In a message dated 12/11/2007 19:08:14 Pacific Standard Time, jeff@mock.com writes: >I think the situation is somewhat better than that. I'm looking at my >LPRO-101. It's about 18-watts while warming up, but once the physics >package is up to temp and locked, the power consumption drops to about >5-watts. The larger rubidium modules are probably more power hungry, >but the small onces aren't so bad once they are running. You still >might need a trunk full of batteries though... >jeff Hi Jeff, you are right. My PRS10 is rated at 13W steady state at room temp. 5W is pretty good. Solar array's are probably the best solution. bye, Said **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

SAIDJACK@aol.com wrote: > > In a message dated 12/11/2007 19:08:14 Pacific Standard Time, jeff@mock.com > writes: > > >> I think the situation is somewhat better than that. I'm looking at my >> LPRO-101. It's about 18-watts while warming up, but once the physics >> package is up to temp and locked, the power consumption drops to about >> 5-watts. The larger rubidium modules are probably more power hungry, >> but the small onces aren't so bad once they are running. You still >> might need a trunk full of batteries though... >> > > >> jeff >> > > > > Hi Jeff, > > you are right. My PRS10 is rated at 13W steady state at room temp. 5W is > pretty good. Solar array's are probably the best solution. > > bye, > Said > > > > At night? Or do you have a very long lead? Bruce