time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Jackson Labs Fury & Isotemp OCXO134-10

MO
Matt Osborn
Sun, Nov 2, 2008 6:28 AM

I think that I've managed to keep a low profile here, trusting that I
would learn more if I refrained from random interjections of
ill-informed thoughts.  However, there comes a point in every man's
life...

A year or two ago, I took advantage of Said's offer and purchased one
of the Jackson Labs OEM external OCXO Fury units and am attempting to
put it to work. I've decided to use an Isotemp OCXO134-10 oscillator
and have several decisions which I would like to vet with those of you
that have been down this road before.

The Isotemp unit has an EFC range of 0 to 8 Volts; the Fury has an EFC
range of 0 to 5 volts.  Using my HP 53131A, I'm able to adjust the
Isotemp to 10 MHz +- 5 mHz with an EFC voltage of 4.64 volts. That is
within the adjustment range of the Fury, but I'm not sure of the
accuracy of the HP53131A.  Should I construct a resistive network ala
Brooks Shera to 'boost' the EFC range just in case or would I be
better off just using the Fury 'as is'?

Secondly, the Jackson Labs advises that since the Fury uses the
external oscillator as its clock, that the oscillator should be
powered up before the Fury itself.  I was hoping that I would be able
to use a single power switch to power both the oscillator and the Fury
simultaneously, but now I'm not so sure.

Finally, are there any of you that have used the Isotemp OXCO134-10
with the Fury?  Have any of you worked out the various SERVO settings
that the Fury makes available?  I'm interested in the  DAC gain, EFC
scale, EFC dampening and Phase compensation.

Any and all advice will be gratefully accepted.

-- kc0ukk at msosborn dot com

I think that I've managed to keep a low profile here, trusting that I would learn more if I refrained from random interjections of ill-informed thoughts. However, there comes a point in every man's life... A year or two ago, I took advantage of Said's offer and purchased one of the Jackson Labs OEM external OCXO Fury units and am attempting to put it to work. I've decided to use an Isotemp OCXO134-10 oscillator and have several decisions which I would like to vet with those of you that have been down this road before. The Isotemp unit has an EFC range of 0 to 8 Volts; the Fury has an EFC range of 0 to 5 volts. Using my HP 53131A, I'm able to adjust the Isotemp to 10 MHz +- 5 mHz with an EFC voltage of 4.64 volts. That is within the adjustment range of the Fury, but I'm not sure of the accuracy of the HP53131A. Should I construct a resistive network ala Brooks Shera to 'boost' the EFC range just in case or would I be better off just using the Fury 'as is'? Secondly, the Jackson Labs advises that since the Fury uses the external oscillator as its clock, that the oscillator should be powered up before the Fury itself. I was hoping that I would be able to use a single power switch to power both the oscillator and the Fury simultaneously, but now I'm not so sure. Finally, are there any of you that have used the Isotemp OXCO134-10 with the Fury? Have any of you worked out the various SERVO settings that the Fury makes available? I'm interested in the DAC gain, EFC scale, EFC dampening and Phase compensation. Any and all advice will be gratefully accepted. -- kc0ukk at msosborn dot com
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Sun, Nov 2, 2008 7:58 AM

Matt Osborn wrote:

I think that I've managed to keep a low profile here, trusting that I
would learn more if I refrained from random interjections of
ill-informed thoughts.  However, there comes a point in every man's
life...

A year or two ago, I took advantage of Said's offer and purchased one
of the Jackson Labs OEM external OCXO Fury units and am attempting to
put it to work. I've decided to use an Isotemp OCXO134-10 oscillator
and have several decisions which I would like to vet with those of you
that have been down this road before.

The Isotemp unit has an EFC range of 0 to 8 Volts; the Fury has an EFC
range of 0 to 5 volts.  Using my HP 53131A, I'm able to adjust the
Isotemp to 10 MHz +- 5 mHz with an EFC voltage of 4.64 volts. That is
within the adjustment range of the Fury, but I'm not sure of the
accuracy of the HP53131A.  Should I construct a resistive network ala
Brooks Shera to 'boost' the EFC range just in case or would I be
better off just using the Fury 'as is'?

If you use a non inverting buffer amplifier with a gain of 1.6 you will
increase the allowance for OCXO aging, otherwise you are a little close
to the Fury EFC output limit of 5V.
Have you tried connecting the OCXO to the Fury and seen how close to the
limit the OCXO EFC is when lock is achieved?

Secondly, the Jackson Labs advises that since the Fury uses the
external oscillator as its clock, that the oscillator should be
powered up before the Fury itself.  I was hoping that I would be able
to use a single power switch to power both the oscillator and the Fury
simultaneously, but now I'm not so sure.

You still can if you use a suitable delay circuit.

Finally, are there any of you that have used the Isotemp OXCO134-10
with the Fury?  Have any of you worked out the various SERVO settings
that the Fury makes available?  I'm interested in the  DAC gain, EFC
scale, EFC dampening and Phase compensation.

Any and all advice will be gratefully accepted.

-- kc0ukk at msosborn dot com

Bruce

Matt Osborn wrote: > I think that I've managed to keep a low profile here, trusting that I > would learn more if I refrained from random interjections of > ill-informed thoughts. However, there comes a point in every man's > life... > > A year or two ago, I took advantage of Said's offer and purchased one > of the Jackson Labs OEM external OCXO Fury units and am attempting to > put it to work. I've decided to use an Isotemp OCXO134-10 oscillator > and have several decisions which I would like to vet with those of you > that have been down this road before. > > The Isotemp unit has an EFC range of 0 to 8 Volts; the Fury has an EFC > range of 0 to 5 volts. Using my HP 53131A, I'm able to adjust the > Isotemp to 10 MHz +- 5 mHz with an EFC voltage of 4.64 volts. That is > within the adjustment range of the Fury, but I'm not sure of the > accuracy of the HP53131A. Should I construct a resistive network ala > Brooks Shera to 'boost' the EFC range just in case or would I be > better off just using the Fury 'as is'? > > If you use a non inverting buffer amplifier with a gain of 1.6 you will increase the allowance for OCXO aging, otherwise you are a little close to the Fury EFC output limit of 5V. Have you tried connecting the OCXO to the Fury and seen how close to the limit the OCXO EFC is when lock is achieved? > Secondly, the Jackson Labs advises that since the Fury uses the > external oscillator as its clock, that the oscillator should be > powered up before the Fury itself. I was hoping that I would be able > to use a single power switch to power both the oscillator and the Fury > simultaneously, but now I'm not so sure. > > You still can if you use a suitable delay circuit. > Finally, are there any of you that have used the Isotemp OXCO134-10 > with the Fury? Have any of you worked out the various SERVO settings > that the Fury makes available? I'm interested in the DAC gain, EFC > scale, EFC dampening and Phase compensation. > > Any and all advice will be gratefully accepted. > > -- kc0ukk at msosborn dot com > > Bruce
JH
Jim Hall
Sun, Nov 2, 2008 7:43 PM

Regarding your second question concerning power supply sequencing.  How
about using one of the "Power Supply Sequencer" chips (e.g. MAX6819)).  The
output of your power supply would go directly to the external OCXO, the
Power Supply Sequencer chip and the input to a MOSFET switch.  Output of the
MOSFET switch goes to the Fury.

When the power supply is switched on the following sequence occurs (assuming
a MAX6819):

  1. Power is applied to the OCXO,  MAX6819 and MOSFET switch input
  2. The MAX6819 starts a 200 millisecond delay
  3. After 200 milliseconds the MAX6819 turns the MOSFET switch On, powering
    the Fury On

MOSFET switches can be used that have only a few tenths (or less) of an ohm
of "ON" resistance.  This minimizes degradation in voltage regulation of the
power applied to the Fury.

The MAX6819 data sheet gives useful examples applicable to the above
application.

73,

Jim Hall W4TVI


From: "Matt Osborn" kc0ukk@msosborn.com
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2008 11:28 PM
To: "time-nuts" time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] Jackson Labs Fury & Isotemp OCXO134-10

I think that I've managed to keep a low profile here, trusting that I
would learn more if I refrained from random interjections of
ill-informed thoughts.  However, there comes a point in every man's
life...

A year or two ago, I took advantage of Said's offer and purchased one
of the Jackson Labs OEM external OCXO Fury units and am attempting to
put it to work. I've decided to use an Isotemp OCXO134-10 oscillator
and have several decisions which I would like to vet with those of you
that have been down this road before.

The Isotemp unit has an EFC range of 0 to 8 Volts; the Fury has an EFC
range of 0 to 5 volts.  Using my HP 53131A, I'm able to adjust the
Isotemp to 10 MHz +- 5 mHz with an EFC voltage of 4.64 volts. That is
within the adjustment range of the Fury, but I'm not sure of the
accuracy of the HP53131A.  Should I construct a resistive network ala
Brooks Shera to 'boost' the EFC range just in case or would I be
better off just using the Fury 'as is'?

Secondly, the Jackson Labs advises that since the Fury uses the
external oscillator as its clock, that the oscillator should be
powered up before the Fury itself.  I was hoping that I would be able
to use a single power switch to power both the oscillator and the Fury
simultaneously, but now I'm not so sure.

Finally, are there any of you that have used the Isotemp OXCO134-10
with the Fury?  Have any of you worked out the various SERVO settings
that the Fury makes available?  I'm interested in the  DAC gain, EFC
scale, EFC dampening and Phase compensation.

Any and all advice will be gratefully accepted.

-- kc0ukk at msosborn dot com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Regarding your second question concerning power supply sequencing. How about using one of the "Power Supply Sequencer" chips (e.g. MAX6819)). The output of your power supply would go directly to the external OCXO, the Power Supply Sequencer chip and the input to a MOSFET switch. Output of the MOSFET switch goes to the Fury. When the power supply is switched on the following sequence occurs (assuming a MAX6819): 1) Power is applied to the OCXO, MAX6819 and MOSFET switch input 2) The MAX6819 starts a 200 millisecond delay 3) After 200 milliseconds the MAX6819 turns the MOSFET switch On, powering the Fury On MOSFET switches can be used that have only a few tenths (or less) of an ohm of "ON" resistance. This minimizes degradation in voltage regulation of the power applied to the Fury. The MAX6819 data sheet gives useful examples applicable to the above application. 73, Jim Hall W4TVI -------------------------------------------------- From: "Matt Osborn" <kc0ukk@msosborn.com> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2008 11:28 PM To: "time-nuts" <time-nuts@febo.com> Subject: [time-nuts] Jackson Labs Fury & Isotemp OCXO134-10 > I think that I've managed to keep a low profile here, trusting that I > would learn more if I refrained from random interjections of > ill-informed thoughts. However, there comes a point in every man's > life... > > A year or two ago, I took advantage of Said's offer and purchased one > of the Jackson Labs OEM external OCXO Fury units and am attempting to > put it to work. I've decided to use an Isotemp OCXO134-10 oscillator > and have several decisions which I would like to vet with those of you > that have been down this road before. > > The Isotemp unit has an EFC range of 0 to 8 Volts; the Fury has an EFC > range of 0 to 5 volts. Using my HP 53131A, I'm able to adjust the > Isotemp to 10 MHz +- 5 mHz with an EFC voltage of 4.64 volts. That is > within the adjustment range of the Fury, but I'm not sure of the > accuracy of the HP53131A. Should I construct a resistive network ala > Brooks Shera to 'boost' the EFC range just in case or would I be > better off just using the Fury 'as is'? > > Secondly, the Jackson Labs advises that since the Fury uses the > external oscillator as its clock, that the oscillator should be > powered up before the Fury itself. I was hoping that I would be able > to use a single power switch to power both the oscillator and the Fury > simultaneously, but now I'm not so sure. > > Finally, are there any of you that have used the Isotemp OXCO134-10 > with the Fury? Have any of you worked out the various SERVO settings > that the Fury makes available? I'm interested in the DAC gain, EFC > scale, EFC dampening and Phase compensation. > > Any and all advice will be gratefully accepted. > > -- kc0ukk at msosborn dot com > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
MO
Matt Osborn
Tue, Nov 4, 2008 12:59 AM

On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:28:34 -0500, Matt Osborn kc0ukk@msosborn.com
wrote:

Hi all,

Thanks for all the help and ideas with the IsoTemp/Fury combination. I
followed Hal Murray's advice fired up the combination yesterday (its
been running for about 24 hours now) and everything is working as
advertised.  The IsoTemp locked in with an EFC of 4.523xxxx and today
is down to 4.498xxxx volts and falling slowly, so it would appear that
boosting the Fury EFC range won't be necessary.

Bruce Griffiths suggested a 1.6 gain buffer amplifier and Jim Miller
had designed that exact amplifier to boost an EFC range of 0 - 5v to 0

  • 8v specifically for the IsoTemp OCXO134.  Jim had a PCB available,
    so I ordered it and will build that up if the IsoTemp starts aging in
    the wrong direction. I believe that problem has been addressed.

I've not yet solved the power sequence problem (if it exists); I'll
follow Said's advice and just try powering both from the same supply
and see if the Fury reset hold time is sufficient.  If not, I'll
pursue Jim Hall's MAX6819 approach. That would seem to be a simple and
inexpensive  solution.

Now I'm trying to understand Bill Jones' GPSCon program and what it is
telling me about the Fury GPSDO.  With some history provided by GPSCon
and a better understanding of just what, exactly, I should expect to
see and to strive for, I will apply Said's suggestions and see what
develops.

BTW, it would appear as though my HP 53131A counter reads 220 mHz low
with a 2 second gate time.  There appears to be no appreciable drift;
it always reads 220 mHz low.  I'm sure there is a name for that
measurement, I hope to learn it soon.

Thanks to all for your help. I'm amazed at the high signal to noise
ratio on this list.

-- kc0ukk at msosborn dot com

On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:28:34 -0500, Matt Osborn <kc0ukk@msosborn.com> wrote: Hi all, Thanks for all the help and ideas with the IsoTemp/Fury combination. I followed Hal Murray's advice fired up the combination yesterday (its been running for about 24 hours now) and everything is working as advertised. The IsoTemp locked in with an EFC of 4.523xxxx and today is down to 4.498xxxx volts and falling slowly, so it would appear that boosting the Fury EFC range won't be necessary. Bruce Griffiths suggested a 1.6 gain buffer amplifier and Jim Miller had designed that exact amplifier to boost an EFC range of 0 - 5v to 0 - 8v specifically for the IsoTemp OCXO134. Jim had a PCB available, so I ordered it and will build that up if the IsoTemp starts aging in the wrong direction. I believe that problem has been addressed. I've not yet solved the power sequence problem (if it exists); I'll follow Said's advice and just try powering both from the same supply and see if the Fury reset hold time is sufficient. If not, I'll pursue Jim Hall's MAX6819 approach. That would seem to be a simple and inexpensive solution. Now I'm trying to understand Bill Jones' GPSCon program and what it is telling me about the Fury GPSDO. With some history provided by GPSCon and a better understanding of just what, exactly, I should expect to see and to strive for, I will apply Said's suggestions and see what develops. BTW, it would appear as though my HP 53131A counter reads 220 mHz low with a 2 second gate time. There appears to be no appreciable drift; it always reads 220 mHz low. I'm sure there is a name for that measurement, I hope to learn it soon. Thanks to all for your help. I'm amazed at the high signal to noise ratio on this list. -- kc0ukk at msosborn dot com