. >> So good or bad a tracking 10 Mhz exists.

Hi all, As noted somewhere on the list, the 10 MHz output of the newer version units is less filtered than before. The output at the internal RF connector is even worse (there is some more filtering going on inside the DB9 itself).

This will be for >>> clocking a microcontroller at 16 MHz given 10 MHz (Cs/Rb/GPSDO).

The HP8662A > had an interesting PLL synthesizer where they had 10 notch > filters for the first 10 harmonics of the sampling frequencies. > This minimized phase shift within the loop bandwidth that > detracted from phase margin.

. > >> So good or bad a tracking 10 Mhz exists.

Hello Brian, Racor has a letter designation for the 2, 10 and 30 micron filters. They are: 2 = S, 10 = T, and 30 = P. The S is for Secondary. I am not sure if they are engineers. Larry Gregory MN Outer Reef

FRom Charla & Steve Spector, Milford Pt sandbar, 7/10/14, 10:30 AM, Black Tern sitting on diminishing sandbar with 14 COTEs; also, at end of main sandbar,  2 Brant.   charsjs@sbcglobal.net

All these measures were taken with > a carrier frequency at 3 GHz, but if I change > the fc at 1 GHz the shape is worst, e.g.

At 21.46 27/10/2009, you wrote: >Check out the TADD-2 which does just that -- >http://www.tapr.org/kits_tadd-2.html > >John Hello John, probably the TADD-2 will be just fine. I'm studying the manual. Thanks for info! Marco IK1ODO

I'm adjusting the 10MHz output of the PRS-10. -- Paul