I am still a novice with PJSIP. However in my project, I am doing something similar to yours. I only change the default setting of input audio device and output audio device. Before doing that I've checked the device id (PID or RID) by running auddemo.exe (one of the program in samples). Then I changed the default device setting in \pjmedia-audiodev\audiodev.h as such: PJMEDIA_AUD_DEFAULT_CAPTURE_DEV = -1,     /**       * Constant to denote default playback device       */     /*PJMEDIA_AUD_DEFAULT_PLAYBACK_DEV = -2, ----original default value/ PJMEDIA_AUD_DEFAULT_PLAYBACK_DEV = 3, /*my new setting for PID */ Hope this is helping. Amna. On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:13:07 +0530 (IST) rams wrote: > Hi, > > I am developing a simple VOIP client using pjsip. I am >facing a problem with audio device settings. > while initializing . i.e  in default_config(), i am >enumerating sound devices and selecting based on the >selected device index. as below. > > > enumeration: > >     input combo    1)USB Audio Device >             2)SoundMAX HD Audio > >     output combo    1)USB Audio Device >             2)SoundMAX HD Audio > > >     n_inDevice = m_ctlcomboAudioIn.GetCurSel(); >     n_outDevice = m_ctlcomboAudioOut.GetCurSel(); > >     cfg->capture_dev = n_inDevice; >     cfg->playback_dev = n_outDevice; > > > and there is also a dialog for selecting the sound >device manually from the combobox with enumerated >devices. I may select the device for example for output i >may use pc speakers(n_outDevice=1) and for input i may >use USB sound device(n_inDevice=0). Then i call >pjsua_set_snd_dev(n_inDevice,n_outDevice); but nothing >happens. Is there any alternative way for setting the >device after initialization of stack or am i doing >something wrong here. Please help > > Thanks > rams > >

A leap second project that I was working on ended this morning, too early to be useful. A while back there were comments regarding the handling of leap seconds by the electric power frequency and if electric clocks would take the change into effect. On December 1, I started making a daily recording (by eye, ear, and ink on paper) of what seconds an electronic digital clock displayed at 08:00:00 Eastern Standard Time from WWV or CHU. I missed only one morning since then. This morning the electricity went off for several seconds and that clock now shows 88 88 88. Lots of heavy snow on trees and wires here today. The clock is a Heathkit I made in 1973 and counts power line frequency. Of the data I got the latest was 08:00:13, and the earliest was 07:59:57. Even if the power had stayed on through the end of January, I think the variation would be too random to pick out a leap second. Wait until next time! ---- My Ultralink 333 did not update until 17 hours after the event, and still has not come up with a value for the DUT1 correction, although shows a "+" where it had been "-6" before. ---- I was looking at some old calendars last night and noticed that I did a watch calibration during July of 1972 (Yes I am a Time Nut from way back.) by writing each day how many seconds my watch was off compared to WWV at the end of the day. One interesting thing is that the 0-error start of the month-long series is just a few hours after the first leap second. I don't know if this is a coincidence or not. By 1972 my 1968 Accutron was already not new and I had access to and knew about WWV several years earlier, so I don't recall why I would have chosen that month to do it. I think I was not aware of leap seconds then. The Accutron was advertised to be accurate to a minute a month. Mine was +47 1/2 seconds at the end of the month. I no longer have that watch. Dennis O'Keefe New Paltz, New York USA

Earlier this week I made a claim that I am a Time Nut from way back. In further evidence of that, I report that I actually clipped and saved that article. Reference: Scientific American, September 1974, pages 192 - 198, in a section called The Amateur Scientist. The man made a quarts crystal oscillator that sent a pulse to an electromagnet that was placed near a permanent magnet mounted on the pendulum of a wall (not a grandfather) clock. The pendulum was set a bit slow for its 72 per minuet beat and the electronics gave it a push each cycle to make it swing at the correct rate. He had faster and slower count settings to adjust its rate. The ultimate check was still listening to WWV while looking at the clock. -- Dennis O'Keefe New Paltz, New York On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 23:11:07 -0800 Hal Murray wrote: >> http://www.telechron.com/ > > Neat. Thanks. > > I think we had one like that back in grade school. That was a long time >ago. > > There was an article in Scientific American 20 or 30 years ago. The idea >was to make an old grandfather clock keep very good time by adding a magnet to > the pendulum so you could gently push/pull it. > > Anybody remember that one? Anybody build one? > > > --

I don't have a electronic way to distribute this article, but will mail a photocopy to the first ten people who request them directly to me at okeefed@newpaltz.edu There are several diagrams and tables that would make a text-only copy useless. Dennis O'Keefe New Paltz, New York > If you have an electronic copy of that I'd like to see it. I found a > text-only version, but would like to see the original. > > I believe he used a TCXO. I have a small French clock that sits on a > mantelpiece, I'd like to do that too, but getting power to it is not too > easy. My wife is not keen on wires going to it. > > I did think about solar power, or powering it from the pendulum itself, > but neither look too practical in my particular circumstances. > > I did wonder if its possible to put the electromagnet under the clock, > rather than inside it, but that will probably put too much wear on the > clock. > > You can probably cut down the power consumption by running the clock at > as accurate as possible (not slow) and using a bipolar pulse, rather > than a uni-polar one. > > Certainly an interesting idea. > > BTW, if you look at the sound produced by an old clock with a microphone > and scope, it is far from regular. I suspect the pendulum is more so > though.

This article from the NIST website also indicates that LORAN has or will have a time code added to the old carrier-only LORAN signal. It indicates it's from the "Proc. 2005 Int. Loran Assoc. Mtg." http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/2105.pdf Dennis O'Keefe New Paltz, New York

Please don't just list tools you found via a google search :) Regards, Robert A. http://www.cgisecurity.com/ http://www.qasec.com/ http://www.webappsec.org/ _______________________________________________ The Web Security Mailing List WebSecurity RSS Feed http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss Join WASC on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to hamiltonbirds+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hamiltonbirds?hl=en?hl=en

The definition you looked at are from the web hacking incident database. I wasn't aware that the projects used different terminology, but that's certainly something we would need to fix.

-----Original Message----- From: websecurity-bounces@lists.webappsec.org [mailto:websecurity-bounces@lists.webappsec.org] On Behalf Of matthew chao Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 2:35 AM To: websecurity@lists.webappsec.org Subject: [WEB SECURITY] What's the differences between weakness and vulnerability?

links: 4. https://qzss.go.jp/en/usage/products/furuno_160915.html