Dickson,
With a gate time of 10 seconds, in statistics mode you can see 13 digits at 10MHz easily.
While I agree it is not an SR620, it a very worth while unit to own. Much nicer than the 5370B units
to operate, and if you get the "C" model, you can measure all the way to a little over 2GHz.
Jerry
At 12:16 PM 4/15/2012, you wrote:
Hi all,
Does somebody know the speed and stability of HP 5372A Time Interval analyzer? in terms of the number of digit per second.
Also, what's the standard built-in frequency reference?
Lastly, what's the max number of digit when performs as a frequency counter?
Thanks and Regards,
Dickson Fu
VR2WHF
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Jerry Mulchin
Hi
I think I might stand up and defend the poor old 5370. It's a beast and not anywhere as sexy as a 5371 or (better yet) the 5372. It does indeed have better single shot resolution though.
Bob
On Apr 15, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Jerry Mulchin wrote:
Dickson,
With a gate time of 10 seconds, in statistics mode you can see 13 digits at 10MHz easily.
While I agree it is not an SR620, it a very worth while unit to own. Much nicer than the 5370B units
to operate, and if you get the "C" model, you can measure all the way to a little over 2GHz.
Jerry
At 12:16 PM 4/15/2012, you wrote:
Hi all,
Does somebody know the speed and stability of HP 5372A Time Interval analyzer? in terms of the number of digit per second.
Also, what's the standard built-in frequency reference?
Lastly, what's the max number of digit when performs as a frequency counter?
Thanks and Regards,
Dickson Fu
VR2WHF
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Jerry Mulchin
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
On 04/15/2012 11:30 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
I think I might stand up and defend the poor old 5370. It's a beast and not anywhere as sexy as a 5371 or (better yet) the 5372. It does indeed have better single shot resolution though.
Indeed. While the later has spiffy 68k processors with floating point
units and sparkling green CRT the 5370 ticks away on a 6800 at 1,5
MHz... but there is some hope. I'm test-driving a CPU upgrade board so
my 5370B has an ethernet sneaked into it, DHCPed an address and I can
make read-outs on the built in webserver. Not even the HP5372A pulls
that off.
I need to hack away a bit on that one. But it brings new life into the
good old HP5370B, that is for sure.
Cheers,
Magnus