Hi
I knew I'd seen a chart somewhere that was getting close to 1x10-11 at 1 second for the best of the group.
It's figure B on page 7 of your FSM 2008 paper.
Bob
On Dec 26, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Robert Lutwak wrote:
I pay pretty close attention to what people in this field are saying, and I've never heard anyone say "we'll get to 1e-11 short term stability at 1 second real soon now."
1e-11 at 1 second is the XPRO spec (and 2X better than LPRO or PRS10). There are good (physics) reasons why those units all draw 100X more power than a CSAC.
CSAC is intended for portable battery-powered operation. Surely your basement has the space and wallplug power to support an LPRO. (p.s. don't cool the damn thing, heat it).
The cats were much happier during the CsIII development (see http://home.comcast.net/~rlutwak). It was bigger and warmer. Any Cat-Nuts out there who can help me find one with significantly lower SWAP?
-RL
At 10:08 AM 12/26/2009, you wrote:
Hi
1x10-11 at 1 second, going down by tau^0.5.
That makes them candidates for the basement system ....
Bob
On Dec 26, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Robert Lutwak wrote:
How "good" do you want?
At 09:13 AM 12/26/2009, you wrote:
Hi
They still seem to be at the stage of "we'll get to good short term stability at 1 second real soon now".
Bob
On Dec 26, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Ronald Held wrote:
I read about this a while ago. Has anyone seen anything recent about
it, notably desktop or even portable units?
Ronald
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
-RL
Robert Lutwak
Symmetricom - Technology Realization Center
mhtml:mid://00000000/mailto:RLutwak@Symmetricom.comRLutwak@Symmetricom.com (Business)
mhtml:mid://00000000/mailto:Lutwak@Alum.mit.eduLutwak@Alum.mit.edu (Personal)
(978) 232-1461 (Desk)
(339) 927-7896 (Mobile)
(978) 927-4099 (Facsimile)
-RL
Robert Lutwak
Symmetricom - Technology Realization Center
mhtml:mid://00000000/mailto:RLutwak@Symmetricom.comRLutwak@Symmetricom.com (Business)
mhtml:mid://00000000/mailto:Lutwak@Alum.mit.eduLutwak@Alum.mit.edu (Personal)
(978) 232-1461 (Desk)
(339) 927-7896 (Mobile)
(978) 927-4099 (Facsimile)
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
-RL
Robert Lutwak
Symmetricom - Technology Realization Center
mhtml:mid://00000000/mailto:RLutwak@Symmetricom.comRLutwak@Symmetricom.com (Business)
mhtml:mid://00000000/mailto:Lutwak@Alum.mit.eduLutwak@Alum.mit.edu (Personal)
(978) 232-1461 (Desk)
(339) 927-7896 (Mobile)
(978) 927-4099 (Facsimile)
-RL
Robert Lutwak
Symmetricom - Technology Realization Center
mhtml:mid://00000000/mailto:RLutwak@Symmetricom.comRLutwak@Symmetricom.com (Business)
mhtml:mid://00000000/mailto:Lutwak@Alum.mit.eduLutwak@Alum.mit.edu (Personal)
(978) 232-1461 (Desk)
(339) 927-7896 (Mobile)
(978) 927-4099 (Facsimile)
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Notwithstanding the performance of one physics package, I think it's
safe to say that no-one is holding their breath waiting for a 1e-11 CSAC.
That figure (5B) shows the Allan deviation of 10 physics packages
(measured with optimal laboratory electronics) and you are correct
that the best of the bunch is down around 2-3e-11 at 1-second. At
that time, with low-power CSAC electronics, the performance of that
same physics package was up around 1e-10 and most were in the 2-3e-10
range (see Figure 6), which would have led to a spec somewhere north
of there, perhaps 3-4e-10.
For your amusement, I just added a more recent paper (from the 2009
FCS/EFTF) to my WWW site. Figure 3 in that paper shows some more
recent results with (newer, better, and lower power) electronics but
similar physics package architecture. These days, typical CSAC
instability is in the range of 8-10e-11 @ 1second, which might lead
to a spec in the 1-3e-10 range.
-RL
At 11:41 AM 12/26/2009, you wrote:
Hi
I knew I'd seen a chart somewhere that was getting close to
1x10-11 at 1 second for the best of the group.
It's figure B on page 7 of your FSM 2008 paper.
Bob
On Dec 26, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Robert Lutwak wrote:
I pay pretty close attention to what people in this field are
saying, and I've never heard anyone say "we'll get to 1e-11 short
term stability at 1 second real soon now."
1e-11 at 1 second is the XPRO spec (and 2X better than LPRO or
PRS10). There are good (physics) reasons why those units all draw
100X more power than a CSAC.
CSAC is intended for portable battery-powered operation. Surely
your basement has the space and wallplug power to support an LPRO.
(p.s. don't cool the damn thing, heat it).
The cats were much happier during the CsIII development (see
http://home.comcast.net/~rlutwak). It was bigger and warmer. Any
Cat-Nuts out there who can help me find one with significantly lower SWAP?
-RL
At 10:08 AM 12/26/2009, you wrote:
Hi
1x10-11 at 1 second, going down by tau^0.5.
That makes them candidates for the basement system ....
Bob
On Dec 26, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Robert Lutwak wrote:
How "good" do you want?
At 09:13 AM 12/26/2009, you wrote:
Hi
They still seem to be at the stage of "we'll get to good
short term stability at 1 second real soon now".
Bob
On Dec 26, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Ronald Held wrote:
I read about this a while ago. Has anyone seen anything recent about
it, notably desktop or even portable units?
Ronald
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
-RL
Robert Lutwak
Symmetricom - Technology Realization Center
(978) 232-1461 (Desk)
(339) 927-7896 (Mobile)
(978) 927-4099 (Facsimile)
-RL
Robert Lutwak
Symmetricom - Technology Realization Center
(978) 232-1461 (Desk)
(339) 927-7896 (Mobile)
(978) 927-4099 (Facsimile)
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
-RL
Robert Lutwak
Symmetricom - Technology Realization Center
(978) 232-1461 (Desk)
(339) 927-7896 (Mobile)
(978) 927-4099 (Facsimile)
-RL
Robert Lutwak
Symmetricom - Technology Realization Center
(978) 232-1461 (Desk)
(339) 927-7896 (Mobile)
(978) 927-4099 (Facsimile)
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
-RL
Robert Lutwak
Symmetricom - Technology Realization Center
mhtml:mid://00000000/mailto:RLutwak@Symmetricom.comRLutwak@Symmetricom.com
(Business)
mhtml:mid://00000000/mailto:Lutwak@Alum.mit.eduLutwak@Alum.mit.edu
(Personal)
(978) 232-1461 (Desk)
(339) 927-7896 (Mobile)
(978) 927-4099 (Facsimile)
-RL
Robert Lutwak
Symmetricom - Technology Realization Center
mhtml:mid://00000000/mailto:RLutwak@Symmetricom.comRLutwak@Symmetricom.com
(Business)
mhtml:mid://00000000/mailto:Lutwak@Alum.mit.eduLutwak@Alum.mit.edu
(Personal)
(978) 232-1461 (Desk)
(339) 927-7896 (Mobile)
(978) 927-4099 (Facsimile)