I see what u mean now, thx.
$ Runsun Pan, PhD $ libs: scadx , doctest , faces ( git ), offline doc ( git ), runscad.py ( 2 , git ), editor of choice: CudaText ( OpenSCAD lexer ); $ Tips ; $ Snippets
--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/
This is actually less of an issue than it appears if libraries are built
well.
If we were to agree on a coding standard, it might be difficult to get
people to change their code to meet it, but what would be the barrier to
others to bring that code up to standard and resubmit it, or even better to
amalgamate it into a standard library?
I'd consider working on that, with a good design. I probably don't have
enough experience with scad to visualize a best approach but I sure like the
language and the concept.
--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/
I have filled issue
https://github.com/openscad/openscad/issues/2377
and sent pull request
https://github.com/openscad/openscad/pull/2384
for nodejs-like modules in OpenSCAD, please, take a look
--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/
If we were to agree on a coding standard, it might be difficult to get
people to change their code to meet it, but what would be the barrier to
others to bring that code up to standard and resubmit it, or even better to
amalgamate it into a standard library?
I'm not sure I can really get to 'good practices' within the constraints of
the language. When something goes wrong it's really hard to work out where
or how.
--
Sent from: http://forum.openscad.org/