time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

About 10 MHz Optical Distro

A(
AC0XU (Jim)
Sun, Aug 29, 2021 2:13 AM

Thanks to all the posters. Especially to Dana -  That is exactly what I was looking for - suggestions for parts and/or circuits to do the job. I was originally thinking that I would go with a digital circuit (sine to square to sine), but maybe analog/sinewave would be simpler and perform about as well.

Anyway, I have ordered some of the recommended optical transceivers. We'll see how that works out.

One or two posters mentioned that phase noise and/or thermal stability may be issues. The referenced research papers don't seem to indicate that phase noise is a problem. I don't think that thermal effects will be a big problem for me - I just need to check the phase calibration from time to time. Certainly there are expensive commerical optical clock distribution systems with excellent properties. Maybe the devil is in the details...

My specifical application at the moment is putting several SDRs at diverse antenna locs and feeding the IF via ethernet-converted-to-optical to my computer. I may want to transmit at some point but receiving is all I want to do for now. Still need a way to get a stable ref clock to each radio to provide phase coherence.... I only need 50-60 meters but an optical solution with single mode fibers can go many km if I ever wanted to scale up. Anyway, my plan is to have only power carried by copper.

I don't want to go with coax, twisted pair, or any other copper solution because of high ambient noise levels in my area and a desire to avoid adding to it. Stringing several 100 meters of copper about my yard, carrying 10 MHz clock signals, no matter if the cables are well shielded, doesn't seem like a great idea.

Overkill?  Probably.

BTW, I would NEVER try to do something like this with copper Ethernet. Even shielded Ethernet cables (Cat-7 and Cat-8) radiate badly when used for 1-G and 10-G Ethernet.

Thanks again to all!

Jim

Thanks to all the posters. Especially to Dana - That is exactly what I was looking for - suggestions for parts and/or circuits to do the job. I was originally thinking that I would go with a digital circuit (sine to square to sine), but maybe analog/sinewave would be simpler and perform about as well. Anyway, I have ordered some of the recommended optical transceivers. We'll see how that works out. One or two posters mentioned that phase noise and/or thermal stability may be issues. The referenced research papers don't seem to indicate that phase noise is a problem. I don't think that thermal effects will be a big problem for me - I just need to check the phase calibration from time to time. Certainly there are expensive commerical optical clock distribution systems with excellent properties. Maybe the devil is in the details... My specifical application at the moment is putting several SDRs at diverse antenna locs and feeding the IF via ethernet-converted-to-optical to my computer. I may want to transmit at some point but receiving is all I want to do for now. Still need a way to get a stable ref clock to each radio to provide phase coherence.... I only need 50-60 meters but an optical solution with single mode fibers can go many km if I ever wanted to scale up. Anyway, my plan is to have only power carried by copper. I don't want to go with coax, twisted pair, or any other copper solution because of high ambient noise levels in my area and a desire to avoid adding to it. Stringing several 100 meters of copper about my yard, carrying 10 MHz clock signals, no matter if the cables are well shielded, doesn't seem like a great idea. Overkill? Probably. BTW, I would NEVER try to do something like this with copper Ethernet. Even shielded Ethernet cables (Cat-7 and Cat-8) radiate badly when used for 1-G and 10-G Ethernet. Thanks again to all! Jim
LJ
Lux, Jim
Sun, Aug 29, 2021 3:57 AM

On 8/28/21 7:13 PM, AC0XU (Jim) wrote:

Thanks to all the posters. Especially to Dana -  That is exactly what I was looking for - suggestions for parts and/or circuits to do the job. I was originally thinking that I would go with a digital circuit (sine to square to sine), but maybe analog/sinewave would be simpler and perform about as well.

Anyway, I have ordered some of the recommended optical transceivers. We'll see how that works out.

One or two posters mentioned that phase noise and/or thermal stability may be issues. The referenced research papers don't seem to indicate that phase noise is a problem. I don't think that thermal effects will be a big problem for me - I just need to check the phase calibration from time to time. Certainly there are expensive commerical optical clock distribution systems with excellent properties. Maybe the devil is in the details...

My specifical application at the moment is putting several SDRs at diverse antenna locs and feeding the IF via ethernet-converted-to-optical to my computer. I may want to transmit at some point but receiving is all I want to do for now. Still need a way to get a stable ref clock to each radio to provide phase coherence.... I only need 50-60 meters but an optical solution with single mode fibers can go many km if I ever wanted to scale up. Anyway, my plan is to have only power carried by copper.

I don't want to go with coax, twisted pair, or any other copper solution because of high ambient noise levels in my area and a desire to avoid adding to it. Stringing several 100 meters of copper about my yard, carrying 10 MHz clock signals, no matter if the cables are well shielded, doesn't seem like a great idea.

This is totally the thing that OVRO LWA dealt with.. Not only is fiber a
LOT cheaper than coax, it solves a lot of problems.

Ethernet to fiber is really cheap ($20 for an endpoint from TP-link ) 
$20 from newegg

https://www.newegg.com/tp-link-mc100cm/p/N82E16833704015?item=N82E16833704015

On 8/28/21 7:13 PM, AC0XU (Jim) wrote: > Thanks to all the posters. Especially to Dana - That is exactly what I was looking for - suggestions for parts and/or circuits to do the job. I was originally thinking that I would go with a digital circuit (sine to square to sine), but maybe analog/sinewave would be simpler and perform about as well. > > Anyway, I have ordered some of the recommended optical transceivers. We'll see how that works out. > > One or two posters mentioned that phase noise and/or thermal stability may be issues. The referenced research papers don't seem to indicate that phase noise is a problem. I don't think that thermal effects will be a big problem for me - I just need to check the phase calibration from time to time. Certainly there are expensive commerical optical clock distribution systems with excellent properties. Maybe the devil is in the details... > > My specifical application at the moment is putting several SDRs at diverse antenna locs and feeding the IF via ethernet-converted-to-optical to my computer. I may want to transmit at some point but receiving is all I want to do for now. Still need a way to get a stable ref clock to each radio to provide phase coherence.... I only need 50-60 meters but an optical solution with single mode fibers can go many km if I ever wanted to scale up. Anyway, my plan is to have only power carried by copper. > > I don't want to go with coax, twisted pair, or any other copper solution because of high ambient noise levels in my area and a desire to avoid adding to it. Stringing several 100 meters of copper about my yard, carrying 10 MHz clock signals, no matter if the cables are well shielded, doesn't seem like a great idea. This is totally the thing that OVRO LWA dealt with.. Not only is fiber a LOT cheaper than coax, it solves a lot of problems. Ethernet to fiber is really cheap ($20 for an endpoint from TP-link )  $20 from newegg https://www.newegg.com/tp-link-mc100cm/p/N82E16833704015?item=N82E16833704015
PS
paul swed
Sun, Aug 29, 2021 2:03 PM

I did see the tp link. Pretty amazing. For the group these devices are
pretty useful.
But watch out for the wavelength of the light you typically need matching
fiber. Also note the connectors and get the matching units.
I have no idea how well 1350 light would pass on multimode for 850 nm.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:57 PM Lux, Jim jim@luxfamily.com wrote:

On 8/28/21 7:13 PM, AC0XU (Jim) wrote:

Thanks to all the posters. Especially to Dana -  That is exactly what I

was looking for - suggestions for parts and/or circuits to do the job. I
was originally thinking that I would go with a digital circuit (sine to
square to sine), but maybe analog/sinewave would be simpler and perform
about as well.

Anyway, I have ordered some of the recommended optical transceivers.

We'll see how that works out.

One or two posters mentioned that phase noise and/or thermal stability

may be issues. The referenced research papers don't seem to indicate that
phase noise is a problem. I don't think that thermal effects will be a big
problem for me - I just need to check the phase calibration from time to
time. Certainly there are expensive commerical optical clock distribution
systems with excellent properties. Maybe the devil is in the details...

My specifical application at the moment is putting several SDRs at

diverse antenna locs and feeding the IF via ethernet-converted-to-optical
to my computer. I may want to transmit at some point but receiving is all I
want to do for now. Still need a way to get a stable ref clock to each
radio to provide phase coherence.... I only need 50-60 meters but an
optical solution with single mode fibers can go many km if I ever wanted to
scale up. Anyway, my plan is to have only power carried by copper.

I don't want to go with coax, twisted pair, or any other copper solution

because of high ambient noise levels in my area and a desire to avoid
adding to it. Stringing several 100 meters of copper about my yard,
carrying 10 MHz clock signals, no matter if the cables are well shielded,
doesn't seem like a great idea.

This is totally the thing that OVRO LWA dealt with.. Not only is fiber a
LOT cheaper than coax, it solves a lot of problems.

Ethernet to fiber is really cheap ($20 for an endpoint from TP-link )
$20 from newegg

https://www.newegg.com/tp-link-mc100cm/p/N82E16833704015?item=N82E16833704015


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.

I did see the tp link. Pretty amazing. For the group these devices are pretty useful. But watch out for the wavelength of the light you typically need matching fiber. Also note the connectors and get the matching units. I have no idea how well 1350 light would pass on multimode for 850 nm. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:57 PM Lux, Jim <jim@luxfamily.com> wrote: > On 8/28/21 7:13 PM, AC0XU (Jim) wrote: > > Thanks to all the posters. Especially to Dana - That is exactly what I > was looking for - suggestions for parts and/or circuits to do the job. I > was originally thinking that I would go with a digital circuit (sine to > square to sine), but maybe analog/sinewave would be simpler and perform > about as well. > > > > Anyway, I have ordered some of the recommended optical transceivers. > We'll see how that works out. > > > > One or two posters mentioned that phase noise and/or thermal stability > may be issues. The referenced research papers don't seem to indicate that > phase noise is a problem. I don't think that thermal effects will be a big > problem for me - I just need to check the phase calibration from time to > time. Certainly there are expensive commerical optical clock distribution > systems with excellent properties. Maybe the devil is in the details... > > > > My specifical application at the moment is putting several SDRs at > diverse antenna locs and feeding the IF via ethernet-converted-to-optical > to my computer. I may want to transmit at some point but receiving is all I > want to do for now. Still need a way to get a stable ref clock to each > radio to provide phase coherence.... I only need 50-60 meters but an > optical solution with single mode fibers can go many km if I ever wanted to > scale up. Anyway, my plan is to have only power carried by copper. > > > > I don't want to go with coax, twisted pair, or any other copper solution > because of high ambient noise levels in my area and a desire to avoid > adding to it. Stringing several 100 meters of copper about my yard, > carrying 10 MHz clock signals, no matter if the cables are well shielded, > doesn't seem like a great idea. > > This is totally the thing that OVRO LWA dealt with.. Not only is fiber a > LOT cheaper than coax, it solves a lot of problems. > > Ethernet to fiber is really cheap ($20 for an endpoint from TP-link ) > $20 from newegg > > > https://www.newegg.com/tp-link-mc100cm/p/N82E16833704015?item=N82E16833704015 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send > an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
DW
Dana Whitlow
Sun, Aug 29, 2021 2:38 PM

Paul is right, and it can be difficult to figure out which cable works well
at a given
wavelength and which connector type is which.  A phone conversation with an
applications person at the cable supplier ought to help avoid any of the
traps

At the Arecibo Observatory we had some bad experiences with fiber to
ethernet
converters.
As a class, these things seemed to have problems with UHF/microwave leakage
and often had to be put in properly-shielding enclosures of our own
design.  Of
course, being a radio observatory, we might have been a wee bit more
sensitive
to such EMI than would many garden-variety users :-)

Dana

On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 9:04 AM paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

I did see the tp link. Pretty amazing. For the group these devices are
pretty useful.
But watch out for the wavelength of the light you typically need matching
fiber. Also note the connectors and get the matching units.
I have no idea how well 1350 light would pass on multimode for 850 nm.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:57 PM Lux, Jim jim@luxfamily.com wrote:

On 8/28/21 7:13 PM, AC0XU (Jim) wrote:

Thanks to all the posters. Especially to Dana -  That is exactly what I

was looking for - suggestions for parts and/or circuits to do the job. I
was originally thinking that I would go with a digital circuit (sine to
square to sine), but maybe analog/sinewave would be simpler and perform
about as well.

Anyway, I have ordered some of the recommended optical transceivers.

We'll see how that works out.

One or two posters mentioned that phase noise and/or thermal stability

may be issues. The referenced research papers don't seem to indicate that
phase noise is a problem. I don't think that thermal effects will be a

big

problem for me - I just need to check the phase calibration from time to
time. Certainly there are expensive commerical optical clock distribution
systems with excellent properties. Maybe the devil is in the details...

My specifical application at the moment is putting several SDRs at

diverse antenna locs and feeding the IF via ethernet-converted-to-optical
to my computer. I may want to transmit at some point but receiving is

all I

want to do for now. Still need a way to get a stable ref clock to each
radio to provide phase coherence.... I only need 50-60 meters but an
optical solution with single mode fibers can go many km if I ever wanted

to

scale up. Anyway, my plan is to have only power carried by copper.

I don't want to go with coax, twisted pair, or any other copper

solution

because of high ambient noise levels in my area and a desire to avoid
adding to it. Stringing several 100 meters of copper about my yard,
carrying 10 MHz clock signals, no matter if the cables are well shielded,
doesn't seem like a great idea.

This is totally the thing that OVRO LWA dealt with.. Not only is fiber a
LOT cheaper than coax, it solves a lot of problems.

Ethernet to fiber is really cheap ($20 for an endpoint from TP-link )
$20 from newegg


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe

send

an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.

Paul is right, and it can be difficult to figure out which cable works well at a given wavelength and which connector type is which. A phone conversation with an applications person at the cable supplier ought to help avoid any of the traps At the Arecibo Observatory we had some bad experiences with fiber to ethernet converters. As a class, these things seemed to have problems with UHF/microwave leakage and often had to be put in properly-shielding enclosures of our own design. Of course, being a radio observatory, we might have been a wee bit more sensitive to such EMI than would many garden-variety users :-) Dana On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 9:04 AM paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: > I did see the tp link. Pretty amazing. For the group these devices are > pretty useful. > But watch out for the wavelength of the light you typically need matching > fiber. Also note the connectors and get the matching units. > I have no idea how well 1350 light would pass on multimode for 850 nm. > Regards > Paul > WB8TSL > > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:57 PM Lux, Jim <jim@luxfamily.com> wrote: > > > On 8/28/21 7:13 PM, AC0XU (Jim) wrote: > > > Thanks to all the posters. Especially to Dana - That is exactly what I > > was looking for - suggestions for parts and/or circuits to do the job. I > > was originally thinking that I would go with a digital circuit (sine to > > square to sine), but maybe analog/sinewave would be simpler and perform > > about as well. > > > > > > Anyway, I have ordered some of the recommended optical transceivers. > > We'll see how that works out. > > > > > > One or two posters mentioned that phase noise and/or thermal stability > > may be issues. The referenced research papers don't seem to indicate that > > phase noise is a problem. I don't think that thermal effects will be a > big > > problem for me - I just need to check the phase calibration from time to > > time. Certainly there are expensive commerical optical clock distribution > > systems with excellent properties. Maybe the devil is in the details... > > > > > > My specifical application at the moment is putting several SDRs at > > diverse antenna locs and feeding the IF via ethernet-converted-to-optical > > to my computer. I may want to transmit at some point but receiving is > all I > > want to do for now. Still need a way to get a stable ref clock to each > > radio to provide phase coherence.... I only need 50-60 meters but an > > optical solution with single mode fibers can go many km if I ever wanted > to > > scale up. Anyway, my plan is to have only power carried by copper. > > > > > > I don't want to go with coax, twisted pair, or any other copper > solution > > because of high ambient noise levels in my area and a desire to avoid > > adding to it. Stringing several 100 meters of copper about my yard, > > carrying 10 MHz clock signals, no matter if the cables are well shielded, > > doesn't seem like a great idea. > > > > This is totally the thing that OVRO LWA dealt with.. Not only is fiber a > > LOT cheaper than coax, it solves a lot of problems. > > > > Ethernet to fiber is really cheap ($20 for an endpoint from TP-link ) > > $20 from newegg > > > > > > > https://www.newegg.com/tp-link-mc100cm/p/N82E16833704015?item=N82E16833704015 > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe > send > > an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send > an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there. >
MF
Martin Flynn
Sun, Aug 29, 2021 2:42 PM

Started into white rabbit on fiber recently -  one tidbit that was
shared with me:  White rabbit typically uses a BIDI over a single fiber
to keep the fiber length (and respective transmit / receive times) as
close as possible

Martin

W2RWJ

On 8/29/2021 10:03 AM, paul swed wrote:

I did see the tp link. Pretty amazing. For the group these devices are
pretty useful.
But watch out for the wavelength of the light you typically need matching
fiber. Also note the connectors and get the matching units.
I have no idea how well 1350 light would pass on multimode for 850 nm.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:57 PM Lux, Jim jim@luxfamily.com wrote:

On 8/28/21 7:13 PM, AC0XU (Jim) wrote:

Thanks to all the posters. Especially to Dana -  That is exactly what I
was looking for - suggestions for parts and/or circuits to do the job. I
was originally thinking that I would go with a digital circuit (sine to
square to sine), but maybe analog/sinewave would be simpler and perform
about as well.
Anyway, I have ordered some of the recommended optical transceivers.
We'll see how that works out.
One or two posters mentioned that phase noise and/or thermal stability
may be issues. The referenced research papers don't seem to indicate that
phase noise is a problem. I don't think that thermal effects will be a big
problem for me - I just need to check the phase calibration from time to
time. Certainly there are expensive commerical optical clock distribution
systems with excellent properties. Maybe the devil is in the details...
My specifical application at the moment is putting several SDRs at
diverse antenna locs and feeding the IF via ethernet-converted-to-optical
to my computer. I may want to transmit at some point but receiving is all I
want to do for now. Still need a way to get a stable ref clock to each
radio to provide phase coherence.... I only need 50-60 meters but an
optical solution with single mode fibers can go many km if I ever wanted to
scale up. Anyway, my plan is to have only power carried by copper.
I don't want to go with coax, twisted pair, or any other copper solution
because of high ambient noise levels in my area and a desire to avoid
adding to it. Stringing several 100 meters of copper about my yard,
carrying 10 MHz clock signals, no matter if the cables are well shielded,
doesn't seem like a great idea.

This is totally the thing that OVRO LWA dealt with.. Not only is fiber a
LOT cheaper than coax, it solves a lot of problems.

Ethernet to fiber is really cheap ($20 for an endpoint from TP-link )
$20 from newegg

https://www.newegg.com/tp-link-mc100cm/p/N82E16833704015?item=N82E16833704015


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send
an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.

Started into white rabbit on fiber recently -  one tidbit that was shared with me:  White rabbit typically uses a BIDI over a single fiber to keep the fiber length (and respective transmit / receive times) as close as possible Martin W2RWJ On 8/29/2021 10:03 AM, paul swed wrote: > I did see the tp link. Pretty amazing. For the group these devices are > pretty useful. > But watch out for the wavelength of the light you typically need matching > fiber. Also note the connectors and get the matching units. > I have no idea how well 1350 light would pass on multimode for 850 nm. > Regards > Paul > WB8TSL > > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:57 PM Lux, Jim <jim@luxfamily.com> wrote: > >> On 8/28/21 7:13 PM, AC0XU (Jim) wrote: >>> Thanks to all the posters. Especially to Dana - That is exactly what I >> was looking for - suggestions for parts and/or circuits to do the job. I >> was originally thinking that I would go with a digital circuit (sine to >> square to sine), but maybe analog/sinewave would be simpler and perform >> about as well. >>> Anyway, I have ordered some of the recommended optical transceivers. >> We'll see how that works out. >>> One or two posters mentioned that phase noise and/or thermal stability >> may be issues. The referenced research papers don't seem to indicate that >> phase noise is a problem. I don't think that thermal effects will be a big >> problem for me - I just need to check the phase calibration from time to >> time. Certainly there are expensive commerical optical clock distribution >> systems with excellent properties. Maybe the devil is in the details... >>> My specifical application at the moment is putting several SDRs at >> diverse antenna locs and feeding the IF via ethernet-converted-to-optical >> to my computer. I may want to transmit at some point but receiving is all I >> want to do for now. Still need a way to get a stable ref clock to each >> radio to provide phase coherence.... I only need 50-60 meters but an >> optical solution with single mode fibers can go many km if I ever wanted to >> scale up. Anyway, my plan is to have only power carried by copper. >>> I don't want to go with coax, twisted pair, or any other copper solution >> because of high ambient noise levels in my area and a desire to avoid >> adding to it. Stringing several 100 meters of copper about my yard, >> carrying 10 MHz clock signals, no matter if the cables are well shielded, >> doesn't seem like a great idea. >> >> This is totally the thing that OVRO LWA dealt with.. Not only is fiber a >> LOT cheaper than coax, it solves a lot of problems. >> >> Ethernet to fiber is really cheap ($20 for an endpoint from TP-link ) >> $20 from newegg >> >> >> https://www.newegg.com/tp-link-mc100cm/p/N82E16833704015?item=N82E16833704015 >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send >> an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
C
CFO
Sun, Aug 29, 2021 7:13 PM

From here
https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Serial-Transceivers/Sending-10Mhz-clock-over-Fiber/td-p/1026390

They suggest these

*** SNIP ***
what length do you need to send over ?

this sort of stuff is a LOT cheaper and more rugged, and more than
capable of sending 10 MHz clock

Cable
https://uk.farnell.com/broadcom-limited/hfbr-rus100z/cable-fibre-optic-1-fibre/dp/1247714
https://uk.farnell.com/broadcom-limited/hfbr-rus100z/cable-fibre-optic-1-fibre/dp/1247714

Drivers
http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1812660.pdf?_ga=2.29282815.2110613125.1570030173-2072545025.1569659196
http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1812660.pdf?_ga=2.29282815.2110613125.1570030173-2072545025.1569659196

and you just drive it with TTL.

*** SNIP ***

Using cheap POF - It seems like 50m is the max for 10MHz
But i think with POF , we should be able to "do connectors at home"

Using 200 μm PCS cable , it seems you could go 120m@50Mbd

But a 100m SC connected fiber cable was "only" like $30 on Aliexpress

They seem a "bit like" the other drivers mentioned , but starts with A
instead of H

CFO
Still timenut beginner

From here https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Serial-Transceivers/Sending-10Mhz-clock-over-Fiber/td-p/1026390 They suggest these *** SNIP *** what length do you need to send over ? this sort of stuff is a LOT cheaper and more rugged, and more than capable of sending 10 MHz clock Cable https://uk.farnell.com/broadcom-limited/hfbr-rus100z/cable-fibre-optic-1-fibre/dp/1247714 <https://uk.farnell.com/broadcom-limited/hfbr-rus100z/cable-fibre-optic-1-fibre/dp/1247714> Drivers http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1812660.pdf?_ga=2.29282815.2110613125.1570030173-2072545025.1569659196 <http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1812660.pdf?_ga=2.29282815.2110613125.1570030173-2072545025.1569659196> and you just drive it with TTL. *** SNIP *** Using cheap POF - It seems like 50m is the max for 10MHz But i think with POF , we should be able to "do connectors at home" Using 200 μm PCS cable , it seems you could go 120m@50Mbd But a 100m SC connected fiber cable was "only" like $30 on Aliexpress They seem a "bit like" the other drivers mentioned , but starts with A instead of H CFO Still timenut beginner
LJ
Lux, Jim
Sun, Aug 29, 2021 7:24 PM

On 8/29/21 12:13 PM, CFO wrote:

Yeah, but those are piece parts.  What would be nice is if a cheap "box"
could be found - ideally (for 10 MHz) BNC in/out and fiber connector
with a wall wart for power. Maybe this a good idea for a TAPR project if
someone was willing to do the design (!)

There's probably plenty of applications out there in amateur radio land
for a inexpensive RF over optical link with "decent" performance
(defined however).

On 8/29/21 12:13 PM, CFO wrote: > From here > https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Serial-Transceivers/Sending-10Mhz-clock-over-Fiber/td-p/1026390 > > > They suggest these > > *** SNIP *** > what length do you need to send over ? > > this sort of stuff is a LOT cheaper and more rugged, and more than > capable of sending 10 MHz clock > > Cable > https://uk.farnell.com/broadcom-limited/hfbr-rus100z/cable-fibre-optic-1-fibre/dp/1247714 > <https://uk.farnell.com/broadcom-limited/hfbr-rus100z/cable-fibre-optic-1-fibre/dp/1247714> > > > Drivers > http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1812660.pdf?_ga=2.29282815.2110613125.1570030173-2072545025.1569659196 > <http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1812660.pdf?_ga=2.29282815.2110613125.1570030173-2072545025.1569659196> > > > and you just drive it with TTL. Yeah, but those are piece parts.  What would be nice is if a cheap "box" could be found - ideally (for 10 MHz) BNC in/out and fiber connector with a wall wart for power. Maybe this a good idea for a TAPR project if someone was willing to do the design (!) There's probably plenty of applications out there in amateur radio land for a inexpensive RF over optical link with "decent" performance (defined however).
BK
Bob kb8tq
Mon, Aug 30, 2021 12:54 AM

Hi

Ok so what is “decent” performance?

Is -150 dbc/ Hz “floor” good enough? it is for some stuff ….

Is -130 dbc/ Hz at 10 Hz a requirement?

Is -100 dbc / Hz at 1 Hz the target?

Is 1x10^-12 at 1 second “good enough” ADEV?

How about 1x10^-13 at 10 seconds …..

Keep in mind that these are system floor numbers. The real signal
“as delivered” isn’t going to ever be as good as the system floor.

You could easily move any of those phase numbers 20 db one way or the other.
The ADEV could go up or down by at least two orders of magnitude. The numbers
would still be “decent” by some definitions.

Bob

On Aug 29, 2021, at 3:24 PM, Lux, Jim jim@luxfamily.com wrote:

On 8/29/21 12:13 PM, CFO wrote:

Yeah, but those are piece parts.  What would be nice is if a cheap "box" could be found - ideally (for 10 MHz) BNC in/out and fiber connector with a wall wart for power. Maybe this a good idea for a TAPR project if someone was willing to do the design (!)

There's probably plenty of applications out there in amateur radio land for a inexpensive RF over optical link with "decent" performance (defined however).


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.

Hi Ok so what is “decent” performance? Is -150 dbc/ Hz “floor” good enough? it is for some stuff …. Is -130 dbc/ Hz at 10 Hz a requirement? Is -100 dbc / Hz at 1 Hz the target? Is 1x10^-12 at 1 second “good enough” ADEV? How about 1x10^-13 at 10 seconds ….. Keep in mind that these are system floor numbers. The real signal “as delivered” isn’t going to ever be as good as the system floor. You could easily move any of those phase numbers 20 db one way or the other. The ADEV could go up or down by at least two orders of magnitude. The numbers would still be “decent” by some definitions. Bob > On Aug 29, 2021, at 3:24 PM, Lux, Jim <jim@luxfamily.com> wrote: > > On 8/29/21 12:13 PM, CFO wrote: >> From here >> https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Serial-Transceivers/Sending-10Mhz-clock-over-Fiber/td-p/1026390 >> >> They suggest these >> >> *** SNIP *** >> what length do you need to send over ? >> >> this sort of stuff is a LOT cheaper and more rugged, and more than capable of sending 10 MHz clock >> >> Cable >> https://uk.farnell.com/broadcom-limited/hfbr-rus100z/cable-fibre-optic-1-fibre/dp/1247714 <https://uk.farnell.com/broadcom-limited/hfbr-rus100z/cable-fibre-optic-1-fibre/dp/1247714> >> >> Drivers >> http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1812660.pdf?_ga=2.29282815.2110613125.1570030173-2072545025.1569659196 <http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1812660.pdf?_ga=2.29282815.2110613125.1570030173-2072545025.1569659196> >> >> and you just drive it with TTL. > > > Yeah, but those are piece parts. What would be nice is if a cheap "box" could be found - ideally (for 10 MHz) BNC in/out and fiber connector with a wall wart for power. Maybe this a good idea for a TAPR project if someone was willing to do the design (!) > > There's probably plenty of applications out there in amateur radio land for a inexpensive RF over optical link with "decent" performance (defined however). > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
JG
Julien Goodwin
Mon, Aug 30, 2021 2:57 AM

On 30/8/21 5:24 am, Lux, Jim wrote:

Yeah, but those are piece parts.  What would be nice is if a cheap "box"
could be found - ideally (for 10 MHz) BNC in/out and fiber connector
with a wall wart for power. Maybe this a good idea for a TAPR project if
someone was willing to do the design (!)

You'd do it using an SFP cage, so the actual optics could be swapped in
for standard commercial ones, and generic 1G LR optics should be < US$10
in small quantity by now (they've been much less than that in tray
quantity for at least a decade), and drive 2km easily.

I've done a little design with SFP for a previous (work-ish) project,
and basing it on the redesigned Spectracom 8140 pods I did a few years
ago[1], I could probably knock out a prototype design in an afternoon.

(Quite if I ever will, and when is a different matter)

1: https://laptop006.livejournal.com/60862.html

On 30/8/21 5:24 am, Lux, Jim wrote: > Yeah, but those are piece parts.  What would be nice is if a cheap "box" > could be found - ideally (for 10 MHz) BNC in/out and fiber connector > with a wall wart for power. Maybe this a good idea for a TAPR project if > someone was willing to do the design (!) You'd do it using an SFP cage, so the actual optics could be swapped in for standard commercial ones, and generic 1G LR optics should be < US$10 in small quantity by now (they've been much less than that in tray quantity for at least a decade), and drive 2km easily. I've done a little design with SFP for a previous (work-ish) project, and basing it on the redesigned Spectracom 8140 pods I did a few years ago[1], I could probably knock out a prototype design in an afternoon. (Quite if I ever will, and when is a different matter) 1: https://laptop006.livejournal.com/60862.html