I found that these 5 GHz PLOs are remarkably stable, and actually seem to prefer a reference in the 10-20 MHz range, whereas the 1 GHz ones were apparently made for a higher range, and were not as good in this respect, with 10 MHz. The more I look at these 5 GHz PLOs, the more I like them.

. -- Fred Helleiner 186 Bayshore Road, Brighton, Ontario, Canada, K0K 1H0 VOICE: (613) 475 5309 If visiting, access via Presqu'ile Provincial Park.

. -- Fred Helleiner 186 Bayshore Road Brighton, Ontario K0K 1H0 613-475-5309 If visiting, access via Presqu'ile Provincial Park

Observed a Sharp-Shinned Hawk visiting feeders in ST. Lawernce park off Collins Bay Rd & Taylor Kidd Blvd in Kingston today at 10:30 am 30 Jan 06. Paul Kingston

Just had a visit by a Northern Mockingbird. It flew out after about 10 minutes but may be back. Seemed to be after the holly berries. Seen at: 1805 Norfolk County Road 19 West RR3 Vanessa

A flock of about 10 evening grosbeaks visited my feeder at our cottage on Rankin Lake, just south of Parry Sound. They were accompanied by the usual chickadees, white breasted nuthatches and blue jays. Brigitte

10 or more pine siskin have been visiting my feeders all day. Joined by the usual junco, house sparrow, blue jays, chickadee nuthatches, downy woodpeckers and cardinals Burlington Barbara Canney

Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District Lake Okeechobee and Navigation Depth Report Data Ending 2400 hours 10 JUN 2008 *Today's Lake Okeechobee Stage = 9.33 ++Today's Route 1 Navigational Depth w 3.27' Today's Route 2 Navigational Depth w 0.67' Bridge Clearance = 54.12' S-308 tailwater elevation = 9.38' joe

Leech wrote: > >> On 10/01/2014 11:46 PM, gsmandvoip wrote: >> >> Yes I am running single channel, but when trying to achieve my desired >> sampling rate without _4rx.rbf, it says, requested sampling rate is not >> valid, adjusting to some 3.9M or so. >> sorry for misleading info I gave earlier, I have i3, with 32 bit and i7 >> with 64

-Ian On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > On 05/27/2016 04:02 PM, Jeremy Hershberger wrote: > > Ian, > > I was able to tune to 50MHz and computed the difference between target and > actual frequency and got 0 Hz.