[USRP-users] DOA with N310 or X310+TwinRX
Marcus D. Leech
patchvonbraun at gmail.com
Sun Jan 26 12:56:26 EST 2020
On 01/25/2020 11:43 AM, Sammy Welschen via USRP-users wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am planning a system with 5-10 channels that is capable of DOA
> Concerning the calibration of the resulting array, would there be a
> difference between a system made up of N310 and one made up of X310
> with TwinRX boards? Would there be other important differences that
> influence estimation performance?
> As I understand it, the TwinRX allows LO sharing between the boards in
> a single X310, but this would not help me if I have two or three X310.
> On the other hand, the N310s could be connected to a shared LO.
> Are the following thoughts correct?
> Suppose I turn on my system. Then I have to calibrate phase offsets
> between channels in any case. Now I change the center frequency. If I
> have N310s without shared LO, I have to recalibrate. Same for the
> X310s, since LOs are shared only internally. If I have N310s with a
> shared LO, I do not have to recalibrate.
> If I restart the system, I have to recalibrate in any case.
> The devices would by synchronized with PPS in any case and with the 10
> MHz reference if no external LO is used.
> What is the better choice for DOA estimation (N310 or X310 with TwinRX
> or something different)?
> Thank you very much
Your characterization of the two scenarios is correct.
There may be some folks on this list who have implemented DOA schemes,
but likely few-to-none who have done it on both X310 and N310
and can comment on the differences they encountered.
More information about the USRP-users