[USRP-users] ....new X310 Does not W.....
neel.pandeya at ettus.com
Sun Oct 4 16:26:01 EDT 2015
On the X300/X310, when using the HGS image, Port 0 must be connected to 1
GbE, and Port 1 must be connected to 10 GbE. Are you saying that you are
able to use 1 GbE on Port 0, but 10 GbE on Port 1 doesn't work? There is
some documentation about this at the link below.
Please let me know about the firewall as well, although I don't think this
is the cause of the problem.
On 2 October 2015 at 12:51, Bob Downing <downing at ll.mit.edu> wrote:
> I cannot set the ip address back to the default - I wish I could. The
> initialization cannot progress through the loopback test.
> The x310 is directly connected to the host via 4-port 10GigE card.
> I will check the firewall set up.
> Is port 0 available for HGS?
> I am trying to find another host.
> On 10/2/2015 3:41 PM, Neel Pandeya wrote:
>> Hello Bob:
>> I'm really baffled by this... There shouldn't be any restriction on the IP
>> addresses assigned to the X310. You can set Port 0 and Port 1 to anything
>> you want. In order to communicate with the host, the host must typically
>> on the same subnet but use a different IP address, that's all.
>> Is the X310 directly connected to the host, or is there a switch in the
>> Are you running a firewall at all ("sudo iptables -L")?
>> Are you able to set the IP address of the X310 back to 192.168.40.2, and
>> get it working again?
>> On 2 October 2015 at 12:30, Bob Downing <downing at ll.mit.edu> wrote:
>>> Thanks for responding. I am using UHD 3.9.1. I do change the ip on the
>>> host and my net mask is 255.255.255.0 The usrp was working when the ip
>>> set to the default 192.168.40.2 with the host set to 192.168.40.20 both
>>> ifc=p2p3. When I change the usrp ip to 192.168.30.2 I also changed the
>>> to 192.168.30.20 at ifc=p2p3 it is at this point the unit no longer
>>> Again I can ping it at 192.168.30.2 and I can run uhd_find_devices but
>>> nothing else. I don't want to offend anyone but have you found that ip
>>> address to work on other units from port 1? I can't help thinking that
>>> somehow I've disabled the unit with that ip address.
>>> Is there anyway to reset the x310 to factory defaults like is done with
>>> the N200?
>>> In preparing these for field use I am in the midst of preparing a
>>> 4-channel grc flow chart and trying to troubleshoot this unit on the same
>>> system. I am going back and forth between the working unit and the
>>> non-working unit which requires a network reconfig. I'm pretty sure I've
>>> got the networking procedure down unless there is something I'm
>>> overlooking. I have had network people look at it with no changes made.
>>> On 10/2/2015 12:23 PM, Neel Pandeya wrote:
>>> Bob, I clicked <Send> too soon. I have another thought. After you change
>>> the IP address of the X310, do you change the IP address of your host, of
>>> the 10 GbE interface? Is its IP address still set to 192.16840.x ? Is
>>> netmask set to 255.255.255.0?
>>> After using "usrp_burn_mb_eeprom" to set the IP of the X310 to
>>> 192.168.40.2, do you also set the IP on the host to something like
>>> 192.168.40.99, or is it still 192.168.30.xx?
>>> On 2 October 2015 at 09:19, Neel Pandeya <neel.pandeya at ettus.com> wrote:
>>> Bob, are you using UHD 3.9.1 with these units? After running
>>>> "usrp_burn_mb_eeprom" and cycling the power, what does "uhd_usrp_probe"
>>>> give you?
>>>> *+Ashish*: Do you have any suggestions?? Thanks in advance for your help
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the USRP-users