Edgardo,

You do use the C-field adjust to put a 5065A "On frequency". The Factory
values are a moot point after all these years!

Just incrementaly adjust the c-field control in small steps while
observing the frequency comparison.

The only thing that might happen is that you reach one end of the C-field
pot before getting to the frequency you want.

If that is the case you will need to set the synthesizer switch to the
next value in the chart. (either up or down depending on which way you
ran out of room.)

Then start over with the c=field adjustment.

If you switch the synthesizer setting you will need to remove power
momentarily to reset the synthesizers lock indication circuit. Otherwise
pushing the logic reset button to get the green light wont work.

Corby

Woman is 53 But Looks 25
Mom reveals 1 simple wrinkle trick that has angered doctors...
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/5081da95575015a951151st02duc

Hi Edgardo,

What you'll find is that many labs do not periodically adjust the C-field of their 5061A or 5065A at all.

Instead, any phase or frequency adjustment is done with phase microsteppers or simply done in software with time and rate adjustments to the raw data. These methods avoid all possible physical side-effects of changing voltages, currents, and fields. It also makes it possible to gather long-term data to show how the standard is operating (if you make mechanical rate adjustments it complicates data that you have already collected).

The other point is that when making stability measurements, there is no requirement that the reference (e.g., 5065A) be perfectly on-frequency. So this removes motivation for physically touching and possibly perturbing the operation of the reference.

Please also take the time to read these pages.

"HP 5065A Rubidium C-Field Resolution"
http://leapsecond.com/pages/hp-5065a-cfield/

"Rubidium Oscillator Stability"
http://leapsecond.com/images/4rb.gif

"Stability and Noise Performance of Various Rubidium Standards"
http://www.ke5fx.com/rb.htm

"Performance of Low-Cost Rubidium Standards"
http://febo.com/pages/oscillators/rubes/

"A close look at a drifting HP 5065A Rubidium Frequency Standard"
http://leapsecond.com/pages/doug-rb/

/tvb

Three companies come to mind for phase microsteppers. A popular one decades ago was made by Austron (model 2055A). I got mine on eBay but they are not as common now as ten years ago.

The current models by Symmetricom and Spectra Dynamics are extremely high-end (expensive) and overqualified for use with a vintage rubidium oscillator. If you visit NIST or USNO you will see these impressive units.

It would be a very fun project to make your own. I suspect other group members could either help you or would eagerly employ your design for their own use.

But -- before you decide on a hardware solution see if you can do it in software.

An analogy is what we do with GPS 1PPS sawtooth errors. There are two ways to deal with this. One is to capture the correction message over RS232, measure the DUT vs. GPS 1PPS with a TIC, and then numerically apply the sawtooth correction with one line of code. Several of the popular GPS monitor programs do this automatically for you (TBoltmon and TAC32, for example). The software solution is perfect to the granularity of the sawtooth message, typically 1 ns.

The hardware implementation usually involves a PIC and a programmable delay generator. The PIC listens for the correction message over RS232 and then has plenty of time (up to one second) to program the delay chip. When the hardware 1PPS arrives it is delayed to compensate for the aforementioned sawtooth error. The result is a hardware 1PPS that's quite close to the ideal 1PPS, limited again by the granularity of the message, as well as offset or linearity errors in the delay chip.

So that's the analogy. To apply this to your rubidium, ask yourself which instruments or measurements or users are downstream of your 5065A 10 MHz output. Can they deal with daily software corrections to a stable but slightly imprecise frequency, or do they really need the frequency to be as accurate as possible at all times.

There's a third alternative as well. You might consider using your 5065A as the LO in a GPSDO. This will sacrifice some short- and mid-term precision due to additive noise, but it will guarantee the best possible long-term accuracy.

/tvb

----- Original Message -----
From: Edgardo Molina
To: Tom Van Baak ; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Adjusting HP 5065A frequency

Dear Tom,

Good evening. In relation to your last comments on this and other subjects, I am sharing some thoughts and experience about it. I took the liberty to separate the topics as to ease the interested parties to follow up accordingly. TNX.

a. Information you kindly provided and the index for newbies:

Thank you! You just provided me with lots of new ideas and information on the subject. You have very valuable information in your web site. As Hal was saying, an index should be done anywhere so it could be easier for the rest of us to locate the information. I am planning soon to build a web page for my lab. In english of course for everybody to share my experiences. I could work on an index to point out to the various sources of information and topics that are difficult to find. That I think could expedite things a little bit.

b. Phase Micro steppers:

I saw the phase micro steppers working at CENAM time scale. I was wondering that the technique could be translated to my 5065As and not trying to touch them so often. If I am assuming correctly and the technique could be used with the HP Rb standards. Are those phase micro steppers easy to find? I mean, affordable in the second market? If there is one of course. I saw the ones used at CENAM are produced by SpectraDynamics in Colorado. According to Mike Lombardi it is a small highly specialized company with a small market to serve. I could translate it as "expensive and exotic"  : ) Am I correct?

c. Thunderbolt and my will to share initial experiences:

I am gathering a lot of information on the Thunderbolts as I am using them in my thesis work. I bought a couple of them. If my information or novice experience with these receivers is good for anybody, I would be more than glad to share it.

Thank you.

Kind regards,

Edgardo Molina
Dirección IPTEL

www.iptel.net.mx

T : 55 55 55202444
M : 04455 20501854

Piensa en Bits SA de CV

Información anexa:

CONFIDENCIALIDAD DE INFORMACION

Este mensaje tiene carácter confidencial. Si usted no es el destinarario de este mensaje, le suplicamos se lo notifique al remitente mediante un correo electrónico y que borre el presente mensaje y sus anexos de su computadora sin retener una copia de los mismos. Queda estrictamente prohibido copiar este mensaje o hacer usode el para cualquier propósito o divulgar su en forma parcial o total su contenido. Gracias.

NON-DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION

This email is strictly confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please immediately advise the sender by replying to this e-mail and then deleting the message and its attachments from your computer without keeping a copy. It is strictly forbidden to copy it or use it for any purpose or disclose its contents to any third party. Thank you.

On Oct 21, 2012, at 7:29 PM, "Tom Van Baak" tvb@LeapSecond.com wrote:

Hi Edgardo,

What you'll find is that many labs do not periodically adjust the C-field of their 5061A or 5065A at all.

Instead, any phase or frequency adjustment is done with phase microsteppers or simply done in software with time and rate adjustments to the raw data. These methods avoid all possible physical side-effects of changing voltages, currents, and fields. It also makes it possible to gather long-term data to show how the standard is operating (if you make mechanical rate adjustments it complicates data that you have already collected).

The other point is that when making stability measurements, there is no requirement that the reference (e.g., 5065A) be perfectly on-frequency. So this removes motivation for physically touching and possibly perturbing the operation of the reference.

Please also take the time to read these pages.

"HP 5065A Rubidium C-Field Resolution"
http://leapsecond.com/pages/hp-5065a-cfield/

"Rubidium Oscillator Stability"
http://leapsecond.com/images/4rb.gif

"Stability and Noise Performance of Various Rubidium Standards"
http://www.ke5fx.com/rb.htm

"Performance of Low-Cost Rubidium Standards"
http://febo.com/pages/oscillators/rubes/

"A close look at a drifting HP 5065A Rubidium Frequency Standard"
http://leapsecond.com/pages/doug-rb/

/tvb


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.