time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

DB
Dave B
Sun, Jan 26, 2025 10:14 AM

On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote:

The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from an
AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA connector,
suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices.

Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the
incoming Sine signal.   50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out.

A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL
levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level,
traversing from + to -, as well as - to +.   But in both cases, it would
be the same polarity output signal.  But at twice the frequency of the
incoming AC power waveform.

There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that
function, easily found online.

Dave G8KBV.

--
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software:

On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote: > The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from an > AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA connector, > suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices. Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the incoming Sine signal.   50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out. A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level, traversing from + to -, as well as - to +.   But in both cases, it would be the same polarity output signal.  But at twice the frequency of the incoming AC power waveform. There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that function, easily found online. 73. Dave G8KBV. -- Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software:
B_
Bryan _
Mon, Jan 27, 2025 4:22 PM

https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-crossing-detector

-=Bryan=-


From: Dave B via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Dave B g8kbvdave@googlemail.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...
 
On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote:

The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from an
AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA connector,
suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices.

Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the
incoming Sine signal.   50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out.

A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL
levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level,
traversing from + to -, as well as - to +.   But in both cases, it would
be the same polarity output signal.  But at twice the frequency of the
incoming AC power waveform.

There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that
function, easily found online.

Dave G8KBV.

--
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software:


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-crossing-detector -=Bryan=- ________________________________________ From: Dave B via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> Cc: Dave B <g8kbvdave@googlemail.com> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...   On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote: > The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from an > AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA connector, > suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices. Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the incoming Sine signal.   50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out. A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level, traversing from + to -, as well as - to +.   But in both cases, it would be the same polarity output signal.  But at twice the frequency of the incoming AC power waveform. There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that function, easily found online. 73. Dave G8KBV. -- Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software: _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
SF
Sebastien F4GRX
Tue, Jan 28, 2025 10:43 AM

hi,

this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the zero
crossing itself. How accurate is that?

Sebastien

On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote:

https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-crossing-detector

-=Bryan=-


From: Dave B via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Dave B g8kbvdave@googlemail.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote:

The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from an
AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA connector,
suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices.
Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the
incoming Sine signal.   50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out.

A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL
levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level,
traversing from + to -, as well as - to +.   But in both cases, it would
be the same polarity output signal.  But at twice the frequency of the
incoming AC power waveform.

There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that
function, easily found online.

Dave G8KBV.

--
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software:


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

hi, this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the zero crossing itself. How accurate is that? Sebastien On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote: > https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-crossing-detector > > -=Bryan=- > > ________________________________________ > From: Dave B via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> > Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM > To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> > Cc: Dave B <g8kbvdave@googlemail.com> > Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... > > On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote: >> The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from an >> AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA connector, >> suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices. > Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the > incoming Sine signal.   50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out. > > A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL > levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level, > traversing from + to -, as well as - to +.   But in both cases, it would > be the same polarity output signal.  But at twice the frequency of the > incoming AC power waveform. > > There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that > function, easily found online. > > 73. > > Dave G8KBV. > > -- > Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software: > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
B_
Bryan _
Thu, Jan 30, 2025 6:34 PM

Yowsa, that is a good point, didn't even pick that up. Waiting for a opto to come in and will check myself on a scope. Suspect the design is such that it doesn't really matter on the exact timing of the cross, just that it occurs and would be consistent, probably not suitable for the of the original poster.

-=Bryan=-


From: Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: January 28, 2025 2:43 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Sebastien F4GRX f4grx@f4grx.net
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

hi,

this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the zero
crossing itself. How accurate is that?

Sebastien

On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote:

https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-crossing-detector

-=Bryan=-


From: Dave B via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Dave B g8kbvdave@googlemail.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote:

The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from an
AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA connector,
suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices.

Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the
incoming Sine signal.  50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out.

A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL
levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level,
traversing from + to -, as well as - to +.  But in both cases, it would
be the same polarity output signal.  But at twice the frequency of the
incoming AC power waveform.

There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that
function, easily found online.

Dave G8KBV.

--
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software:


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Yowsa, that is a good point, didn't even pick that up. Waiting for a opto to come in and will check myself on a scope. Suspect the design is such that it doesn't really matter on the exact timing of the cross, just that it occurs and would be consistent, probably not suitable for the of the original poster. -=Bryan=- ________________________________ From: Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> Sent: January 28, 2025 2:43 AM To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> Cc: Sebastien F4GRX <f4grx@f4grx.net> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... hi, this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the zero crossing itself. How accurate is that? Sebastien On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote: > https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-crossing-detector > > -=Bryan=- > > ________________________________________ > From: Dave B via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> > Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM > To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> > Cc: Dave B <g8kbvdave@googlemail.com> > Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... > > On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote: >> The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from an >> AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA connector, >> suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices. > Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the > incoming Sine signal. 50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out. > > A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL > levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level, > traversing from + to -, as well as - to +. But in both cases, it would > be the same polarity output signal. But at twice the frequency of the > incoming AC power waveform. > > There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that > function, easily found online. > > 73. > > Dave G8KBV. > > -- > Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software: > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
AB
Azelio Boriani
Fri, Jan 31, 2025 9:53 AM

The MCP6561 has built-in hysteresis, so the zero cross will be a window
around the real zero cross.

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 8:41 PM Bryan _ via time-nuts <
time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote:

Yowsa, that is a good point, didn't even pick that up. Waiting for a opto
to come in and will check myself on a scope. Suspect the design is such
that it doesn't really matter on the exact timing of the cross, just that
it occurs and would be consistent, probably not suitable for the of the
original poster.

-=Bryan=-


From: Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: January 28, 2025 2:43 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Sebastien F4GRX f4grx@f4grx.net
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

hi,

this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the zero
crossing itself. How accurate is that?

Sebastien

On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote:

-=Bryan=-


From: Dave B via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Dave B g8kbvdave@googlemail.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote:

The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from

an

AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA

connector,

suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices.

Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the
incoming Sine signal.  50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out.

A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL
levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level,
traversing from + to -, as well as - to +.  But in both cases, it would
be the same polarity output signal.  But at twice the frequency of the
incoming AC power waveform.

There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that
function, easily found online.

Dave G8KBV.

--
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source

software:


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

The MCP6561 has built-in hysteresis, so the zero cross will be a window around the real zero cross. On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 8:41 PM Bryan _ via time-nuts < time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > Yowsa, that is a good point, didn't even pick that up. Waiting for a opto > to come in and will check myself on a scope. Suspect the design is such > that it doesn't really matter on the exact timing of the cross, just that > it occurs and would be consistent, probably not suitable for the of the > original poster. > > -=Bryan=- > ________________________________ > From: Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> > Sent: January 28, 2025 2:43 AM > To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> > Cc: Sebastien F4GRX <f4grx@f4grx.net> > Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... > > hi, > > this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the zero > crossing itself. How accurate is that? > > Sebastien > > > On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote: > > > https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-crossing-detector > > > > -=Bryan=- > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: Dave B via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> > > Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM > > To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> > > Cc: Dave B <g8kbvdave@googlemail.com> > > Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... > > > > On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote: > >> The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from > an > >> AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA > connector, > >> suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices. > > Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the > > incoming Sine signal. 50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out. > > > > A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL > > levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level, > > traversing from + to -, as well as - to +. But in both cases, it would > > be the same polarity output signal. But at twice the frequency of the > > incoming AC power waveform. > > > > There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that > > function, easily found online. > > > > 73. > > > > Dave G8KBV. > > > > -- > > Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source > software: > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >
SF
Sebastien F4GRX
Fri, Jan 31, 2025 10:01 AM

Hi,

then it means that the pulse timing will depend on the mains voltage
rate of change, which will be inaccurate if there are harmonics, or
noise/data signals near the zero crossing.

You would need some stringent mains frequency bandpass filtering to get
rid of most of that.

Numbers from your experiment will be interesting.

Sebastien

On 30/01/2025 19:34, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote:

Yowsa, that is a good point, didn't even pick that up. Waiting for a opto to come in and will check myself on a scope. Suspect the design is such that it doesn't really matter on the exact timing of the cross, just that it occurs and would be consistent, probably not suitable for the of the original poster.

-=Bryan=-


From: Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: January 28, 2025 2:43 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Sebastien F4GRX f4grx@f4grx.net
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

hi,

this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the zero
crossing itself. How accurate is that?

Sebastien

On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote:

https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-crossing-detector

-=Bryan=-


From: Dave B via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Dave B g8kbvdave@googlemail.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote:

The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from an
AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA connector,
suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices.
Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the
incoming Sine signal.  50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out.

A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL
levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level,
traversing from + to -, as well as - to +.  But in both cases, it would
be the same polarity output signal.  But at twice the frequency of the
incoming AC power waveform.

There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that
function, easily found online.

Dave G8KBV.

--
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software:


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi, then it means that the pulse timing will depend on the mains voltage rate of change, which will be inaccurate if there are harmonics, or noise/data signals near the zero crossing. You would need some stringent mains frequency bandpass filtering to get rid of most of that. Numbers from your experiment will be interesting. Sebastien On 30/01/2025 19:34, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote: > Yowsa, that is a good point, didn't even pick that up. Waiting for a opto to come in and will check myself on a scope. Suspect the design is such that it doesn't really matter on the exact timing of the cross, just that it occurs and would be consistent, probably not suitable for the of the original poster. > > -=Bryan=- > ________________________________ > From: Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> > Sent: January 28, 2025 2:43 AM > To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> > Cc: Sebastien F4GRX <f4grx@f4grx.net> > Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... > > hi, > > this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the zero > crossing itself. How accurate is that? > > Sebastien > > > On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote: >> https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-crossing-detector >> >> -=Bryan=- >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: Dave B via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> >> Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM >> To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> >> Cc: Dave B <g8kbvdave@googlemail.com> >> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... >> >> On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote: >>> The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from an >>> AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA connector, >>> suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices. >> Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the >> incoming Sine signal. 50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out. >> >> A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL >> levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level, >> traversing from + to -, as well as - to +. But in both cases, it would >> be the same polarity output signal. But at twice the frequency of the >> incoming AC power waveform. >> >> There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that >> function, easily found online. >> >> 73. >> >> Dave G8KBV. >> >> -- >> Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software: >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
BC
Bob Camp
Fri, Jan 31, 2025 2:40 PM

Hi

If you really want to dig into this, go back into the archives and look for “Colins limiter”. There is a lot of “trouble” that comes in when trying to get an accurate estimate of a slow moving edge. It normally gets a deep dive for things like ADEV testing when a beat note is being used.

Given how dirt cheap MCU’s with ADC’s on them are these days, there are a lot of options for doing “something fancy” ( = digital filtering / signal processing) with a 50 or 60Hz power line signal. Sounds like a great rabbit hole to spend a few years wandering down :) :).

Yes, one could ask “how good is good enough?”. Since this is Time Nuts …. there likely will be a wide range of answers to that question.

Bob

On Jan 31, 2025, at 5:01 AM, Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

Hi,

then it means that the pulse timing will depend on the mains voltage rate of change, which will be inaccurate if there are harmonics, or noise/data signals near the zero crossing.

You would need some stringent mains frequency bandpass filtering to get rid of most of that.

Numbers from your experiment will be interesting.

Sebastien

On 30/01/2025 19:34, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote:

Yowsa, that is a good point, didn't even pick that up. Waiting for a opto to come in and will check myself on a scope. Suspect the design is such that it doesn't really matter on the exact timing of the cross, just that it occurs and would be consistent, probably not suitable for the of the original poster.

-=Bryan=-


From: Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: January 28, 2025 2:43 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Sebastien F4GRX f4grx@f4grx.net
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

hi,

this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the zero
crossing itself. How accurate is that?

Sebastien

On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote:

https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-crossing-detector

-=Bryan=-


From: Dave B via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Dave B g8kbvdave@googlemail.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote:

The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from an
AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA connector,
suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices.

Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the
incoming Sine signal.  50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out.

A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL
levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level,
traversing from + to -, as well as - to +.  But in both cases, it would
be the same polarity output signal.  But at twice the frequency of the
incoming AC power waveform.

There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that
function, easily found online.

Dave G8KBV.

--
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software:


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi If you really want to dig into this, go back into the archives and look for “Colins limiter”. There is a lot of “trouble” that comes in when trying to get an accurate estimate of a slow moving edge. It normally gets a deep dive for things like ADEV testing when a beat note is being used. Given how dirt cheap MCU’s with ADC’s on them are these days, there are a lot of options for doing “something fancy” ( = digital filtering / signal processing) with a 50 or 60Hz power line signal. Sounds like a great rabbit hole to spend a few years wandering down :) :). Yes, one could ask “how good is good enough?”. Since this is Time Nuts …. there likely will be a wide range of answers to that question. Bob > On Jan 31, 2025, at 5:01 AM, Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > then it means that the pulse timing will depend on the mains voltage rate of change, which will be inaccurate if there are harmonics, or noise/data signals near the zero crossing. > > You would need some stringent mains frequency bandpass filtering to get rid of most of that. > > Numbers from your experiment will be interesting. > > Sebastien > > > On 30/01/2025 19:34, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote: >> Yowsa, that is a good point, didn't even pick that up. Waiting for a opto to come in and will check myself on a scope. Suspect the design is such that it doesn't really matter on the exact timing of the cross, just that it occurs and would be consistent, probably not suitable for the of the original poster. >> >> -=Bryan=- >> ________________________________ >> From: Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> >> Sent: January 28, 2025 2:43 AM >> To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> >> Cc: Sebastien F4GRX <f4grx@f4grx.net> >> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... >> >> hi, >> >> this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the zero >> crossing itself. How accurate is that? >> >> Sebastien >> >> >> On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote: >>> https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-crossing-detector >>> >>> -=Bryan=- >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Dave B via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> >>> Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM >>> To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> >>> Cc: Dave B <g8kbvdave@googlemail.com> >>> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... >>> >>> On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote: >>>> The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector from an >>>> AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an SMA connector, >>>> suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices. >>> Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the >>> incoming Sine signal. 50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out. >>> >>> A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL >>> levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level, >>> traversing from + to -, as well as - to +. But in both cases, it would >>> be the same polarity output signal. But at twice the frequency of the >>> incoming AC power waveform. >>> >>> There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that >>> function, easily found online. >>> >>> 73. >>> >>> Dave G8KBV. >>> >>> -- >>> Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software: >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >>> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >>> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
MB
m.bafaro@comcast.net
Fri, Jan 31, 2025 4:27 PM

BTW the folks at RCA had a zero-crossing detector the CA3058, CA3059 that was available in 1982.  It was intended to provide a switching signal for a Triac.  I am not sure if it is still available, but I would imagine that if not there are other manufacturers that make a similar circuit.

Mike Bafaro

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Camp via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2025 8:40 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

Hi

If you really want to dig into this, go back into the archives and look for “Colins limiter”. There is a lot of “trouble” that comes in when trying to get an accurate estimate of a slow moving edge. It normally gets a deep dive for things like ADEV testing when a beat note is being used.

Given how dirt cheap MCU’s with ADC’s on them are these days, there are a lot of options for doing “something fancy” ( = digital filtering / signal processing) with a 50 or 60Hz power line signal. Sounds like a great rabbit hole to spend a few years wandering down :) :).

Yes, one could ask “how good is good enough?”. Since this is Time Nuts …. there likely will be a wide range of answers to that question.

Bob

On Jan 31, 2025, at 5:01 AM, Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

Hi,

then it means that the pulse timing will depend on the mains voltage rate of change, which will be inaccurate if there are harmonics, or noise/data signals near the zero crossing.

You would need some stringent mains frequency bandpass filtering to get rid of most of that.

Numbers from your experiment will be interesting.

Sebastien

On 30/01/2025 19:34, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote:

Yowsa, that is a good point, didn't even pick that up. Waiting for a opto to come in and will check myself on a scope. Suspect the design is such that it doesn't really matter on the exact timing of the cross, just that it occurs and would be consistent, probably not suitable for the of the original poster.

-=Bryan=-


From: Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: January 28, 2025 2:43 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Sebastien F4GRX f4grx@f4grx.net
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

hi,

this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the
zero crossing itself. How accurate is that?

Sebastien

On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote:

https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-cro
ssing-detector

-=Bryan=-


From: Dave B via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Dave B g8kbvdave@googlemail.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote:

The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector
from an AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an
SMA connector, suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices.

Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the
incoming Sine signal.  50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out.

A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL
levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level,
traversing from + to -, as well as - to +.  But in both cases, it would
be the same polarity output signal.  But at twice the frequency of
the incoming AC power waveform.

There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that
function, easily found online.

Dave G8KBV.

--
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software:


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe
send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe
send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe
send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe
send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe send
an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

BTW the folks at RCA had a zero-crossing detector the CA3058, CA3059 that was available in 1982. It was intended to provide a switching signal for a Triac. I am not sure if it is still available, but I would imagine that if not there are other manufacturers that make a similar circuit. Mike Bafaro -----Original Message----- From: Bob Camp via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2025 8:40 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> Cc: Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... Hi If you really want to dig into this, go back into the archives and look for “Colins limiter”. There is a lot of “trouble” that comes in when trying to get an accurate estimate of a slow moving edge. It normally gets a deep dive for things like ADEV testing when a beat note is being used. Given how dirt cheap MCU’s with ADC’s on them are these days, there are a lot of options for doing “something fancy” ( = digital filtering / signal processing) with a 50 or 60Hz power line signal. Sounds like a great rabbit hole to spend a few years wandering down :) :). Yes, one could ask “how good is good enough?”. Since this is Time Nuts …. there likely will be a wide range of answers to that question. Bob > On Jan 31, 2025, at 5:01 AM, Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > then it means that the pulse timing will depend on the mains voltage rate of change, which will be inaccurate if there are harmonics, or noise/data signals near the zero crossing. > > You would need some stringent mains frequency bandpass filtering to get rid of most of that. > > Numbers from your experiment will be interesting. > > Sebastien > > > On 30/01/2025 19:34, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote: >> Yowsa, that is a good point, didn't even pick that up. Waiting for a opto to come in and will check myself on a scope. Suspect the design is such that it doesn't really matter on the exact timing of the cross, just that it occurs and would be consistent, probably not suitable for the of the original poster. >> >> -=Bryan=- >> ________________________________ >> From: Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> >> Sent: January 28, 2025 2:43 AM >> To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> >> Cc: Sebastien F4GRX <f4grx@f4grx.net> >> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... >> >> hi, >> >> this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the >> zero crossing itself. How accurate is that? >> >> Sebastien >> >> >> On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote: >>> https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-cro >>> ssing-detector >>> >>> -=Bryan=- >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Dave B via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> >>> Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM >>> To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> >>> Cc: Dave B <g8kbvdave@googlemail.com> >>> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... >>> >>> On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote: >>>> The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector >>>> from an AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an >>>> SMA connector, suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices. >>> Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the >>> incoming Sine signal. 50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out. >>> >>> A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL >>> levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level, >>> traversing from + to -, as well as - to +. But in both cases, it would >>> be the same polarity output signal. But at twice the frequency of >>> the incoming AC power waveform. >>> >>> There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that >>> function, easily found online. >>> >>> 73. >>> >>> Dave G8KBV. >>> >>> -- >>> Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software: >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe >>> send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe >>> send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe >> send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe >> send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe send > an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
RV
Rsec Van der leij
Fri, Jan 31, 2025 5:36 PM

On 31 Jan 2025, at 18:05, Michael Bafaro via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

BTW the folks at RCA had a zero-crossing detector the CA3058, CA3059 that was available in 1982.

These days one would use something like a AMC23C10 from Texas Instruments.

--

Ruben

> On 31 Jan 2025, at 18:05, Michael Bafaro via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > > BTW the folks at RCA had a zero-crossing detector the CA3058, CA3059 that was available in 1982. These days one would use something like a AMC23C10 from Texas Instruments. -- Ruben
JL
Jim Lux
Thu, Feb 6, 2025 9:30 PM

 
Those parts are fairly simple - they're a bridge with some form of limiter (probably diode clamps) and a threshold circuit.
I would assume that you deal with transients by filtering in front of it. 

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 10:27:01 -0600, Michael Bafaro via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

BTW the folks at RCA had a zero-crossing detector the CA3058, CA3059 that was available in 1982. It was intended to provide a switching signal for a Triac. I am not sure if it is still available, but I would imagine that if not there are other manufacturers that make a similar circuit.

Mike Bafaro

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Camp via time-nuts
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2025 8:40 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Cc: Bob Camp
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

Hi

If you really want to dig into this, go back into the archives and look for “Colins limiter”. There is a lot of “trouble” that comes in when trying to get an accurate estimate of a slow moving edge. It normally gets a deep dive for things like ADEV testing when a beat note is being used.

Given how dirt cheap MCU’s with ADC’s on them are these days, there are a lot of options for doing “something fancy” ( = digital filtering / signal processing) with a 50 or 60Hz power line signal. Sounds like a great rabbit hole to spend a few years wandering down :) :).

Yes, one could ask “how good is good enough?”. Since this is Time Nuts …. there likely will be a wide range of answers to that question.

Bob

On Jan 31, 2025, at 5:01 AM, Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts  wrote:

Hi,

then it means that the pulse timing will depend on the mains voltage rate of change, which will be inaccurate if there are harmonics, or noise/data signals near the zero crossing.

You would need some stringent mains frequency bandpass filtering to get rid of most of that.

Numbers from your experiment will be interesting.

Sebastien

On 30/01/2025 19:34, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote:

Yowsa, that is a good point, didn't even pick that up. Waiting for a opto to come in and will check myself on a scope. Suspect the design is such that it doesn't really matter on the exact timing of the cross, just that it occurs and would be consistent, probably not suitable for the of the original poster.

-=Bryan=-


From: Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts
Sent: January 28, 2025 2:43 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Sebastien F4GRX
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

hi,

this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the
zero crossing itself. How accurate is that?

Sebastien

On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote:

https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-cro
ssing-detector

-=Bryan=-


From: Dave B via time-nuts
Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Cc: Dave B
Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ...

On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote:

The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector
from an AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an
SMA connector, suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices.

Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the
incoming Sine signal. 50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out.

A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL
levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level,
traversing from + to -, as well as - to +. But in both cases, it would
be the same polarity output signal. But at twice the frequency of
the incoming AC power waveform.

There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that
function, easily found online.

Dave G8KBV.

--
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software:


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe
send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe
send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe
send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe
send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe send
an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
 

  Those parts are fairly simple - they're a bridge with some form of limiter (probably diode clamps) and a threshold circuit. I would assume that you deal with transients by filtering in front of it.  On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 10:27:01 -0600, Michael Bafaro via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: BTW the folks at RCA had a zero-crossing detector the CA3058, CA3059 that was available in 1982. It was intended to provide a switching signal for a Triac. I am not sure if it is still available, but I would imagine that if not there are other manufacturers that make a similar circuit. Mike Bafaro -----Original Message----- From: Bob Camp via time-nuts Sent: Friday, January 31, 2025 8:40 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Cc: Bob Camp Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... Hi If you really want to dig into this, go back into the archives and look for “Colins limiter”. There is a lot of “trouble” that comes in when trying to get an accurate estimate of a slow moving edge. It normally gets a deep dive for things like ADEV testing when a beat note is being used. Given how dirt cheap MCU’s with ADC’s on them are these days, there are a lot of options for doing “something fancy” ( = digital filtering / signal processing) with a 50 or 60Hz power line signal. Sounds like a great rabbit hole to spend a few years wandering down :) :). Yes, one could ask “how good is good enough?”. Since this is Time Nuts …. there likely will be a wide range of answers to that question. Bob > On Jan 31, 2025, at 5:01 AM, Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts wrote: > > Hi, > > then it means that the pulse timing will depend on the mains voltage rate of change, which will be inaccurate if there are harmonics, or noise/data signals near the zero crossing. > > You would need some stringent mains frequency bandpass filtering to get rid of most of that. > > Numbers from your experiment will be interesting. > > Sebastien > > > On 30/01/2025 19:34, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote: >> Yowsa, that is a good point, didn't even pick that up. Waiting for a opto to come in and will check myself on a scope. Suspect the design is such that it doesn't really matter on the exact timing of the cross, just that it occurs and would be consistent, probably not suitable for the of the original poster. >> >> -=Bryan=- >> ________________________________ >> From: Sebastien F4GRX via time-nuts >> Sent: January 28, 2025 2:43 AM >> To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> Cc: Sebastien F4GRX >> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... >> >> hi, >> >> this particular one is surprising: it starts the pulse before the >> zero crossing itself. How accurate is that? >> >> Sebastien >> >> >> On 27/01/2025 17:22, Bryan _ via time-nuts wrote: >>> https://dextrel.net/dextrel-start-page/design-ideas-2/mains-zero-cro >>> ssing-detector >>> >>> -=Bryan=- >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: Dave B via time-nuts >>> Sent: January 26, 2025 2:14 AM >>> To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com >>> Cc: Dave B >>> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: Now available: Zero-crossing detector ... >>> >>> On 25/01/2025 14:02, Jeremy Elson wrote: >>>> The board is simple: it takes 5-12VAC input on a barrel connector >>>> from an AC wall wart. It gives you a 3.3V square wave output on an >>>> SMA connector, suitable for plugging into a variety of measurement devices. >>> Call me fussy, but that looks like just a limited version of the >>> incoming Sine signal. 50/60Hz in, 50/60 Hz out. >>> >>> A "Zero Crossing" detector would send out narrow pulses (at CMOS/TTL >>> levels) as the incoming signal crosses the Zero Voltage level, >>> traversing from + to -, as well as - to +. But in both cases, it would >>> be the same polarity output signal. But at twice the frequency of >>> the incoming AC power waveform. >>> >>> There are plenty of tried and tested circuits for that provide that >>> function, easily found online. >>> >>> 73. >>> >>> Dave G8KBV. >>> >>> -- >>> Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software: >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe >>> send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe >>> send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe >> send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe >> send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe send > an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com