Sorry for a somewhat Non time nuts posting but this topic seems to have drawn a lot of interest.
I found the Microsoft article fascinating. Thanks for sharing.
Re DC power. I've seen some computing equipment that ran from -48 volts DC but to expand on the comments from PHK about DC power it never really seemed to catch on in the Enterprise space. The need to deal with actual wiring issues vs simply plugging in an AC power cord was a major obstacle in my view, but there were others as well in my view.
(Years ago I did a quick assessment of building a data centre that would have largely used -48 volt DC power. We didn't proceed with the project.)
To return to a time nuts focus:
One of the things I like about much of my time nuts gear is that it runs from 24 Volts D.C. At this point though the only gear I have powered by my backup battery system is gear that already has a backup 24 Volt power connection.
I've toyed with the idea of constructing a simple change over system to quickly switch from the AC line powered supplies to the backup battery system for the gear that doesn't have backup power inputs.
(I briefly considered running the gear from the batteries full time but I'm concerned that some equipment really wants to see 24 volts not the 27.5 thru 28 volts or so that is required to charge the batteries. My BVA oscillator is a particular concern for me in this regard.)
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 13, 2015, at 11:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp phk@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message 4FD0F30EBAEF49609DF207E3EE61C15B@pc52, "Tom Van Baak" writes:
I used to rely on one massive UPS (along with natural gas generator)
for my entire lab. Eventually I found it more reliable and convenient
to have localized power backup. By local I mean backup for a single
shelf, or even a single instrument.
The big gain is avoiding the DC->AC conversions.
AC->DC conversions are covered under EnergyStar and similar programmes,
so they're generally 90% efficient or better.
But DC->AC conversions, for instance in inverters and UPS's are not
covered, the argument going that they are only run very seldomly,
and therefore capital cost would be wasted.
In the professional segment, UPS's which require a forklift,
efficiencies are good, in some cases very good, because power costs
money at that scale.
But anyting you can fit into a rack will typically have horrible
losses, the smaller the UPS the worse. I've personally measured
sub 50% efficiency in one case.
The argument against running stuff on 12 or 24V DC is the short
circuit currents, and the absense of an affordable standarized
connector.
For the short circuit currents the only cure is fuses and caution,
and for connectors there seems to be no hope of a standard - ever.
China forced USB through as the standard for mobile phones, but
despite several valiant attempts nobody has ever managed to get
anything above 5V/5W standardized.
Here's the website of the IEEE WG which came out with a standard
(IEEE 1823:2015) this May:
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/msc/upamd/
It will cost you $160 to see the full standard, which is a very
good and strong reason why adoption will be slow, and nobody
I've talked to expects it to go anywhere ever.
At the same time USB has come up with 100W power concept
which is not compatible, since IEEE uses CANbus and different
connectors.
I've not heard any rumours that China man nail this one.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi Tom:
The Li-Ion 18650 size cells (18mm dia x 650mm long) are used in most laptop computer batteries and Tesla cars because
they are made in such high volumes.
The referenced article shows a single 18650 cell, but with about 3.7 Volts per cell you need to connect them in series
and/or parallel to get the typically needed 12 or 24 Volts (and needed amp hours) for backup power. The big problem is
these cells can easily catch on fire and/or explode if they are mistreated either during discharge or charge. To
prevent that a protection circuit needs to be incorporated for each individual cell. The easiest way to do that is to
buy a battery pack with internal protection circuits and matched charger. Then this can be connected to the external DC
input on an individual piece of equipment. For example:
http://www.batteryspace.com/li-ionpacks37-89v.aspx
My first precision oscillator was a rack mount Gibbs 5 MHz standard that I got for a very low price because the internal
lead acid battery had vented acid fumes which etched away many of the copper PCB traces inside the oven.
http://prc68.com/I/office_equip.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/rack1.html
Mail_Attachment --
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html
Tom Van Baak wrote:
I found this UPS article fascinating, because it echoed what I eventually found in my own lab:
http://www.theplatform.net/2015/03/13/how-this-battery-cut-microsoft-datacenter-costs-by-a-quarter/
I used to rely on one massive UPS (along with natural gas generator) for my entire lab. Eventually I found it more reliable and convenient to have localized power backup. By local I mean backup for a single shelf, or even a single instrument.
Consider that many Rb/Cs standards and even some Qz standards have internal batteries. Even if one chooses not to use their internal batteries, most of these instruments still feature dual power inputs. In addition to power redundancy it also makes it easy to move equipment or cables around without power loss. Most importantly, local backup like this avoids the possibility of single-point lab-wide power failures.
Recently, as some of my gear works from 5 VDC, those ~2600 mAh mobile phone USB backup power bricks make an excellent mini-UPS. The ideal models are those without LEDs or on/off buttons so they discharge and charge/float seamlessly without manual intervention, even if fully drained.
Multiple units can be placed in series for additional, if slightly inefficient, capacity. A good self-test is:
http://leapsecond.com/images/perpetual-USB-power.jpg
/tvb
----- Original Message -----
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" phk@phk.freebsd.dk
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" time-nuts@febo.com; "Bill Byrom" time@radio.sent.com
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] UPS for my time rack
In message 1444701906.379459.408467601.5676DFA5@webmail.messagingengine.com,
Bill Byrom writes:
Anything can (and will) fail, [...]
The interesting thing is that several sources in that business have
reported to me that about 30-40% of all power related downtime is
caused by Battery, generator and UPS failure, in that order.
Many sites simply have lower uptime after they install UPS systems.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
A winning way to do 12v and 24v wiring up to 45Amps are Anderson Powerpole
connectors. Many sources sell fused distribution panels.
For larger currents (up to 350A) the SB "Storage Battery" series is broadly
used in Forklifts and solar applications
Tim N3QE
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','phk@phk.freebsd.dk');> wrote:
In message 4FD0F30EBAEF49609DF207E3EE61C15B@pc52, "Tom Van Baak" writes:
I used to rely on one massive UPS (along with natural gas generator)
for my entire lab. Eventually I found it more reliable and convenient
to have localized power backup. By local I mean backup for a single
shelf, or even a single instrument.
The big gain is avoiding the DC->AC conversions.
AC->DC conversions are covered under EnergyStar and similar programmes,
so they're generally 90% efficient or better.
But DC->AC conversions, for instance in inverters and UPS's are not
covered, the argument going that they are only run very seldomly,
and therefore capital cost would be wasted.
In the professional segment, UPS's which require a forklift,
efficiencies are good, in some cases very good, because power costs
money at that scale.
But anyting you can fit into a rack will typically have horrible
losses, the smaller the UPS the worse. I've personally measured
sub 50% efficiency in one case.
The argument against running stuff on 12 or 24V DC is the short
circuit currents, and the absense of an affordable standarized
connector.
For the short circuit currents the only cure is fuses and caution,
and for connectors there seems to be no hope of a standard - ever.
China forced USB through as the standard for mobile phones, but
despite several valiant attempts nobody has ever managed to get
anything above 5V/5W standardized.
Here's the website of the IEEE WG which came out with a standard
(IEEE 1823:2015) this May:
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/msc/upamd/
It will cost you $160 to see the full standard, which is a very
good and strong reason why adoption will be slow, and nobody
I've talked to expects it to go anywhere ever.
At the same time USB has come up with 100W power concept
which is not compatible, since IEEE uses CANbus and different
connectors.
I've not heard any rumours that China man nail this one.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Am Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:54:58 +0000
schrieb "Poul-Henning Kamp" phk@phk.freebsd.dk:
In message 4FD0F30EBAEF49609DF207E3EE61C15B@pc52, "Tom Van Baak"
writes:
I used to rely on one massive UPS (along with natural gas generator)
for my entire lab. Eventually I found it more reliable and convenient
to have localized power backup. By local I mean backup for a single
shelf, or even a single instrument.
The big gain is avoiding the DC->AC conversions.
AC->DC conversions are covered under EnergyStar and similar
programmes, so they're generally 90% efficient or better.
But DC->AC conversions, for instance in inverters and UPS's are not
covered, the argument going that they are only run very seldomly,
and therefore capital cost would be wasted.
Definitely, avoiding unnecessary conversions is key to achieve good
efficiency. And in most cases equipment actually converts to DC
internally, so converting AC to DC (for the battery), then back into AC
to power the equipment, which in turn converts to DC to power internal
circuitry is bound to be inefficient. DC-DC converters with very
good efficiency exist for quite some time now. I've converted most of
the stuff I regularly use to run off common 12V and/or 48V rails
generated by two "central" power supply blocks.
The argument against running stuff on 12 or 24V DC is the short
circuit currents, and the absense of an affordable standarized
connector.
For the short circuit currents the only cure is fuses and caution,
and for connectors there seems to be no hope of a standard - ever.
Umm, around here, at least for ham radio operators, it seems many
standardize now on PowerPole connectors for 12V DC. They are pretty
affordable, running at below 2 Euro for a single pair. Sure, it's not
as cheap as an USB connector, but they are designed to handle
significant currents (15, 30, 45 amps which are freely interchangeable,
versions rated for 75 or 120 amps exist also).
Now of course if you want to mix voltage levels, things might become a
bit more complicated, as most 12V equipment doesn't like to be supplied
with 24 volts, so it might actually not be the brightest idea to use
identical connectors in such circumstances. Don't ask how I know... ;-)
Of course, short circuit currents are the same as before, so properly
rated fuses and/or circuit breakers are a must, but that would be
recommended for mains powered equipment as well.
Best regards,
Florian
Hi Poul:
I really like Power Pole connectors. Unlike cigarette lighter plugs and sockets where the spring causes them to
separate on their own the Power Pole connectors "snap" together.
The Amateur Radio Emergency Services (ARES) used to use car trailer connectors but long ago switched to Power Pole
connectors in a specific configuration that maintains their Hermaphroditic http://www.prc68.com/I/PowerPole.shtml#Herm
nature. That's to say unlike conventional electrical extension cords that have a male and female end, in this system
both ends of the cord are identical. The ARES configuration is
"Red on right
A reads right"
http://www.prc68.com/I/PowerPole.shtml
The PP15 series plastic shells used for ARES can accept contacts rated at 15, 30 or 45 Amps, so they can handle quite a
bit of power.
The contacts are also self wiping.
I've come up with a 24 Volt configuration that does NOT mate with the 12 Volt ARES standard, but retains the
hermaphroditic feature.
I don't like the systems that only change the plastic shell color because they mate with the 12 Volt system.
http://www.prc68.com/I/PowerPole.shtml#24VP
There are a number of companies making DC outlet strips and various other power management devices all based on Power
Pole connectors.
For example: http://www.powerwerx.com/powerpole-power-distribution/rigrunner-4005.html
Mail_Attachment --
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke, N6GCE
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 4FD0F30EBAEF49609DF207E3EE61C15B@pc52, "Tom Van Baak" writes:
I used to rely on one massive UPS (along with natural gas generator)
for my entire lab. Eventually I found it more reliable and convenient
to have localized power backup. By local I mean backup for a single
shelf, or even a single instrument.
The big gain is avoiding the DC->AC conversions.
AC->DC conversions are covered under EnergyStar and similar programmes,
so they're generally 90% efficient or better.
But DC->AC conversions, for instance in inverters and UPS's are not
covered, the argument going that they are only run very seldomly,
and therefore capital cost would be wasted.
In the professional segment, UPS's which require a forklift,
efficiencies are good, in some cases very good, because power costs
money at that scale.
But anyting you can fit into a rack will typically have horrible
losses, the smaller the UPS the worse. I've personally measured
sub 50% efficiency in one case.
The argument against running stuff on 12 or 24V DC is the short
circuit currents, and the absense of an affordable standarized
connector.
For the short circuit currents the only cure is fuses and caution,
and for connectors there seems to be no hope of a standard - ever.
China forced USB through as the standard for mobile phones, but
despite several valiant attempts nobody has ever managed to get
anything above 5V/5W standardized.
Here's the website of the IEEE WG which came out with a standard
(IEEE 1823:2015) this May:
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/msc/upamd/
It will cost you $160 to see the full standard, which is a very
good and strong reason why adoption will be slow, and nobody
I've talked to expects it to go anywhere ever.
At the same time USB has come up with 100W power concept
which is not compatible, since IEEE uses CANbus and different
connectors.
I've not heard any rumours that China man nail this one.
Hi
One option for the “fuse” part of the DC supply system are PTC resettable
fuses. You do indeed need to be careful about voltage and current ratings
on these gizmos. If the only objective is to “not have smoke” when there is a short,
that can reduce the variables to a manageable level. If your wire will handle 20A for
long enough to get the gizmo to limit and your load is typically < 5A there are
parts you can find.
A few cautions:
The trip points are very temperature dependent. If you need to handle -20C in the winter
and +40C in the summer, that will narrow things down quite a bit.
Mounting matters quite a bit. If you go with SMD parts, be careful of traces that act as
heatsinks. This is one case that the part needs to get hot.
There are to many variables on most of the spec sheets to simply pick one and move on.
The only good way to do it is to get several and run repeated tests on them Min carry current
will occur at your highest temperature. Worst case trip will occur at your lowest temperature.
Consider that the “carry current” may not be the real limitation. Resistance in the supply lead
of an OCXO is a bad idea. This may limit your current well below the point that the fuse actually
trips.
This sounds like a pretty scary list. To some degree it is. These parts do have their place. That
does not mean they work everywhere and anywhere.
Bob
On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp phk@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message 4FD0F30EBAEF49609DF207E3EE61C15B@pc52, "Tom Van Baak" writes:
I used to rely on one massive UPS (along with natural gas generator)
for my entire lab. Eventually I found it more reliable and convenient
to have localized power backup. By local I mean backup for a single
shelf, or even a single instrument.
The big gain is avoiding the DC->AC conversions.
Depending on your actual power throughput needs- PTCs can be a challenge as
Bob mentions. You will have a tough time meeting the power requirements of
a Thunderbolt with many you'll see. Now efuses (think TPS24/25xxx) or
mosfets with a controller (think LTC43xx) can be a good choice but don't
hesitate to use a real honest to god fuse that blows out and waits for you
to come replace it if that is what you would need
I personally do as suggested in the thread above to some degree- I do AC to
DC conversion once for all my time and frequency stuff then have batteries
local to important gear and (in older stuff) a diode(s) or (in newer stuff)
a real hotswap controller. But whenever something is really important
there's whatever fuse is needed.
Finally if you are of the type to be adventuresome -
http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/datasheet/4110fb.pdf or
NS
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:01 AM Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
One option for the “fuse” part of the DC supply system are PTC resettable
fuses. You do indeed need to be careful about voltage and current ratings
on these gizmos. If the only objective is to “not have smoke” when there
is a short,
that can reduce the variables to a manageable level. If your wire will
handle 20A for
long enough to get the gizmo to limit and your load is typically < 5A
there are
parts you can find.
A few cautions:
The trip points are very temperature dependent. If you need to handle -20C
in the winter
and +40C in the summer, that will narrow things down quite a bit.
Mounting matters quite a bit. If you go with SMD parts, be careful of
traces that act as
heatsinks. This is one case that the part needs to get hot.
There are to many variables on most of the spec sheets to simply pick one
and move on.
The only good way to do it is to get several and run repeated tests on
them Min carry current
will occur at your highest temperature. Worst case trip will occur at your
lowest temperature.
Consider that the “carry current” may not be the real limitation.
Resistance in the supply lead
of an OCXO is a bad idea. This may limit your current well below the point
that the fuse actually
trips.
This sounds like a pretty scary list. To some degree it is. These parts do
have their place. That
does not mean they work everywhere and anywhere.
Bob
On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp phk@phk.freebsd.dk
wrote:
writes:
I used to rely on one massive UPS (along with natural gas generator)
for my entire lab. Eventually I found it more reliable and convenient
to have localized power backup. By local I mean backup for a single
shelf, or even a single instrument.
The big gain is avoiding the DC->AC conversions.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
In message 20151013225202.1e70abe8@aluminium.mobile.teply.info, Florian Teply
writes:
DC-DC converters with very
good efficiency exist for quite some time now.
The one I just put in my HP5065A does 60W with 90+% efficiency
in a 2x1x.5 inch package:
http://phk.freebsd.dk/hacks/HP5065A/20150930_dcdc/index.html
Umm, around here, at least for ham radio operators, it seems many
standardize now on PowerPole connectors for 12V DC.
They're quite neat, but I wish there were something a little less
heavy-duty for the 1-2 Amp range.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
How did you find the units that will act as a UPS, without buying
everything on the market and testing them?
I just checked all of those bricks in our house, and none will do it.
There are a couple of PNY units that do not provide output power until a
button is pressed, and don't charge until input power is connected while in
idle mode. Then there are Tp-Link and Mophie units that switch on the
output automatically when a load is connected (or perhaps the output is
just always powered), but which disable the output and switch to charge
mode when input power is provided. None of them seem able to pass through
5V power without discharging.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Tom Van Baak tvb@leapsecond.com wrote:
Recently, as some of my gear works from 5 VDC, those ~2600 mAh mobile
phone USB backup power bricks make an excellent mini-UPS. The ideal models
are those without LEDs or on/off buttons so they discharge and charge/float
seamlessly without manual intervention, even if fully drained.
Multiple units can be placed in series for additional, if slightly
inefficient, capacity. A good self-test is:
http://leapsecond.com/images/perpetual-USB-power.jpg
/tvb
I’ve used Anderson PowerPoles in mixed voltage environments successfully. A visual indication can be obtained by using other colors for the connector shell; e.g., red for +13 Vdc and blue for +25 Vdc…
One can also re-orient one of the connectors in each pair by 90º or 180º to create a physical incompatibility. This takes some care as the cable ends are no longer interchangeable, but it does provide protection against connecting to the wrong voltage.
— Eric K3NA
On 2015 Oct 13, at 16:52 , Florian Teply usenet@teply.info wrote:
Am Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:54:58 +0000
schrieb "Poul-Henning Kamp" phk@phk.freebsd.dk:
[…snip…]
Umm, around here, at least for ham radio operators, it seems many
standardize now on PowerPole connectors for 12V DC. They are pretty
affordable, running at below 2 Euro for a single pair. Sure, it's not
as cheap as an USB connector, but they are designed to handle
significant currents (15, 30, 45 amps which are freely interchangeable,
versions rated for 75 or 120 amps exist also).
Now of course if you want to mix voltage levels, things might become a
bit more complicated, as most 12V equipment doesn't like to be supplied
with 24 volts, so it might actually not be the brightest idea to use
identical connectors in such circumstances. Don't ask how I know... ;-)
Of course, short circuit currents are the same as before, so properly
rated fuses and/or circuit breakers are a must, but that would be
recommended for mains powered equipment as well.
Best regards,
Florian