Stun and multiple SIP accounts
Hi all,
How can we handle the NAT/STUN matter when using multiple SIP account ?
Is there a way to specify a STUN configuration per SIP account, so that
the same configuration could not be applied to every accounts?
Great library by the way .
Thanks,
Manu
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Emmanuel Milou <
emmanuel.milou@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
Hi all,
How can we handle the NAT/STUN matter when using multiple SIP account ?
Is there a way to specify a STUN configuration per SIP account, so that the
same configuration could not be applied to every accounts?
Unfortunately we can't do that for now. This is another thing that would
need revamping, as things like TURN is much more logical to be put as part
of account specific settings and not global settings. My hesitation is that
this would break compatibility severely, so perhaps we'll do this at some
point in the future where it becomes more acceptable.
Great library by the way .
Thanks. Hope we will not let you down.
cheers
Benny
Thanks,
Manu
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
OK, thanks for the quick answer.
We are developing in Montreal an open-source softphone ( have a look on
our website: http://www.sflphone.org ), based on pjsip for the SIP
layer. The support of multiple accounts is the main reason we have been
migrating to pjsip and we are very pleased of the result.
By the way, did you think of packaging your library ? I'll probably be
able to help you on that if you need it. It would be great to provide a
rpm/debian packages on your website or to be integrated in the official
repositories.
Regards
Manu
Benny Prijono a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Emmanuel Milou
<emmanuel.milou@savoirfairelinux.com
mailto:emmanuel.milou@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
Hi all,
How can we handle the NAT/STUN matter when using multiple SIP
account ?
Is there a way to specify a STUN configuration per SIP account, so
that the same configuration could not be applied to every accounts?
Unfortunately we can't do that for now. This is another thing that
would need revamping, as things like TURN is much more logical to be
put as part of account specific settings and not global settings. My
hesitation is that this would break compatibility severely, so perhaps
we'll do this at some point in the future where it becomes more
acceptable.
Great library by the way .
Thanks. Hope we will not let you down.
cheers
Benny
Thanks,
Manu
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org <mailto:pjsip@lists.pjsip.org>
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Emmanuel Milou <
emmanuel.milou@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
OK, thanks for the quick answer.
We are developing in Montreal an open-source softphone ( have a look on our
website: http://www.sflphone.org ), based on pjsip for the SIP layer.
Yep I'm aware of that, in fact I've listed SFLPhone in
http://www.pjsip.org/apps.htm.
The support of multiple accounts is the main reason we have been migrating
to pjsip and we are very pleased of the result.
Great! And what was your initial concern with STUN not being linked to
account?
By the way, did you think of packaging your library ? I'll probably be able
to help you on that if you need it.
That would great!
It would be great to provide a rpm/debian packages on your website or to be
integrated in the official repositories.
Yes I think we can do that. This is not a promise though, since we stopped
distributing binaries long time ago.
cheers
Benny