[USRP-users] Ethernet over SFP+ in custom FPGA design (X3x0)
christian.lenz at freedelity.com
Sun Nov 5 08:55:20 EST 2017
thanks for your help. I apologize for the incredible delay from my
side, but back to my question.
We want to port a hole IP solution from some proprietary hardware to
the USRP and evaluate the costs (mainly development time) of migrating
our IP to RFNoC vs. a custom image.
The crux is, we already have a complete implementation of both FPGA
infrastructure (mostly auto-generated VHDL) and the corresponding
software running on a connected PC. However, on the currently used
hardware platform, the PC is connected via USB.
That's why I'm interested in the effort to get the Ethernet connection
1. You wrote that eth_dispatch and chdr_eth_framer blocks handle MAC,
IP etc., but I thought we are only talking about PHY+MAC
implementation. So does the Ethernet Core actually implement IP layer
2. For the packte based communication you said that as long as it is a
chdr paket, the FPGA would handle it. The structure of such a chdr
paket can be found here:
http://files.ettus.com/manual/page_rtp.html#rtp_chdr. Related to point
1, the chdr structure must be present in the payload of an Ethernet
frame or is this already the (adapted) Ethernet frame structure itself?
Do you know if i can transmit a chdr paket to the USRP utilizing a so
called "Raw-Ethernet socket" (what seems to be a solution for
MAC-layer Ethernet communication w/o TCP/IP). For isntance, raw
ethernet sockets are availably in Python.
3. Is the code of the UHD part available that interfaces the network
device and drops of the chdr pakets?
Zitat von Sugandha Gupta <sugandha.gupta at ettus.com>:
> Hi Christian
> It would be good if you could explain your application and need to have a
> custom image. From your questions, it looks like you would be redoing a lot
> of the infrastructure already present in the X3x0. In your application, if
> you want to add new blocks to the existing code to offload SW tasks, you
> can use the existing RFNoC framework
> See inline for the answers.
> Let me know if you have any further questions.
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Christian Lenz via USRP-users <
> usrp-users at lists.ettus.com> wrote:
>> I’m currently evaluating the effort/feasibility of running a custom FPGA
>> image in a USRP X3x0. One thing left is the connection Host PC <—> FPGA
>> to exchange control/status information (neither high throughput nor low
>> latency needed here).
>> To achieve this, I have the idea of using the provided IP to interface one
>> of the SFP+ ports on the FPGA side and connect to a host PC using the SFP 1
>> Gigabit Ethernet Interface Kit.
>> Related to this are the following questions:
>> 1. I traced down the signals, beginning from the SFP+ FPGA pins. The main
>> ethernet functionality (PHY+MAC) is included in the ‘x300_sfpp_io_core’,
> >> Yes.
>> Additionally, do I need to incorporate also the ‘eth_interface’ included
>> in ‘x300_core/bus_int’, which somehow translates the AXI data streams
>> coming from the ‘x300_sfpp_io_core’?
>>> The eth_interface has 2 parts
> - eth_dispatch - It routes the incoming packets appropriately based on
> the MAC, IP, chdr (or not?), etc.
> - chdr_eth_framer - It re-constructs the chdr packets coming back
> from the crossbar -> adds the MAC and IP.
> So, I guess you would need it.
>> 2. I want to use the ‘x300_sfpp_io_core’ for a single SFP+ port with
>> protocol “1GbE”. I did found all the required source files except for the
>> modules ‘one_gig_eth_pcs_pma_support’, located in the ‘one_gige_phy’ and
>> the ‘axi64_8k_2clk_fifo’, located in the ‘simple_gemac_wrapper’. There are
>> only some references in related makefiles but I can not find the verilog
>> source files where the modules are described in. Am I misleaded at some
>>> These files are generated during the build process.
> Look in :
>> 3. This question may also apply to the plain UHD FPGA design: Let’s assume
>> I get the SFP+ core running within my custom FPGA design. How do I
>> communicate with the FPGA using an ethernet-connected host PC?
>>> That is what you have a existing UHD code for.
> Since the provided cores included in ‘x300_sfpp_io_core’ implement PHY +
>> MAC functionalities, do I need additional cores to implement IP and TCP/UDP
>> or in which way do you transfer data between Host and FPGA using Ethernet
>> (see also my question 1.)? The target would be to establish a packet based
>> communication over Ethernet and having AXI streams for sending/receiving on
>> the FPGA side.
> >> If it is a chdr packet, then the current FPGA design handles it.
>> Hopefully, my questions are not too far away from the oridnary USRP use
>> Thanks for the help,
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> USRP-users at lists.ettus.com
> Sugandha Gupta
> Staff Software Engineer
> Ettus Research
More information about the USRP-users