time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

problem with Trimble Mini-T

EK
Erik Kaashoek
Sat, Nov 4, 2023 11:49 AM

While evaluating a Trimble Mini-T GPSDO it appears the 10 MHz output
frequency,  with loop control enabled, is jumping up/down every second
or so in the order of 5e-10  (green trace in attached image) resulting
in a 0.1 s ADEV of 8e-11.
In holdover mode (no GPS input and no PPS output) the output frequency
has a much better short term stability  (purple trace in attached image)
resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 5e-12
The time constant was set to 100s and the damping factor to 1. The
Mini-T was powered by a linear bench supply.
The DOCXO used has reference has a 0.1s - 10 s ADEV of at most 5e-12.
Is there anything in the tuning that can reduce the jumps or is this to
be expected from a Mini-T?
Erik.

While evaluating a Trimble Mini-T GPSDO it appears the 10 MHz output frequency,  with loop control enabled, is jumping up/down every second or so in the order of 5e-10  (green trace in attached image) resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 8e-11. In holdover mode (no GPS input and no PPS output) the output frequency has a much better short term stability  (purple trace in attached image) resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 5e-12 The time constant was set to 100s and the damping factor to 1. The Mini-T was powered by a linear bench supply. The DOCXO used has reference has a 0.1s - 10 s ADEV of at most 5e-12. Is there anything in the tuning that can reduce the jumps or is this to be expected from a Mini-T? Erik.
MD
Magnus Danielson
Sat, Nov 4, 2023 11:35 PM

Erik,

That looks to me as the beating from being unable to lock. One possible
reason is that the oscillator drifted too far so it no longer can really
reach 10 MHz. You keep getting cycle-slips.

It might be better if you measured it in free-running state, so you
start the Mini-T up with no antenna connected, but measure the 10 MHz
output. Then you can observe the oscillators behaviour without the PLL
pulling it here and there.

The beat-frequency indicates the unmodulated oscillators frequency
offset. Usually should this provide a component for the PI loop to pull
it in, but if the steering range is not working, then that will stop it.

You should be able to diagnoze more with Lady Heather or other analysis
of PLL state.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-04 12:49, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

While evaluating a Trimble Mini-T GPSDO it appears the 10 MHz output
frequency,  with loop control enabled, is jumping up/down every second
or so in the order of 5e-10  (green trace in attached image) resulting
in a 0.1 s ADEV of 8e-11.
In holdover mode (no GPS input and no PPS output) the output frequency
has a much better short term stability  (purple trace in attached
image) resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 5e-12
The time constant was set to 100s and the damping factor to 1. The
Mini-T was powered by a linear bench supply.
The DOCXO used has reference has a 0.1s - 10 s ADEV of at most 5e-12.
Is there anything in the tuning that can reduce the jumps or is this
to be expected from a Mini-T?
Erik.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Erik, That looks to me as the beating from being unable to lock. One possible reason is that the oscillator drifted too far so it no longer can really reach 10 MHz. You keep getting cycle-slips. It might be better if you measured it in free-running state, so you start the Mini-T up with no antenna connected, but measure the 10 MHz output. Then you can observe the oscillators behaviour without the PLL pulling it here and there. The beat-frequency indicates the unmodulated oscillators frequency offset. Usually should this provide a component for the PI loop to pull it in, but if the steering range is not working, then that will stop it. You should be able to diagnoze more with Lady Heather or other analysis of PLL state. Cheers, Magnus On 2023-11-04 12:49, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: > While evaluating a Trimble Mini-T GPSDO it appears the 10 MHz output > frequency,  with loop control enabled, is jumping up/down every second > or so in the order of 5e-10  (green trace in attached image) resulting > in a 0.1 s ADEV of 8e-11. > In holdover mode (no GPS input and no PPS output) the output frequency > has a much better short term stability  (purple trace in attached > image) resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 5e-12 > The time constant was set to 100s and the damping factor to 1. The > Mini-T was powered by a linear bench supply. > The DOCXO used has reference has a 0.1s - 10 s ADEV of at most 5e-12. > Is there anything in the tuning that can reduce the jumps or is this > to be expected from a Mini-T? > Erik. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
EK
Erik Kaashoek
Mon, Nov 6, 2023 3:47 PM

Hi Magnus,
Thanks for telling me to check everything.
I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output coax
running close to the coax from the reference.
To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop mode
the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz correctly
centered in the middle of the DAC range.
Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was stable and
within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference.
The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL active
the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough for me. The
active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the loop time constant
longer if needed (it is now at 100s)
Erik.

On 5-11-2023 0:35, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote:

Erik,

That looks to me as the beating from being unable to lock. One
possible reason is that the oscillator drifted too far so it no longer
can really reach 10 MHz. You keep getting cycle-slips.

It might be better if you measured it in free-running state, so you
start the Mini-T up with no antenna connected, but measure the 10 MHz
output. Then you can observe the oscillators behaviour without the PLL
pulling it here and there.

The beat-frequency indicates the unmodulated oscillators frequency
offset. Usually should this provide a component for the PI loop to
pull it in, but if the steering range is not working, then that will
stop it.

You should be able to diagnoze more with Lady Heather or other
analysis of PLL state.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-04 12:49, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

While evaluating a Trimble Mini-T GPSDO it appears the 10 MHz output
frequency,  with loop control enabled, is jumping up/down every
second or so in the order of 5e-10 (green trace in attached image)
resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 8e-11.
In holdover mode (no GPS input and no PPS output) the output
frequency has a much better short term stability  (purple trace in
attached image) resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 5e-12
The time constant was set to 100s and the damping factor to 1. The
Mini-T was powered by a linear bench supply.
The DOCXO used has reference has a 0.1s - 10 s ADEV of at most 5e-12.
Is there anything in the tuning that can reduce the jumps or is this
to be expected from a Mini-T?
Erik.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi Magnus, Thanks for telling me to check everything. I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output coax running close to the coax from the reference. To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop mode the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz correctly centered in the middle of the DAC range. Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was stable and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference. The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough for me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the loop time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s) Erik. On 5-11-2023 0:35, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote: > Erik, > > That looks to me as the beating from being unable to lock. One > possible reason is that the oscillator drifted too far so it no longer > can really reach 10 MHz. You keep getting cycle-slips. > > It might be better if you measured it in free-running state, so you > start the Mini-T up with no antenna connected, but measure the 10 MHz > output. Then you can observe the oscillators behaviour without the PLL > pulling it here and there. > > The beat-frequency indicates the unmodulated oscillators frequency > offset. Usually should this provide a component for the PI loop to > pull it in, but if the steering range is not working, then that will > stop it. > > You should be able to diagnoze more with Lady Heather or other > analysis of PLL state. > > Cheers, > Magnus > > On 2023-11-04 12:49, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: >> While evaluating a Trimble Mini-T GPSDO it appears the 10 MHz output >> frequency,  with loop control enabled, is jumping up/down every >> second or so in the order of 5e-10 (green trace in attached image) >> resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 8e-11. >> In holdover mode (no GPS input and no PPS output) the output >> frequency has a much better short term stability  (purple trace in >> attached image) resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 5e-12 >> The time constant was set to 100s and the damping factor to 1. The >> Mini-T was powered by a linear bench supply. >> The DOCXO used has reference has a 0.1s - 10 s ADEV of at most 5e-12. >> Is there anything in the tuning that can reduce the jumps or is this >> to be expected from a Mini-T? >> Erik. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
MD
Magnus Danielson
Mon, Nov 6, 2023 7:12 PM

Hi Erik,

Really happy to hear you got hold of the issue, and happy that my little
suggestions got you in the right track quick enough.

With ADEV, do you mean the Lady Heather self-reports or that of a
separate reference measurement?

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-06 16:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Magnus,
Thanks for telling me to check everything.
I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output
coax running close to the coax from the reference.
To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop mode
the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz correctly
centered in the middle of the DAC range.
Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was stable
and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference.
The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL
active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough for
me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the loop
time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s)
Erik.

On 5-11-2023 0:35, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote:

Erik,

That looks to me as the beating from being unable to lock. One
possible reason is that the oscillator drifted too far so it no
longer can really reach 10 MHz. You keep getting cycle-slips.

It might be better if you measured it in free-running state, so you
start the Mini-T up with no antenna connected, but measure the 10 MHz
output. Then you can observe the oscillators behaviour without the
PLL pulling it here and there.

The beat-frequency indicates the unmodulated oscillators frequency
offset. Usually should this provide a component for the PI loop to
pull it in, but if the steering range is not working, then that will
stop it.

You should be able to diagnoze more with Lady Heather or other
analysis of PLL state.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-04 12:49, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

While evaluating a Trimble Mini-T GPSDO it appears the 10 MHz output
frequency,  with loop control enabled, is jumping up/down every
second or so in the order of 5e-10 (green trace in attached image)
resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 8e-11.
In holdover mode (no GPS input and no PPS output) the output
frequency has a much better short term stability  (purple trace in
attached image) resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 5e-12
The time constant was set to 100s and the damping factor to 1. The
Mini-T was powered by a linear bench supply.
The DOCXO used has reference has a 0.1s - 10 s ADEV of at most 5e-12.
Is there anything in the tuning that can reduce the jumps or is this
to be expected from a Mini-T?
Erik.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi Erik, Really happy to hear you got hold of the issue, and happy that my little suggestions got you in the right track quick enough. With ADEV, do you mean the Lady Heather self-reports or that of a separate reference measurement? Cheers, Magnus On 2023-11-06 16:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: > Hi Magnus, > Thanks for telling me to check everything. > I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output > coax running close to the coax from the reference. > To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop mode > the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz correctly > centered in the middle of the DAC range. > Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was stable > and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference. > The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL > active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough for > me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the loop > time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s) > Erik. > > > On 5-11-2023 0:35, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote: >> Erik, >> >> That looks to me as the beating from being unable to lock. One >> possible reason is that the oscillator drifted too far so it no >> longer can really reach 10 MHz. You keep getting cycle-slips. >> >> It might be better if you measured it in free-running state, so you >> start the Mini-T up with no antenna connected, but measure the 10 MHz >> output. Then you can observe the oscillators behaviour without the >> PLL pulling it here and there. >> >> The beat-frequency indicates the unmodulated oscillators frequency >> offset. Usually should this provide a component for the PI loop to >> pull it in, but if the steering range is not working, then that will >> stop it. >> >> You should be able to diagnoze more with Lady Heather or other >> analysis of PLL state. >> >> Cheers, >> Magnus >> >> On 2023-11-04 12:49, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: >>> While evaluating a Trimble Mini-T GPSDO it appears the 10 MHz output >>> frequency,  with loop control enabled, is jumping up/down every >>> second or so in the order of 5e-10 (green trace in attached image) >>> resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 8e-11. >>> In holdover mode (no GPS input and no PPS output) the output >>> frequency has a much better short term stability  (purple trace in >>> attached image) resulting in a 0.1 s ADEV of 5e-12 >>> The time constant was set to 100s and the damping factor to 1. The >>> Mini-T was powered by a linear bench supply. >>> The DOCXO used has reference has a 0.1s - 10 s ADEV of at most 5e-12. >>> Is there anything in the tuning that can reduce the jumps or is this >>> to be expected from a Mini-T? >>> Erik. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >>> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
EK
Erik Kaashoek
Tue, Nov 7, 2023 6:29 AM

Hi Magnus
The ADEV was a separate measurement using the 10MHz output of the Mini-T
against my most stable DOCXO using a tinyPFA
Erik.

On 6-11-2023 20:12, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Erik,

Really happy to hear you got hold of the issue, and happy that my
little suggestions got you in the right track quick enough.

With ADEV, do you mean the Lady Heather self-reports or that of a
separate reference measurement?

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-06 16:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Magnus,
Thanks for telling me to check everything.
I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output
coax running close to the coax from the reference.
To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop
mode the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz
correctly centered in the middle of the DAC range.
Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was stable
and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference.
The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL
active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough
for me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the
loop time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s)
Erik.

Hi Magnus The ADEV was a separate measurement using the 10MHz output of the Mini-T against my most stable DOCXO using a tinyPFA Erik. On 6-11-2023 20:12, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote: > Hi Erik, > > Really happy to hear you got hold of the issue, and happy that my > little suggestions got you in the right track quick enough. > > With ADEV, do you mean the Lady Heather self-reports or that of a > separate reference measurement? > > Cheers, > Magnus > > On 2023-11-06 16:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: >> Hi Magnus, >> Thanks for telling me to check everything. >> I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output >> coax running close to the coax from the reference. >> To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop >> mode the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz >> correctly centered in the middle of the DAC range. >> Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was stable >> and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference. >> The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL >> active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough >> for me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the >> loop time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s) >> Erik. >> >>
MD
Magnus Danielson
Tue, Nov 7, 2023 3:53 PM

Hi Erik,

OK, that makes sense. That's fine. Thanks for the clarification!

I have yet to setup and test tinyPFA. Will be interesting to compare it
to other measurement solutions.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-07 07:29, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Magnus
The ADEV was a separate measurement using the 10MHz output of the
Mini-T against my most stable DOCXO using a tinyPFA
Erik.

On 6-11-2023 20:12, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Erik,

Really happy to hear you got hold of the issue, and happy that my
little suggestions got you in the right track quick enough.

With ADEV, do you mean the Lady Heather self-reports or that of a
separate reference measurement?

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-06 16:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Magnus,
Thanks for telling me to check everything.
I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output
coax running close to the coax from the reference.
To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop
mode the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz
correctly centered in the middle of the DAC range.
Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was stable
and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference.
The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL
active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough
for me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the
loop time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s)
Erik.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi Erik, OK, that makes sense. That's fine. Thanks for the clarification! I have yet to setup and test tinyPFA. Will be interesting to compare it to other measurement solutions. Cheers, Magnus On 2023-11-07 07:29, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: > Hi Magnus > The ADEV was a separate measurement using the 10MHz output of the > Mini-T against my most stable DOCXO using a tinyPFA > Erik. > > On 6-11-2023 20:12, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote: >> Hi Erik, >> >> Really happy to hear you got hold of the issue, and happy that my >> little suggestions got you in the right track quick enough. >> >> With ADEV, do you mean the Lady Heather self-reports or that of a >> separate reference measurement? >> >> Cheers, >> Magnus >> >> On 2023-11-06 16:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: >>> Hi Magnus, >>> Thanks for telling me to check everything. >>> I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output >>> coax running close to the coax from the reference. >>> To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop >>> mode the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz >>> correctly centered in the middle of the DAC range. >>> Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was stable >>> and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference. >>> The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL >>> active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough >>> for me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the >>> loop time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s) >>> Erik. >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
EK
Erik Kaashoek
Tue, Nov 7, 2023 5:25 PM

Magnus,
I know both John Ackermann and Bob did extensive measurements with the
tinyPFA and compared it to other phase measurement tools.
Erik.

On 7-11-2023 16:53, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Erik,

OK, that makes sense. That's fine. Thanks for the clarification!

I have yet to setup and test tinyPFA. Will be interesting to compare
it to other measurement solutions.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-07 07:29, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Magnus
The ADEV was a separate measurement using the 10MHz output of the
Mini-T against my most stable DOCXO using a tinyPFA
Erik.

On 6-11-2023 20:12, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Erik,

Really happy to hear you got hold of the issue, and happy that my
little suggestions got you in the right track quick enough.

With ADEV, do you mean the Lady Heather self-reports or that of a
separate reference measurement?

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-06 16:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Magnus,
Thanks for telling me to check everything.
I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output
coax running close to the coax from the reference.
To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop
mode the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz
correctly centered in the middle of the DAC range.
Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was
stable and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference.
The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL
active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough
for me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the
loop time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s)
Erik.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Magnus, I know both John Ackermann and Bob did extensive measurements with the tinyPFA and compared it to other phase measurement tools. Erik. On 7-11-2023 16:53, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote: > Hi Erik, > > OK, that makes sense. That's fine. Thanks for the clarification! > > I have yet to setup and test tinyPFA. Will be interesting to compare > it to other measurement solutions. > > Cheers, > Magnus > > On 2023-11-07 07:29, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: >> Hi Magnus >> The ADEV was a separate measurement using the 10MHz output of the >> Mini-T against my most stable DOCXO using a tinyPFA >> Erik. >> >> On 6-11-2023 20:12, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote: >>> Hi Erik, >>> >>> Really happy to hear you got hold of the issue, and happy that my >>> little suggestions got you in the right track quick enough. >>> >>> With ADEV, do you mean the Lady Heather self-reports or that of a >>> separate reference measurement? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Magnus >>> >>> On 2023-11-06 16:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: >>>> Hi Magnus, >>>> Thanks for telling me to check everything. >>>> I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output >>>> coax running close to the coax from the reference. >>>> To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop >>>> mode the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz >>>> correctly centered in the middle of the DAC range. >>>> Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was >>>> stable and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference. >>>> The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL >>>> active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough >>>> for me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the >>>> loop time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s) >>>> Erik. >>>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
JA
John Ackermann N8UR
Tue, Nov 7, 2023 8:40 PM

I measured a Thunderbolt using both TinyPFA and a TimePod and got the
attached ADEV plots.  From one second out, they're virtually
indistinguishable.  I was very impressed!

It may be a while before I am able to publish results, but in
September/October I did a very long data collection run using four
TinyPFAs measuring different GPS/GPSDO sources at a 10 Hz rate over a
total of 42 days.  The TinyPFAs ran flawlessly over that period writing
to a laptop over USB.  Again, very impressive.

John

On 11/7/23 12:25, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

Magnus,
I know both John Ackermann and Bob did extensive measurements with the
tinyPFA and compared it to other phase measurement tools.
Erik.

On 7-11-2023 16:53, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Erik,

OK, that makes sense. That's fine. Thanks for the clarification!

I have yet to setup and test tinyPFA. Will be interesting to compare
it to other measurement solutions.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-07 07:29, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Magnus
The ADEV was a separate measurement using the 10MHz output of the
Mini-T against my most stable DOCXO using a tinyPFA
Erik.

On 6-11-2023 20:12, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Erik,

Really happy to hear you got hold of the issue, and happy that my
little suggestions got you in the right track quick enough.

With ADEV, do you mean the Lady Heather self-reports or that of a
separate reference measurement?

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-06 16:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Magnus,
Thanks for telling me to check everything.
I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output
coax running close to the coax from the reference.
To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop
mode the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz
correctly centered in the middle of the DAC range.
Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was
stable and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference.
The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL
active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough
for me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the
loop time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s)
Erik.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

I measured a Thunderbolt using both TinyPFA and a TimePod and got the attached ADEV plots. From one second out, they're virtually indistinguishable. I was very impressed! It may be a while before I am able to publish results, but in September/October I did a very long data collection run using four TinyPFAs measuring different GPS/GPSDO sources at a 10 Hz rate over a total of 42 days. The TinyPFAs ran flawlessly over that period writing to a laptop over USB. Again, very impressive. John ---- On 11/7/23 12:25, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: > Magnus, > I know both John Ackermann and Bob did extensive measurements with the > tinyPFA and compared it to other phase measurement tools. > Erik. > > On 7-11-2023 16:53, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote: >> Hi Erik, >> >> OK, that makes sense. That's fine. Thanks for the clarification! >> >> I have yet to setup and test tinyPFA. Will be interesting to compare >> it to other measurement solutions. >> >> Cheers, >> Magnus >> >> On 2023-11-07 07:29, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: >>> Hi Magnus >>> The ADEV was a separate measurement using the 10MHz output of the >>> Mini-T against my most stable DOCXO using a tinyPFA >>> Erik. >>> >>> On 6-11-2023 20:12, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote: >>>> Hi Erik, >>>> >>>> Really happy to hear you got hold of the issue, and happy that my >>>> little suggestions got you in the right track quick enough. >>>> >>>> With ADEV, do you mean the Lady Heather self-reports or that of a >>>> separate reference measurement? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Magnus >>>> >>>> On 2023-11-06 16:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: >>>>> Hi Magnus, >>>>> Thanks for telling me to check everything. >>>>> I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output >>>>> coax running close to the coax from the reference. >>>>> To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop >>>>> mode the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz >>>>> correctly centered in the middle of the DAC range. >>>>> Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was >>>>> stable and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference. >>>>> The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL >>>>> active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough >>>>> for me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the >>>>> loop time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s) >>>>> Erik. >>>>> >>>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >>> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
BC
Bob Camp
Tue, Nov 7, 2023 8:43 PM

Hi

It looked good to me. It’s certainly at the top of the “bang for the buck” list.

Bob

On Nov 7, 2023, at 12:25 PM, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

Magnus,
I know both John Ackermann and Bob did extensive measurements with the tinyPFA and compared it to other phase measurement tools.
Erik.

On 7-11-2023 16:53, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Erik,

OK, that makes sense. That's fine. Thanks for the clarification!

I have yet to setup and test tinyPFA. Will be interesting to compare it to other measurement solutions.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-07 07:29, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Magnus
The ADEV was a separate measurement using the 10MHz output of the Mini-T against my most stable DOCXO using a tinyPFA
Erik.

On 6-11-2023 20:12, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Erik,

Really happy to hear you got hold of the issue, and happy that my little suggestions got you in the right track quick enough.

With ADEV, do you mean the Lady Heather self-reports or that of a separate reference measurement?

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2023-11-06 16:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote:

Hi Magnus,
Thanks for telling me to check everything.
I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output coax running close to the coax from the reference.
To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop mode the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz correctly centered in the middle of the DAC range.
Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was stable and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference.
The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough for me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the loop time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s)
Erik.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi It looked good to me. It’s certainly at the top of the “bang for the buck” list. Bob > On Nov 7, 2023, at 12:25 PM, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > > Magnus, > I know both John Ackermann and Bob did extensive measurements with the tinyPFA and compared it to other phase measurement tools. > Erik. > > On 7-11-2023 16:53, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote: >> Hi Erik, >> >> OK, that makes sense. That's fine. Thanks for the clarification! >> >> I have yet to setup and test tinyPFA. Will be interesting to compare it to other measurement solutions. >> >> Cheers, >> Magnus >> >> On 2023-11-07 07:29, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: >>> Hi Magnus >>> The ADEV was a separate measurement using the 10MHz output of the Mini-T against my most stable DOCXO using a tinyPFA >>> Erik. >>> >>> On 6-11-2023 20:12, Magnus Danielson via time-nuts wrote: >>>> Hi Erik, >>>> >>>> Really happy to hear you got hold of the issue, and happy that my little suggestions got you in the right track quick enough. >>>> >>>> With ADEV, do you mean the Lady Heather self-reports or that of a separate reference measurement? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Magnus >>>> >>>> On 2023-11-06 16:47, Erik Kaashoek via time-nuts wrote: >>>>> Hi Magnus, >>>>> Thanks for telling me to check everything. >>>>> I turned out to be leakage from another 10MHz source with an output coax running close to the coax from the reference. >>>>> To ensure the PLL worked correctly I first validated in open loop mode the control range of the DAC, which turned out to have 10MHz correctly centered in the middle of the DAC range. >>>>> Then I enabled the PLL and after about 10 minutes the PLL was stable and within 1e-10 of a Rubidium reference. >>>>> The 0.1s ADEV without PLL active is just below 0.8e-11. With PLL active the 01. - 100 s ADEV is at about 3e-11 which is good enough for me. The active PLL ADEV can be further improved by making the loop time constant longer if needed (it is now at 100s) >>>>> Erik. >>>>> >>>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >>> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com