While there are probably a number of use cases where external programs using OpenSCAD as backend make very much sense, it's still a bit sad to see all those projects started with huge enthusiasm die after half a year or so when it gets hard to continue supporting users. ciao, Torsten.

Hi all, Quick follow-up: I contacted Maxim to see if the chips were authentic, and their very pleasant customer support people verified that the markings and appearance of the chip are consistent with their records for that year and lot number. That's a good thing.

A forum thread has started looking to support your devices, however comments say: "The best way would be to use the API of 3Dconnexion. But the license of the API is prohibitive for Free- / Open Source Software." So they are looking to support it via HID.

On 01/30/2012 04:05 PM, Shen Wenbo wrote: > Hi All, > > I have burned the USRP2 to support the UHD, but now I need to run some old > USRP2 code. > The new burned USRP2 images don't support the old code. So, is there any > ways I can restore > USRP2 images to old version to support the old code?

> > I've found that USRP X410 more likely supports that interface but I > wonder if anyone know how to implement the interface in other USRP > products such as X300 series or so. > > Regards. > > -- > > Armin Ghani > > Research Engineer | Communication Systems Division (CSD) > > aghani@cttc.es | +34 93 645 29 08 (2143) > > Centre Tecnològic

Best Regard, Frank.zheng 2013/9/24 Kristian Kielhofner > Hello, > > As discussed in my post here: > > http://blog.krisk.org/2013/09/learning-stupid-nat-tricks-from-apple.html > > My company is interested in sponsoring the development of > Content-Encoding: deflate support in pjsip.

Best regards, Marcus On 24.04.2017 08:31, 김태영 via USRP-users wrote: > > Hi all > > > > Is there any reason RFNoC support only E and X series? > > Or future plan for the other device?

Bob > On May 12, 2020, at 1:52 PM, Wes wrote: > > Does anyone know of a ready made board that will allow me to mount and at the least, minimally support the operation of an MV89A oscillator.

python-pjsip > > Samples reside then in /usr/lib/libpjsip-samples/ > > Features: > • Python 2.7 bindings > • SSL > • (new) Video support > • (new) vidgui sample application [is patched] > Next steps: > • Add x264 > • Python bindings: Add video support > • Python bindings: Bump bindings to Python 3.X > > http://blog.g00se.org/2013/10/pjsip-for-ubuntu-ppa-with-video-support.html

This package is based on the Asterisk fork with the support for dynamic library. Anything elase would not be acceptable for a major distribution. I hope to see this code merged soon. https://github.com/asterisk/pjproject BTW: that branch sadly fails o build at the moment without video support.