WE HAVE SUNSET THIS LISTSERV - Join us at collectionspace@lyrasislists.org
View all threadsso.. my offline test are not going well.
however, in digging into this; maybe an upgrade is not what I need; maybe a whole new instance.
If the 3 things that are I need are:
Could I not build a fresh and current 5.2 instance and restore those elements into the brand new one?
p.s. my production backup seems to show the database name as cspace_default and nuxeo_default ... is that an old standard?
I've pivoting to building a 5.2 in VM to see if that works better. I can get collection space up and running but even after the database restores, the web instance still looks as if things are brand new. I think the db names are messing with me.
p.s. Ray... thanks for that first quick reply.
Hi Eldon,
Yes, it would be fine to build a fresh 5.2 instance and copy those things in. For upgrades between some versions that's basically what you have to do anyway. The correct database names are cspace_default and nuxeo_default on a standard installation of cspace. Sorry for the confusion; I often refer to them generically as just the "cspace" database and the "nuxeo" database. The "nuxeo" database can also have different names for other (non-core) tenants, e.g. "anthro_default". And the "_default" part is configurable, but most people will just leave it as is.
Let us know how it goes.
Ray
From: Talk talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org on behalf of Eldon Neustaeter eldon@bcam.net
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 7:11 PM
To: talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Subject: [Talk] backup/restore of CollectionSpace
so.. my offline test are not going well.
however, in digging into this; maybe an upgrade is not what I need; maybe a whole new instance.
If the 3 things that are I need are:
Could I not build a fresh and current 5.2 instance and restore those elements into the brand new one?
p.s. my production backup seems to show the database name as cspace_default and nuxeo_default ... is that an old standard?
I've pivoting to building a 5.2 in VM to see if that works better. I can get collection space up and running but even after the database restores, the web instance still looks as if things are brand new. I think the db names are messing with me.
p.s. Ray... thanks for that first quick reply.