time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] Loran?

G
GandalfG8@aol.com
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 9:45 PM

In a message dated 20/12/2010 17:29:18 GMT Standard Time,
albertson.chris@gmail.com writes:

The  Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed in lower
case.

Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym.  It is  a coined
word.  Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by  the
first letter of several other words.  "SCUBA" is an acronym  but
"scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old  1950's
vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage.  But "radar" was never  an  acronym.

The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that  the  English
language changes  with time.    You can  disagree.  Many people do and
claim English has fixed rules that never  change but if you do then you
will have to pick a date for when it was  "correct" and then explain
how it could be incorrect before that  date.


S'funny, I was always under the impression, from many years back, that  it
WAS an acronym, "radio detection and ranging" comes to mind.

The following Wikipedia comments would seem to confirm that,  although they
also suggest it's lost its capitalisation somewhere  along the way, much as
you comment for SCUBA, so I guess it might even  be considered optional:-)


The term RADAR was coined in 1940 by the U.S. Navy
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S.Navy)  as  an acronym
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym_and_initialism)  for  radio detection and ranging.
[1]_
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar#cite_note-0) [2]
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar#cite_note-1)  The term radar has since entered the English and other languages as
the  common noun, radar, losing all of the capitalization. In the United
Kingdom
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom) , this technology was
initially called RDF (range and direction  finding), using the same acronym
as the one for radio direction  finding
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_direction_finding)  to conceal its ranging capability.

Most modern languages change with time, nothing new there, but it's perhaps
never a good idea to be too pedantic, especially when quoting  another's
opinion:-)

regards

Nigel
GM8PZR

In a message dated 20/12/2010 17:29:18 GMT Standard Time, albertson.chris@gmail.com writes: The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed in lower case. Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym. It is a coined word. Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the first letter of several other words. "SCUBA" is an acronym but "scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old 1950's vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage. But "radar" was never an acronym. The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the English language changes with time. You can disagree. Many people do and claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then you will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then explain how it could be incorrect before that date. -------- S'funny, I was always under the impression, from many years back, that it WAS an acronym, "radio detection and ranging" comes to mind. The following Wikipedia comments would seem to confirm that, although they also suggest it's lost its capitalisation somewhere along the way, much as you comment for SCUBA, so I guess it might even be considered optional:-) ----------------- The term RADAR was coined in 1940 by the _U.S. Navy_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Navy) as an _acronym_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym_and_initialism) for radio detection and ranging._[1]_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar#cite_note-0) _[2]_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar#cite_note-1) The term radar has since entered the English and other languages as the common noun, radar, losing all of the capitalization. In the _United Kingdom_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom) , this technology was initially called RDF (range and direction finding), using the same acronym as the one for _radio direction finding_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_direction_finding) to conceal its ranging capability. ------------------ Most modern languages change with time, nothing new there, but it's perhaps never a good idea to be too pedantic, especially when quoting another's opinion:-) regards Nigel GM8PZR