixed, their performance is stunning.
That's why these rare old Sulzer's are highly prized.

/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Dear Tom, Luciano, all, Thank you for your comments. The Sulzer is not intended to be used as a high accuracy standard. The oscillator fits nicely to some old radio's ;-) However, I think (not measured) that stability of the oscillator is better then the average stability of a modern low budget oscillator. Therefore it would be nice to have it up and running. The schematic on the website of Tom was very helpful. Basically it would be sufficient for trouble-shooting/repair. However, I would like to figure out the numbers which should be indicated by the moving coil meter on the front. I did a quick measurement with a HP counter 53230A (without a very stable reference). The number shown for the allen variation (after a couple of hours) was 1.5mHz on the 5MHz signal. (Maybe this number shows the stability of the HP....??) This number gives good hope, according to me. Is there a source for manuals on these instruments? I checked the site of KO4BB, unfortunately he doesn't have a PDF of the manual. Best regards, Jeroen On 09/17/2012 02:50 PM, Timeok wrote: > Yes Tom you right, > but your example is on a rare Sulzer 2.5 MHz. Another very good > reference can be an HP 106 (quasi impossible to find). This is not > valid for the Racal model as described. I have had several unit of > this standar under test and I keep one for my personal small museum. I > have also a Suzer 5 MHz, it is better than Racal but same as > performance to several others. I have an HP 107Br but it is not > working and I cannot test it at the moment. > > All us are looking to find some units in flea market, old and good, > but this is a very rare event due the fact there is a large 5e-10 > (OCXO)production or lower, and few top performance products as you > describe. > > good luck to us! > > Luciano > > Il 2012-09-14 19:32 Tom Van Baak ha scritto: >>> This equipment is only good to spend winter time or for museum. Several >>> newer oscillator,like HP10811/10544, have the same characteristics or >>> better in smaller size. >>> The component used ar not the best and you can have fault expecially on >>> the power supply. >> >> Luciano, >> >> My experience is that some of these old 2.5 or 5 MHz Sulzer >> oscillators have vastly better performance than most 10811/10544. For >> example, see: >> http://www.febo.com/pages/oscillators/sulzer/ >> http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-1/ >> http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-2/ >> >> While it is true that they don't always work out-of-the-box when you >> find them cheap on eBay, once fixed, their performance is stunning. >> That's why these rare old Sulzer's are highly prized. >> >> /tvb >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >
T
Timeok
Tue, Sep 18, 2012 8:30 AM

Hi Jeroen,

I have a paper copy of the SULZER 5A (the 5 MHz version) and of the
Racal. If you want I can make a paper copy and send you it by postal
service. I do not know if Tom have a pdf copy of the manuals. Me too
have these OCXO for passion. I suggest you to buy e ceep GPSDO and use
it as reference for your counter, so you can start to do accurate
measurement and compare the standard you have (or will have) in your
lab.

Let me know, for logistic use my direct email:  timeok@timeok.it

Luciano
IZ5JHJ
www.timeok.it

Il 2012-09-18 09:04 Jeroen Bastemeijer ha scritto:

Dear Tom, Luciano, all,

Thank you for your comments. The Sulzer is not intended to be used as
a high accuracy standard. The oscillator fits nicely to some old
radio's ;-) However, I think (not measured) that stability of the
oscillator is better then the average stability of a modern low
budget
oscillator.

Therefore it would be nice to have it up and running. The schematic
on the website of  Tom was very helpful. Basically it would be
sufficient for trouble-shooting/repair. However, I would like to
figure out the numbers which should be indicated by the moving coil
meter on the front.

I did a quick measurement with a HP counter 53230A (without a very
stable reference). The number shown for the allen variation (after a
couple of hours) was 1.5mHz on the 5MHz signal. (Maybe this number
shows the stability of the HP....??) This number gives good hope,
according to me.

Is there a source for manuals on these instruments? I checked the
site of KO4BB, unfortunately he doesn't have a PDF of the manual.

Best regards, Jeroen

On 09/17/2012 02:50 PM, Timeok wrote:

Yes Tom you right,
but your example is on a rare Sulzer 2.5 MHz. Another very good
reference can be an HP 106 (quasi impossible to find). This is not
valid for the Racal model as described. I have had several unit of
this standar under test and I keep one for my personal small museum. I
have also a Suzer 5 MHz, it is better than Racal but same as
performance to several others. I have an HP 107Br but it is not
working and I cannot test it at the moment.

All us are looking to find some units in flea market, old and good,
but this is a very rare event due the fact there is a large 5e-10
(OCXO)production or lower, and few top performance  products as you
describe.

good luck to us!

Luciano

Il 2012-09-14 19:32 Tom Van Baak ha scritto:

This equipment is only good to spend winter time or for museum.
Several
newer oscillator,like HP10811/10544, have the same characteristics
or
better in smaller size.
The component used ar not the best and you can have fault
expecially on
the power supply.

Luciano,

My experience is that some of these old 2.5 or 5 MHz Sulzer
oscillators have vastly better performance than most 10811/10544.
For
example, see:
http://www.febo.com/pages/oscillators/sulzer/
http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-1/
http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-2/

While it is true that they don't always work out-of-the-box when
you
find them cheap on eBay, once fixed, their performance is stunning.
That's why these rare old Sulzer's are highly prized.

/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
timeok

Hi Jeroen, I have a paper copy of the SULZER 5A (the 5 MHz version) and of the Racal. If you want I can make a paper copy and send you it by postal service. I do not know if Tom have a pdf copy of the manuals. Me too have these OCXO for passion. I suggest you to buy e ceep GPSDO and use it as reference for your counter, so you can start to do accurate measurement and compare the standard you have (or will have) in your lab. Let me know, for logistic use my direct email: timeok@timeok.it Luciano IZ5JHJ www.timeok.it Il 2012-09-18 09:04 Jeroen Bastemeijer ha scritto: > Dear Tom, Luciano, all, > > Thank you for your comments. The Sulzer is not intended to be used as > a high accuracy standard. The oscillator fits nicely to some old > radio's ;-) However, I think (not measured) that stability of the > oscillator is better then the average stability of a modern low > budget > oscillator. > > Therefore it would be nice to have it up and running. The schematic > on the website of Tom was very helpful. Basically it would be > sufficient for trouble-shooting/repair. However, I would like to > figure out the numbers which should be indicated by the moving coil > meter on the front. > > I did a quick measurement with a HP counter 53230A (without a very > stable reference). The number shown for the allen variation (after a > couple of hours) was 1.5mHz on the 5MHz signal. (Maybe this number > shows the stability of the HP....??) This number gives good hope, > according to me. > > Is there a source for manuals on these instruments? I checked the > site of KO4BB, unfortunately he doesn't have a PDF of the manual. > > Best regards, Jeroen > > > > > On 09/17/2012 02:50 PM, Timeok wrote: >> Yes Tom you right, >> but your example is on a rare Sulzer 2.5 MHz. Another very good >> reference can be an HP 106 (quasi impossible to find). This is not >> valid for the Racal model as described. I have had several unit of >> this standar under test and I keep one for my personal small museum. I >> have also a Suzer 5 MHz, it is better than Racal but same as >> performance to several others. I have an HP 107Br but it is not >> working and I cannot test it at the moment. >> >> All us are looking to find some units in flea market, old and good, >> but this is a very rare event due the fact there is a large 5e-10 >> (OCXO)production or lower, and few top performance products as you >> describe. >> >> good luck to us! >> >> Luciano >> >> Il 2012-09-14 19:32 Tom Van Baak ha scritto: >>>> This equipment is only good to spend winter time or for museum. >>>> Several >>>> newer oscillator,like HP10811/10544, have the same characteristics >>>> or >>>> better in smaller size. >>>> The component used ar not the best and you can have fault >>>> expecially on >>>> the power supply. >>> >>> Luciano, >>> >>> My experience is that some of these old 2.5 or 5 MHz Sulzer >>> oscillators have vastly better performance than most 10811/10544. >>> For >>> example, see: >>> http://www.febo.com/pages/oscillators/sulzer/ >>> http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-1/ >>> http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-2/ >>> >>> While it is true that they don't always work out-of-the-box when >>> you >>> find them cheap on eBay, once fixed, their performance is stunning. >>> That's why these rare old Sulzer's are highly prized. >>> >>> /tvb >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. -- timeok
JB
Jeroen Bastemeijer
Tue, Sep 18, 2012 10:59 AM

Dear Luciano,

Thank you for your offer to make copies of the manuals. If it is OK with
you, I can make a PDF-scan of the manuals and send them to KO4BB to be
put on his website. I will contact you offlist for my address details.

Luckily enough I have a GPSDO, but... the GPSDO is at home and the
counter is at work. A challenge to get these two together ;-)

Best regards, Jeroen PE1RGE

On 09/18/2012 10:30 AM, Timeok wrote:

Hi Jeroen,

I have a paper copy of the SULZER 5A (the 5 MHz version) and of the
Racal. If you want I can make a paper copy and send you it by postal
service. I do not know if Tom have a pdf copy of the manuals. Me too
have these OCXO for passion. I suggest you to buy e ceep GPSDO and use
it as reference for your counter, so you can start to do accurate
measurement and compare the standard you have (or will have) in your lab.

Let me know, for logistic use my direct email:  timeok@timeok.it

Luciano
IZ5JHJ
www.timeok.it

Il 2012-09-18 09:04 Jeroen Bastemeijer ha scritto:

Dear Tom, Luciano, all,

Thank you for your comments. The Sulzer is not intended to be used as
a high accuracy standard. The oscillator fits nicely to some old
radio's ;-) However, I think (not measured) that stability of the
oscillator is better then the average stability of a modern low budget
oscillator.

Therefore it would be nice to have it up and running. The schematic
on the website of  Tom was very helpful. Basically it would be
sufficient for trouble-shooting/repair. However, I would like to
figure out the numbers which should be indicated by the moving coil
meter on the front.

I did a quick measurement with a HP counter 53230A (without a very
stable reference). The number shown for the allen variation (after a
couple of hours) was 1.5mHz on the 5MHz signal. (Maybe this number
shows the stability of the HP....??) This number gives good hope,
according to me.

Is there a source for manuals on these instruments? I checked the
site of KO4BB, unfortunately he doesn't have a PDF of the manual.

Best regards, Jeroen

On 09/17/2012 02:50 PM, Timeok wrote:

Yes Tom you right,
but your example is on a rare Sulzer 2.5 MHz. Another very good
reference can be an HP 106 (quasi impossible to find). This is not
valid for the Racal model as described. I have had several unit of
this standar under test and I keep one for my personal small museum.
I have also a Suzer 5 MHz, it is better than Racal but same as
performance to several others. I have an HP 107Br but it is not
working and I cannot test it at the moment.

All us are looking to find some units in flea market, old and good,
but this is a very rare event due the fact there is a large 5e-10
(OCXO)production or lower, and few top performance  products as you
describe.

good luck to us!

Luciano

Il 2012-09-14 19:32 Tom Van Baak ha scritto:

This equipment is only good to spend winter time or for museum.
Several
newer oscillator,like HP10811/10544, have the same characteristics or
better in smaller size.
The component used ar not the best and you can have fault
expecially on
the power supply.

Luciano,

My experience is that some of these old 2.5 or 5 MHz Sulzer
oscillators have vastly better performance than most 10811/10544. For
example, see:
http://www.febo.com/pages/oscillators/sulzer/
http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-1/
http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-2/

While it is true that they don't always work out-of-the-box when you
find them cheap on eBay, once fixed, their performance is stunning.
That's why these rare old Sulzer's are highly prized.

/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Dear Luciano, Thank you for your offer to make copies of the manuals. If it is OK with you, I can make a PDF-scan of the manuals and send them to KO4BB to be put on his website. I will contact you offlist for my address details. Luckily enough I have a GPSDO, but... the GPSDO is at home and the counter is at work. A challenge to get these two together ;-) Best regards, Jeroen PE1RGE On 09/18/2012 10:30 AM, Timeok wrote: > Hi Jeroen, > > I have a paper copy of the SULZER 5A (the 5 MHz version) and of the > Racal. If you want I can make a paper copy and send you it by postal > service. I do not know if Tom have a pdf copy of the manuals. Me too > have these OCXO for passion. I suggest you to buy e ceep GPSDO and use > it as reference for your counter, so you can start to do accurate > measurement and compare the standard you have (or will have) in your lab. > > Let me know, for logistic use my direct email: timeok@timeok.it > > > Luciano > IZ5JHJ > www.timeok.it > > > > Il 2012-09-18 09:04 Jeroen Bastemeijer ha scritto: >> Dear Tom, Luciano, all, >> >> Thank you for your comments. The Sulzer is not intended to be used as >> a high accuracy standard. The oscillator fits nicely to some old >> radio's ;-) However, I think (not measured) that stability of the >> oscillator is better then the average stability of a modern low budget >> oscillator. >> >> Therefore it would be nice to have it up and running. The schematic >> on the website of Tom was very helpful. Basically it would be >> sufficient for trouble-shooting/repair. However, I would like to >> figure out the numbers which should be indicated by the moving coil >> meter on the front. >> >> I did a quick measurement with a HP counter 53230A (without a very >> stable reference). The number shown for the allen variation (after a >> couple of hours) was 1.5mHz on the 5MHz signal. (Maybe this number >> shows the stability of the HP....??) This number gives good hope, >> according to me. >> >> Is there a source for manuals on these instruments? I checked the >> site of KO4BB, unfortunately he doesn't have a PDF of the manual. >> >> Best regards, Jeroen >> >> >> >> >> On 09/17/2012 02:50 PM, Timeok wrote: >>> Yes Tom you right, >>> but your example is on a rare Sulzer 2.5 MHz. Another very good >>> reference can be an HP 106 (quasi impossible to find). This is not >>> valid for the Racal model as described. I have had several unit of >>> this standar under test and I keep one for my personal small museum. >>> I have also a Suzer 5 MHz, it is better than Racal but same as >>> performance to several others. I have an HP 107Br but it is not >>> working and I cannot test it at the moment. >>> >>> All us are looking to find some units in flea market, old and good, >>> but this is a very rare event due the fact there is a large 5e-10 >>> (OCXO)production or lower, and few top performance products as you >>> describe. >>> >>> good luck to us! >>> >>> Luciano >>> >>> Il 2012-09-14 19:32 Tom Van Baak ha scritto: >>>>> This equipment is only good to spend winter time or for museum. >>>>> Several >>>>> newer oscillator,like HP10811/10544, have the same characteristics or >>>>> better in smaller size. >>>>> The component used ar not the best and you can have fault >>>>> expecially on >>>>> the power supply. >>>> >>>> Luciano, >>>> >>>> My experience is that some of these old 2.5 or 5 MHz Sulzer >>>> oscillators have vastly better performance than most 10811/10544. For >>>> example, see: >>>> http://www.febo.com/pages/oscillators/sulzer/ >>>> http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-1/ >>>> http://leapsecond.com/museum/sul25-2/ >>>> >>>> While it is true that they don't always work out-of-the-box when you >>>> find them cheap on eBay, once fixed, their performance is stunning. >>>> That's why these rare old Sulzer's are highly prized. >>>> >>>> /tvb >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>>> To unsubscribe, go to >>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >