[USRP-users] args field in uhd::tune_request_t

Josh Blum josh at ettus.com
Thu Feb 7 18:17:22 EST 2013



On 02/06/2013 12:47 PM, Sivan Toledo wrote:
> Thanks a lot. I hope it makes it to the master branch and get tested. We'll
> definitely use it (I am not sure how bad are the spurs that we get in
> fractional mode, but we'll be happy to get rid of them and the specific
> choice of LO frequency is not really important to us).

If it helps in the meantime, there is a branch called
wip_integer_n_tuning on uhd.git with support for one of the sbx revs.

-josh

> 
> Sivan
> 
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Josh Blum <josh at ettus.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On 02/06/2013 12:30 AM, Sivan Toledo wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The documentation (
>>>
>> http://files.ettus.com/uhd_docs/doxygen/html/structuhd_1_1tune__request__t.html
>> )
>>> says that uhd::tune_request_t has an args field that allows you to
>> request
>>> integer rather than fractional synthesizer. It's not in my header fines
>>> (for 3.5.1 and 3.5.0) and the compiler complains that the field is
>> missing.
>>>
>>> Does this field exist in any version of UHD and does it actually work
>> (sets
>>> the synthesizer to integer-N tuning)?
>>>
>>
>> This was pushed out on the master branch so its not in any release.
>> There is SBX/WBX code to use this, but its in test and not yet pushed.
>>
>> -josh
>>
>>> Thanks, Sivan Toledo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> USRP-users mailing list
>>> USRP-users at lists.ettus.com
>>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> USRP-users mailing list
>> USRP-users at lists.ettus.com
>> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
>>
> 




More information about the USRP-users mailing list