Hi,

I used to have Ubuntu 14.04 and had no issues with uhd. Recently i had
to upgrade to Ubuntu 20.04, and I can't find any uhd version that
can compile in it. I have tried over 20 from git from 3.9.0 to
3.11.5:(

With earlier releases like 3.9.x I get into boost problems, and
something like "native" not defined.
In more recent releases like 3.11.x I get:

In file included from
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/usrp/cores/gpio_atr_3000.cpp:8:
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/usrp/cores/gpio_atr_3000.hpp:20:42:
error: expected class-name before ‘{’ token
20 | class gpio_atr_3000 : boost::noncopyable {
|                                          ^
make[2]: *** [lib/CMakeFiles/uhd.dir/build.make:1237:
lib/CMakeFiles/uhd.dir/usrp/cores/gpio_atr_3000.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:655: lib/CMakeFiles/uhd.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:163: all] Error 2

This seems like a c++ issue...

Is there any git release that compiles in Ubuntu 20.04?
I know that you list in supported versions, only Ubuntu 14.04 & 16.04,
but I suspect this is outdated, since Ubuntu doesn't support them any
more, and in uhd installation you describe 20.04 build instructions.

TIA
Nikos

USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-leave@lists.ettus.com

On 2022-04-19 22:45, Nikos Balkanas wrote:

Hi,

I used to have Ubuntu 14.04 and had no issues with uhd. Recently i had
to upgrade to Ubuntu 20.04, and I can't find any uhd version that
can compile in it. I have tried over 20 from git from 3.9.0 to
3.11.5:(

With earlier releases like 3.9.x I get into boost problems, and
something like "native" not defined.
In more recent releases like 3.11.x I get:

In file included from
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/usrp/cores/gpio_atr_3000.cpp:8:
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/usrp/cores/gpio_atr_3000.hpp:20:42:
error: expected class-name before ‘{’ token
20 | class gpio_atr_3000 : boost::noncopyable {
|                                          ^
make[2]: *** [lib/CMakeFiles/uhd.dir/build.make:1237:
lib/CMakeFiles/uhd.dir/usrp/cores/gpio_atr_3000.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:655: lib/CMakeFiles/uhd.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:163: all] Error 2

This seems like a c++ issue...

Is there any git release that compiles in Ubuntu 20.04?
I know that you list in supported versions, only Ubuntu 14.04 & 16.04,
but I suspect this is outdated, since Ubuntu doesn't support them any
more, and in uhd installation you describe 20.04 build instructions.

TIA
Nikos

---

USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-leave@lists.ettus.com
For Ubuntu 20.04, you can just install it from the package repo using
APT--no need to compile it.

USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-leave@lists.ettus.com

Hi,

Seems no one is looking into Ubuntu 20.04 compilation.
My X-300 is getting lonely...:(
If there are no objections, I can look it up myself.
I was thinking about fixing release_003_009_005.
Seems stable and hopefully need very little tweaking.
Since I don't know the code, I hope it's alright to ask here, if I
have any questions:)

These are all the errors I found with make -k (60% completion):
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/transport/udp_zero_copy.cpp:193:29:
error: ‘class boost::asio::basic_datagram_socketboost::asio::ip::udp’
has no member named ‘native’
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/transport/tcp_zero_copy.cpp:157:29:
error: ‘class boost::asio::basic_stream_socketboost::asio::ip::tcp’
has no member named ‘native’
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/transport/udp_simple.cpp:59:46: error:
‘class boost::asio::basic_datagram_socketboost::asio::ip::udp’ has
no member named ‘native’
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/usrp/x300/x300_impl.cpp:1475:114: error:
no matching function for call to
‘boost::date_time::subsecond_duration<boost::posix_time::time_duration,
1000>::subsecond_duration(double)’
/usr/include/boost/date_time/time_duration.hpp:285:14: error: no type
named ‘type’ in ‘struct boost::enable_if<boost::is_integral<double>,
void>’

The first 3 I replaced:
_socket->native() -> _socket->native_handle()  Compiles OK.

The last 2 are from the same place in x300_impl.cpp. This is a time
loop of 1 ms, until timeout. The code is perfectly
sound :
boost::system_time timeout_time = boost::get_system_time() +
boost::posix_time::milliseconds(timeout * 1000.0);

What this has to do with subsecond_duration?

From /usr/include/boost/date_time/time_duration.hpp: 285
public:
// The argument (ss) must be an integral type
template <typename T>
explicit subsecond_duration(T const& ss,
typename
boost::enable_if<boost::is_integral<T>, void>::type* =
BOOST_DATE_TIME_NULLPTR) :
base_duration(impl_type(traits_type::ticks_per_second >=
frac_of_second ? ss * adjustment_ratio : ss / adjustment_ratio))

I could rewrite the time loop in C, outside boost, but don't want to
break structure. Any ideas why is the compiler complaining?

TIA
Nikos

On 2022-04-21 10:52, Nikos Balkanas wrote:

Hi,

Seems no one is looking into Ubuntu 20.04 compilation.
My X-300 is getting lonely...:(
If there are no objections, I can look it up myself.
I was thinking about fixing release_003_009_005.
Seems stable and hopefully need very little tweaking.
Since I don't know the code, I hope it's alright to ask here, if I
have any questions:)

These are all the errors I found with make -k (60% completion):
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/transport/udp_zero_copy.cpp:193:29:
error: ‘class boost::asio::basic_datagram_socketboost::asio::ip::udp’
has no member named ‘native’
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/transport/tcp_zero_copy.cpp:157:29:
error: ‘class boost::asio::basic_stream_socketboost::asio::ip::tcp’
has no member named ‘native’
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/transport/udp_simple.cpp:59:46: error:
‘class boost::asio::basic_datagram_socketboost::asio::ip::udp’ has
no member named ‘native’
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/usrp/x300/x300_impl.cpp:1475:114: error:
no matching function for call to
‘boost::date_time::subsecond_duration<boost::posix_time::time_duration,
1000>::subsecond_duration(double)’
/usr/include/boost/date_time/time_duration.hpp:285:14: error: no type
named ‘type’ in ‘struct boost::enable_if<boost::is_integral<double>,
void>’

The first 3 I replaced:
_socket->native() -> _socket->native_handle()  Compiles OK.

The last 2 are from the same place in x300_impl.cpp. This is a time
loop of 1 ms, until timeout. The code is perfectly
sound :
boost::system_time timeout_time = boost::get_system_time() +
boost::posix_time::milliseconds(timeout * 1000.0);

What this has to do with subsecond_duration?

From /usr/include/boost/date_time/time_duration.hpp: 285
public:
// The argument (ss) must be an integral type
template <typename T>
explicit subsecond_duration(T const& ss,
typename
boost::enable_if<boost::is_integral<T>, void>::type* =
BOOST_DATE_TIME_NULLPTR) :
base_duration(impl_type(traits_type::ticks_per_second >=
frac_of_second ? ss * adjustment_ratio : ss / adjustment_ratio))

I could rewrite the time loop in C, outside boost, but don't want to
break structure. Any ideas why is the compiler complaining?

TIA
Nikos

Ubuntu 20.04 already packages UHD-3.15.0.0, so figuring out how to
compile a MUCH OLDER release of
UHD on 20.04 would perhaps be useful for people who really, really
need a MUCH OLDER release of UHD.
But 3.15.0.0 already works out of the box from the package repos for
Ubuntu 20.04.

Aaah OK. I asked before whether there was a ready UHD version for
20.04, but noone answered.
After I tried 20 of them, I assumed there was none:(
I chose 3.9.5 as the oldest stable, UHD release.
Is UHD 3.15.0.0 stable? cmake says it is unstable, development:(

Nikos

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 6:00 PM Marcus D. Leech patchvonbraun@gmail.com wrote:

On 2022-04-21 10:52, Nikos Balkanas wrote:

Hi,

Seems no one is looking into Ubuntu 20.04 compilation.
My X-300 is getting lonely...:(
If there are no objections, I can look it up myself.
I was thinking about fixing release_003_009_005.
Seems stable and hopefully need very little tweaking.
Since I don't know the code, I hope it's alright to ask here, if I
have any questions:)

These are all the errors I found with make -k (60% completion):
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/transport/udp_zero_copy.cpp:193:29:
error: ‘class boost::asio::basic_datagram_socketboost::asio::ip::udp’
has no member named ‘native’
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/transport/tcp_zero_copy.cpp:157:29:
error: ‘class boost::asio::basic_stream_socketboost::asio::ip::tcp’
has no member named ‘native’
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/transport/udp_simple.cpp:59:46: error:
‘class boost::asio::basic_datagram_socketboost::asio::ip::udp’ has
no member named ‘native’
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/usrp/x300/x300_impl.cpp:1475:114: error:
no matching function for call to
‘boost::date_time::subsecond_duration<boost::posix_time::time_duration,
1000>::subsecond_duration(double)’
/usr/include/boost/date_time/time_duration.hpp:285:14: error: no type
named ‘type’ in ‘struct boost::enable_if<boost::is_integral<double>,
void>’

The first 3 I replaced:
_socket->native() -> _socket->native_handle()  Compiles OK.

The last 2 are from the same place in x300_impl.cpp. This is a time
loop of 1 ms, until timeout. The code is perfectly
sound :
boost::system_time timeout_time = boost::get_system_time() +
boost::posix_time::milliseconds(timeout * 1000.0);

What this has to do with subsecond_duration?

From /usr/include/boost/date_time/time_duration.hpp: 285
public:
// The argument (ss) must be an integral type
template <typename T>
explicit subsecond_duration(T const& ss,
typename
boost::enable_if<boost::is_integral<T>, void>::type* =
BOOST_DATE_TIME_NULLPTR) :
base_duration(impl_type(traits_type::ticks_per_second >=
frac_of_second ? ss * adjustment_ratio : ss / adjustment_ratio))

I could rewrite the time loop in C, outside boost, but don't want to
break structure. Any ideas why is the compiler complaining?

TIA
Nikos

Ubuntu 20.04 already packages UHD-3.15.0.0, so figuring out how to
compile a MUCH OLDER release of
UHD on 20.04 would perhaps be useful for people who really, really
need a MUCH OLDER release of UHD.
But 3.15.0.0 already works out of the box from the package repos for
Ubuntu 20.04.

Aaah OK. I asked before whether there was a ready UHD version for
20.04, but noone answered.
After I tried 20 of them, I assumed there was none:(
I chose 3.9.5 as the oldest stable, UHD release.
Is UHD 3.15.0.0 stable? cmake says it is unstable, development:(

Nikos

On 2022-04-19 22:45, Nikos Balkanas wrote:

Hi,

I used to have Ubuntu 14.04 and had no issues with uhd. Recently i had
to upgrade to Ubuntu 20.04, and I can't find any uhd version that
can compile in it. I have tried over 20 from git from 3.9.0 to
3.11.5:(

With earlier releases like 3.9.x I get into boost problems, and
something like "native" not defined.
In more recent releases like 3.11.x I get:

In file included from
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/usrp/cores/gpio_atr_3000.cpp:8:
/home/nikos/work/uhd/host/lib/usrp/cores/gpio_atr_3000.hpp:20:42:
error: expected class-name before ‘{’ token
20 | class gpio_atr_3000 : boost::noncopyable {
|                                          ^
make[2]: *** [lib/CMakeFiles/uhd.dir/build.make:1237:
lib/CMakeFiles/uhd.dir/usrp/cores/gpio_atr_3000.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:655: lib/CMakeFiles/uhd.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:163: all] Error 2

This seems like a c++ issue...

Is there any git release that compiles in Ubuntu 20.04?
I know that you list in supported versions, only Ubuntu 14.04 & 16.04,
but I suspect this is outdated, since Ubuntu doesn't support them any
more, and in uhd installation you describe 20.04 build instructions.

TIA
Nikos

---

USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-leave@lists.ettus.com
For Ubuntu 20.04, you can just install it from the package repo using
APT--no need to compile it.

USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-leave@lists.ettus.com

You can check back your answer.
you answered to me, but there was nothing in your mail:(

BR
Nikos