10/12 -- I should have sent this in yesterday. Just a reminder for those in southeastern CT: Harkness SP is awash in sparrows right now. Wish I had had more time to spend there yesterday.

From Scott Kruitbosch: 10/15/11 - Stratford, Community Gardens -- 1 CLAY-COLORED SPARROW feeding by itself in a garden, my third of the fall after two previous at Stratford Point. Also 45+ Chipping Sparrow, 1 Field Sparrow, 15+ Savannah Sparrow, 20+ Song Sparrow, 2 Swamp Sparrow, 6 White-throated Sparrow, 2 Dark-eyed Junco, 2 Eastern Phoebe.

Whitby,Ontario,Canada October 10/2007 Totals Day Month Year TurkeyVulture 662 1,095 1,536 Osprey 0 0 24 Bald Eagle 0 7 34 N.Harrier 8 16 53 Sharp-Shinned 41 130

Hi, Brian: As you know, I'm reticent to put forth an opposing point of view, but here goes: Racor recommends 30 or 10 micron primaries with a 500-hour change interval; Lugger recommends changing the secondary at 600 hours. Based on experience, I believe that's conservative, and so I go about twice that.

The 30 vs 10 vs 2 micron argument has been hashed on this list many times. My personal opinion, mind you, very personal, is that if what I have is working for me, than there are plenty of other things not working that need my attention...

. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.openscad.org/Compiling-for-64-bit-Sparc-Solaris-10-tp10741p11544.html > Sent from the OpenSCAD mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > Discuss@lists.openscad.org > http://lists.openscad.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.openscad.org

Matt Ettus wrote: > - Second, for when there is no 10 MHz reference connected, the system > needs to be brought to a reasonable frequency. The PLL charge pump > outputs are tri-stated. On the end of the loop filter, right before > the control voltage input to the VCXO, I have a resistor divider to > center the voltage between 3.3V and ground.

Laboratory 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Mail Stop 161-213 Pasadena, CA, 91109 +1(818)354-2075 phone +1(818)393-6875 fax > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com > [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Scott Mace > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 8:37 AM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 10

> > Possible problems might be that a 10MHz squarewave is > simply too 'slow' > > to be transmitted by an SFP, which expects 1.25Gb/s 8/10 > encoded data. > > Another interesting question would be how much jitter/noise such a > > setup would add?

this sort of stuff is a LOT cheaper and more rugged, and more than capable of sending 10 MHz clock Cable https://uk.farnell.com/broadcom-limited/hfbr-rus100z/cable-fibre-optic-1-fibre/dp/1247714 Drivers http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/1812660.pdf?