trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

Re: T&T: Hurricane, Webasto or Espar

JH
Jim Healy
Sun, Dec 14, 2008 9:01 PM

What is missing is data on how much BTU is required to heat the particular

boat in question and how often the compressor cycles. Please note I am not
talking about the air handler fan, but the actual

compressor itself.  Having lived in a mobile home in the PNW I can attest

to the fact an 1100 watt oil filled Delonghi heater was sufficient to heat
an 1200 square foot mobile.

Exactly, Arild.  Just as in your example, the fact that the water heater
temperature stabilizes at 57 degrees in the Ketch in moderate winter
overnight temperatures ( 20s at night, hi 30s to low 40s during the day)
supports the concept that heat gain balances heat loss within the
environmental operating range of the system.  I make no claims about the
thermal losses of the boats involved.  I simply state - again - that there
is a set of different boats in Baltimore in the the Mid-Atlantic Region for
which this system works just fine.  So, we're left only with five years of
those empirical facts.

Since my truthfulness, skills in observation, skills in description, or all
three, have been questioned, here's what I'll do.  Henry had the original
question.  Because he lives in the Baltimore area, what I'll do for him, and
for him alone, is this: if he'd like to see these installations, I'll make
the contacts necessary to have him see them.  That way, he get's to make up
his own mind, based on his situation and his first hand assessment.  Henry,
if interested, please contact me off-list!

Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary,
currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL
AGLCA # 3767
MTOA # 3436

> What is missing is data on how much BTU is required to heat the particular boat in question and how often the compressor cycles. Please note I am not talking about the air handler fan, but the actual > compressor itself. Having lived in a mobile home in the PNW I can attest to the fact an 1100 watt oil filled Delonghi heater was sufficient to heat an 1200 square foot mobile. Exactly, Arild. Just as in your example, the *fact* that the water heater temperature stabilizes at 57 degrees in the Ketch in moderate winter overnight temperatures ( 20s at night, hi 30s to low 40s during the day) supports the concept that heat gain balances heat loss within the environmental operating range of the system. I make no claims about the thermal losses of the boats involved. I simply state - again - that there is a set of different boats in Baltimore in the the Mid-Atlantic Region for which this system works just fine. So, we're left only with five years of those empirical facts. Since my truthfulness, skills in observation, skills in description, or all three, have been questioned, here's what I'll do. Henry had the original question. Because he lives in the Baltimore area, what I'll do for him, and for him alone, is this: if he'd like to see these installations, I'll make the contacts necessary to have him see them. That way, he get's to make up his own mind, based on his situation and his first hand assessment. Henry, if interested, please contact me off-list! Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary, currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL AGLCA # 3767 MTOA # 3436
HJ
Henry J. Dennig
Mon, Dec 15, 2008 12:40 AM

Jim,
I appreciate your postings and information.
Our boat is a 47' trawler, 16' beam with raised pilothouse/watch cabin.
We have two 16kw and a 12kw A/C unit.  I have been advised I will need
something in the 40-44kw of heat. The A/C units run off a 1200 gallon pump.
When I looked at Home Depot, they had a 6 gallon and a 20 gallon water
heater.  The 20 gallon unit draws 17 amps.
With that said, I am leaning towards a hydronic system.  We met with an
installer today and looked at several of the fan blowers, exhaust system,
etc.
What been trying to keep the boat warm with 2 1500w oil heaters, 2
1500w element heaters which is keeping the boat in the 50-60s.  We received
an electric bill from the marine for the month of November of $1,252.00.

 Thank you for your help,
         Henry

-----Original Message-----
From: trawlers-and-trawlering-bounces@lists.samurai.com
[mailto:trawlers-and-trawlering-bounces@lists.samurai.com] On Behalf Of Jim
Healy
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 4:02 PM
To: trawlers-and-trawlering@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: T&T: Hurricane, Webasto or Espar

What is missing is data on how much BTU is required to heat the particular

boat in question and how often the compressor cycles. Please note I am not
talking about the air handler fan, but the actual

compressor itself.  Having lived in a mobile home in the PNW I can attest

to the fact an 1100 watt oil filled Delonghi heater was sufficient to heat
an 1200 square foot mobile.

Exactly, Arild.  Just as in your example, the fact that the water heater
temperature stabilizes at 57 degrees in the Ketch in moderate winter
overnight temperatures ( 20s at night, hi 30s to low 40s during the day)
supports the concept that heat gain balances heat loss within the
environmental operating range of the system.  I make no claims about the
thermal losses of the boats involved.  I simply state - again - that there
is a set of different boats in Baltimore in the the Mid-Atlantic Region for
which this system works just fine.  So, we're left only with five years of
those empirical facts.

Since my truthfulness, skills in observation, skills in description, or all
three, have been questioned, here's what I'll do.  Henry had the original
question.  Because he lives in the Baltimore area, what I'll do for him, and
for him alone, is this: if he'd like to see these installations, I'll make
the contacts necessary to have him see them.  That way, he get's to make up
his own mind, based on his situation and his first hand assessment.  Henry,
if interested, please contact me off-list!

Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary,
currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL
AGLCA # 3767
MTOA # 3436


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering

To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options (get password, change
email address, etc) go to:
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/trawlers-and-trawlering

Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.

Jim, I appreciate your postings and information. Our boat is a 47' trawler, 16' beam with raised pilothouse/watch cabin. We have two 16kw and a 12kw A/C unit. I have been advised I will need something in the 40-44kw of heat. The A/C units run off a 1200 gallon pump. When I looked at Home Depot, they had a 6 gallon and a 20 gallon water heater. The 20 gallon unit draws 17 amps. With that said, I am leaning towards a hydronic system. We met with an installer today and looked at several of the fan blowers, exhaust system, etc. What been trying to keep the boat warm with 2 1500w oil heaters, 2 1500w element heaters which is keeping the boat in the 50-60s. We received an electric bill from the marine for the month of November of $1,252.00. Thank you for your help, Henry -----Original Message----- From: trawlers-and-trawlering-bounces@lists.samurai.com [mailto:trawlers-and-trawlering-bounces@lists.samurai.com] On Behalf Of Jim Healy Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 4:02 PM To: trawlers-and-trawlering@lists.samurai.com Subject: Re: T&T: Hurricane, Webasto or Espar > What is missing is data on how much BTU is required to heat the particular boat in question and how often the compressor cycles. Please note I am not talking about the air handler fan, but the actual > compressor itself. Having lived in a mobile home in the PNW I can attest to the fact an 1100 watt oil filled Delonghi heater was sufficient to heat an 1200 square foot mobile. Exactly, Arild. Just as in your example, the *fact* that the water heater temperature stabilizes at 57 degrees in the Ketch in moderate winter overnight temperatures ( 20s at night, hi 30s to low 40s during the day) supports the concept that heat gain balances heat loss within the environmental operating range of the system. I make no claims about the thermal losses of the boats involved. I simply state - again - that there is a set of different boats in Baltimore in the the Mid-Atlantic Region for which this system works just fine. So, we're left only with five years of those empirical facts. Since my truthfulness, skills in observation, skills in description, or all three, have been questioned, here's what I'll do. Henry had the original question. Because he lives in the Baltimore area, what I'll do for him, and for him alone, is this: if he'd like to see these installations, I'll make the contacts necessary to have him see them. That way, he get's to make up his own mind, based on his situation and his first hand assessment. Henry, if interested, please contact me off-list! Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary, currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL AGLCA # 3767 MTOA # 3436 _______________________________________________ http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options (get password, change email address, etc) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/trawlers-and-trawlering Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.
KB
Ken Bloomfield
Mon, Dec 15, 2008 5:57 PM

Whoa folks,
in my response to Jim, I did not mean to question or impugn any of Jim's
following concerns:

Since my truthfulness, skills in observation, skills in description, or all
three, have been questioned,

Please let me make the following points:

  1. I am sure that Jim is truthful, and further more offered his
    observations with every intent to help the readers.
  2. I have no doubt that he saw a system plumbed/constructed as he
    stated, and I don't doubt that it was keeping the boats he saw it in
    sufficiently warm and not freezing up the tank.
  3. I believe that he has described it very well, and I fully understand
    what they are doing.  It is just that I believe there is a much more
    cost effective way to solve the problem the live aboard boat owners set
    out to solve.  Hence the following, also meant to be constructive.

Here are the only points that I would make:

  1. The tank system can not help but be less efficient than direct
    resistive heating, --- because --- it is in fact a system that solely
    relies on resistive heating.  Namely the resistive heater in the tank.
    That is where all the heat can and does come from, period.  The rest of
    the system is just if anything a slight efficiency reducer.

  2. No doubt the system causes the heat pump to run for a shorter period
    of time than it would with cold seawater.  The 1500 watts of the tank
    heater is apparently more than enough to heat the boats.  However, why
    run the heat pump at all?  That is the key question.  One poster implied
    that it is due to the greater heat per kilowatt that heat pumps give
    relative to resistive heating.  That is only true when the heat pump has
    access to nearly infinite amounts of water with useful heat.  I
    explained this in my original posting, that heat pumps transport and
    concentrate available heat, but do not create heat.  When you are in a
    closed system, the ONLY significant heat there is available to the heat
    pump is that which is put into the water from the resistive element.
    Otherwise, you would have found a way to amplify heat and solved our
    national energy crisis.

  3. I do believe that it does not freeze the tank, for one very simple
    reason.  That is that all heat pumps vary efficiency as the water they
    are extracting heat from approaches the setting of the system evaporator
    temperature.  When they are equal, there is zero efficiency, so the
    system will pull the tank water down to some temperature where an
    equilibrium is reached.  As the water falls in temperature, the heat
    pump efficiency progressively reduces its ability to extract BTUs from
    the water, till it reaches a point that it is capable of extracting
    exactly the same amount of heat from the water as is being put into the
    water.  This will vary from system to system, but the 47 deg. F
    mentioned sounds very right to me for a typical system. For this reason
    (constant addition of heat), the system will never freeze.  The perfect
    example of the potential for inefficiency of heat pumps is the whole
    driver behind the folks that devised the tank system.  They no doubt
    found that in the winter the heat pump was eating its normal around 12
    amps (or so) at 120 volts (1440 watts) and providing virtually no (or
    very little) heat.  Here there efficiency was negative.  On the other
    hand in early fall, when the water was say 55 deg. F, during the cold
    night they could get a lot more heat from the heat pump amperage drawn
    than a resistive element would have given them at the same amperage.
    These are the boundary conditions.

  4. Remember that heat pumps do not create heat, they only transport
    it.  Now think about it:  (a) the only heat available for the boat is
    from the resistive heater in the tank. (b) delivering it from the tank
    to the A/C blower requires that the compressor and the pump be running
    to transport the heat from the tank to the forced air (via the heat
    exchanger). (c) all the time this compressor and pump are running, they
    are eating about 1500 watts (1.5 kW) and contributing very little heat
    for those watts -- all they are really doing is just transporting the
    heat that the resistive element already made.

  5. If you are going to use resistive heat anyway, rather than put it in
    the tank, just install proper heat strips in the A/C unit.  When heat is
    called for, it is nearly immediately available (strip heats up very
    fast), and only the fan is running in the A/C unit thereby dropping the
    additional current demand down to only likely about 2 to 3 amps for the
    fan, since the compressor and the pump are not needed.

  6. I do not know of any instance where there has ever been a fire from
    the properly engineered heater strips internal to a commercial marine
    A/C system, so I doubt that there is much of a safety argument against them.

Now, I know what would happen if this logic is brought to the users of
the system.  It would be instantly dismissed.  They are convinced that
they are getting a benefit, and would give the "well, I don't know about
all that stuff - but I just know the system works".  The last thing they
want to hear, and therefor will not believe, is that "yes it works but
not as well as it could and costs more than it should, with more
complication than necessary including compressor wear and tear, and
circulating pump wear and tear".  No doubt they went direct from a heat
pump system that in winter would not heat their boat to comfort levels
-- to a hodge-podge of various ceramic heaters, etc. that were a real
aggravation -- to this tank system, which seemed to them like Valhalla.
I will be willing to bet that not one of them ever tried the heater
strips heating in the A/C system.

Ken Bloomfield
Tellico Lady
50' Marine Trader

Whoa folks, in my response to Jim, I did not mean to question or impugn any of Jim's following concerns: > Since my truthfulness, skills in observation, skills in description, or all > three, have been questioned, Please let me make the following points: 1. I am sure that Jim is truthful, and further more offered his observations with every intent to help the readers. 2. I have no doubt that he saw a system plumbed/constructed as he stated, and I don't doubt that it was keeping the boats he saw it in sufficiently warm and not freezing up the tank. 3. I believe that he has described it very well, and I fully understand what they are doing. It is just that I believe there is a much more cost effective way to solve the problem the live aboard boat owners set out to solve. Hence the following, also meant to be constructive. Here are the only points that I would make: 1. The tank system can not help but be less efficient than direct resistive heating, --- because --- it is in fact a system that solely relies on resistive heating. Namely the resistive heater in the tank. That is where all the heat can and does come from, period. The rest of the system is just if anything a slight efficiency reducer. 2. No doubt the system causes the heat pump to run for a shorter period of time than it would with cold seawater. The 1500 watts of the tank heater is apparently more than enough to heat the boats. However, why run the heat pump at all? That is the key question. One poster implied that it is due to the greater heat per kilowatt that heat pumps give relative to resistive heating. That is only true when the heat pump has access to nearly infinite amounts of water with useful heat. I explained this in my original posting, that heat pumps transport and concentrate available heat, but do not create heat. When you are in a closed system, the ONLY significant heat there is available to the heat pump is that which is put into the water from the resistive element. Otherwise, you would have found a way to amplify heat and solved our national energy crisis. 3. I do believe that it does not freeze the tank, for one very simple reason. That is that all heat pumps vary efficiency as the water they are extracting heat from approaches the setting of the system evaporator temperature. When they are equal, there is zero efficiency, so the system will pull the tank water down to some temperature where an equilibrium is reached. As the water falls in temperature, the heat pump efficiency progressively reduces its ability to extract BTUs from the water, till it reaches a point that it is capable of extracting exactly the same amount of heat from the water as is being put into the water. This will vary from system to system, but the 47 deg. F mentioned sounds very right to me for a typical system. For this reason (constant addition of heat), the system will never freeze. The perfect example of the potential for inefficiency of heat pumps is the whole driver behind the folks that devised the tank system. They no doubt found that in the winter the heat pump was eating its normal around 12 amps (or so) at 120 volts (1440 watts) and providing virtually no (or very little) heat. Here there efficiency was negative. On the other hand in early fall, when the water was say 55 deg. F, during the cold night they could get a lot more heat from the heat pump amperage drawn than a resistive element would have given them at the same amperage. These are the boundary conditions. 4. Remember that heat pumps do not create heat, they only transport it. Now think about it: (a) the only heat available for the boat is from the resistive heater in the tank. (b) delivering it from the tank to the A/C blower requires that the compressor and the pump be running to transport the heat from the tank to the forced air (via the heat exchanger). (c) all the time this compressor and pump are running, they are eating about 1500 watts (1.5 kW) and contributing very little heat for those watts -- all they are really doing is just transporting the heat that the resistive element already made. 5. If you are going to use resistive heat anyway, rather than put it in the tank, just install proper heat strips in the A/C unit. When heat is called for, it is nearly immediately available (strip heats up very fast), and only the fan is running in the A/C unit thereby dropping the additional current demand down to only likely about 2 to 3 amps for the fan, since the compressor and the pump are not needed. 6. I do not know of any instance where there has ever been a fire from the properly engineered heater strips internal to a commercial marine A/C system, so I doubt that there is much of a safety argument against them. Now, I know what would happen if this logic is brought to the users of the system. It would be instantly dismissed. They are convinced that they are getting a benefit, and would give the "well, I don't know about all that stuff - but I just know the system works". The last thing they want to hear, and therefor will not believe, is that "yes it works but not as well as it could and costs more than it should, with more complication than necessary including compressor wear and tear, and circulating pump wear and tear". No doubt they went direct from a heat pump system that in winter would not heat their boat to comfort levels -- to a hodge-podge of various ceramic heaters, etc. that were a real aggravation -- to this tank system, which seemed to them like Valhalla. I will be willing to bet that not one of them ever tried the heater strips heating in the A/C system. Ken Bloomfield Tellico Lady 50' Marine Trader
2
2elnav@netbistro.com
Mon, Dec 15, 2008 6:22 PM

One of the challenges in boat heating is the extreme compartmentalization
you often find in boats.

All those smaller compartments, lockers,  nooks and crannies.
This makes it difficult to rely on natural convection air flow.

Invariably it seems the worst heat loss spots (single glazed windows) are
located above the place (bunk or couch) you want to get warm. As the air
loses its heat to the window pane, the cooler air falls down to the place
you want to keep warm. Result;  lack of comfort.

Air ducts designed for cooling (air conditioning) should dump cold air
into a compartment from a high location. Normally a return air duct is
then located down lower.
This is totally opposite to what is required for heating where you locate
hot air ducts close to floor to blow across the floor.  Returns are placed
to create the maximum air travel distance  through the compartment befoer
returnin gto the air handler / heat exchanger.

Good installers know these things and position air outlets accordingly.
Which is why a system PLANNED and installed by an experienced company /
installer work so well.

Yes, it does cost more but the end results are usually worth while.
HVAC systems for boats are more of a design challenge than  equivalent
systems ashore for houses.

Cheers
Arild

One of the challenges in boat heating is the extreme compartmentalization you often find in boats. All those smaller compartments, lockers, nooks and crannies. This makes it difficult to rely on natural convection air flow. Invariably it seems the worst heat loss spots (single glazed windows) are located above the place (bunk or couch) you want to get warm. As the air loses its heat to the window pane, the cooler air falls down to the place you want to keep warm. Result; lack of comfort. Air ducts designed for cooling (air conditioning) should dump cold air into a compartment from a high location. Normally a return air duct is then located down lower. This is totally opposite to what is required for heating where you locate hot air ducts close to floor to blow across the floor. Returns are placed to create the maximum air travel distance through the compartment befoer returnin gto the air handler / heat exchanger. Good installers know these things and position air outlets accordingly. Which is why a system PLANNED and installed by an experienced company / installer work so well. Yes, it does cost more but the end results are usually worth while. HVAC systems for boats are more of a design challenge than equivalent systems ashore for houses. Cheers Arild
JH
Jim Healy
Mon, Dec 15, 2008 7:24 PM

Ken,

I was not referring to you, I assure you. In this discussion, I've had a
number of unfortunate off-list exchanges from one individual who has
challenged my truthfulness, intelligence and "pigheadedness" for not simply
admitting I invented the whole thing because it plainly cannot work.  He's a
very bright guy with a very poor sense of interpersonal relationships and
effective approach to getting to a mutual understanding.  Perhaps email is
just not his media.

Prior to this discussion, I, personally, was not aware of the heat strips to
which you and Arild refer.  I'm as sure as I can be that the folks I've
referenced are also not aware of them.  The designer of the supplemental
system is a retired Coastie who now makes his "post retirement" living as an
HVAC technician, so I would ass/u/me he is aware of them, but I can't be
sure until I see him.  I don't know whether or not they could be retrofit
into older a/c units, and that may be why he didn't use/recommend them.  My
system, for instance, is an older (1988) MarinaAir, which has the old style
rotary control panel with expansion tube for temperature control.  In my OEM
installation, I am not able to run the fan separately from the
pump/compressor, so getting heat from a heat strip in the air plenum would
involve some invention to avoid running the pump/compressor.  I do not know
if the same constraint applied to my references at the time their
supplemental systems were installed.  I do know a company called Climate
Controls in Maryland makes a digital replacement for the old style
controllers, which I bought at the Annapolis Boat Show, have onboard, and
plan to install on my system after the first of the year.  That will enable
me to run the fan alone, and with a relay, would allow the use of the heat
strips.  When we lived in Indiana, we had a heat pump for the house.  It had
a 25KW electric furnace atop the air handler to supplement the heat pump
when winter temperatures where below 33 degrees and the heat pump's
efficiency fell off, so the concept is clearly viable and well established.
It also had a 400A service entrance, a tiche more than my boat's 2x30A shore
power.

The reason for installing the supplemental system I've described in the
first place was to get the advantages of air and heat distribution
throughout the boat.  In every case I'm aware of, preceding attempts to heat
these boats had involved oil filled and ceramic cube type heaters.  They
result in hot and cold spots, and distributing the heat through out the boat
was a kludge not suitable for life as a liveaboard.  Using the heat pump's
fan distributed the heat better, but the poor efficiency of water at 40
degrees and below meant the compressor ran continuously, which is both
expensive and very hard on the compressor.  So, the supplemental system made
the compressor more efficient. distributed the heat and reduced it's duty
cycle significantly.

I agree with all of the points you've raised in your note.  However, w/r/t
your closing paragraph, I do think my compatriots will all be interested
in the introduction of heat strips into the equation.  I will be with them
after the holidays.  We stop there on our way back to Florida, and you may
rest assured, Ken, I will mention it to them!!!

I appreciate your interest and your welcoming, encouraging approach.  Makes
me much more willing to engage.

Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary,
currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL
AGLCA # 3767
MTOA # 3436

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Bloomfield [mailto:khtb@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 12:57 PM
To: Jim Healy
Cc: trawlers-and-trawlering@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: Re: T&T: Hurricane, Webasto or Espar

Whoa folks,
in my response to Jim, I did not mean to question or impugn any of Jim's
following concerns:

Since my truthfulness, skills in observation, skills in description,
or all three, have been questioned,

Please let me make the following points:

  1. I am sure that Jim is truthful, and further more offered his
    observations with every intent to help the readers.
  2. I have no doubt that he saw a system plumbed/constructed as he stated,
    and I don't doubt that it was keeping the boats he saw it in sufficiently
    warm and not freezing up the tank.
  3. I believe that he has described it very well, and I fully understand
    what they are doing.  It is just that I believe there is a much more cost
    effective way to solve the problem the live aboard boat owners set out to
    solve.  Hence the following, also meant to be constructive.

Here are the only points that I would make:

  1. The tank system can not help but be less efficient than direct resistive
    heating, --- because --- it is in fact a system that solely relies on
    resistive heating.  Namely the resistive heater in the tank.
    That is where all the heat can and does come from, period.  The rest of the
    system is just if anything a slight efficiency reducer.

  2. No doubt the system causes the heat pump to run for a shorter period of
    time than it would with cold seawater.  The 1500 watts of the tank heater is
    apparently more than enough to heat the boats.  However, why run the heat
    pump at all?  That is the key question.  One poster implied that it is due
    to the greater heat per kilowatt that heat pumps give relative to resistive
    heating.  That is only true when the heat pump has access to nearly infinite
    amounts of water with useful heat.  I explained this in my original posting,
    that heat pumps transport and concentrate available heat, but do not create
    heat.  When you are in a closed system, the ONLY significant heat there is
    available to the heat pump is that which is put into the water from the
    resistive element.
    Otherwise, you would have found a way to amplify heat and solved our
    national energy crisis.

  3. I do believe that it does not freeze the tank, for one very simple
    reason.  That is that all heat pumps vary efficiency as the water they are
    extracting heat from approaches the setting of the system evaporator
    temperature.  When they are equal, there is zero efficiency, so the system
    will pull the tank water down to some temperature where an equilibrium is
    reached.  As the water falls in temperature, the heat pump efficiency
    progressively reduces its ability to extract BTUs from the water, till it
    reaches a point that it is capable of extracting exactly the same amount of
    heat from the water as is being put into the water.  This will vary from
    system to system, but the 47 deg. F mentioned sounds very right to me for a
    typical system. For this reason (constant addition of heat), the system will
    never freeze.  The perfect example of the potential for inefficiency of heat
    pumps is the whole driver behind the folks that devised the tank system.
    They no doubt found that in the winter the heat pump was eating its normal
    around 12 amps (or so) at 120 volts (1440 watts) and providing virtually no
    (or very little) heat.  Here there efficiency was negative.  On the other
    hand in early fall, when the water was say 55 deg. F, during the cold night
    they could get a lot more heat from the heat pump amperage drawn than a
    resistive element would have given them at the same amperage.
    These are the boundary conditions.

  4. Remember that heat pumps do not create heat, they only transport it.
    Now think about it:  (a) the only heat available for the boat is from the
    resistive heater in the tank. (b) delivering it from the tank to the A/C
    blower requires that the compressor and the pump be running to transport the
    heat from the tank to the forced air (via the heat exchanger). (c) all the
    time this compressor and pump are running, they are eating about 1500 watts
    (1.5 kW) and contributing very little heat for those watts -- all they are
    really doing is just transporting the heat that the resistive element
    already made.

  5. If you are going to use resistive heat anyway, rather than put it in the
    tank, just install proper heat strips in the A/C unit.  When heat is called
    for, it is nearly immediately available (strip heats up very fast), and only
    the fan is running in the A/C unit thereby dropping the additional current
    demand down to only likely about 2 to 3 amps for the fan, since the
    compressor and the pump are not needed.

  6. I do not know of any instance where there has ever been a fire from the
    properly engineered heater strips internal to a commercial marine A/C
    system, so I doubt that there is much of a safety argument against them.

Now, I know what would happen if this logic is brought to the users of the
system.  It would be instantly dismissed.  They are convinced that they are
getting a benefit, and would give the "well, I don't know about all that
stuff - but I just know the system works".  The last thing they want to
hear, and therefor will not believe, is that "yes it works but not as well
as it could and costs more than it should, with more complication than
necessary including compressor wear and tear, and circulating pump wear and
tear".  No doubt they went direct from a heat pump system that in winter
would not heat their boat to comfort levels
-- to a hodge-podge of various ceramic heaters, etc. that were a real
aggravation -- to this tank system, which seemed to them like Valhalla.
I will be willing to bet that not one of them ever tried the heater strips
heating in the A/C system.

Ken Bloomfield
Tellico Lady
50' Marine Trader

Ken, I was not referring to you, I assure you. In this discussion, I've had a number of unfortunate off-list exchanges from one individual who has challenged my truthfulness, intelligence and "pigheadedness" for not simply admitting I invented the whole thing because it plainly cannot work. He's a very bright guy with a very poor sense of interpersonal relationships and effective approach to getting to a mutual understanding. Perhaps email is just not his media. Prior to this discussion, I, personally, was not aware of the heat strips to which you and Arild refer. I'm as sure as I can be that the folks I've referenced are also not aware of them. The designer of the supplemental system is a retired Coastie who now makes his "post retirement" living as an HVAC technician, so I would ass/u/me he is aware of them, but I can't be sure until I see him. I don't know whether or not they could be retrofit into older a/c units, and that may be why he didn't use/recommend them. My system, for instance, is an older (1988) MarinaAir, which has the old style rotary control panel with expansion tube for temperature control. In my OEM installation, I am not able to run the fan separately from the pump/compressor, so getting heat from a heat strip in the air plenum would involve some invention to avoid running the pump/compressor. I do not know if the same constraint applied to my references at the time their supplemental systems were installed. I do know a company called Climate Controls in Maryland makes a digital replacement for the old style controllers, which I bought at the Annapolis Boat Show, have onboard, and plan to install on my system after the first of the year. That will enable me to run the fan alone, and with a relay, would allow the use of the heat strips. When we lived in Indiana, we had a heat pump for the house. It had a 25KW electric furnace atop the air handler to supplement the heat pump when winter temperatures where below 33 degrees and the heat pump's efficiency fell off, so the concept is clearly viable and well established. It also had a 400A service entrance, a tiche more than my boat's 2x30A shore power. The reason for installing the supplemental system I've described in the first place was to get the advantages of air and heat distribution throughout the boat. In every case I'm aware of, preceding attempts to heat these boats had involved oil filled and ceramic cube type heaters. They result in hot and cold spots, and distributing the heat through out the boat was a kludge not suitable for life as a liveaboard. Using the heat pump's fan distributed the heat better, but the poor efficiency of water at 40 degrees and below meant the compressor ran continuously, which is both expensive and very hard on the compressor. So, the supplemental system made the compressor more efficient. distributed the heat and reduced it's duty cycle significantly. I agree with all of the points you've raised in your note. However, w/r/t your closing paragraph, I do think my compatriots will *all* be interested in the introduction of heat strips into the equation. I will be with them after the holidays. We stop there on our way back to Florida, and you may rest assured, Ken, I will mention it to them!!! I appreciate your interest and your welcoming, encouraging approach. Makes me much more willing to engage. Jim Healy aboard Sanctuary, currently at Charlotte Harbor, Punta Gorda, FL AGLCA # 3767 MTOA # 3436 -----Original Message----- From: Ken Bloomfield [mailto:khtb@bellsouth.net] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 12:57 PM To: Jim Healy Cc: trawlers-and-trawlering@lists.samurai.com Subject: Re: Re: T&T: Hurricane, Webasto or Espar Whoa folks, in my response to Jim, I did not mean to question or impugn any of Jim's following concerns: > Since my truthfulness, skills in observation, skills in description, > or all three, have been questioned, Please let me make the following points: 1. I am sure that Jim is truthful, and further more offered his observations with every intent to help the readers. 2. I have no doubt that he saw a system plumbed/constructed as he stated, and I don't doubt that it was keeping the boats he saw it in sufficiently warm and not freezing up the tank. 3. I believe that he has described it very well, and I fully understand what they are doing. It is just that I believe there is a much more cost effective way to solve the problem the live aboard boat owners set out to solve. Hence the following, also meant to be constructive. Here are the only points that I would make: 1. The tank system can not help but be less efficient than direct resistive heating, --- because --- it is in fact a system that solely relies on resistive heating. Namely the resistive heater in the tank. That is where all the heat can and does come from, period. The rest of the system is just if anything a slight efficiency reducer. 2. No doubt the system causes the heat pump to run for a shorter period of time than it would with cold seawater. The 1500 watts of the tank heater is apparently more than enough to heat the boats. However, why run the heat pump at all? That is the key question. One poster implied that it is due to the greater heat per kilowatt that heat pumps give relative to resistive heating. That is only true when the heat pump has access to nearly infinite amounts of water with useful heat. I explained this in my original posting, that heat pumps transport and concentrate available heat, but do not create heat. When you are in a closed system, the ONLY significant heat there is available to the heat pump is that which is put into the water from the resistive element. Otherwise, you would have found a way to amplify heat and solved our national energy crisis. 3. I do believe that it does not freeze the tank, for one very simple reason. That is that all heat pumps vary efficiency as the water they are extracting heat from approaches the setting of the system evaporator temperature. When they are equal, there is zero efficiency, so the system will pull the tank water down to some temperature where an equilibrium is reached. As the water falls in temperature, the heat pump efficiency progressively reduces its ability to extract BTUs from the water, till it reaches a point that it is capable of extracting exactly the same amount of heat from the water as is being put into the water. This will vary from system to system, but the 47 deg. F mentioned sounds very right to me for a typical system. For this reason (constant addition of heat), the system will never freeze. The perfect example of the potential for inefficiency of heat pumps is the whole driver behind the folks that devised the tank system. They no doubt found that in the winter the heat pump was eating its normal around 12 amps (or so) at 120 volts (1440 watts) and providing virtually no (or very little) heat. Here there efficiency was negative. On the other hand in early fall, when the water was say 55 deg. F, during the cold night they could get a lot more heat from the heat pump amperage drawn than a resistive element would have given them at the same amperage. These are the boundary conditions. 4. Remember that heat pumps do not create heat, they only transport it. Now think about it: (a) the only heat available for the boat is from the resistive heater in the tank. (b) delivering it from the tank to the A/C blower requires that the compressor and the pump be running to transport the heat from the tank to the forced air (via the heat exchanger). (c) all the time this compressor and pump are running, they are eating about 1500 watts (1.5 kW) and contributing very little heat for those watts -- all they are really doing is just transporting the heat that the resistive element already made. 5. If you are going to use resistive heat anyway, rather than put it in the tank, just install proper heat strips in the A/C unit. When heat is called for, it is nearly immediately available (strip heats up very fast), and only the fan is running in the A/C unit thereby dropping the additional current demand down to only likely about 2 to 3 amps for the fan, since the compressor and the pump are not needed. 6. I do not know of any instance where there has ever been a fire from the properly engineered heater strips internal to a commercial marine A/C system, so I doubt that there is much of a safety argument against them. Now, I know what would happen if this logic is brought to the users of the system. It would be instantly dismissed. They are convinced that they are getting a benefit, and would give the "well, I don't know about all that stuff - but I just know the system works". The last thing they want to hear, and therefor will not believe, is that "yes it works but not as well as it could and costs more than it should, with more complication than necessary including compressor wear and tear, and circulating pump wear and tear". No doubt they went direct from a heat pump system that in winter would not heat their boat to comfort levels -- to a hodge-podge of various ceramic heaters, etc. that were a real aggravation -- to this tank system, which seemed to them like Valhalla. I will be willing to bet that not one of them ever tried the heater strips heating in the A/C system. Ken Bloomfield Tellico Lady 50' Marine Trader
2
2elnav@netbistro.com
Mon, Dec 15, 2008 11:02 PM

I don't know whether or not they could be retrofit

into older a/c units,

snip <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

I bought at the Annapolis Boat Show, have onboard, and

plan to install on my system after the first of the year.  That will
enable  me to run the fan alone, and with a relay, would allow the use

of the heat strips.

REPLY
Any system can be retro fitted. It all depends on how much design effort
you are able and willing to invest in the project.

If you have to work from scratch, look into ceramic heaters since these
genrally provide better fire safety than resistive heater coils with
glowing wires. The Ceramic stack has air passing through it and a hi limit
klixon thermo disc type safety. (this is essential if you use wooden
panels for air ducting. If air flow is restricted by plugged filter or a
defective fan or control circuit, the disk goes open circuit  preventing
the ceramic stack from getting power. If you can't find them elsewhere or
want to do it low cost(DIY)  cannibalize an old microwave or two. All the
ones I have disassembled had several thermo disc devices inside.  I
scrounged a water cooler that had a failure and fixed it with a thermo
disc from a microwave.  The Water cooler has now been working in my
kitchen for the past year. The same micro wave also gave me a programmable
timer with keyboard for some shop projects.

Even if you do not buy the fancy HVAC controller you can install a by-pass
switch for just the fan portion of your air handler. The fan runs most of
the time and he thermo stat cycles the heater element.

Jim wrote:

In every case I'm aware of, preceding attempts to heat these boats had

involved oil filled and ceramic cube type heaters. They result in hot
and cold spots, and distributing the heat through out the boat was a
kludge not suitable for life as a liveaboard. Using the heat pump's fan
distributed the heat better,

REPLY
Sounds more like insufficient air flow and too small fans than any other
reasons.
BTW  - electric furnaces for homes work exactly the same way. Resistive
heater coils are inserted into the air duct plenum and a large enough fan
assembly blow the air through the duct work.

regards
Arild

I don't know whether or not they could be retrofit > into older a/c units, >>>>>>>>>> snip <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< I bought at the Annapolis Boat Show, have onboard, and > plan to install on my system after the first of the year. That will > enable me to run the fan alone, and with a relay, would allow the use of the heat strips. REPLY Any system can be retro fitted. It all depends on how much design effort you are able and willing to invest in the project. If you have to work from scratch, look into ceramic heaters since these genrally provide better fire safety than resistive heater coils with glowing wires. The Ceramic stack has air passing through it and a hi limit klixon thermo disc type safety. (this is essential if you use wooden panels for air ducting. If air flow is restricted by plugged filter or a defective fan or control circuit, the disk goes open circuit preventing the ceramic stack from getting power. If you can't find them elsewhere or want to do it low cost(DIY) cannibalize an old microwave or two. All the ones I have disassembled had several thermo disc devices inside. I scrounged a water cooler that had a failure and fixed it with a thermo disc from a microwave. The Water cooler has now been working in my kitchen for the past year. The same micro wave also gave me a programmable timer with keyboard for some shop projects. Even if you do not buy the fancy HVAC controller you can install a by-pass switch for just the fan portion of your air handler. The fan runs most of the time and he thermo stat cycles the heater element. Jim wrote: > In every case I'm aware of, preceding attempts to heat these boats had involved oil filled and ceramic cube type heaters. They result in hot and cold spots, and distributing the heat through out the boat was a kludge not suitable for life as a liveaboard. Using the heat pump's fan distributed the heat better, REPLY Sounds more like insufficient air flow and too small fans than any other reasons. BTW - electric furnaces for homes work exactly the same way. Resistive heater coils are inserted into the air duct plenum and a large enough fan assembly blow the air through the duct work. regards Arild
2
2elnav@netbistro.com
Mon, Dec 15, 2008 11:12 PM

two instruments  that are of really great usefulness  is an indoor /
outdoor thermometer. These often sell for around $10  in automotive
accessory stores. They have a remote mounted sensor  on about 15 - 20 feet
of wire and  for the outdoor sensing. For indoor sensing the thermistor is
inside the instrument case. With it you can simultaneously measure inlet
air and outlet air.

The other instrument  that can be very useful is a air flow speed meter.
Often sold as anemometers for serious hang glider fliers, or sail plane
enthusiasts, These anemometers typically have multiple scales.  MPH and
feet or meters per second.
HVAC systems are often given calibration specs using either feet or meters
per second air flow. Just as a fuel filter will develop excessive vacuum
when the filter element plugs up; an air filter will slow down air
movement and that in turn will cause  excessive temp rise in a heater
element.

Cheers
Arild

two instruments that are of really great usefulness is an indoor / outdoor thermometer. These often sell for around $10 in automotive accessory stores. They have a remote mounted sensor on about 15 - 20 feet of wire and for the outdoor sensing. For indoor sensing the thermistor is inside the instrument case. With it you can simultaneously measure inlet air and outlet air. The other instrument that can be very useful is a air flow speed meter. Often sold as anemometers for serious hang glider fliers, or sail plane enthusiasts, These anemometers typically have multiple scales. MPH and feet or meters per second. HVAC systems are often given calibration specs using either feet or meters per second air flow. Just as a fuel filter will develop excessive vacuum when the filter element plugs up; an air filter will slow down air movement and that in turn will cause excessive temp rise in a heater element. Cheers Arild