By the by, the last time I asked for your support was in the Autumn 2017. Have no fears, you won't be badgered about making a donation. Unless someone posts a question or comment, I'll be reporting to you only on fund-raising progress, and publicly thanking those who have stepped forward. Please help make the List self-supporting in 2020. Thank you!

Maybe RFNoC isn't your only option to achieve what you need Best regards, Marcus On 24042017 08:31, 김태영 via USRP-users wrote: Hi all Is there any reason RFNoC support only E and X series? Or future plan for the other device?

Hello Leo, You are correct, use of custom RFNoC blocks is only supported on the rfnoc-devel branch at this time. The full RFNoC support will be exposed on the main branches in the future, the UHF 4.0.0.0 release is the currently planned time for doing that.

Does anyone here know if any other network cards that support software defined pins, like the i210 does, or any other methods for getting a PPS signal to be fed into a PC, and of course interpreted correctly? Thanks! John

The article brings to the forefront the variety of issues faced by libraries as they support faculty research and faculty's perceptions of library support. Most importantly, it provides a starting point for greater understanding of activities to engage faculty and improve library support of faculty research.

By the way, do we have >> the plan to support RFC7118:The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for >> the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)? >> > > There is no built in support but you can write a custom transport which > works fine. It is what we do in Asterisk. > > -- > Joshua C.

Mel > New website finally up. > > Google search: "Pairadoxproperties.com".

DE 206693267 VERTRAULICHKEITS-INFORMATION: Dieses e-Mail und alle anhängenden Dokumente, enthalten Informationen der Konrad GmbH und sind nur für die adressierte Person bestimmt. Diese können vertraulich und/oder von Veröffentlichungen ausgenommen sein. Das Kopieren und die Weitergabe an nicht autorisierte Dritte sind verboten.

Glendora Ave | Glendora, CA 91741 P 626-852-4891 E LVILLEGAS@cityofglendora.gov cityofglendora.gov ________________________________ From: Mario Adame via Support-services <support-services@lists.socallibraries.org> Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2026 10:26 AM To: support-services@lists.socallibraries.org <support-services@lists.socallibraries.org> Subject: [Support-services

Instead of: o Support for RBAC groups (with users inheriting rights of group) It might be better to include: o Support for pre-defined and custom roles that can be assigned to users; list default user roles [Ofer] this is actually something I had in the original :). I added your distinction between pre-defined and custom roles.