time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Loran?

CA
Chris Albertson
Sat, Dec 18, 2010 11:46 PM

Some one gave me an old Loran receiver.  It fires up, the keypad and
LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching"

Questions:

  1. I think there are still Loran transmitters?
  2. What does a Loran antenna look like?  A random length of wire
    strung up in the attic is doing nothing.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

Some one gave me an old Loran receiver. It fires up, the keypad and LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching" Questions: 1) I think there are still Loran transmitters? 2) What does a Loran antenna look like? A random length of wire strung up in the attic is doing nothing. -- ===== Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California
CH
Chuck Harris
Sat, Dec 18, 2010 11:55 PM

Loran is gone from the US.

Chris Albertson wrote:

Some one gave me an old Loran receiver.  It fires up, the keypad and
LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching"

Questions:

  1. I think there are still Loran transmitters?
  2. What does a Loran antenna look like?  A random length of wire
    strung up in the attic is doing nothing.
Loran is gone from the US. Chris Albertson wrote: > Some one gave me an old Loran receiver. It fires up, the keypad and > LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching" > > Questions: > 1) I think there are still Loran transmitters? > 2) What does a Loran antenna look like? A random length of wire > strung up in the attic is doing nothing. >
MD
Magnus Danielson
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 12:01 AM

On 12/19/2010 12:46 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

Some one gave me an old Loran receiver.  It fires up, the keypad and
LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching"

Questions:

  1. I think there are still Loran transmitters?
  2. What does a Loran antenna look like?  A random length of wire
    strung up in the attic is doing nothing.

If you are in North America you are out of luck. You might pick up on
European LORAN-C transmitters.

So, locality first...

THEN we can advice you on what antenna needs you have... and then we
also needs to know what LORAN C receiver you have...

Cheers,
Magnus

On 12/19/2010 12:46 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: > Some one gave me an old Loran receiver. It fires up, the keypad and > LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching" > > Questions: > 1) I think there are still Loran transmitters? > 2) What does a Loran antenna look like? A random length of wire > strung up in the attic is doing nothing. > If you are in North America you are out of luck. You *might* pick up on European LORAN-C transmitters. So, locality first... THEN we can advice you on what antenna needs you have... and then we also needs to know what LORAN C receiver you have... Cheers, Magnus
SR
Stanley Reynolds
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 12:05 AM

A loop with preamp or an active antenna (whip with preamp). Any Loran you
receive will be DX as the US chains were turned off to pay for the tax cut :-)
Astrons need a external frequency standard to work does your receiver have a
model/Brand ?

Stanley

 

----- Original Message ----
From: Chris Albertson albertson.chris@gmail.com
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Sat, December 18, 2010 5:46:58 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] Loran?

Some one gave me an old Loran receiver.  It fires up, the keypad and
LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching"

Questions:

  1. I think there are still Loran transmitters?
  2. What does a Loran antenna look like?  A random length of wire
    strung up in the attic is doing nothing.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

A loop with preamp or an active antenna (whip with preamp). Any Loran you receive will be DX as the US chains were turned off to pay for the tax cut :-) Astrons need a external frequency standard to work does your receiver have a model/Brand ? Stanley   ----- Original Message ---- From: Chris Albertson <albertson.chris@gmail.com> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Sat, December 18, 2010 5:46:58 PM Subject: [time-nuts] Loran? Some one gave me an old Loran receiver.  It fires up, the keypad and LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching" Questions: 1) I think there are still Loran transmitters? 2) What does a Loran antenna look like?  A random length of wire strung up in the attic is doing nothing. -- ===== Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
CA
Chris Albertson
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 4:44 AM

This is a marine navigation unit sold under "West Marine's" own brand
name.    It looks modern and automated.  Has functions on it like
"anchor drift alarm"  Where you fix your location then set a radius
and if the unit moves outside the radius it beeps loudly.  Just what
you'd want if your ship of dragging anchor.  The unit is very small
and modern looking.  It is controlled with a keypad and large LCD
screen.  Zero analog knobs.

My guess is that this thing wants an active whip antenna of some kind.
There is an BNC on the back.

I don't think this is worth a lot of time, not if the transmitters are
gone.  I thought I read they were going to continue for another 20
years.

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Magnus Danielson
magnus@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:

On 12/19/2010 12:46 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

Some one gave me an old Loran receiver.  It fires up, the keypad and
LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching"

Questions:

  1. I think there are still Loran transmitters?
  2. What does a Loran antenna look like?  A random length of wire
    strung up in the attic is doing nothing.

If you are in North America you are out of luck. You might pick up on
European LORAN-C transmitters.

So, locality first...

THEN we can advice you on what antenna needs you have... and then we also
needs to know what LORAN C receiver you have...

Cheers,
Magnus


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

This is a marine navigation unit sold under "West Marine's" own brand name. It looks modern and automated. Has functions on it like "anchor drift alarm" Where you fix your location then set a radius and if the unit moves outside the radius it beeps loudly. Just what you'd want if your ship of dragging anchor. The unit is very small and modern looking. It is controlled with a keypad and large LCD screen. Zero analog knobs. My guess is that this thing wants an active whip antenna of some kind. There is an BNC on the back. I don't think this is worth a lot of time, not if the transmitters are gone. I thought I read they were going to continue for another 20 years. On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Magnus Danielson <magnus@rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote: > On 12/19/2010 12:46 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: >> >> Some one gave me an old Loran receiver.  It fires up, the keypad and >> LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching" >> >> Questions: >> 1) I think there are still Loran transmitters? >> 2) What does a Loran antenna look like?  A random length of wire >> strung up in the attic is doing nothing. >> > > If you are in North America you are out of luck. You *might* pick up on > European LORAN-C transmitters. > > So, locality first... > > THEN we can advice you on what antenna needs you have... and then we also > needs to know what LORAN C receiver you have... > > Cheers, > Magnus > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- ===== Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California
MR
Max Robinson
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 4:49 AM

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system that used to
operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the 160 meter
ham band.  That hasn't been around for decades.  I don't think there is a
version of it operating anywhere in the world.

Regards.

Max.  K 4 O D S.

Email: max@maxsmusicplace.com

Transistor site http://www.funwithtransistors.net
Vacuum tube site: http://www.funwithtubes.net
Music site: http://www.maxsmusicplace.com

To subscribe to the fun with transistors group send an email to.
funwithtransistors-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the fun with tubes group send an email to,
funwithtubes-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Magnus Danielson" magnus@rubidium.dyndns.org
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran?

On 12/19/2010 12:46 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

Some one gave me an old Loran receiver.  It fires up, the keypad and
LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching"

Questions:

  1. I think there are still Loran transmitters?
  2. What does a Loran antenna look like?  A random length of wire
    strung up in the attic is doing nothing.

If you are in North America you are out of luck. You might pick up on
European LORAN-C transmitters.

So, locality first...

THEN we can advice you on what antenna needs you have... and then we also
needs to know what LORAN C receiver you have...

Cheers,
Magnus


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran. That is the old system that used to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't think there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world. Regards. Max. K 4 O D S. Email: max@maxsmusicplace.com Transistor site http://www.funwithtransistors.net Vacuum tube site: http://www.funwithtubes.net Music site: http://www.maxsmusicplace.com To subscribe to the fun with transistors group send an email to. funwithtransistors-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the fun with tubes group send an email to, funwithtubes-subscribe@yahoogroups.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Magnus Danielson" <magnus@rubidium.dyndns.org> To: <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 6:01 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran? > On 12/19/2010 12:46 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: >> Some one gave me an old Loran receiver. It fires up, the keypad and >> LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching" >> >> Questions: >> 1) I think there are still Loran transmitters? >> 2) What does a Loran antenna look like? A random length of wire >> strung up in the attic is doing nothing. >> > > If you are in North America you are out of luck. You *might* pick up on > European LORAN-C transmitters. > > So, locality first... > > THEN we can advice you on what antenna needs you have... and then we also > needs to know what LORAN C receiver you have... > > Cheers, > Magnus > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BC
Bob Camp
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 4:54 AM

Hi

More precisely, LORAN-A as opposed to LORAN-C.

Bob

On Dec 18, 2010, at 11:49 PM, Max Robinson wrote:

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system that used to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the 160 meter ham band.  That hasn't been around for decades.  I don't think there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.

Regards.

Max.  K 4 O D S.

Email: max@maxsmusicplace.com

Transistor site http://www.funwithtransistors.net
Vacuum tube site: http://www.funwithtubes.net
Music site: http://www.maxsmusicplace.com

To subscribe to the fun with transistors group send an email to.
funwithtransistors-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the fun with tubes group send an email to,
funwithtubes-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

----- Original Message ----- From: "Magnus Danielson" magnus@rubidium.dyndns.org
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran?

On 12/19/2010 12:46 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

Some one gave me an old Loran receiver.  It fires up, the keypad and
LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching"

Questions:

  1. I think there are still Loran transmitters?
  2. What does a Loran antenna look like?  A random length of wire
    strung up in the attic is doing nothing.

If you are in North America you are out of luck. You might pick up on European LORAN-C transmitters.

So, locality first...

THEN we can advice you on what antenna needs you have... and then we also needs to know what LORAN C receiver you have...

Cheers,
Magnus


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi More precisely, LORAN-A as opposed to LORAN-C. Bob On Dec 18, 2010, at 11:49 PM, Max Robinson wrote: > He didn't say Loran C he said Loran. That is the old system that used to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't think there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world. > > Regards. > > Max. K 4 O D S. > > Email: max@maxsmusicplace.com > > Transistor site http://www.funwithtransistors.net > Vacuum tube site: http://www.funwithtubes.net > Music site: http://www.maxsmusicplace.com > > To subscribe to the fun with transistors group send an email to. > funwithtransistors-subscribe@yahoogroups.com > > To subscribe to the fun with tubes group send an email to, > funwithtubes-subscribe@yahoogroups.com > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Magnus Danielson" <magnus@rubidium.dyndns.org> > To: <time-nuts@febo.com> > Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 6:01 PM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran? > > >> On 12/19/2010 12:46 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: >>> Some one gave me an old Loran receiver. It fires up, the keypad and >>> LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching" >>> >>> Questions: >>> 1) I think there are still Loran transmitters? >>> 2) What does a Loran antenna look like? A random length of wire >>> strung up in the attic is doing nothing. >>> >> >> If you are in North America you are out of luck. You *might* pick up on European LORAN-C transmitters. >> >> So, locality first... >> >> THEN we can advice you on what antenna needs you have... and then we also needs to know what LORAN C receiver you have... >> >> Cheers, >> Magnus >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
CH
Chuck Harris
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 6:27 AM

There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain he meant
Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then,
you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up.

-Chuck Harris

Max Robinson wrote:

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system that used
to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the
160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't think
there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.

There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad. I am certain he meant Loran C. Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then, you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up. -Chuck Harris Max Robinson wrote: > He didn't say Loran C he said Loran. That is the old system that used > to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the > 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't think > there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.
MD
Magnus Danielson
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 8:30 AM

On 12/19/2010 05:44 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

This is a marine navigation unit sold under "West Marine's" own brand
name.    It looks modern and automated.  Has functions on it like
"anchor drift alarm"  Where you fix your location then set a radius
and if the unit moves outside the radius it beeps loudly.  Just what
you'd want if your ship of dragging anchor.  The unit is very small
and modern looking.  It is controlled with a keypad and large LCD
screen.  Zero analog knobs.

My guess is that this thing wants an active whip antenna of some kind.
There is an BNC on the back.

For longer distances I think a H-field antenna is preferred. It would
probably not be too hard to cook one up that would be suitable. The DC
bias of the BNC would be good to know in that case.

I don't think this is worth a lot of time, not if the transmitters are
gone.  I thought I read they were going to continue for another 20
years.

Again, this all depends on where on this earth you are. We don't need
bomb-coordinates to help you...

Cheers,
Magnus

On 12/19/2010 05:44 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: > This is a marine navigation unit sold under "West Marine's" own brand > name. It looks modern and automated. Has functions on it like > "anchor drift alarm" Where you fix your location then set a radius > and if the unit moves outside the radius it beeps loudly. Just what > you'd want if your ship of dragging anchor. The unit is very small > and modern looking. It is controlled with a keypad and large LCD > screen. Zero analog knobs. > > My guess is that this thing wants an active whip antenna of some kind. > There is an BNC on the back. For longer distances I think a H-field antenna is preferred. It would probably not be too hard to cook one up that would be suitable. The DC bias of the BNC would be good to know in that case. > I don't think this is worth a lot of time, not if the transmitters are > gone. I thought I read they were going to continue for another 20 > years. Again, this all depends on where on this earth you are. We don't need bomb-coordinates to help you... Cheers, Magnus
CA
Chris Albertson
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 9:04 AM

Again, this all depends on where on this earth you are. We don't need
bomb-coordinates to help you...

Cheers,
Magnus

It's on the signature line:  "Redondo Beach, California".  That is about
10 miles south of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and about
a half mile due east of the Pacific Ocean

I looked up on the West marine web site and they still cary an antenna
and it's in stock.  It's just a plain old 8 foot whip and sells for about $40.
with cable attached.

I took the unit apart and peked at the PCB.  The antenna leads goes into
what looks like a RF amp made of discrete transistors, no DC to power
an active antenna.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

> > Again, this all depends on where on this earth you are. We don't need > bomb-coordinates to help you... > > Cheers, > Magnus > It's on the signature line: "Redondo Beach, California". That is about 10 miles south of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and about a half mile due east of the Pacific Ocean I looked up on the West marine web site and they still cary an antenna and it's in stock. It's just a plain old 8 foot whip and sells for about $40. with cable attached. I took the unit apart and peked at the PCB. The antenna leads goes into what looks like a RF amp made of discrete transistors, no DC to power an active antenna. -- ===== Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California
MD
Magnus Danielson
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 10:19 AM

On 12/19/2010 10:04 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

Again, this all depends on where on this earth you are. We don't need
bomb-coordinates to help you...

Cheers,
Magnus

It's on the signature line:  "Redondo Beach, California".  That is about
10 miles south of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and about
a half mile due east of the Pacific Ocean

Sorry for the mental blocking. Signature lines is amusement only usually.

You are a bit far from the active LORAN-C transmitters... a continent
and an ocean away...

I looked up on the West marine web site and they still cary an antenna
and it's in stock.  It's just a plain old 8 foot whip and sells for about $40.
with cable attached.

Fair deal.

I took the unit apart and peked at the PCB.  The antenna leads goes into
what looks like a RF amp made of discrete transistors, no DC to power
an active antenna.

I wonder if a 8 foot whip and that amp will handle the distance.

I need a whip-antenna myself for my DGPS...

Cheers,
Magnus

On 12/19/2010 10:04 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: >> >> Again, this all depends on where on this earth you are. We don't need >> bomb-coordinates to help you... >> >> Cheers, >> Magnus >> > > It's on the signature line: "Redondo Beach, California". That is about > 10 miles south of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and about > a half mile due east of the Pacific Ocean Sorry for the mental blocking. Signature lines is amusement only usually. You are a bit far from the active LORAN-C transmitters... a continent and an ocean away... > I looked up on the West marine web site and they still cary an antenna > and it's in stock. It's just a plain old 8 foot whip and sells for about $40. > with cable attached. Fair deal. > I took the unit apart and peked at the PCB. The antenna leads goes into > what looks like a RF amp made of discrete transistors, no DC to power > an active antenna. I wonder if a 8 foot whip and that amp will handle the distance. I need a whip-antenna myself for my DGPS... Cheers, Magnus
JL
J. L. Trantham
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 1:59 PM

The Canadian LORAN chains were operating after the US shut theirs down.
When I was flying my plane north of North Carolina, I could pick up the
Canadian chains and my old Northstar M2 LORAN/GPS would be fully functional.
However, since I live in Florida, I removed the Northstar and replaced it
with a Garmin GNS530W.

Are the Canadian chains still up or did they get shut down as well?  Do you
live near Canada?

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Chris Albertson
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 10:45 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran?

This is a marine navigation unit sold under "West Marine's" own brand
name.    It looks modern and automated.  Has functions on it like
"anchor drift alarm"  Where you fix your location then set a radius and if
the unit moves outside the radius it beeps loudly.  Just what you'd want if
your ship of dragging anchor.  The unit is very small and modern looking.
It is controlled with a keypad and large LCD screen.  Zero analog knobs.

My guess is that this thing wants an active whip antenna of some kind.
There is an BNC on the back.

I don't think this is worth a lot of time, not if the transmitters are
gone.  I thought I read they were going to continue for another 20
years.

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Magnus Danielson
magnus@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote:

On 12/19/2010 12:46 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

Some one gave me an old Loran receiver.  It fires up, the keypad and
LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching"

Questions:

  1. I think there are still Loran transmitters?
  2. What does a Loran antenna look like?  A random length of wire
    strung up in the attic is doing nothing.

If you are in North America you are out of luck. You might pick up
on European LORAN-C transmitters.

So, locality first...

THEN we can advice you on what antenna needs you have... and then we
also needs to know what LORAN C receiver you have...

Cheers,
Magnus


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

The Canadian LORAN chains were operating after the US shut theirs down. When I was flying my plane north of North Carolina, I could pick up the Canadian chains and my old Northstar M2 LORAN/GPS would be fully functional. However, since I live in Florida, I removed the Northstar and replaced it with a Garmin GNS530W. Are the Canadian chains still up or did they get shut down as well? Do you live near Canada? Joe -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Chris Albertson Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 10:45 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran? This is a marine navigation unit sold under "West Marine's" own brand name. It looks modern and automated. Has functions on it like "anchor drift alarm" Where you fix your location then set a radius and if the unit moves outside the radius it beeps loudly. Just what you'd want if your ship of dragging anchor. The unit is very small and modern looking. It is controlled with a keypad and large LCD screen. Zero analog knobs. My guess is that this thing wants an active whip antenna of some kind. There is an BNC on the back. I don't think this is worth a lot of time, not if the transmitters are gone. I thought I read they were going to continue for another 20 years. On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Magnus Danielson <magnus@rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote: > On 12/19/2010 12:46 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: >> >> Some one gave me an old Loran receiver.  It fires up, the keypad and >> LCD display seem to work but status is always "Searching" >> >> Questions: >> 1) I think there are still Loran transmitters? >> 2) What does a Loran antenna look like?  A random length of wire >> strung up in the attic is doing nothing. >> > > If you are in North America you are out of luck. You *might* pick up > on European LORAN-C transmitters. > > So, locality first... > > THEN we can advice you on what antenna needs you have... and then we > also needs to know what LORAN C receiver you have... > > Cheers, > Magnus > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- ===== Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
CH
Chuck Harris
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 2:52 PM

Canada took theirs down in August, 2010.

J. L. Trantham wrote:

The Canadian LORAN chains were operating after the US shut theirs down.
When I was flying my plane north of North Carolina, I could pick up the
Canadian chains and my old Northstar M2 LORAN/GPS would be fully functional.
However, since I live in Florida, I removed the Northstar and replaced it
with a Garmin GNS530W.

Are the Canadian chains still up or did they get shut down as well?  Do you
live near Canada?

Joe

Canada took theirs down in August, 2010. J. L. Trantham wrote: > The Canadian LORAN chains were operating after the US shut theirs down. > When I was flying my plane north of North Carolina, I could pick up the > Canadian chains and my old Northstar M2 LORAN/GPS would be fully functional. > However, since I live in Florida, I removed the Northstar and replaced it > with a Garmin GNS530W. > > Are the Canadian chains still up or did they get shut down as well? Do you > live near Canada? > > Joe
PS
paul swed
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 3:31 PM

LORAN -A,C are all dead in north america.
I think you have a boat anchor. Pun intended.
The LORAN As never had a keypad because they were analog.
As I recall they also used a twinax connector.
I dealt with a LORAN A on the NAVY ships in 1973, transitioned to OMEGA
(Long dead) and the LORAN C before getting out. It was pretty new. Also
aboard ship we were actually experimenting with sat nav. I think it was the
transit sats or even pre-transit. It was hush hush stuff then. Special team
came on board hooked up stuff for a run to Hawaii.
Regards

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Chuck Harris cfharris@erols.com wrote:

Canada took theirs down in August, 2010.

J. L. Trantham wrote:

The Canadian LORAN chains were operating after the US shut theirs down.
When I was flying my plane north of North Carolina, I could pick up the
Canadian chains and my old Northstar M2 LORAN/GPS would be fully
functional.
However, since I live in Florida, I removed the Northstar and replaced it
with a Garmin GNS530W.

Are the Canadian chains still up or did they get shut down as well?  Do
you
live near Canada?

Joe


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

LORAN -A,C are all dead in north america. I think you have a boat anchor. Pun intended. The LORAN As never had a keypad because they were analog. As I recall they also used a twinax connector. I dealt with a LORAN A on the NAVY ships in 1973, transitioned to OMEGA (Long dead) and the LORAN C before getting out. It was pretty new. Also aboard ship we were actually experimenting with sat nav. I think it was the transit sats or even pre-transit. It was hush hush stuff then. Special team came on board hooked up stuff for a run to Hawaii. Regards On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Chuck Harris <cfharris@erols.com> wrote: > Canada took theirs down in August, 2010. > > > J. L. Trantham wrote: > >> The Canadian LORAN chains were operating after the US shut theirs down. >> When I was flying my plane north of North Carolina, I could pick up the >> Canadian chains and my old Northstar M2 LORAN/GPS would be fully >> functional. >> However, since I live in Florida, I removed the Northstar and replaced it >> with a Garmin GNS530W. >> >> Are the Canadian chains still up or did they get shut down as well? Do >> you >> live near Canada? >> >> Joe >> > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
JF
J. Forster
Sun, Dec 19, 2010 5:52 PM

There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR.

They are BOTH acronyms.

-John

=================

There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain he meant
Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then,
you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up.

-Chuck Harris

Max Robinson wrote:

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system that used
to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the
160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't think
there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR. They are BOTH acronyms. -John ================= > There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad. I am certain he meant > Loran C. Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then, > you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up. > > -Chuck Harris > > Max Robinson wrote: >> He didn't say Loran C he said Loran. That is the old system that used >> to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the >> 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't think >> there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > >
PS
paul swed
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 3:07 PM

Indeed. But thats the way it goes.

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster jfor@quik.com wrote:

There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR.

They are BOTH acronyms.

-John

=================

There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain he meant
Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then,
you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up.

-Chuck Harris

Max Robinson wrote:

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system that used
to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the
160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't think
there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Indeed. But thats the way it goes. On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster <jfor@quik.com> wrote: > There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR. > > They are BOTH acronyms. > > -John > > ================= > > > > There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad. I am certain he meant > > Loran C. Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then, > > you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up. > > > > -Chuck Harris > > > > Max Robinson wrote: > >> He didn't say Loran C he said Loran. That is the old system that used > >> to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the > >> 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't think > >> there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
CA
Chris Albertson
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 5:29 PM

The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed in lower case.

Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym.  It is a coined
word.  Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the
first letter of several other words.  "SCUBA" is an acronym but
"scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old 1950's
vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage.  But "radar" was never an  acronym.

The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the  English
language changes  with time.    You can disagree.  Many people do and
claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then you
will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then explain
how it could be incorrect before that date.

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

Indeed. But thats the way it goes.

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster jfor@quik.com wrote:

There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR.

They are BOTH acronyms.

-John

=================

There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain he meant
Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then,
you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up.

-Chuck Harris

Max Robinson wrote:

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system that used
to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the
160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't think
there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed in lower case. Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym. It is a coined word. Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the first letter of several other words. "SCUBA" is an acronym but "scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old 1950's vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage. But "radar" was never an acronym. The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the English language changes with time. You can disagree. Many people do and claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then you will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then explain how it could be incorrect before that date. On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: > Indeed. But thats the way it goes. > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster <jfor@quik.com> wrote: > >> There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR. >> >> They are BOTH acronyms. >> >> -John >> >> ================= >> >> >> > There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain he meant >> > Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then, >> > you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up. >> > >> > -Chuck Harris >> > >> > Max Robinson wrote: >> >> He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system that used >> >> to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the >> >> 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't think >> >> there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> > To unsubscribe, go to >> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> > and follow the instructions there. >> > >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- ===== Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California
WH
William H. Fite
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 5:35 PM

As a non-engineer but a dedicated people-watcher, I enjoy the gentle
oneupsmanship on this list.  It is conducted with the studied courtesy of
debate in the US Senate.

I await the day when someone opines as to the number of angels that can
dance on the head of a GPS antenna.

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Chris Albertson <albertson.chris@gmail.com

wrote:

The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed in lower
case.

Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym.  It is a coined
word.  Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the
first letter of several other words.  "SCUBA" is an acronym but
"scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old 1950's
vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage.  But "radar" was never an  acronym.

The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the  English
language changes  with time.    You can disagree.  Many people do and
claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then you
will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then explain
how it could be incorrect before that date.

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

Indeed. But thats the way it goes.

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster jfor@quik.com wrote:

There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR.

They are BOTH acronyms.

-John

=================

There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain he meant
Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then,
you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up.

-Chuck Harris

Max Robinson wrote:

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system that

used

to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the
160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't

think

there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

As a non-engineer but a dedicated people-watcher, I enjoy the gentle oneupsmanship on this list. It is conducted with the studied courtesy of debate in the US Senate. I await the day when someone opines as to the number of angels that can dance on the head of a GPS antenna. On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Chris Albertson <albertson.chris@gmail.com > wrote: > The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed in lower > case. > > Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym. It is a coined > word. Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the > first letter of several other words. "SCUBA" is an acronym but > "scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old 1950's > vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage. But "radar" was never an acronym. > > The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the English > language changes with time. You can disagree. Many people do and > claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then you > will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then explain > how it could be incorrect before that date. > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: > > Indeed. But thats the way it goes. > > > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster <jfor@quik.com> wrote: > > > >> There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR. > >> > >> They are BOTH acronyms. > >> > >> -John > >> > >> ================= > >> > >> > >> > There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad. I am certain he meant > >> > Loran C. Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then, > >> > you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up. > >> > > >> > -Chuck Harris > >> > > >> > Max Robinson wrote: > >> >> He didn't say Loran C he said Loran. That is the old system that > used > >> >> to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of the > >> >> 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't > think > >> >> there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world. > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > >> > To unsubscribe, go to > >> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >> > and follow the instructions there. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > >> To unsubscribe, go to > >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >> and follow the instructions there. > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > > -- > ===== > Chris Albertson > Redondo Beach, California > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
JF
J. Forster
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 6:04 PM

IMO this trend is a two edged sword:

I don't like to see the historical aspect of the name lost by it becomming
a lower-case noun.

OTOH, it's been said that the ultimate tribute in Physics is to become
"part of the furniture", like Newton's or Maxwell's Laws.

FWIW,

-John

===============

The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed in lower
case.

Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym.  It is a coined
word.  Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the
first letter of several other words.  "SCUBA" is an acronym but
"scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old 1950's
vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage.  But "radar" was never an  acronym.

The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the  English
language changes  with time.    You can disagree.  Many people do and
claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then you
will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then explain
how it could be incorrect before that date.

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

Indeed. But thats the way it goes.

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster jfor@quik.com wrote:

There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR.

They are BOTH acronyms.

-John

=================

There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain he

meant

Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then,
you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up.

-Chuck Harris

Max Robinson wrote:

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system that

used

to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of

the

160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't

think

there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

IMO this trend is a two edged sword: I don't like to see the historical aspect of the name lost by it becomming a lower-case noun. OTOH, it's been said that the ultimate tribute in Physics is to become "part of the furniture", like Newton's or Maxwell's Laws. FWIW, -John =============== > The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed in lower > case. > > Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym. It is a coined > word. Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the > first letter of several other words. "SCUBA" is an acronym but > "scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old 1950's > vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage. But "radar" was never an acronym. > > The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the English > language changes with time. You can disagree. Many people do and > claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then you > will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then explain > how it could be incorrect before that date. > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: >> Indeed. But thats the way it goes. >> >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster <jfor@quik.com> wrote: >> >>> There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR. >>> >>> They are BOTH acronyms. >>> >>> -John >>> >>> ================= >>> >>> >>> > There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain he >>> meant >>> > Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then, >>> > you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up. >>> > >>> > -Chuck Harris >>> > >>> > Max Robinson wrote: >>> >> He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system that >>> used >>> >> to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of >>> the >>> >> 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't >>> think >>> >> there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world. >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> > To unsubscribe, go to >>> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> > and follow the instructions there. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > > > > -- > ===== > Chris Albertson > Redondo Beach, California > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > >
JN
Jean-Louis Noel
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 8:48 PM

Hi,

From: "Chris Albertson" albertson.chris@gmail.com

Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym.

OED says: radar orig. U.S. [f. radio detection and ranging.]

Bye,
Jean-Louis

Hi, From: "Chris Albertson" <albertson.chris@gmail.com> > Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym. OED says: radar orig. U.S. [f. radio detection and ranging.] Bye, Jean-Louis
DM
David McGaw
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 8:48 PM

As written in Wikipedia and as I have always understood:  "The term
RADAR was coined in 1940 by the [1]U.S. Navy as an [2]acronym for radio
detection and ranging."
David
At 01:04 PM 12/20/2010, you wrote:

 IMO this trend is a two edged sword:
 I don't like to see the historical aspect of the name lost by it
 becomming
 a lower-case noun.
 OTOH, it's been said that the ultimate tribute in Physics is to
 become
 "part of the furniture", like Newton's or Maxwell's Laws.
 FWIW,
 -John
 ===============

The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed

 in lower

case.

Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym.  It is a

 coined

word.  Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the
first letter of several other words.  "SCUBA" is an acronym but
"scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old

 1950's

vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage.  But "radar" was never an

 acronym.

The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the  English
language changes  with time.    You can disagree.  Many people do

 and

claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then

 you

will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then

 explain

how it could be incorrect before that date.

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com

 wrote:

Indeed. But thats the way it goes.

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster jfor@quik.com

 wrote:

There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR.

They are BOTH acronyms.

-John

=================

There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain

 he

meant

Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service...

 But then,

you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up.

-Chuck Harris

Max Robinson wrote:

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system

 that

used

to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away

 most of

the

160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I

 don't

think

there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[3]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[4]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[5]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[6]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

As written in Wikipedia and as I have always understood: "The term RADAR was coined in 1940 by the [1]U.S. Navy as an [2]acronym for radio detection and ranging." David At 01:04 PM 12/20/2010, you wrote: IMO this trend is a two edged sword: I don't like to see the historical aspect of the name lost by it becomming a lower-case noun. OTOH, it's been said that the ultimate tribute in Physics is to become "part of the furniture", like Newton's or Maxwell's Laws. FWIW, -John =============== > The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed in lower > case. > > Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym. It is a coined > word. Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the > first letter of several other words. "SCUBA" is an acronym but > "scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old 1950's > vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage. But "radar" was never an acronym. > > The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the English > language changes with time. You can disagree. Many people do and > claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then you > will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then explain > how it could be incorrect before that date. > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: >> Indeed. But thats the way it goes. >> >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster <jfor@quik.com> wrote: >> >>> There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR. >>> >>> They are BOTH acronyms. >>> >>> -John >>> >>> ================= >>> >>> >>> > There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad. I am certain he >>> meant >>> > Loran C. Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then, >>> > you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up. >>> > >>> > -Chuck Harris >>> > >>> > Max Robinson wrote: >>> >> He didn't say Loran C he said Loran. That is the old system that >>> used >>> >> to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of >>> the >>> >> 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't >>> think >>> >> there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world. >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> > To unsubscribe, go to >>> > [3]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> > and follow the instructions there. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> [4]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> [5]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > > > > -- > ===== > Chris Albertson > Redondo Beach, California > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > [6]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to [7]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. References 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Navy 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym_and_initialism 3. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 4. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 5. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 6. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 7. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
JF
J. Forster
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 8:49 PM

OED be damned!

I'm not going to change the name of one of my Yahoo Groups from
Vintage-Military-RADAR

So there ! :)

-Jo0hn

==================

As written in Wikipedia and as I have always understood:  "The term
RADAR was coined in 1940 by the U.S. Navy as an acronym for radio
detection and ranging."

David

At 01:04 PM 12/20/2010, you wrote:
IMO this trend is a two edged sword:

I don't like to see the historical aspect of the name lost by it
becomming
a lower-case noun.

OTOH, it's been said that the ultimate tribute in Physics is to become
"part of the furniture", like Newton's or Maxwell's Laws.

FWIW,

-John

===============

The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and

"scuba" all listed in lower

case.

Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym.  It is a

coined

word.  Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the
first letter of several other words.  "SCUBA" is an acronym

but

"scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the

old 1950's

vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage.  But "radar" was

never an  acronym.

The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the  English
language changes  with time.    You can disagree.  Many people do and
claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then you
will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then

explain

how it could be incorrect before that date.

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed  wrote:

Indeed. But thats the way it goes.

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster  wrote:

There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR.

They are BOTH acronyms.

-John

=================

There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain he

meant

Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But

then,

you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up.

-Chuck Harris

Max Robinson wrote:

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system that

used

to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of

the

160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't

think

there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

OED be damned! I'm not going to change the name of one of my Yahoo Groups from Vintage-Military-RADAR So there ! :) -Jo0hn ================== > As written in Wikipedia and as I have always understood: &quot;The term > RADAR was coined in 1940 by the U.S. Navy as an acronym for radio > detection and ranging.&quot; > > David > > At 01:04 PM 12/20/2010, you wrote: > IMO this trend is a two edged sword: > > I don't like to see the historical aspect of the name lost by it > becomming > a lower-case noun. > > OTOH, it's been said that the ultimate tribute in Physics is to become > &quot;part of the furniture&quot;, like Newton's or Maxwell's Laws. > > FWIW, > > -John > > =============== > > > > The Oxford dictionary has &quot;radar&quot;, &quot;loran&quot; and > &quot;scuba&quot; all listed in lower > > case. > > > > Also according to them &quot;radar&quot; never was an acronym. It is a > coined > > word. Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the > > first letter of several other words. &quot;SCUBA&quot; is an acronym > but > > &quot;scuba&quot; is now a common English word that has displaced the > old 1950's > > vintage &quot;SCUBA&quot; in modern usage. But &quot;radar&quot; was > never an acronym. > > > > The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the English > > language changes with time. You can disagree. Many people do and > > claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then you > > will have to pick a date for when it was &quot;correct&quot; and then > explain > > how it could be incorrect before that date. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed wrote: > >> Indeed. But thats the way it goes. > >> > >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster wrote: > >> > >>> There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR. > >>> > >>> They are BOTH acronyms. > >>> > >>> -John > >>> > >>> ================= > >>> > >>> > >>> > There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad. I am certain he > >>> meant > >>> > Loran C. Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But > then, > >>> > you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up. > >>> > > >>> > -Chuck Harris > >>> > > >>> > Max Robinson wrote: > >>> >> He didn't say Loran C he said Loran. That is the old system that > >>> used > >>> >> to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of > >>> the > >>> >> 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't > >>> think > >>> >> there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world. > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > >>> > To unsubscribe, go to > >>> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >>> > and follow the instructions there. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > >>> To unsubscribe, go to > >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >>> and follow the instructions there. > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > >> To unsubscribe, go to > >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >> and follow the instructions there. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > ===== > > Chris Albertson > > Redondo Beach, California > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
CA
Chris Albertson
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 9:39 PM

Well I guess we are getting "nuts" about this.  Yes OED
says "radar orig. U.S. [f. radio detection and ranging.]"
but that does not mean it is an acronym.  OED reserves
the term "acronym" for words made using only the fist
letter of each description word. "radar" uses the first two
letters from "radio" and so OED uses only the "f."

I have the full version of OED at home.  I'll try to look
it up.  I bet they have a page length article on "radar".
The on-line version is very slimmed down

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Jean-Louis Noel jln@stben.net wrote:

Hi,

From: "Chris Albertson" albertson.chris@gmail.com

Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym.

OED says: radar orig. U.S. [f. radio detection and ranging.]

Bye,
Jean-Louis


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

Well I guess we are getting "nuts" about this. Yes OED says "radar orig. U.S. [f. radio detection and ranging.]" but that does not mean it is an acronym. OED reserves the term "acronym" for words made using only the fist letter of each description word. "radar" uses the first two letters from "radio" and so OED uses only the "f." I have the full version of OED at home. I'll try to look it up. I bet they have a page length article on "radar". The on-line version is very slimmed down On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Jean-Louis Noel <jln@stben.net> wrote: > Hi, > > From: "Chris Albertson" <albertson.chris@gmail.com> > >> Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym. > > OED says: radar orig. U.S. [f. radio detection and ranging.] > > Bye, > Jean-Louis > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- ===== Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California
RK
Rob Kimberley
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 9:51 PM

I there was me thinking that we invented RADAR......

Rob (in UK) Kimberley

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of David McGaw
Sent: 20 December 2010 8:49 PM
To: jfor@quik.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran?

As written in Wikipedia and as I have always understood:  "The term
RADAR was coined in 1940 by the [1]U.S. Navy as an [2]acronym for radio
detection and ranging."
David
At 01:04 PM 12/20/2010, you wrote:

 IMO this trend is a two edged sword:
 I don't like to see the historical aspect of the name lost by it
 becomming
 a lower-case noun.
 OTOH, it's been said that the ultimate tribute in Physics is to
 become
 "part of the furniture", like Newton's or Maxwell's Laws.
 FWIW,
 -John
 ===============

The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed

 in lower

case.

Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym.  It is a

 coined

word.  Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the
first letter of several other words.  "SCUBA" is an acronym but
"scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old

 1950's

vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage.  But "radar" was never an

 acronym.

The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the  English
language changes  with time.    You can disagree.  Many people do

 and

claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then

 you

will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then

 explain

how it could be incorrect before that date.

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com

 wrote:

Indeed. But thats the way it goes.

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster jfor@quik.com

 wrote:

There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR.

They are BOTH acronyms.

-John

=================

There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain

 he

meant

Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service...

 But then,

you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up.

-Chuck Harris

Max Robinson wrote:

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system

 that

used

to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away

 most of

the

160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I

 don't

think

there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[3]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[4]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[5]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[6]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

 _______________________________________________
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 [7]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

References

  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Navy
  2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym_and_initialism
  3. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  4. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  5. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  6. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  7. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I there was me thinking that we invented RADAR...... Rob (in UK) Kimberley -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of David McGaw Sent: 20 December 2010 8:49 PM To: jfor@quik.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran? As written in Wikipedia and as I have always understood: "The term RADAR was coined in 1940 by the [1]U.S. Navy as an [2]acronym for radio detection and ranging." David At 01:04 PM 12/20/2010, you wrote: IMO this trend is a two edged sword: I don't like to see the historical aspect of the name lost by it becomming a lower-case noun. OTOH, it's been said that the ultimate tribute in Physics is to become "part of the furniture", like Newton's or Maxwell's Laws. FWIW, -John =============== > The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed in lower > case. > > Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym. It is a coined > word. Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the > first letter of several other words. "SCUBA" is an acronym but > "scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old 1950's > vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage. But "radar" was never an acronym. > > The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the English > language changes with time. You can disagree. Many people do and > claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then you > will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then explain > how it could be incorrect before that date. > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: >> Indeed. But thats the way it goes. >> >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster <jfor@quik.com> wrote: >> >>> There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR. >>> >>> They are BOTH acronyms. >>> >>> -John >>> >>> ================= >>> >>> >>> > There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad. I am certain he >>> meant >>> > Loran C. Loran is (was) the common name for the service... But then, >>> > you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up. >>> > >>> > -Chuck Harris >>> > >>> > Max Robinson wrote: >>> >> He didn't say Loran C he said Loran. That is the old system that >>> used >>> >> to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away most of >>> the >>> >> 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I don't >>> think >>> >> there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world. >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> > To unsubscribe, go to >>> > [3]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> > and follow the instructions there. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> [4]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> [5]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > > > > -- > ===== > Chris Albertson > Redondo Beach, California > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > [6]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to [7]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. References 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Navy 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym_and_initialism 3. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 4. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 5. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 6. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts 7. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
JN
Jean-Louis Noel
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 9:51 PM

Hi,
From: "Chris Albertson" albertson.chris@gmail.com

Well I guess we are getting "nuts" about this.

Yes!

I have the full version of OED at home.

It is from the paper version!
First usage on the 18th of November 1941 by the N.Y. Times.
It was written 'Radar'.

I bet they have a page length article on "radar".

Yes, almost.

Bye,
Jean-Louis

Hi, From: "Chris Albertson" <albertson.chris@gmail.com> > Well I guess we are getting "nuts" about this. Yes! > I have the full version of OED at home. It is from the paper version! First usage on the 18th of November 1941 by the N.Y. Times. It was written 'Radar'. > I bet they have a page length article on "radar". Yes, almost. Bye, Jean-Louis
AM
Alan Melia
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 10:23 PM

Hi Rob no we invented "RDF" (or Radio Location)and they called it Radar :-))
Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Kimberley" rk@timing-consultants.com
To: "'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran?

I there was me thinking that we invented RADAR......

Rob (in UK) Kimberley

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of David McGaw
Sent: 20 December 2010 8:49 PM
To: jfor@quik.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran?

As written in Wikipedia and as I have always understood:  "The term
RADAR was coined in 1940 by the [1]U.S. Navy as an [2]acronym for radio
detection and ranging."
David
At 01:04 PM 12/20/2010, you wrote:

  IMO this trend is a two edged sword:
  I don't like to see the historical aspect of the name lost by it
  becomming
  a lower-case noun.
  OTOH, it's been said that the ultimate tribute in Physics is to
  become
  "part of the furniture", like Newton's or Maxwell's Laws.
  FWIW,
  -John
  ===============

The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed

  in lower

case.

Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym.  It is a

  coined

word.  Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the
first letter of several other words.  "SCUBA" is an acronym but
"scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old

  1950's

vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage.  But "radar" was never an

  acronym.

The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the  English
language changes  with time.    You can disagree.  Many people do

  and

claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then

  you

will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then

  explain

how it could be incorrect before that date.

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com

  wrote:

Indeed. But thats the way it goes.

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster jfor@quik.com

  wrote:

There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR.

They are BOTH acronyms.

-John

=================

There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain

  he

meant

Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service...

  But then,

you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up.

-Chuck Harris

Max Robinson wrote:

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system

  that

used

to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away

  most of

the

160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I

  don't

think

there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[3]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[4]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[5]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[6]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

  _______________________________________________
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  [7]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.

References

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Navy
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym_and_initialism
3. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
4. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
5. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
6. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
7. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the instructions there.

Hi Rob no we invented "RDF" (or Radio Location)and they called it Radar :-)) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Kimberley" <rk@timing-consultants.com> To: "'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'" <time-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:51 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran? > I there was me thinking that we invented RADAR...... > > Rob (in UK) Kimberley > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On > Behalf Of David McGaw > Sent: 20 December 2010 8:49 PM > To: jfor@quik.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran? > > As written in Wikipedia and as I have always understood: "The term > RADAR was coined in 1940 by the [1]U.S. Navy as an [2]acronym for radio > detection and ranging." > David > At 01:04 PM 12/20/2010, you wrote: > > IMO this trend is a two edged sword: > I don't like to see the historical aspect of the name lost by it > becomming > a lower-case noun. > OTOH, it's been said that the ultimate tribute in Physics is to > become > "part of the furniture", like Newton's or Maxwell's Laws. > FWIW, > -John > =============== > > The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed > in lower > > case. > > > > Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym. It is a > coined > > word. Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the > > first letter of several other words. "SCUBA" is an acronym but > > "scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old > 1950's > > vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage. But "radar" was never an > acronym. > > > > The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the English > > language changes with time. You can disagree. Many people do > and > > claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then > you > > will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then > explain > > how it could be incorrect before that date. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Indeed. But thats the way it goes. > >> > >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster <jfor@quik.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR. > >>> > >>> They are BOTH acronyms. > >>> > >>> -John > >>> > >>> ================= > >>> > >>> > >>> > There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad. I am certain > he > >>> meant > >>> > Loran C. Loran is (was) the common name for the service... > But then, > >>> > you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up. > >>> > > >>> > -Chuck Harris > >>> > > >>> > Max Robinson wrote: > >>> >> He didn't say Loran C he said Loran. That is the old system > that > >>> used > >>> >> to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away > most of > >>> the > >>> >> 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I > don't > >>> think > >>> >> there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world. > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > >>> > To unsubscribe, go to > >>> > [3]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >>> > and follow the instructions there. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > >>> To unsubscribe, go to > >>> [4]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >>> and follow the instructions there. > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > >> To unsubscribe, go to > >> [5]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >> and follow the instructions there. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > ===== > > Chris Albertson > > Redondo Beach, California > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > > [6]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > [7]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > References > > 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Navy > 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym_and_initialism > 3. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > 4. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > 5. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > 6. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > 7. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
PS
paul swed
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 10:34 PM

Well to be honest when I typed loran it was simply because I felt like it.
It was more important to communicate the fact that I couldn't here and
european stations in the northeast us. Thats all that mattered. Caps or
lowercase simply no longer matters to me on the dead us service.
So getting back at it I will fire up a different antenna and preamp and give
it one more shot.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Alan Melia alan.melia@btinternet.comwrote:

Hi Rob no we invented "RDF" (or Radio Location)and they called it Radar
:-))
Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Kimberley" rk@timing-consultants.com
To: "'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran?

I there was me thinking that we invented RADAR......

Rob (in UK) Kimberley

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of David McGaw
Sent: 20 December 2010 8:49 PM
To: jfor@quik.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran?

As written in Wikipedia and as I have always understood:  "The term
RADAR was coined in 1940 by the [1]U.S. Navy as an [2]acronym for

radio

detection and ranging."
David
At 01:04 PM 12/20/2010, you wrote:

  IMO this trend is a two edged sword:
  I don't like to see the historical aspect of the name lost by it
  becomming
  a lower-case noun.
  OTOH, it's been said that the ultimate tribute in Physics is to
  become
  "part of the furniture", like Newton's or Maxwell's Laws.
  FWIW,
  -John
  ===============

The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed

  in lower

case.

Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym.  It is a

  coined

word.  Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the
first letter of several other words.  "SCUBA" is an acronym but
"scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old

  1950's

vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage.  But "radar" was never an

  acronym.

The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the  English
language changes  with time.    You can disagree.  Many people do

  and

claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then

  you

will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then

  explain

how it could be incorrect before that date.

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com

  wrote:

Indeed. But thats the way it goes.

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster jfor@quik.com

  wrote:

There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR.

They are BOTH acronyms.

-John

=================

There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad.  I am certain

  he

meant

Loran C.  Loran is (was) the common name for the service...

  But then,

you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up.

-Chuck Harris

Max Robinson wrote:

He didn't say Loran C he said Loran.  That is the old system

  that

used

to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away

  most of

the

160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I

  don't

think

there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[3]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[4]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[5]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
[6]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

  _______________________________________________
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  [7]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.

References

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Navy
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym_and_initialism
3. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
4. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
5. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
6. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
7. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Well to be honest when I typed loran it was simply because I felt like it. It was more important to communicate the fact that I couldn't here and european stations in the northeast us. Thats all that mattered. Caps or lowercase simply no longer matters to me on the dead us service. So getting back at it I will fire up a different antenna and preamp and give it one more shot. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Alan Melia <alan.melia@btinternet.com>wrote: > Hi Rob no we invented "RDF" (or Radio Location)and they called it Radar > :-)) > Alan G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rob Kimberley" <rk@timing-consultants.com> > To: "'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'" > <time-nuts@febo.com> > Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:51 PM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran? > > > > I there was me thinking that we invented RADAR...... > > > > Rob (in UK) Kimberley > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On > > Behalf Of David McGaw > > Sent: 20 December 2010 8:49 PM > > To: jfor@quik.com; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Loran? > > > > As written in Wikipedia and as I have always understood: "The term > > RADAR was coined in 1940 by the [1]U.S. Navy as an [2]acronym for > radio > > detection and ranging." > > David > > At 01:04 PM 12/20/2010, you wrote: > > > > IMO this trend is a two edged sword: > > I don't like to see the historical aspect of the name lost by it > > becomming > > a lower-case noun. > > OTOH, it's been said that the ultimate tribute in Physics is to > > become > > "part of the furniture", like Newton's or Maxwell's Laws. > > FWIW, > > -John > > =============== > > > The Oxford dictionary has "radar", "loran" and "scuba" all listed > > in lower > > > case. > > > > > > Also according to them "radar" never was an acronym. It is a > > coined > > > word. Technically to be an acronym the it must be spelled by the > > > first letter of several other words. "SCUBA" is an acronym but > > > "scuba" is now a common English word that has displaced the old > > 1950's > > > vintage "SCUBA" in modern usage. But "radar" was never an > > acronym. > > > > > > The Oxford English Dictionary takes the view that the English > > > language changes with time. You can disagree. Many people do > > and > > > claim English has fixed rules that never change but if you do then > > you > > > will have to pick a date for when it was "correct" and then > > explain > > > how it could be incorrect before that date. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:07 AM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> Indeed. But thats the way it goes. > > >> > > >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM, J. Forster <jfor@quik.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> There ain't no such thing as Loran. It's LORAN, just like RADAR. > > >>> > > >>> They are BOTH acronyms. > > >>> > > >>> -John > > >>> > > >>> ================= > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > There never was a Loran receiver with a keypad. I am certain > > he > > >>> meant > > >>> > Loran C. Loran is (was) the common name for the service... > > But then, > > >>> > you already knew that, and were just trying to stir things up. > > >>> > > > >>> > -Chuck Harris > > >>> > > > >>> > Max Robinson wrote: > > >>> >> He didn't say Loran C he said Loran. That is the old system > > that > > >>> used > > >>> >> to operate just above the AM broadcast band and took away > > most of > > >>> the > > >>> >> 160 meter ham band. That hasn't been around for decades. I > > don't > > >>> think > > >>> >> there is a version of it operating anywhere in the world. > > >>> > > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > > >>> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > >>> > To unsubscribe, go to > > >>> > [3]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > >>> > and follow the instructions there. > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > >>> To unsubscribe, go to > > >>> [4]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > >>> and follow the instructions there. > > >>> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > >> To unsubscribe, go to > > >> [5]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > >> and follow the instructions there. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ===== > > > Chris Albertson > > > Redondo Beach, California > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > > To unsubscribe, go to > > > [6]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > > [7]https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > References > > > > 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Navy > > 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym_and_initialism > > 3. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > 4. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > 5. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > 6. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > 7. https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
PK
Poul-Henning Kamp
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 10:45 PM

Well to be honest when I typed loran it was simply because I felt like it.
It was more important to communicate the fact that I couldn't here and
european stations in the northeast us. Thats all that mattered. Caps or
lowercase simply no longer matters to me on the dead us service.
So getting back at it I will fire up a different antenna and preamp and give
it one more shot.

Make sure you listen on the correct GRI's, some tables still list the
long abandoned 3-digit USCG chains, rather than the 4-digit NELS chains:

Eiði, GRI=9007
Lessay, GRI=6731
Sylt, GRI=7499
Værlandet, GRI=7001

For what it's worth, I have never been able to more than barely detect
the 9960 chain from here in Denmark, and that was only after a major
DSP exercise...

Poul-Henning

--
Poul-Henning Kamp      | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG        | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer      | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

In message <AANLkTi=KYamMSdN7KoMCPBs8iGw=EXzxm7NQ767-+TOc@mail.gmail.com>, paul swed writes: >Well to be honest when I typed loran it was simply because I felt like it. >It was more important to communicate the fact that I couldn't here and >european stations in the northeast us. Thats all that mattered. Caps or >lowercase simply no longer matters to me on the dead us service. >So getting back at it I will fire up a different antenna and preamp and give >it one more shot. Make sure you listen on the correct GRI's, some tables still list the long abandoned 3-digit USCG chains, rather than the 4-digit NELS chains: Eiði, GRI=9007 Lessay, GRI=6731 Sylt, GRI=7499 Værlandet, GRI=7001 For what it's worth, I have never been able to more than barely detect the 9960 chain from here in Denmark, and that was only after a major DSP exercise... Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
PS
paul swed
Mon, Dec 20, 2010 11:34 PM

Thanks Poul will do its long enough past sunset to start hunting.

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp phk@phk.freebsd.dkwrote:

In message <AANLkTi=KYamMSdN7KoMCPBs8iGw=EXzxm7NQ767-+TOc@mail.gmail.comEXzxm7NQ767-%2BTOc@mail.gmail.com>,
paul
swed writes:

Well to be honest when I typed loran it was simply because I felt like it.
It was more important to communicate the fact that I couldn't here and
european stations in the northeast us. Thats all that mattered. Caps or
lowercase simply no longer matters to me on the dead us service.
So getting back at it I will fire up a different antenna and preamp and

give

it one more shot.

Make sure you listen on the correct GRI's, some tables still list the
long abandoned 3-digit USCG chains, rather than the 4-digit NELS chains:

    Eiği, GRI=9007
    Lessay, GRI=6731
    Sylt, GRI=7499
    Værlandet, GRI=7001

For what it's worth, I have never been able to more than barely detect
the 9960 chain from here in Denmark, and that was only after a major
DSP exercise...

Poul-Henning

--
Poul-Henning Kamp      | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG        | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer      | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Thanks Poul will do its long enough past sunset to start hunting. On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote: > In message <AANLkTi=KYamMSdN7KoMCPBs8iGw=EXzxm7NQ767-+TOc@mail.gmail.com<EXzxm7NQ767-%2BTOc@mail.gmail.com>>, > paul > swed writes: > > >Well to be honest when I typed loran it was simply because I felt like it. > >It was more important to communicate the fact that I couldn't here and > >european stations in the northeast us. Thats all that mattered. Caps or > >lowercase simply no longer matters to me on the dead us service. > >So getting back at it I will fire up a different antenna and preamp and > give > >it one more shot. > > Make sure you listen on the correct GRI's, some tables still list the > long abandoned 3-digit USCG chains, rather than the 4-digit NELS chains: > > Eiği, GRI=9007 > Lessay, GRI=6731 > Sylt, GRI=7499 > Værlandet, GRI=7001 > > For what it's worth, I have never been able to more than barely detect > the 9960 chain from here in Denmark, and that was only after a major > DSP exercise... > > Poul-Henning > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
PS
paul swed
Tue, Dec 21, 2010 1:54 AM

Interesting
Just barely I may be seeing several chains on the east coast of the US near
Boston.
I am using a austron 2100 and a 2100F. Definitely see it trying to lock and
its does go into settle mode. But I am afraid I may have some nasty
switching power supply of some sort nearby. I see a bursting noise signal
semi synchronous at 100 KC. Never seen this before.

I seem to see 9007 and 6731 the best. 7499 nothing and would say 7001 quite
weak.
May have to go to the older Austron 2000c and take a look. That gives me
much more flexibility in control to confirm that I can see the signals.

Antenna is a Loran preamplified antenna (No idea the model hamfest
stuff) with a fiber glass whip 7' tall wound with hundreds of turns of #26
gauge wire as a single layer. Approx 6 ft off the ground.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

2010/12/20 paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com

Thanks Poul will do its long enough past sunset to start hunting.

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp phk@phk.freebsd.dkwrote:

In message <AANLkTi=KYamMSdN7KoMCPBs8iGw=EXzxm7NQ767-+TOc@mail.gmail.comEXzxm7NQ767-%2BTOc@mail.gmail.com>,
paul
swed writes:

Well to be honest when I typed loran it was simply because I felt like

it.

It was more important to communicate the fact that I couldn't here and
european stations in the northeast us. Thats all that mattered. Caps or
lowercase simply no longer matters to me on the dead us service.
So getting back at it I will fire up a different antenna and preamp and

give

it one more shot.

Make sure you listen on the correct GRI's, some tables still list the
long abandoned 3-digit USCG chains, rather than the 4-digit NELS chains:

    Eiği, GRI=9007
    Lessay, GRI=6731
    Sylt, GRI=7499
    Værlandet, GRI=7001

For what it's worth, I have never been able to more than barely detect
the 9960 chain from here in Denmark, and that was only after a major
DSP exercise...

Poul-Henning

--
Poul-Henning Kamp      | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG        | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer      | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
incompetence.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Interesting Just barely I may be seeing several chains on the east coast of the US near Boston. I am using a austron 2100 and a 2100F. Definitely see it trying to lock and its does go into settle mode. But I am afraid I may have some nasty switching power supply of some sort nearby. I see a bursting noise signal semi synchronous at 100 KC. Never seen this before. I seem to see 9007 and 6731 the best. 7499 nothing and would say 7001 quite weak. May have to go to the older Austron 2000c and take a look. That gives me much more flexibility in control to confirm that I can see the signals. Antenna is a Loran preamplified antenna (No idea the model hamfest stuff) with a fiber glass whip 7' tall wound with hundreds of turns of #26 gauge wire as a single layer. Approx 6 ft off the ground. Regards Paul WB8TSL 2010/12/20 paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> > Thanks Poul will do its long enough past sunset to start hunting. > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote: > >> In message <AANLkTi=KYamMSdN7KoMCPBs8iGw=EXzxm7NQ767-+TOc@mail.gmail.com<EXzxm7NQ767-%2BTOc@mail.gmail.com>>, >> paul >> swed writes: >> >> >Well to be honest when I typed loran it was simply because I felt like >> it. >> >It was more important to communicate the fact that I couldn't here and >> >european stations in the northeast us. Thats all that mattered. Caps or >> >lowercase simply no longer matters to me on the dead us service. >> >So getting back at it I will fire up a different antenna and preamp and >> give >> >it one more shot. >> >> Make sure you listen on the correct GRI's, some tables still list the >> long abandoned 3-digit USCG chains, rather than the 4-digit NELS chains: >> >> Eiği, GRI=9007 >> Lessay, GRI=6731 >> Sylt, GRI=7499 >> Værlandet, GRI=7001 >> >> For what it's worth, I have never been able to more than barely detect >> the 9960 chain from here in Denmark, and that was only after a major >> DSP exercise... >> >> Poul-Henning >> >> -- >> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 >> phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 >> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe >> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by >> incompetence. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > >