[USRP-users] FPGA source code license

Michał Wróbel michal.a.wrobel at gmail.com
Fri Nov 10 16:57:40 EST 2017


My fix will be in a file which has a GPL copyright notice, so I think there
won't be a problem with it.

Still, it might be a good idea to include the license in the root directory
of the repository. It's recommended e.g. by GNU GPL how-to.

2017-11-09 16:33 GMT+01:00 Michał Wróbel <michal.a.wrobel at gmail.com>:

> Hi Manuel,
>
> Is it possible to include "LICENSE.md" file in the repository? It seems
> that GitHub even has a tool for that:
>
> https://help.github.com/articles/adding-a-license-to-a-repository/
>
> Thanks,
> Michał
>
> 2017-11-09 15:36 GMT+01:00 Manuel Uhm <manuel.uhm at ettus.com>:
>
>> Hi Michal.
>>
>> UHD and RFNoC and both covered under GPLv3. We look forward to seeing
>> your fix!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Manuel
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Michał Wróbel via USRP-users
>> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2:29 AM
>> Subject: [USRP-users] FPGA source code license
>> To: USRP-users
>>
>>
>> I want to contribute a fix to https://github.com/EttusResearch/fpga repository.
>> However, given my agreement with the company I work for, the process of
>> submitting the patch might be different depending on the license of the
>> project I want to contribute to. My assumption would be that the license is
>> the same as GNU Radio project (GPL-3.0), however the mentioned FPGA source
>> code repository doesn't state that explicitly. Can you clarify which
>> license does the FPGA code for USRP devices use?
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/attachments/20171110/0d5b9a74/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the USRP-users mailing list