[USRP-users] Vivado Version for fpga RFNoC Branch
jonathon.pendlum at ettus.com
Thu Mar 17 15:20:37 EDT 2016
uhd_image_downloader will place the files in <install
path>/share/uhd/images. Did you manually copy the bitstream to that new
location? Also, run 'md5sum' on your bit file. It should calculate a md5 of
06c99581aeb247d25a6664b537d00127. If your's is different, then you do not
have the correct bitstream.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Zhihong Luo <zhluo at umich.edu> wrote:
> Hi Jonathon,
> I just used the uhd_image_loader:
> uhd_image_loader --fpga-path new_fpga3.16/usrp_x300_fpga_HGS.bit
> ( new_fpga3.16 is a file created containing the images from
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Jonathon Pendlum <
> jonathon.pendlum at ettus.com> wrote:
>> You can install Vivado 2015.2 alongside of 2015.4.
>> It looks like you didn't flash your X310 with the correct image. What
>> command did you run to flash your X310?
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Zhihong Luo <zhluo at umich.edu> wrote:
>>> Hi Jonathon,
>>> Okay, so I'll have to switch to 2015.2 for now, can I install 2015.2
>>> without deleting the 2015.4 version?
>>> I used uhd_images_downloader to get the image, and load the
>>> usrp_x300_fpga_HGS.bit into the x300. After that I ran uhd_usrp_probe
>>> --init-only, the output seems right.
>>> But when I used a simple GRC to test it, it ran into errors:
>>> linux; GNU C++ version 4.8.4; Boost_105400;
>>> Using Volk machine: sse4_2_64_orc
>>> -- X300 initialization sequence...
>>> -- Determining maximum frame size... 8000 bytes.
>>> -- Setup basic communication...
>>> Expected FPGA compatibility number 1000, but got 20:
>>> RuntimeError: EnvironmentError: IOError: Radio ctrl (A) no response
>>> packet - AssertionError: bool(buff)
>>> in uint64_t radio_ctrl_core_3000_impl::wait_for_ack(bool)
>>> at /home/zhluo/uhd/host/lib/usrp/cores/radio_ctrl_core_3000.cpp:203
>>> RuntimeError: LookupError: IndexError: multi_usrp::mb_root(56238800) -
>>> I assume it is because the fpga from the downloader is too old? So I
>>> have to make the usrp_x300_fpga_HGS.bit from source?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the USRP-users