trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

TWL: Re: RIB--happalon or PVC

CM
C. Marin Faure
Fri, Sep 5, 2003 7:10 AM

From: CAPTGMA@aol.com
Subject: TWL: RIB--happalon or PVC

starting to shop for my first RIB and seriously considering happalon. A

recent Zodiac dealor trlls me to stay away from happalon because it coasts
too much and cant br easely repaired. Any one with experience on this??

This won't answer your question, but.....

We researched the whole hypalon/PVC/etc. question thoroughly when we were
deciding on a swim-step mounted dinghy for our trawler.  (The boat came
with a lovely Montgomery sailing dinghy on the aft cabin top, which we
kept, but we wanted something more stable and easier to launch for the
everyday dinghy.)  We talked to dealers.  We talked to owners.  We looked
at dinghies on all sorts of boats.  We talked to more owners.  We read
articles.  We looked at brochures.  We climbed in and out of people's
dinghies.  We talked to more dealers and read more brochures.

In the end we settled on a dinghy that avoided the hypalon vs. PVC vs.
leaks vs. delfates-over-time vs. hard-to-repair debate altogether.  We
bought a Livingston hardshell dinghy and have never regretted it for an
instant.  There are other harshell dinghies that are just as good or
better, it's just that the Pacific Northwest tends to be Livingston country.

Livingstons and their ilk are boring and ugly, no question.  You don't look
very yachty in a Livingston.  So if you really like the look of an RIB, try
a Bullfrog.  Foam filled tubes that never deflate, leak, or deteriorate,
and an aluminum V-bottom.  They come in a variety of sizes.  They're made
in Bellingham, Washington and I assume they have a website.

After all our research, we decided the limited life and potential hassles
of an inflatable are simply not worth it in the long run.  I walk around
our large marina and I see scores of sagging, half-inflated inflatables on
boats and on the dinghy racks.  I see people trying to fix leaks, or
dealing with deteriorating fabric.  I see people repairing (for the
umpteenth time) swim step attachments that are coming unglued from the
fabric.

I'm a bit puzzled by the super popularity of inflatables.  Their original
advantage was that you could deflate them for easy storage.  But they've
long since outgrown that premise, and now sport 100 hp motors, consol
steering, and can cost as much as a small trawler.  So since no one
deflates them anymore, why lose all that space to a set of tubes?  There
are hardshell dinghies that can go just as fast and have floatation so they
won't sink (and aren't as likely to go skittering off across the waves in a
windy emergency situation like an inflatable can.)  And a hardshell dinghy
has much more usable room inside than an inflatable (or rigid tube) boat
with the same planform.

And twenty years from now, that hardshell will be just as strong and
dependable as it is today.  Where will most, if not all of the inflatables
be in twenty years' time?

And... and here's the amazing part... a hardshell dinghy will generally
cost a fraction of what a comparable size inflatable or RIB will cost.  The
manufacturers have clearly not figured this out yet.  Normally, selling
something with a more or less infinite life is a great excuse to charge the
hell out of the customers.  But in dinghies we have the opposite situation.
The ones with the finite lives and built-in hassles cost tons more than the
trouble-free ones that will last forever.  God help us when the people at
Livingston, Sorenson, etc. realize their mistake.

So after adding all this stuff up and making up pro and con lists, we
looked at the data and said, Why would anyone in their right mind fork over
a zillion dollars for a finite-life inflatable when you can get a same-size
dinghy with more room in it for a hell of a lot less that will do everthing
the inflatable will do (except deflate) that will last more or less forever?

That was our take on the situation.  I know others will have equally valid
reasons for going the other way.


C. Marin Faure
GB36-403 "La Perouse"
Bellingham, WA

From: CAPTGMA@aol.com Subject: TWL: RIB--happalon or PVC >starting to shop for my first RIB and seriously considering happalon. A recent Zodiac dealor trlls me to stay away from happalon because it coasts too much and cant br easely repaired. Any one with experience on this?? This won't answer your question, but..... We researched the whole hypalon/PVC/etc. question thoroughly when we were deciding on a swim-step mounted dinghy for our trawler. (The boat came with a lovely Montgomery sailing dinghy on the aft cabin top, which we kept, but we wanted something more stable and easier to launch for the everyday dinghy.) We talked to dealers. We talked to owners. We looked at dinghies on all sorts of boats. We talked to more owners. We read articles. We looked at brochures. We climbed in and out of people's dinghies. We talked to more dealers and read more brochures. In the end we settled on a dinghy that avoided the hypalon vs. PVC vs. leaks vs. delfates-over-time vs. hard-to-repair debate altogether. We bought a Livingston hardshell dinghy and have never regretted it for an instant. There are other harshell dinghies that are just as good or better, it's just that the Pacific Northwest tends to be Livingston country. Livingstons and their ilk are boring and ugly, no question. You don't look very yachty in a Livingston. So if you really like the look of an RIB, try a Bullfrog. Foam filled tubes that never deflate, leak, or deteriorate, and an aluminum V-bottom. They come in a variety of sizes. They're made in Bellingham, Washington and I assume they have a website. After all our research, we decided the limited life and potential hassles of an inflatable are simply not worth it in the long run. I walk around our large marina and I see scores of sagging, half-inflated inflatables on boats and on the dinghy racks. I see people trying to fix leaks, or dealing with deteriorating fabric. I see people repairing (for the umpteenth time) swim step attachments that are coming unglued from the fabric. I'm a bit puzzled by the super popularity of inflatables. Their original advantage was that you could deflate them for easy storage. But they've long since outgrown that premise, and now sport 100 hp motors, consol steering, and can cost as much as a small trawler. So since no one deflates them anymore, why lose all that space to a set of tubes? There are hardshell dinghies that can go just as fast and have floatation so they won't sink (and aren't as likely to go skittering off across the waves in a windy emergency situation like an inflatable can.) And a hardshell dinghy has much more usable room inside than an inflatable (or rigid tube) boat with the same planform. And twenty years from now, that hardshell will be just as strong and dependable as it is today. Where will most, if not all of the inflatables be in twenty years' time? And... and here's the amazing part... a hardshell dinghy will generally cost a fraction of what a comparable size inflatable or RIB will cost. The manufacturers have clearly not figured this out yet. Normally, selling something with a more or less infinite life is a great excuse to charge the hell out of the customers. But in dinghies we have the opposite situation. The ones with the finite lives and built-in hassles cost tons more than the trouble-free ones that will last forever. God help us when the people at Livingston, Sorenson, etc. realize their mistake. So after adding all this stuff up and making up pro and con lists, we looked at the data and said, Why would anyone in their right mind fork over a zillion dollars for a finite-life inflatable when you can get a same-size dinghy with more room in it for a hell of a lot less that will do everthing the inflatable will do (except deflate) that will last more or less forever? That was our take on the situation. I know others will have equally valid reasons for going the other way. _______________ C. Marin Faure GB36-403 "La Perouse" Bellingham, WA
RC
R C Smith Jr
Fri, Sep 5, 2003 12:23 PM

C. Marin Faure wrote:

I'm a bit puzzled by the super popularity of inflatables.  Their original
advantage was that you could deflate them for easy storage.

Wait a minute....how about load capacity? Usually much more than a rigid.
Also, I love not having to worry about fenders. I park anywhere and do not
worry that I will damage any other boats. I bought my Avon RIB in 1984,
NEVER keep it under cover and it's on its third motor...hypalon, of course.

Bob


R C Smith Jr
M/V MARY KATHRYN
Hatteras 58 LRC
Annapolis

C. Marin Faure wrote: > I'm a bit puzzled by the super popularity of inflatables. Their original > advantage was that you could deflate them for easy storage. Wait a minute....how about load capacity? Usually much more than a rigid. Also, I love not having to worry about fenders. I park anywhere and do not worry that I will damage any other boats. I bought my Avon RIB in 1984, NEVER keep it under cover and it's on its third motor...hypalon, of course. Bob ________________ R C Smith Jr M/V MARY KATHRYN Hatteras 58 LRC Annapolis
MM
m/v MOJO
Fri, Sep 5, 2003 12:26 PM

So after adding all this stuff up and making up pro and con lists, we
looked at the data and said, Why would anyone in their right mind fork

over

a zillion dollars for a finite-life inflatable when you can get a

same-size

dinghy with more room in it for a hell of a lot less that will do

everthing

the inflatable will do (except deflate) that will last more or less

forever?

I agree with you, the Livingston is a dinghy.  But, there are some
advantages to an inflatable:

  1. Stability - you can stand on the "rail" of an inflatable without fear of
    swamping or turning it over
  2. Load carry capacity - load 'em to the gills with beer, groceries, etc. -
    hardly affects the waterline or stability.
  3. Speed - inflatables, depending on the model, are generally rated for
    higher horsepower than comparable size hard dinks.  Many will argue about
    the need for speed in a dink, but when you're a full time live-aboard and
    your dink is your only means of transportation, and you're anchored a long
    way from shore/town/dive-site/etc., it's nice to have a fast dinghy.  We
    spent 5 months diving in Bonaire and without a fast inflatable capable of
    carrying full SCUBA gear for both of us we would not have been able to dive
    any of the sites on Klein Bonaire, arguably the best diving!
  4. Soft sides - no damage to the mother ship if you're trying to board in a
    rough anchorage, etc.  Admitably, a good rub rail and/or fenders on a hard
    dink can solve most of this problem but the inflatable is still easier on
    the topsides.  If you leave your dinghy tied along side at night, the
    inflatable is much quieter - less bumps in the night.
  5. Weight - comparably sized inflatables are generally, although not always
    lighter than hard dinks.  Can make a difference if you're hauling it up on
    davits every night like we had to do in Venezuela to keep the banditos from
    stealing the motor, etc.

So, yes, the Livingston is a great boat and in many, many instances is a
better choice than an inflatable.  I've thought seriously about buying one
myself and dealing with the issues raised above because I really like the
Livingston.  Just thought it would be a good idea to provide a little
balance to the other side of the equation!  No doubt this will start a new
line of discussion on hard vs. soft!

Ray B.
m/v MOJO
Bebe Design #112 Passagemaker 49-10 in steel
www.mvmojo.com

> So after adding all this stuff up and making up pro and con lists, we > looked at the data and said, Why would anyone in their right mind fork over > a zillion dollars for a finite-life inflatable when you can get a same-size > dinghy with more room in it for a hell of a lot less that will do everthing > the inflatable will do (except deflate) that will last more or less forever? I agree with you, the Livingston is a dinghy. But, there are some advantages to an inflatable: 1. Stability - you can stand on the "rail" of an inflatable without fear of swamping or turning it over 2. Load carry capacity - load 'em to the gills with beer, groceries, etc. - hardly affects the waterline or stability. 3. Speed - inflatables, depending on the model, are generally rated for higher horsepower than comparable size hard dinks. Many will argue about the need for speed in a dink, but when you're a full time live-aboard and your dink is your only means of transportation, and you're anchored a long way from shore/town/dive-site/etc., it's nice to have a fast dinghy. We spent 5 months diving in Bonaire and without a fast inflatable capable of carrying full SCUBA gear for both of us we would not have been able to dive any of the sites on Klein Bonaire, arguably the best diving! 4. Soft sides - no damage to the mother ship if you're trying to board in a rough anchorage, etc. Admitably, a good rub rail and/or fenders on a hard dink can solve most of this problem but the inflatable is still easier on the topsides. If you leave your dinghy tied along side at night, the inflatable is much quieter - less bumps in the night. 5. Weight - comparably sized inflatables are generally, although not always lighter than hard dinks. Can make a difference if you're hauling it up on davits every night like we had to do in Venezuela to keep the banditos from stealing the motor, etc. So, yes, the Livingston is a great boat and in many, many instances is a better choice than an inflatable. I've thought seriously about buying one myself and dealing with the issues raised above because I really like the Livingston. Just thought it would be a good idea to provide a little balance to the other side of the equation! No doubt this will start a new line of discussion on hard vs. soft! Ray B. m/v MOJO Bebe Design #112 Passagemaker 49-10 in steel www.mvmojo.com
PJ
Philip J. Rosch
Sat, Sep 6, 2003 1:24 AM

IMHO, the best solution for a live-aboard's dinghy is a Carolina Skiff.
Lobsters don't puncture it, Coral isn't a problem, it handles like a
real boat, doesn't rot in the tropical sun and is just as stable. I
think I paid $850 for the base boat (12') new from Space Coast Marine
and its been great little skiff! I use a 15 HP Yamaha, but will move up
to a 25 when the 15 dies (which is likely to be a very long time).

The "all-up" weight is 355 lbs though so you need to make sure your
davits are up to the job.

                               Regards.....

Phil Rosch
Old Harbor Consulting
M/V "Curmudgeon" Marine Trader 44 TC
Currently on the hard at PointView Marina, Jerusalem, RI

IMHO, the best solution for a live-aboard's dinghy is a Carolina Skiff. Lobsters don't puncture it, Coral isn't a problem, it handles like a real boat, doesn't rot in the tropical sun and is just as stable. I think I paid $850 for the base boat (12') new from Space Coast Marine and its been great little skiff! I use a 15 HP Yamaha, but will move up to a 25 when the 15 dies (which is likely to be a very long time). The "all-up" weight is 355 lbs though so you need to make sure your davits are up to the job. Regards..... Phil Rosch Old Harbor Consulting M/V "Curmudgeon" Marine Trader 44 TC Currently on the hard at PointView Marina, Jerusalem, RI