[USRP-users] DOA with N310 or X310+TwinRX

Sammy Welschen sammywelschen at gmail.com
Mon Jan 27 08:18:51 EST 2020


Thank you Marcus! So the N310 would be the way to go? I was unsure since
the TwinRX is recommended for phase coherent applications.

Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users <usrp-users at lists.ettus.com> schrieb am So.,
26. Jan. 2020, 18:57:

> On 01/25/2020 11:43 AM, Sammy Welschen via USRP-users wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I am planning a system with 5-10 channels that is capable of DOA
> > estimation.
> >
> > Concerning the calibration of the resulting array, would there be a
> > difference between a system made up of N310 and one made up of X310
> > with TwinRX boards? Would there be other important differences that
> > influence estimation performance?
> >
> > As I understand it, the TwinRX allows LO sharing between the boards in
> > a single X310, but this would not help me if I have two or three X310.
> > On the other hand, the N310s could be connected to a shared LO.
> >
> > Are the following thoughts correct?
> >
> > Suppose I turn on my system. Then I have to calibrate phase offsets
> > between channels in any case. Now I change the center frequency. If I
> > have N310s without shared LO, I have to recalibrate. Same for the
> > X310s, since LOs are shared only internally. If I have N310s with a
> > shared LO, I do not have to recalibrate.
> >
> > If I restart the system, I have to recalibrate in any case.
> >
> > The devices would by synchronized with PPS in any case and with the 10
> > MHz reference if no external LO is used.
> >
> > What is the better choice for DOA estimation (N310 or X310 with TwinRX
> > or something different)?
> >
> > Thank you very much
> >
> > Sammy
> >
> >
> Sammy:
>
> Your characterization of the two scenarios is correct.
>
> There may be some folks on this list who have implemented DOA schemes,
> but likely few-to-none who have done it on both X310 and N310
>    and can comment on the differences they encountered.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list
> USRP-users at lists.ettus.com
> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/attachments/20200127/5844c0e2/attachment.html>


More information about the USRP-users mailing list