Empathy List Archives

BB

Bob Bownes

Fri, Feb 17, 2012 6:44 PM

I was a Tek aficionado for many many years. My first personal scope was a
tek, my first work scope was a Tek. I've owned at least half a dozen over
the decades. The three scopes I own today are Tek. But everything else on
my lab bench has changed over to HP (with the exception of a couple of
TM5006 mainframes full of specialty plugins).

The quality, availability, and most important to me, the consistency of HP
gear has been impressive. I've yet to go into a lab where the majority of
basic RF equipment, counters, sig gens, spectrum analyzers, etc was not HP.
Unless they were lucky enough to have R&S.

The ability to get manuals, parts, and just plain guidance on the HP gear
has been great.

Now if I can score an HP Primary or GPSDO standard, I'll be happy.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

I believe in HPs case a unique situation occurred on the old gear.
That is there were and are people at agilent willing to take the time to
preserve their history. After all its still pretty fantastic stuff even at
20, 30, and yes I have a piece in the 40-50 years old era. Generally
amazingly well built. I do know that when test and measurement was HP their
support was top notch both for me professionally and personally. It did
effect what I chose to buy for the business. But on the personal side they
always helped I was above board about why I was calling.
Ahhh for the good ole days.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

I was a Tek aficionado for many many years. My first personal scope was a tek, my first work scope was a Tek. I've owned at least half a dozen over the decades. The three scopes I own today are Tek. But everything else on my lab bench has changed over to HP (with the exception of a couple of TM5006 mainframes full of specialty plugins). The quality, availability, and most important to me, the consistency of HP gear has been impressive. I've yet to go into a lab where the majority of basic RF equipment, counters, sig gens, spectrum analyzers, etc was not HP. Unless they were lucky enough to have R&S. The ability to get manuals, parts, and just plain guidance on the HP gear has been great. Now if I can score an HP Primary or GPSDO standard, I'll be happy. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe in HPs case a unique situation occurred on the old gear. > That is there were and are people at agilent willing to take the time to > preserve their history. After all its still pretty fantastic stuff even at > 20, 30, and yes I have a piece in the 40-50 years old era. Generally > amazingly well built. I do know that when test and measurement was HP their > support was top notch both for me professionally and personally. It did > effect what I chose to buy for the business. But on the personal side they > always helped I was above board about why I was calling. > Ahhh for the good ole days. > Regards > Paul > WB8TSL > > >

TK

Tom Knox

Fri, Feb 17, 2012 7:14 PM

With Scopes the company that has impressed me is LeCroy, not only are all their manuals on line, but where they really shine is service prices, their parts and repairs are very very reasonable.
Although Agilent, and Tektronix make fine products, I am now exclusively LeCroy. And NO I do not own stock in LeCroy.
Thomas Knox

Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:44:40 -0500
From: bownes@gmail.com
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Tek to HP conversion... Was: Re: Fwd: FE-5680A Contact FEI

I was a Tek aficionado for many many years. My first personal scope was a
tek, my first work scope was a Tek. I've owned at least half a dozen over
the decades. The three scopes I own today are Tek. But everything else on
my lab bench has changed over to HP (with the exception of a couple of
TM5006 mainframes full of specialty plugins).

The quality, availability, and most important to me, the consistency of HP
gear has been impressive. I've yet to go into a lab where the majority of
basic RF equipment, counters, sig gens, spectrum analyzers, etc was not HP.
Unless they were lucky enough to have R&S.

The ability to get manuals, parts, and just plain guidance on the HP gear
has been great.

Now if I can score an HP Primary or GPSDO standard, I'll be happy.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

I believe in HPs case a unique situation occurred on the old gear.
That is there were and are people at agilent willing to take the time to
preserve their history. After all its still pretty fantastic stuff even at
20, 30, and yes I have a piece in the 40-50 years old era. Generally
amazingly well built. I do know that when test and measurement was HP their
support was top notch both for me professionally and personally. It did
effect what I chose to buy for the business. But on the personal side they
always helped I was above board about why I was calling.
Ahhh for the good ole days.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

With Scopes the company that has impressed me is LeCroy, not only are all their manuals on line, but where they really shine is service prices, their parts and repairs are very very reasonable. Although Agilent, and Tektronix make fine products, I am now exclusively LeCroy. And NO I do not own stock in LeCroy. Thomas Knox > Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:44:40 -0500 > From: bownes@gmail.com > To: time-nuts@febo.com > Subject: [time-nuts] Tek to HP conversion... Was: Re: Fwd: FE-5680A Contact FEI > > I was a Tek aficionado for many many years. My first personal scope was a > tek, my first work scope was a Tek. I've owned at least half a dozen over > the decades. The three scopes I own today are Tek. But everything else on > my lab bench has changed over to HP (with the exception of a couple of > TM5006 mainframes full of specialty plugins). > > The quality, availability, and most important to me, the consistency of HP > gear has been impressive. I've yet to go into a lab where the majority of > basic RF equipment, counters, sig gens, spectrum analyzers, etc was not HP. > Unless they were lucky enough to have R&S. > > The ability to get manuals, parts, and just plain guidance on the HP gear > has been great. > > Now if I can score an HP Primary or GPSDO standard, I'll be happy. > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I believe in HPs case a unique situation occurred on the old gear. > > That is there were and are people at agilent willing to take the time to > > preserve their history. After all its still pretty fantastic stuff even at > > 20, 30, and yes I have a piece in the 40-50 years old era. Generally > > amazingly well built. I do know that when test and measurement was HP their > > support was top notch both for me professionally and personally. It did > > effect what I chose to buy for the business. But on the personal side they > > always helped I was above board about why I was calling. > > Ahhh for the good ole days. > > Regards > > Paul > > WB8TSL > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.

JF

J. Forster

Fri, Feb 17, 2012 9:36 PM

Tek went into the toilet when Danaher bought them out.

I bought a TDS1002 and could not even get the PC software to download
screen images, even after "registering".

However, registration sure did get me onto their spam list. It took at
least a hald-dozed tries to get their spam to stop.

I have lusted after Tek since about 1962 and have over 100 of their
instruments. The 7000 series and TM500 seriea are masterpieces.

But, never again.

YMMV,

-John

=================

I was a Tek aficionado for many many years. My first personal scope was a
tek, my first work scope was a Tek. I've owned at least half a dozen over
the decades. The three scopes I own today are Tek. But everything else on
my lab bench has changed over to HP (with the exception of a couple of
TM5006 mainframes full of specialty plugins).

The quality, availability, and most important to me, the consistency of HP
gear has been impressive. I've yet to go into a lab where the majority of
basic RF equipment, counters, sig gens, spectrum analyzers, etc was not
HP.
Unless they were lucky enough to have R&S.

The ability to get manuals, parts, and just plain guidance on the HP gear
has been great.

Now if I can score an HP Primary or GPSDO standard, I'll be happy.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

I believe in HPs case a unique situation occurred on the old gear.
That is there were and are people at agilent willing to take the time to
preserve their history. After all its still pretty fantastic stuff even
at
20, 30, and yes I have a piece in the 40-50 years old era. Generally
amazingly well built. I do know that when test and measurement was HP
their
support was top notch both for me professionally and personally. It did
effect what I chose to buy for the business. But on the personal side
they
always helped I was above board about why I was calling.
Ahhh for the good ole days.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Tek went into the toilet when Danaher bought them out. I bought a TDS1002 and could not even get the PC software to download screen images, even after "registering". However, registration sure did get me onto their spam list. It took at least a hald-dozed tries to get their spam to stop. I have lusted after Tek since about 1962 and have over 100 of their instruments. The 7000 series and TM500 seriea are masterpieces. But, never again. YMMV, -John ================= > I was a Tek aficionado for many many years. My first personal scope was a > tek, my first work scope was a Tek. I've owned at least half a dozen over > the decades. The three scopes I own today are Tek. But everything else on > my lab bench has changed over to HP (with the exception of a couple of > TM5006 mainframes full of specialty plugins). > > The quality, availability, and most important to me, the consistency of HP > gear has been impressive. I've yet to go into a lab where the majority of > basic RF equipment, counters, sig gens, spectrum analyzers, etc was not > HP. > Unless they were lucky enough to have R&S. > > The ability to get manuals, parts, and just plain guidance on the HP gear > has been great. > > Now if I can score an HP Primary or GPSDO standard, I'll be happy. > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I believe in HPs case a unique situation occurred on the old gear. >> That is there were and are people at agilent willing to take the time to >> preserve their history. After all its still pretty fantastic stuff even >> at >> 20, 30, and yes I have a piece in the 40-50 years old era. Generally >> amazingly well built. I do know that when test and measurement was HP >> their >> support was top notch both for me professionally and personally. It did >> effect what I chose to buy for the business. But on the personal side >> they >> always helped I was above board about why I was calling. >> Ahhh for the good ole days. >> Regards >> Paul >> WB8TSL >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > >

B

bownes

Fri, Feb 17, 2012 9:56 PM

Yup. Between the 1ghz 7000 series, the DSA602 w 1Ghz plug ins, and the 2236 portable I don't expect I'll ever need to buy another scope.

On Feb 17, 2012, at 16:36, "J. Forster" jfor@quikus.com wrote:

Tek went into the toilet when Danaher bought them out.

I bought a TDS1002 and could not even get the PC software to download
screen images, even after "registering".

However, registration sure did get me onto their spam list. It took at
least a hald-dozed tries to get their spam to stop.

I have lusted after Tek since about 1962 and have over 100 of their
instruments. The 7000 series and TM500 seriea are masterpieces.

But, never again.

YMMV,

-John

=================

I was a Tek aficionado for many many years. My first personal scope was a
tek, my first work scope was a Tek. I've owned at least half a dozen over
the decades. The three scopes I own today are Tek. But everything else on
my lab bench has changed over to HP (with the exception of a couple of
TM5006 mainframes full of specialty plugins).

The quality, availability, and most important to me, the consistency of HP
gear has been impressive. I've yet to go into a lab where the majority of
basic RF equipment, counters, sig gens, spectrum analyzers, etc was not
HP.
Unless they were lucky enough to have R&S.

The ability to get manuals, parts, and just plain guidance on the HP gear
has been great.

Now if I can score an HP Primary or GPSDO standard, I'll be happy.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

I believe in HPs case a unique situation occurred on the old gear.
That is there were and are people at agilent willing to take the time to
preserve their history. After all its still pretty fantastic stuff even
at
20, 30, and yes I have a piece in the 40-50 years old era. Generally
amazingly well built. I do know that when test and measurement was HP
their
support was top notch both for me professionally and personally. It did
effect what I chose to buy for the business. But on the personal side
they
always helped I was above board about why I was calling.
Ahhh for the good ole days.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Yup. Between the 1ghz 7000 series, the DSA602 w 1Ghz plug ins, and the 2236 portable I don't expect I'll ever need to buy another scope. On Feb 17, 2012, at 16:36, "J. Forster" <jfor@quikus.com> wrote: > Tek went into the toilet when Danaher bought them out. > > I bought a TDS1002 and could not even get the PC software to download > screen images, even after "registering". > > However, registration sure did get me onto their spam list. It took at > least a hald-dozed tries to get their spam to stop. > > I have lusted after Tek since about 1962 and have over 100 of their > instruments. The 7000 series and TM500 seriea are masterpieces. > > But, never again. > > YMMV, > > -John > > ================= > > > > > > > >> I was a Tek aficionado for many many years. My first personal scope was a >> tek, my first work scope was a Tek. I've owned at least half a dozen over >> the decades. The three scopes I own today are Tek. But everything else on >> my lab bench has changed over to HP (with the exception of a couple of >> TM5006 mainframes full of specialty plugins). >> >> The quality, availability, and most important to me, the consistency of HP >> gear has been impressive. I've yet to go into a lab where the majority of >> basic RF equipment, counters, sig gens, spectrum analyzers, etc was not >> HP. >> Unless they were lucky enough to have R&S. >> >> The ability to get manuals, parts, and just plain guidance on the HP gear >> has been great. >> >> Now if I can score an HP Primary or GPSDO standard, I'll be happy. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I believe in HPs case a unique situation occurred on the old gear. >>> That is there were and are people at agilent willing to take the time to >>> preserve their history. After all its still pretty fantastic stuff even >>> at >>> 20, 30, and yes I have a piece in the 40-50 years old era. Generally >>> amazingly well built. I do know that when test and measurement was HP >>> their >>> support was top notch both for me professionally and personally. It did >>> effect what I chose to buy for the business. But on the personal side >>> they >>> always helped I was above board about why I was calling. >>> Ahhh for the good ole days. >>> Regards >>> Paul >>> WB8TSL >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.

JF

J. Forster

Fri, Feb 17, 2012 10:12 PM

Perhaps LeCroy has changed it's spots from the NIM and CAMAC days, but any
documentation, like service manuals, was completely unavailable. I tried
several times.

I am not about to buy anything where at least a schematic is not
available. I have never sent an instrument in for factory service, and
never will. It's far too expensive.

-John

==============

With Scopes the company that has impressed me is LeCroy, not only are all
their manuals on line, but where they really shine is service prices,
their parts and repairs are very very reasonable.
Although Agilent, and Tektronix make fine products, I am now exclusively
LeCroy. And NO I do not own stock in LeCroy.
Thomas Knox

Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:44:40 -0500
From: bownes@gmail.com
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Tek to HP conversion... Was: Re: Fwd: FE-5680A
Contact FEI

I was a Tek aficionado for many many years. My first personal scope was
a
tek, my first work scope was a Tek. I've owned at least half a dozen
over
the decades. The three scopes I own today are Tek. But everything else
on
my lab bench has changed over to HP (with the exception of a couple of
TM5006 mainframes full of specialty plugins).

The quality, availability, and most important to me, the consistency of
HP
gear has been impressive. I've yet to go into a lab where the majority
of
basic RF equipment, counters, sig gens, spectrum analyzers, etc was not
HP.
Unless they were lucky enough to have R&S.

The ability to get manuals, parts, and just plain guidance on the HP
gear
has been great.

Now if I can score an HP Primary or GPSDO standard, I'll be happy.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

I believe in HPs case a unique situation occurred on the old gear.
That is there were and are people at agilent willing to take the time

to

preserve their history. After all its still pretty fantastic stuff

even at

20, 30, and yes I have a piece in the 40-50 years old era. Generally
amazingly well built. I do know that when test and measurement was HP

their

support was top notch both for me professionally and personally. It

did

effect what I chose to buy for the business. But on the personal side

they

always helped I was above board about why I was calling.
Ahhh for the good ole days.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Perhaps LeCroy has changed it's spots from the NIM and CAMAC days, but any documentation, like service manuals, was completely unavailable. I tried several times. I am not about to buy anything where at least a schematic is not available. I have never sent an instrument in for factory service, and never will. It's far too expensive. -John ============== > > With Scopes the company that has impressed me is LeCroy, not only are all > their manuals on line, but where they really shine is service prices, > their parts and repairs are very very reasonable. > Although Agilent, and Tektronix make fine products, I am now exclusively > LeCroy. And NO I do not own stock in LeCroy. > Thomas Knox > > > >> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:44:40 -0500 >> From: bownes@gmail.com >> To: time-nuts@febo.com >> Subject: [time-nuts] Tek to HP conversion... Was: Re: Fwd: FE-5680A >> Contact FEI >> >> I was a Tek aficionado for many many years. My first personal scope was >> a >> tek, my first work scope was a Tek. I've owned at least half a dozen >> over >> the decades. The three scopes I own today are Tek. But everything else >> on >> my lab bench has changed over to HP (with the exception of a couple of >> TM5006 mainframes full of specialty plugins). >> >> The quality, availability, and most important to me, the consistency of >> HP >> gear has been impressive. I've yet to go into a lab where the majority >> of >> basic RF equipment, counters, sig gens, spectrum analyzers, etc was not >> HP. >> Unless they were lucky enough to have R&S. >> >> The ability to get manuals, parts, and just plain guidance on the HP >> gear >> has been great. >> >> Now if I can score an HP Primary or GPSDO standard, I'll be happy. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I believe in HPs case a unique situation occurred on the old gear. >> > That is there were and are people at agilent willing to take the time >> to >> > preserve their history. After all its still pretty fantastic stuff >> even at >> > 20, 30, and yes I have a piece in the 40-50 years old era. Generally >> > amazingly well built. I do know that when test and measurement was HP >> their >> > support was top notch both for me professionally and personally. It >> did >> > effect what I chose to buy for the business. But on the personal side >> they >> > always helped I was above board about why I was calling. >> > Ahhh for the good ole days. >> > Regards >> > Paul >> > WB8TSL >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > >

BW

Brian, WA1ZMS

Fri, Feb 17, 2012 10:15 PM

Bob-

I have a spare that i need to test and make sure all is OK.

Any interest?
Make me an offer and it's yours after I get time to test is out.

-Brian, WA1ZMS

On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:56 PM, bownes bownes@gmail.com wrote:

Bob- I have a spare that i need to test and make sure all is OK. Any interest? Make me an offer and it's yours after I get time to test is out. -Brian, WA1ZMS On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:56 PM, bownes <bownes@gmail.com> wrote:

BW

Brian, WA1ZMS

Fri, Feb 17, 2012 10:31 PM

Sorry for band width to group!
Stupid iPhone! :-)

-Brian, WA1ZMS

On Feb 17, 2012, at 5:15 PM, "Brian, WA1ZMS" wa1zms@att.net wrote:

Bob-

I have a spare that i need to test and make sure all is OK.

Any interest?
Make me an offer and it's yours after I get time to test is out.

-Brian, WA1ZMS

On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:56 PM, bownes bownes@gmail.com wrote:

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Sorry for band width to group! Stupid iPhone! :-) -Brian, WA1ZMS On Feb 17, 2012, at 5:15 PM, "Brian, WA1ZMS" <wa1zms@att.net> wrote: > Bob- > > I have a spare that i need to test and make sure all is OK. > > Any interest? > Make me an offer and it's yours after I get time to test is out. > > > -Brian, WA1ZMS > > On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:56 PM, bownes <bownes@gmail.com> wrote: > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.

B

bownes

Fri, Feb 17, 2012 11:20 PM

Oh you are a bad bad man.

I'll do some homework and see what a rational offer is, but suffice it to say, I'll probably take it. :)

On Feb 17, 2012, at 17:15, "Brian, WA1ZMS" wa1zms@att.net wrote:

Bob-

I have a spare that i need to test and make sure all is OK.

Any interest?
Make me an offer and it's yours after I get time to test is out.

-Brian, WA1ZMS

On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:56 PM, bownes bownes@gmail.com wrote:

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Oh you are a bad bad man. I'll do some homework and see what a rational offer is, but suffice it to say, I'll probably take it. :) On Feb 17, 2012, at 17:15, "Brian, WA1ZMS" <wa1zms@att.net> wrote: > Bob- > > I have a spare that i need to test and make sure all is OK. > > Any interest? > Make me an offer and it's yours after I get time to test is out. > > > -Brian, WA1ZMS > > On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:56 PM, bownes <bownes@gmail.com> wrote: > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.

CF

Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R

Sat, Feb 18, 2012 1:26 AM

How does the HP compare to a Thunbderbolt?

On 02/17/2012 02:31 PM, Brian, WA1ZMS wrote:

Sorry for band width to group!
Stupid iPhone! :-)

-Brian, WA1ZMS

On Feb 17, 2012, at 5:15 PM, "Brian, WA1ZMS"wa1zms@att.net wrote:

Bob-

I have a spare that i need to test and make sure all is OK.

Any interest?
Make me an offer and it's yours after I get time to test is out.

-Brian, WA1ZMS

On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:56 PM, bownesbownes@gmail.com wrote:

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R caf@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software"
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430

How does the HP compare to a Thunbderbolt? On 02/17/2012 02:31 PM, Brian, WA1ZMS wrote: > Sorry for band width to group! > Stupid iPhone! :-) > > > -Brian, WA1ZMS > > On Feb 17, 2012, at 5:15 PM, "Brian, WA1ZMS"<wa1zms@att.net> wrote: > >> Bob- >> >> I have a spare that i need to test and make sure all is OK. >> >> Any interest? >> Make me an offer and it's yours after I get time to test is out. >> >> >> -Brian, WA1ZMS >> >> On Feb 17, 2012, at 4:56 PM, bownes<bownes@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R caf@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430

time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Tek to HP conversion... Was: Re: Fwd: FE-5680A Contact FEI