time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Phase microstepper designs?

AK
Attila Kinali
Wed, Dec 9, 2015 10:26 AM

Moin,

I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build,
but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents
US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure
that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of documentation
out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for?

		Attila Kinali

--
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson

Moin, I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build, but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of documentation out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for? Attila Kinali -- It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no use without that foundation. -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
AW
Anders Wallin
Wed, Dec 9, 2015 4:04 PM

Do you mean delay-generators for 1PPS? Or a finely-tunable frequency
synthesizer?

For 1PPS, the fine-delay FMC card might be worth a look:
http://www.ohwr.org/projects/fmc-delay-1ns-8cha/wiki

afaik it works by first time-stamping the input pulse, then delaying the
output with an integer number of clock cycles on the FPGA, and for
sub-cycle fine delay it uses programmable hardware delay-lines (these run
quite hot on the board),
If you need only 1PPS that is synchronous to some input 10MHz signal then
the design is much simpler since you don't need to time-stamp an
asynchronous input pulse first.

SRS DG645 and similar might be worth a look too.

Anders

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Attila Kinali attila@kinali.ch wrote:

Moin,

I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build,
but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents
US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure
that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of
documentation
out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for?

                     Attila Kinali

--
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Do you mean delay-generators for 1PPS? Or a finely-tunable frequency synthesizer? For 1PPS, the fine-delay FMC card might be worth a look: http://www.ohwr.org/projects/fmc-delay-1ns-8cha/wiki afaik it works by first time-stamping the input pulse, then delaying the output with an integer number of clock cycles on the FPGA, and for sub-cycle fine delay it uses programmable hardware delay-lines (these run quite hot on the board), If you need only 1PPS that is synchronous to some input 10MHz signal then the design is much simpler since you don't need to time-stamp an asynchronous input pulse first. SRS DG645 and similar might be worth a look too. Anders On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch> wrote: > Moin, > > I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build, > but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents > US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure > that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of > documentation > out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for? > > Attila Kinali > > -- > It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All > the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no > use without that foundation. > -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
R(
Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Wed, Dec 9, 2015 4:05 PM

On 12/9/2015 2:26 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:

Moin,

I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build,
but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents
US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure
that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of documentation
out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for?

		Attila Kinali

My extensive experience with digging up old articles (before the
internet, the library was like my second office) is that when
the trail goes cold on some topic for no apparent
reason, it turns out that there is a (non-apparent) good reason
why no one is writing about the topic any more.  I usually
got to the bottom of this by asking experts in the industry.

My general impression about phase microsteppers based on when I
was involved in the time industry is that they didn't have a
very good reputation and were an inferior solution that was
used as an expediency because it it could be "bolted on"
to an existing system that wasn't originally designed to be
tuned.  I think the concensus was that direct digital synthesis
is the better way to go, assuming you can design it into the
architecture in the first place.  DDS is a pretty well developed
technology at this time that is supported by good OTS chips,
so it is not clear what the value proposition would be for
phase microsteppers.

When we were designing the 5071A 25 years ago, it was clear
that the method of tuning by varying the C field was not
acceptable for a state of the art standard.  There are
multiple reasons for this decision.  At the time,
there were a few DDS chips, but we had to roll our own DDS
due to the stringent and specialized requirements.  It took
a whole PC board for this circuit at the time.  The possibility
of using a phase microstepper was never even considered AFAIK.

Are you aware of some redeeming value that phase microsteppers
have that would make us want to investigate them?  Am I
being too harsh on them?  Maybe you can champion them and they
will make a come back :-)

Rick Karlquist N6RK

On 12/9/2015 2:26 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: > Moin, > > I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build, > but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents > US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure > that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of documentation > out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for? > > Attila Kinali My extensive experience with digging up old articles (before the internet, the library was like my second office) is that when the trail goes cold on some topic for no apparent reason, it turns out that there is a (non-apparent) good reason why no one is writing about the topic any more. I usually got to the bottom of this by asking experts in the industry. My general impression about phase microsteppers based on when I was involved in the time industry is that they didn't have a very good reputation and were an inferior solution that was used as an expediency because it it could be "bolted on" to an existing system that wasn't originally designed to be tuned. I think the concensus was that direct digital synthesis is the better way to go, assuming you can design it into the architecture in the first place. DDS is a pretty well developed technology at this time that is supported by good OTS chips, so it is not clear what the value proposition would be for phase microsteppers. When we were designing the 5071A 25 years ago, it was clear that the method of tuning by varying the C field was not acceptable for a state of the art standard. There are multiple reasons for this decision. At the time, there were a few DDS chips, but we had to roll our own DDS due to the stringent and specialized requirements. It took a whole PC board for this circuit at the time. The possibility of using a phase microstepper was never even considered AFAIK. Are you aware of some redeeming value that phase microsteppers have that would make us want to investigate them? Am I being too harsh on them? Maybe you can champion them and they will make a come back :-) Rick Karlquist N6RK
AP
Alex Pummer
Wed, Dec 9, 2015 4:53 PM

it is not a hint, for what you asked, but if you add a DC voltage to the
output of the phase detector in an analog PLL the VCO phase could be
adjusted, similarly if you add a constants to the  input data of a phase
accumulator of the NCO you could adjust the phase of the NCO
but be aware, the NCO will have always more jitter than a VCO
get Giora's book -- see my previous e-mail
also QAM demodulators used phase rotators too...
73
KJ6UHN
Alex
On 12/9/2015 2:26 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:

Moin,

I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build,
but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents
US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure
that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of documentation
out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for?

		Attila Kinali
it is not a hint, for what you asked, but if you add a DC voltage to the output of the phase detector in an analog PLL the VCO phase could be adjusted, similarly if you add a constants to the input data of a phase accumulator of the NCO you could adjust the phase of the NCO but be aware, the NCO will have always more jitter than a VCO get Giora's book -- see my previous e-mail also QAM demodulators used phase rotators too... 73 KJ6UHN Alex On 12/9/2015 2:26 AM, Attila Kinali wrote: > Moin, > > I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build, > but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents > US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure > that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of documentation > out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for? > > Attila Kinali >
TV
Tom Van Baak
Wed, Dec 9, 2015 5:34 PM

Are you aware of some redeeming value that phase microsteppers
have that would make us want to investigate them?  Am I
being too harsh on them?  Maybe you can champion them and they
will make a come back :-)

Rick Karlquist N6RK

A phase microstepper is useful with many older Rb and Cs standards (e.g., 5061A and 5065A) so that you don't have to touch the C-field. It is also useful with a 5071A to improve the time sync/step/steer resolution.

Note that you can also implement a GPSDO with a phase microstepper and this allows you to avoid Vref, DAC and EFC. Not all LO have EFC, and even if they do, it may be more stable not to use EFC. Plus with a DDS you avoid EFC-out-of-range problems.

See also http://leapsecond.com/pages/fe405/ and the links near the bottom. This (patented) FEI design avoids the spur issues several of you have been talking about: the RF output comes from a low-noise VCXO not the low-drift OCXO+DDS itself.

And finally, another very interesting use of a DDS as a sort of microstepper phase comparator is:
http://www.ptfinc.com/dsheets/App_35_picoPak.pdf

/tvb

> Are you aware of some redeeming value that phase microsteppers > have that would make us want to investigate them? Am I > being too harsh on them? Maybe you can champion them and they > will make a come back :-) > > Rick Karlquist N6RK A phase microstepper is useful with many older Rb and Cs standards (e.g., 5061A and 5065A) so that you don't have to touch the C-field. It is also useful with a 5071A to improve the time sync/step/steer resolution. Note that you can also implement a GPSDO with a phase microstepper and this allows you to avoid Vref, DAC and EFC. Not all LO have EFC, and even if they do, it may be more stable not to use EFC. Plus with a DDS you avoid EFC-out-of-range problems. See also http://leapsecond.com/pages/fe405/ and the links near the bottom. This (patented) FEI design avoids the spur issues several of you have been talking about: the RF output comes from a low-noise VCXO not the low-drift OCXO+DDS itself. And finally, another very interesting use of a DDS as a sort of microstepper phase comparator is: http://www.ptfinc.com/dsheets/App_35_picoPak.pdf /tvb
BC
Brooke Clarke
Wed, Dec 9, 2015 7:54 PM

Hi Attila:

Once you find a patent you can then  search on the class number for very similar patents.
See the links under "Handy External Links:"
http://www.prc68.com/I/Learning.shtml
Quick allows searching for a class number or other fields (but not the text of the patent).
PS Sunnyvale has a patent library where they file US patents by class number making manual searches fairly easy.
Top Level Class # http://www.uspto.gov/go/classification/selectbynum.htm (left) allows you to see the meaning of the
class to be sure that's what you're interested in.

US 4358741 https://www.google.com/patents/US4358741 Micro time and phase stepper, 331/2
https://www.google.com/url?id=rl0dBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc331/defs331.htm&usg=AFQjCNHhVSrSreshQPR_PYhdLJ0aw9tBCQ#C331S002000,
327/161
https://www.google.com/url?id=rl0dBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc327/defs327.htm&usg=AFQjCNFoZx7H6EhU2a-QMFPGAY1I73oBzw#C327S161000,
333/18
https://www.google.com/url?id=rl0dBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc333/defs333.htm&usg=AFQjCNF4ObmgvfHFQi9OPkPToOvejSWAZg#C333S018000,
331/25
https://www.google.com/url?id=rl0dBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc331/defs331.htm&usg=AFQjCNHhVSrSreshQPR_PYhdLJ0aw9tBCQ#C331S025000

CLASS 331, OSCILLATORS

2 Plural oscillators controlled: javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs331sf.htm?331_2&D&2&3');

25 Signal or phase comparator: javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs331sf.htm?331_25&D&2&J&Q');

CLASS 327,MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVE ELECTRICAL NONLINEAR DEVICES, CIRCUITS, AND SYSTEMS
161 With delay means: javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs327sf.htm?327_161&D&2S&3X&4H');

286 With counter: javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs327sf.htm?327_286&D&2S&79&7X&7Y');

US 4417352 https://www.google.com/patents/US4417352?dq=US4417352 Microphase stepper employing improved digital timing
incrementer employing a rate multiplier, 377/43
https://www.google.com/url?id=Jt8eBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc377/defs377.htm&usg=AFQjCNES34nVJJvy1BQF6eXy2lUwpG20wg#C377S043000,
377/47
https://www.google.com/url?id=Jt8eBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc377/defs377.htm&usg=AFQjCNES34nVJJvy1BQF6eXy2lUwpG20wg#C377S047000,
327/286
https://www.google.com/url?id=Jt8eBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc327/defs327.htm&usg=AFQjCNFoZx7H6EhU2a-QMFPGAY1I73oBzw#C327S286000,
377/52
https://www.google.com/url?id=Jt8eBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc377/defs377.htm&usg=AFQjCNES34nVJJvy1BQF6eXy2lUwpG20wg#C377S052000

CLASS 377,ELECTRICAL PULSE COUNTERS, PULSE DIVIDERS, OR SHIFT REGISTERS: CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS
43 Having phase shift: javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs377sf.htm?377_43&D&T&19');

47 Pulse multiplication or division: javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs377sf.htm?377_47&D&T&1D');

52 With programmable counter (i.e., with variable base):
javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs377sf.htm?377_52&D&T&1I');

US 5440313 https://www.google.com/patents/US5440313 GPS synchronized frequency/time source (Q5200
http://www.prc68.com/I/Q5200.shtml), 342/352
https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc342/defs342.htm&usg=AFQjCNHmJcOXqM2sgcclreqTZjYK9v88aQ#C342S352000,
375/362
https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc375/defs375.htm&usg=AFQjCNFcuagMfSu6xvEzMh0uBF37Cw37ZA#C375S362000,
368/200
https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc368/defs368.htm&usg=AFQjCNH9PXe6MYSffVhm9JQ8TwfbzXRIrA#C368S200000,
342/357.29
https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc342/defs342.htm&usg=AFQjCNHmJcOXqM2sgcclreqTZjYK9v88aQ#C342S357290,
342/357.42
https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc342/defs342.htm&usg=AFQjCNHmJcOXqM2sgcclreqTZjYK9v88aQ#C342S357420,
342/357.59
https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc342/defs342.htm&usg=AFQjCNHmJcOXqM2sgcclreqTZjYK9v88aQ#C342S357590,
342/357.68
https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc342/defs342.htm&usg=AFQjCNHmJcOXqM2sgcclreqTZjYK9v88aQ#C342S357680,
342/357.48
https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc342/defs342.htm&usg=AFQjCNHmJcOXqM2sgcclreqTZjYK9v88aQ#C342S357480

CLASS 342,COMMUNICATIONS: DIRECTIVE RADIO WAVE SYSTEMS AND DEVICES (E.G., RADAR, RADIO NAVIGATION)
352 Including a satellite: javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs342sf.htm?342_352&D&60&62');

CLASS 368,HOROLOGY: TIME MEASURING SYSTEMS OR DEVICES
200 For adjusting the frequency or beat: javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs368sf.htm?368_200&D&54&5K');

CLASS 375, PULSE OR DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS

62 Frequency or phase control using synchronizing signal:
javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs375sf.htm?375_362&D&5F&5N');

I haven't shown all of the class number detail, but there's a lot of class numbers to look at.

--
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html

Attila Kinali wrote:

Moin,

I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build,
but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents
US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure
that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of documentation
out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for?

		Attila Kinali
Hi Attila: Once you find a patent you can then search on the class number for very similar patents. See the links under "Handy External Links:" http://www.prc68.com/I/Learning.shtml Quick allows searching for a class number or other fields (but not the text of the patent). PS Sunnyvale has a patent library where they file US patents by class number making manual searches fairly easy. Top Level Class # <http://www.uspto.gov/go/classification/selectbynum.htm> (left) allows you to see the meaning of the class to be sure that's what you're interested in. US 4358741 <https://www.google.com/patents/US4358741> Micro time and phase stepper, 331/2 <https://www.google.com/url?id=rl0dBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc331/defs331.htm&usg=AFQjCNHhVSrSreshQPR_PYhdLJ0aw9tBCQ#C331S002000>, 327/161 <https://www.google.com/url?id=rl0dBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc327/defs327.htm&usg=AFQjCNFoZx7H6EhU2a-QMFPGAY1I73oBzw#C327S161000>, 333/18 <https://www.google.com/url?id=rl0dBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc333/defs333.htm&usg=AFQjCNF4ObmgvfHFQi9OPkPToOvejSWAZg#C333S018000>, 331/25 <https://www.google.com/url?id=rl0dBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc331/defs331.htm&usg=AFQjCNHhVSrSreshQPR_PYhdLJ0aw9tBCQ#C331S025000> CLASS 331, OSCILLATORS 2 Plural oscillators controlled: <javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs331sf.htm?331_2&D&2&3');> 25 Signal or phase comparator: <javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs331sf.htm?331_25&D&2&J&Q');> CLASS 327,MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVE ELECTRICAL NONLINEAR DEVICES, CIRCUITS, AND SYSTEMS 161 With delay means: <javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs327sf.htm?327_161&D&2S&3X&4H');> 286 With counter: <javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs327sf.htm?327_286&D&2S&79&7X&7Y');> US 4417352 <https://www.google.com/patents/US4417352?dq=US4417352> Microphase stepper employing improved digital timing incrementer employing a rate multiplier, 377/43 <https://www.google.com/url?id=Jt8eBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc377/defs377.htm&usg=AFQjCNES34nVJJvy1BQF6eXy2lUwpG20wg#C377S043000>, 377/47 <https://www.google.com/url?id=Jt8eBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc377/defs377.htm&usg=AFQjCNES34nVJJvy1BQF6eXy2lUwpG20wg#C377S047000>, 327/286 <https://www.google.com/url?id=Jt8eBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc327/defs327.htm&usg=AFQjCNFoZx7H6EhU2a-QMFPGAY1I73oBzw#C327S286000>, 377/52 <https://www.google.com/url?id=Jt8eBAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc377/defs377.htm&usg=AFQjCNES34nVJJvy1BQF6eXy2lUwpG20wg#C377S052000> CLASS 377,ELECTRICAL PULSE COUNTERS, PULSE DIVIDERS, OR SHIFT REGISTERS: CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS 43 Having phase shift: <javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs377sf.htm?377_43&D&T&19');> 47 Pulse multiplication or division: <javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs377sf.htm?377_47&D&T&1D');> 52 With programmable counter (i.e., with variable base): <javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs377sf.htm?377_52&D&T&1I');> US 5440313 <https://www.google.com/patents/US5440313> GPS synchronized frequency/time source (Q5200 <http://www.prc68.com/I/Q5200.shtml>), 342/352 <https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc342/defs342.htm&usg=AFQjCNHmJcOXqM2sgcclreqTZjYK9v88aQ#C342S352000>, 375/362 <https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc375/defs375.htm&usg=AFQjCNFcuagMfSu6xvEzMh0uBF37Cw37ZA#C375S362000>, 368/200 <https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc368/defs368.htm&usg=AFQjCNH9PXe6MYSffVhm9JQ8TwfbzXRIrA#C368S200000>, 342/357.29 <https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc342/defs342.htm&usg=AFQjCNHmJcOXqM2sgcclreqTZjYK9v88aQ#C342S357290>, 342/357.42 <https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc342/defs342.htm&usg=AFQjCNHmJcOXqM2sgcclreqTZjYK9v88aQ#C342S357420>, 342/357.59 <https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc342/defs342.htm&usg=AFQjCNHmJcOXqM2sgcclreqTZjYK9v88aQ#C342S357590>, 342/357.68 <https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc342/defs342.htm&usg=AFQjCNHmJcOXqM2sgcclreqTZjYK9v88aQ#C342S357680>, 342/357.48 <https://www.google.com/url?id=vp08BAABERAJ&q=http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc342/defs342.htm&usg=AFQjCNHmJcOXqM2sgcclreqTZjYK9v88aQ#C342S357480> CLASS 342,COMMUNICATIONS: DIRECTIVE RADIO WAVE SYSTEMS AND DEVICES (E.G., RADAR, RADIO NAVIGATION) 352 Including a satellite: <javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs342sf.htm?342_352&D&60&62');> CLASS 368,HOROLOGY: TIME MEASURING SYSTEMS OR DEVICES 200 For adjusting the frequency or beat: <javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs368sf.htm?368_200&D&54&5K');> CLASS 375, PULSE OR DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS 62 Frequency or phase control using synchronizing signal: <javascript:poptastic('../shadowFiles/defs375sf.htm?375_362&D&5F&5N');> I haven't shown all of the class number detail, but there's a lot of class numbers to look at. -- Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html Attila Kinali wrote: > Moin, > > I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build, > but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents > US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure > that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of documentation > out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for? > > Attila Kinali >
BC
Brooke Clarke
Wed, Dec 9, 2015 8:32 PM

Hi Tom:

While I was working at TRW Microwave we were purchased by FEI.  It's my understanding the their key capability was in
the crystal material in that it produced the cleanest oscillators on the market.

--
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html

Tom Van Baak wrote:

Are you aware of some redeeming value that phase microsteppers
have that would make us want to investigate them?  Am I
being too harsh on them?  Maybe you can champion them and they
will make a come back :-)

Rick Karlquist N6RK

A phase microstepper is useful with many older Rb and Cs standards (e.g., 5061A and 5065A) so that you don't have to touch the C-field. It is also useful with a 5071A to improve the time sync/step/steer resolution.

Note that you can also implement a GPSDO with a phase microstepper and this allows you to avoid Vref, DAC and EFC. Not all LO have EFC, and even if they do, it may be more stable not to use EFC. Plus with a DDS you avoid EFC-out-of-range problems.

See also http://leapsecond.com/pages/fe405/ and the links near the bottom. This (patented) FEI design avoids the spur issues several of you have been talking about: the RF output comes from a low-noise VCXO not the low-drift OCXO+DDS itself.

And finally, another very interesting use of a DDS as a sort of microstepper phase comparator is:
http://www.ptfinc.com/dsheets/App_35_picoPak.pdf

/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Tom: While I was working at TRW Microwave we were purchased by FEI. It's my understanding the their key capability was in the crystal material in that it produced the cleanest oscillators on the market. -- Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html Tom Van Baak wrote: >> Are you aware of some redeeming value that phase microsteppers >> have that would make us want to investigate them? Am I >> being too harsh on them? Maybe you can champion them and they >> will make a come back :-) >> >> Rick Karlquist N6RK > A phase microstepper is useful with many older Rb and Cs standards (e.g., 5061A and 5065A) so that you don't have to touch the C-field. It is also useful with a 5071A to improve the time sync/step/steer resolution. > > Note that you can also implement a GPSDO with a phase microstepper and this allows you to avoid Vref, DAC and EFC. Not all LO have EFC, and even if they do, it may be more stable not to use EFC. Plus with a DDS you avoid EFC-out-of-range problems. > > See also http://leapsecond.com/pages/fe405/ and the links near the bottom. This (patented) FEI design avoids the spur issues several of you have been talking about: the RF output comes from a low-noise VCXO not the low-drift OCXO+DDS itself. > > And finally, another very interesting use of a DDS as a sort of microstepper phase comparator is: > http://www.ptfinc.com/dsheets/App_35_picoPak.pdf > > /tvb > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
TV
Tom Van Baak
Wed, Dec 9, 2015 9:51 PM

Moin,

I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build,
but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents
US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure
that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of documentation
out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for?

Attila Kinali

Attila,

Try these search terms:
phase microstepper
microphase stepper
time frequency phase "offset generator"
auxiliary offset generator
phase frequency AOG
programmable clean-up oscillator

The two commercial products I'm familiar with get down to 1e-19 resolution:

http://www.microsemi.com/products/timing-synchronization-systems/time-frequency-references/active-hydrogen-maser/aog-110

http://www.spectradynamics.com/products/hrog-5-high-resolution-phase-and-frequency-offset-generator

Somewhere I have the block diagram for these. Very complex. Depending on the resolution and stability specs you need a DDS solution might be simpler today.

The write-up about Bert's DDS board is here:
http://leapsecond.com/pages/ad9913/
http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD9913.pdf

You'll want to use a DDS with a "programmable modulus" feature:
http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/application-notes/AN-953.pdf

/tvb

> Moin, > > I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build, > but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents > US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure > that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of documentation > out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for? > > Attila Kinali Attila, Try these search terms: phase microstepper microphase stepper time frequency phase "offset generator" auxiliary offset generator phase frequency AOG programmable clean-up oscillator The two commercial products I'm familiar with get down to 1e-19 resolution: http://www.microsemi.com/products/timing-synchronization-systems/time-frequency-references/active-hydrogen-maser/aog-110 http://www.spectradynamics.com/products/hrog-5-high-resolution-phase-and-frequency-offset-generator Somewhere I have the block diagram for these. Very complex. Depending on the resolution and stability specs you need a DDS solution might be simpler today. The write-up about Bert's DDS board is here: http://leapsecond.com/pages/ad9913/ http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD9913.pdf You'll want to use a DDS with a "programmable modulus" feature: http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/application-notes/AN-953.pdf /tvb
MD
Magnus Danielson
Wed, Dec 9, 2015 10:41 PM

Hi,

Vremya also have such boxes. The current one, VCH-317, goes under the
name "Real-Time Atomic Clock Combiner" which may not give you the
initial association of it being a micro-stepper. I have read the manual
for an older box, or at least an older description, which included a
nice description and overview, but I could not locate it.

"offset generator" is a re-occuring theme common to AOG and HROG.

The SpectraDynamics HROG is in patent US6278330.

As always, it can be interesting to look up cited patents and check what
else that company or inventor may have come up with.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 12/09/2015 10:51 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:

Moin,

I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build,
but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents
US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure
that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of documentation
out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for?

Attila Kinali

Attila,

Try these search terms:
phase microstepper
microphase stepper
time frequency phase "offset generator"
auxiliary offset generator
phase frequency AOG
programmable clean-up oscillator

The two commercial products I'm familiar with get down to 1e-19 resolution:

http://www.microsemi.com/products/timing-synchronization-systems/time-frequency-references/active-hydrogen-maser/aog-110

http://www.spectradynamics.com/products/hrog-5-high-resolution-phase-and-frequency-offset-generator

Somewhere I have the block diagram for these. Very complex. Depending on the resolution and stability specs you need a DDS solution might be simpler today.

The write-up about Bert's DDS board is here:
http://leapsecond.com/pages/ad9913/
http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD9913.pdf

You'll want to use a DDS with a "programmable modulus" feature:
http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/application-notes/AN-953.pdf

/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi, Vremya also have such boxes. The current one, VCH-317, goes under the name "Real-Time Atomic Clock Combiner" which may not give you the initial association of it being a micro-stepper. I have read the manual for an older box, or at least an older description, which included a nice description and overview, but I could not locate it. "offset generator" is a re-occuring theme common to AOG and HROG. The SpectraDynamics HROG is in patent US6278330. As always, it can be interesting to look up cited patents and check what else that company or inventor may have come up with. Cheers, Magnus On 12/09/2015 10:51 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote: >> Moin, >> >> I just tried to figure out how phase microsteppers are usually build, >> but, beside the time-nuts discussion from 10 years ago and US patents >> US4358741 and US4417352 my search turned out empty. I am pretty sure >> that I used the wrong search terms and there should be lots of documentation >> out there. Can someone give me a hint what to look for? >> >> Attila Kinali > > Attila, > > Try these search terms: > phase microstepper > microphase stepper > time frequency phase "offset generator" > auxiliary offset generator > phase frequency AOG > programmable clean-up oscillator > > The two commercial products I'm familiar with get down to 1e-19 resolution: > > http://www.microsemi.com/products/timing-synchronization-systems/time-frequency-references/active-hydrogen-maser/aog-110 > > http://www.spectradynamics.com/products/hrog-5-high-resolution-phase-and-frequency-offset-generator > > Somewhere I have the block diagram for these. Very complex. Depending on the resolution and stability specs you need a DDS solution might be simpler today. > > The write-up about Bert's DDS board is here: > http://leapsecond.com/pages/ad9913/ > http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD9913.pdf > > You'll want to use a DDS with a "programmable modulus" feature: > http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/application-notes/AN-953.pdf > > /tvb > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BC
Bob Camp
Wed, Dec 9, 2015 10:53 PM

Hi

On Dec 9, 2015, at 12:34 PM, Tom Van Baak tvb@LeapSecond.com wrote:

Are you aware of some redeeming value that phase microsteppers
have that would make us want to investigate them?  Am I
being too harsh on them?  Maybe you can champion them and they
will make a come back :-)

Rick Karlquist N6RK

A phase microstepper is useful with many older Rb and Cs standards (e.g., 5061A and 5065A) so that you don't have to touch the C-field. It is also useful with a 5071A to improve the time sync/step/steer resolution.

Note that you can also implement a GPSDO with a phase microstepper and this allows you to avoid Vref, DAC and EFC. Not all LO have EFC, and even if they do, it may be more stable not to use EFC. Plus with a DDS you avoid EFC-out-of-range problems.

See also http://leapsecond.com/pages/fe405/ and the links near the bottom. This (patented) FEI design avoids the spur issues several of you have been talking about: the RF output comes from a low-noise VCXO not the low-drift OCXO+DDS itself.

It avoids the far removed spurs. If you have a close in spur, it passes right through the PLL loop and messes up your ADEV.
Yes, this really does happen on real gear in the real world …..

Bob

And finally, another very interesting use of a DDS as a sort of microstepper phase comparator is:
http://www.ptfinc.com/dsheets/App_35_picoPak.pdf

/tvb


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi > On Dec 9, 2015, at 12:34 PM, Tom Van Baak <tvb@LeapSecond.com> wrote: > >> Are you aware of some redeeming value that phase microsteppers >> have that would make us want to investigate them? Am I >> being too harsh on them? Maybe you can champion them and they >> will make a come back :-) >> >> Rick Karlquist N6RK > > A phase microstepper is useful with many older Rb and Cs standards (e.g., 5061A and 5065A) so that you don't have to touch the C-field. It is also useful with a 5071A to improve the time sync/step/steer resolution. > > Note that you can also implement a GPSDO with a phase microstepper and this allows you to avoid Vref, DAC and EFC. Not all LO have EFC, and even if they do, it may be more stable not to use EFC. Plus with a DDS you avoid EFC-out-of-range problems. > > See also http://leapsecond.com/pages/fe405/ and the links near the bottom. This (patented) FEI design avoids the spur issues several of you have been talking about: the RF output comes from a low-noise VCXO not the low-drift OCXO+DDS itself. > It avoids the far removed spurs. If you have a close in spur, it passes right through the PLL loop and messes up your ADEV. Yes, this really does happen on real gear in the real world ….. Bob > And finally, another very interesting use of a DDS as a sort of microstepper phase comparator is: > http://www.ptfinc.com/dsheets/App_35_picoPak.pdf > > /tvb > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.